Why a curling stone curls remains controversial. Yes there are
computer models which generate similiar trajectories, but they rest on
assumptions of melt water, and other scientists who research ice
tribology find no evidence that ice melts at the associated
temperatures and pressures.
I believe
lol
Harry
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 12:51 AM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
Not good Harry, change it somehow. Since Marry and I got engaged I am a
whole lot
happier. Not even Jones upsets me any more.
I predict I will spend another year alone.
Happy New Year y'all.
Harry
Electromagnetic Composites at the Compton Scale
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1110/1110.0034v1.pdf
I. INTRODUCTION
In recent years there have been a number of experimental observations
that are dicult to explain within our nowstandard
models of atomic and nuclear physics and cosmology.
I predict I will spend another year alone.
Happy New Year y'all.
Harry
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Robert Leguillon
robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:
I predict that LENR will see enormous growth and even a see real publication
in a peer reviewed journal. I think that transmutations will
I am told by cold fusioneers (as WL calles them) that the WL theory
makes many wrong predictions. You will only hear from WL the correct
predictions.
harry
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 2:38 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Lewis Larsen considers some of the criticisms of LENR theory by CF
It is unfortunate that WL refuses to acknowledge the many difficulties
associated with their own theory.
harry
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
I am told by cold fusioneers (as WL calles them) that the WL theory
makes many wrong predictions. You
Notice this was all resolved using calculations and computers.
Now we need not worry making materials that do not conform to physical law. ;-)
Harry
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
FYI: just a heads-up for the theorists in the group…
-Mark
Electric Scooter Project Video #4.
http://youtu.be/lcfUoS30LgM
Harry
McKubre now acknowledges his 23.8 KeV was in error.
Harry
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
It is not theory, it is experimental result. Go to:
http://www.lenr-canr.org/
and enter Miles helium and McKubre helium.
On Dec 27, 2011, at 8:00 AM,
The Magic of Christmas
(as drawn by children)
http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.251839494882181.61350.113366232062842type=1
Harry
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 3:13 AM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Continuing the discussion of the mathematical modeling proposed for the
October 6 experiment, my informant, who still prefers to remain anonymous,
remarked that the examples suggested by Jed and others (nails, anvils and
the
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
In Rossi's case, trying to maintain a low profile is a delicate business
tactic that has limited shelf life.
Yup. It is a delaying tactic.
[This]
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
A
plausible method of fakery is not evidence of fakery.
Obviously not. But heat, by itself, is not evidence of a nuclear reaction
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
Are you seeing the ads? Especially on:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg59132.html
I am seeing the ads on both a Mac G5 running IBM RISC chips using Safari,
and an Intel based Win 7 system using
Earlier this year Rossi made similar glowing remarks about the
professors from Uppsala University.
Is he working with them today? No.
Harry
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=516cpage=15#comment-155608
if it meant the individual E-Cat modules were
running at 25% of rated output.
AG
On 12/24/2011 1:27 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Earlier this year Rossi made similar glowing remarks about the
professors from Uppsala University.
Is he working with them today? No.
Harry
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 9:53 PM
The background to this story is that Mitchell lSwartz does not approve
of Jed Rothwell and Ed Storms content policy for the LENR library.
They have said they prefer to include papers in the library which will
raise the credibitily and respectability of the field ( and I don't
just mean they prefer
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Ruby r...@hush.com wrote:
The public needs to be informed so that we will have the capacity to demand
this technology, and not let it be derailed again. What do you think is the
best way to do this?
Seek out mainstream journalists and explain to them why this
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Colin Hercus colinher...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jed,
Google have published some details of their algorithm and that's pretty much
how it works.
If they want to do say English/Italian translation they find a lot of text
(books, menus etc.) that exist in both
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
The background to this story is that Mitchell lSwartz does not approve of
Jed Rothwell and Ed Storms content policy for the LENR library.
He may have said that, but we do
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
You're more likely to be able to purchase an invisible unicorn
than a single e-cat to test.
Do I get my choice of colors?
T
Tinker Bell can see
Are Maker Spaces the Future of Public Libraries?
When was the last time you went to the library looking for a book? How
about a 3D printer? The Fayetteville Free Library, a public library in
upstate New York, plans to offer its community both options: A
traditional, book-filled library, and a Fab
Plausible deniability is the 'modus operandi' of the zealous skeptic.
Harry
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Giovanni Santostasi
gsantost...@gmail.com wrote:
With meteorite sightings you have many witnesses in many countries. The path
of the meteorite can be traced sometime (if the witness
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Plausible deniability is the 'modus operandi' of the zealous skeptic.
Ah, but this is implausible deniability. Santostasi will not believe it
until every amateur enthusiast
they need to do to justify their
claims.
Giovanni
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Plausible deniability is the 'modus operandi' of the zealous skeptic.
Harry
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Giovanni Santostasi
gsantost...@gmail.com wrote
The staff?
http://www.nature.com/polopoly_fs/7.1684.1323189515!/image/ehrsson.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_630/ehrsson.jpg
harry
http://youtu.be/QdoTdG_VNV4
Harry
That is a great idea.
I'm leaving too.
Correa was right. The Vortex list does not live up to its ideals.
Harry
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Dusty Bradshaw d_bra...@bellsouth.netwrote:
unsubsribe
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux
Thane posted a new video on dec.14.
He says he is going to install the prototype shown in an electric scooter.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dme4bW2fPhQ
Harry
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
I think I've watched all of Thane's vids and from
expresses his belief quite openly and I say good for him.
Harry
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Thane posted a new video on dec.14.
He says he is going to install the prototype
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 December 2011 21:24, Zell, Chris chrisz...@wetmtv.com wrote:
How much government spending goes to the richest 1%? Very little, I
think.
This is the very problem of current socialist policy. However, if we
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
On 11-12-16 06:07 AM, Joshua Cude wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Following this line of reasoning, it is logical to assume that MY is more
likely than not a male. I
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
MY wrote:
I know of no properly demonstrated violation of Lenz law. Such a
violation would also violate COE and Newton 3. That's rather
Geocentrism took over 1000 years to debunk.
The Law of CoE might take as long to debunk.
Harry
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Charles Hope lookslikeiwasri...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any examples of pathological science persisting 20 years
Archeologists concern themselves with the reconstruction of cracked pots.
Crackpots have fragments of insight.
Harry
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
You'd better hope it's not, says the water in my toilet, the water in the
sewers, the water exposed to toxic metals in mines, and the water used to
clean slaughter houses, after accidents, in mortuaries and infectious
MY wrote:
I know of no properly demonstrated violation of Lenz law. Such a violation
would also violate COE and Newton 3. That's rather unlikely, at least on any
macro scale for any appreciable time period -- or the universe would not be
the way we see it.
Are you trying to convince me or
day I hope to see this
test performed.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 12, 2011 9:20 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load
Hopefully it will become free energy device.
Dozens of amateur
there is a difficulty
in
reading the true power output and input.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Dec 11, 2011 12:53 pm
Subject: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load
acceleration under load effect
Please remember that the impluse required to produce a jump in angular
velocity is not the same as the torque required
to produce a steady angular acceleration.
Harry
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Robert Leguillon
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Robert Leguillon
2) Shorting the coil does create a collapsing magnetic field. The time
constant of the collapsing field is proportional to the resistance to
electrical current. If the shorted coil collapses at just the right speed
w.r.t. the disk rotation,
The Sven Kullander eCat Talk.
http://ecatnews.com/?p=1416
“He (Kullander) was puzzled by the presence of natural copper in the
ash, but a detailed isotopic analysis is expected to be ready for
Christmas”.
harry
Message-
From: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Dec 11, 2011 12:53 pm
Subject: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load
acceleration under load effect, by deepcut66
http://youtu.be/vBDOOSOhbz0
The previous setup had physical limitations although
Message-
From: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Dec 11, 2011 12:53 pm
Subject: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load
acceleration under load effect, by deepcut66
http://youtu.be/vBDOOSOhbz0
The previous setup had physical limitations although
Rossi did not even answer the question. lol
Harry
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Francesco Fiorenzani
December 10th, 2011 at 10:03 AM
Dear Andrea Rossi
In your opinion the collaboration with University of Bologna
will start before the next March or
acceleration under load effect, by deepcut66
http://youtu.be/vBDOOSOhbz0
The previous setup had physical limitations although it was
excellent for demonstrating the AUL [acceleration under load] effect.
This setup lends itself better to harnessing the effect for
power-generation.
I've done away
If Romney wants to get elected he should NOT shy away from this.
Harry
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
On 11-12-09 02:27 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:13 PM, David ledin
mathematic.analy...@gmail.com wrote:
Look like Romney
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
I believe in laboratories, looking at ways to conduct electricity
with -- with cold fusion, if we can come up with it. It was the
University of Utah that solved that. We somehow can’t figure out how
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Ha! I'll bet that's what he had in mind.
Still, he mentioned U. Utah.
Yeah, he mixed his metaphors!
T
Oh sure, and the T is short for TINKERBELL.
harry
I have suggested a few times that is might prove useful to model cold
fusion processes using liquid drops. Liquid drop models of nuclear
fission were helpful in the the early years of fission research.
Although in the case of cold fusion I think the drops should be
treated as non-newtonian
Idea of a cold fusion plant in Massachusetts explored
Italian investor meets with scientists, state officials to pitch
controversial technology
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45557227/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/idea-cold-fusion-plant-massachusetts-explored/#.Tt3c0lbbDRQ
harry
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
I wholeheartedly disagree with your statement,
“Resonance is very much a part of brute force physics.”
I think I need to
I propse that the primary motive force responsible for the tracks in
the CO2 mist is not an air stream impacting on the mist. An air
thread serves as an electrical bridge, but it is the local charging of
the mist and the subsequent self repulsion among the charges that is
primary force behind the
NASA satellite hits car...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgTyiaDmytwob=av3e
Harry
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
If Rossi's operations are, as it sometimes seems, similar in nature to
Steorn's, then it may be sometime before he does another inconclusive
demonstration of some type -- if there even is another. Steorn, in their
now
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Am 03.12.2011 16:20, schrieb Horace Heffner:
I suggest that the dark zone at the tip of the needle is not due to a
vacuum there. It is more likely due to the average delay for recombination
of the ions and electrons.
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Electrical power was not continuosly recorded in most of rossi's tests.
In the Oct. 6 test, which is
2011/12/3 Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de:
Am 03.12.2011 22:14, schrieb Harry Veeder:
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Peter Heckertpeter.heck...@arcor.de
wrote:
I believe there is a vacuum for these reasons:
1) I placed a charged needle 1-2 cm above a water surface. The air blow
Only the science of instrumentation should be bound by the laws of physics.
Harry
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Giovanni Santostasi gsantost...@gmail.com wrote:
It is
visitable by the qualified public
who qualifies?
harry
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Andrea Rossi
November 28th, 2011 at 6:48 PM November 28th, 2011 at 6:48 PM
Dear Herb Gills:
Today we sold in the USA a 1 MW plant which will go to a normal Customer.
Google falls down
http://mrdoob.com/projects/chromeexperiments/google_gravity/
(no naked protons here)
Harry
I don't know about you, but I come here for the naked protons.
Harry
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Terry, I'm shocked.
Yes, the f-word offends me, too. I was only trying to
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 3:50 AM, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Natural laws cannot been patented.
I think natural laws should be patentable.
They result from human effort and they are useful whether are not
deemed to be objectively true.
A patented natural law would not prevent people from
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 3:50 AM, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Natural laws cannot been patented.
I think natural laws should be patentable
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Am 25.11.2011 18:57, schrieb Harry Veeder:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 3:50 AM,peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Natural laws cannot been patented.
I think natural laws should be patentable.
They result from human
I would argue that the law of nature known as the conservation of
momentum is a specific implementation of the force of nature known
as the property of inertia.
Of course, since the law of CoM has been in the public domain since
the 19th century, it would not be patentable today. The question is
I meant since the 18th century or even earlier.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course, since the law of CoM has been in the public domain since
the 19th century, it would not be patentable today. The question is
really about future laws.
Harry
I wrote:
The natural laws form a map of the universe. The map is not the
territory, so just as owning a map is not the same thing as owning the
terrority, owning the natural laws does not mean you own the whole
universe.
humm ... the grand narrative for interpreting natural law was
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
This is like saying that because a theatre gradually filled with
people over two hours it is implausible to believe the same theatre
emptied
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I understand why Rossi does not want tests. He is trying to keep his results
ambiguous. However, until he decides to allow tests, he should not visit
elected officials and waste their time. He should not waste
Rossi has consistently stated that he does not like playing bones
with other people's money which is very commendable.
However, it is not commendable of him to use scientific associations
to promote interest in his ECAT, and refuse an independent
evalusation of the ECAT's performance. Rossi
This is like saying that because a theatre gradually filled with
people over two hours it is implausible to believe the same theatre
emptied of people in minutes after a fire alarm.
However it is only implausible based on the assumption there is only
one entrance/exit or the entrance/exit is
Ex-Chancellor backs Philip over attack on wind farms which Duke
described as 'absolutely useless'
By Tamara Cohen
Last updated at 12:17 PM on 21st November 2011
Former Chancellor Lord Lawson yesterday led the backing for Prince
Philip after he branded wind farms ‘absolutely useless’.
In a
The Genius of the Crowd by Charles Bukowski (poetry reading)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPzWLPAxn1o
Harry
http://www.hps.cam.ac.uk/people/chang/boiling/
begin quote We all learn at school that pure water always boils at
100°C (212°F), under normal atmospheric pressure. Like surprisingly
many things that everybody knows, this is a myth. We ought to stop
perpetuating this myth in schools and
begin quote Modern theories of boiling
In the traditional theory of boiling in physics and physical
chemistry, the boundary between the liquid state and the gas state is
sharply defined as the line on which the vapor pressure (function of
temperature) reaches the level of the external pressure.
The recent discussion about water drops in steam has me thinking about
how cold fusion might come about.
Consider that the process of condensation releases heat.
Cold fusion might be like a process of condensation where a small drop
and large drop fuse to form a larger drop. ( H nucleus + Ni
If the same water is _theoretically_ supposed to boil at the same
precise temperature at a given pressure, I just don't understand how
water can _theoreticallly_ survive as a liquid drop while surrounded
by steam which is above the boiling point. In other words, the theory
that the same water
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Am 19.11.2011 22:56, schrieb Harry Veeder:
If the same water is _theoretically_ supposed to boil at the same
precise temperature at a given pressure, I just don't understand how
water can _theoreticallly_ survive
New results show neutrinos still faster than light
01:09 18 November 2011 by Lisa Grossman
One of the most staggering results in physics – that neutrinos may go
faster than light – has not gone away with two further weeks of
observations. The researchers behind the jaw-dropping finding are now
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
So, if you trust the reported *measurements*, then they are consistent with
no excess energy at all. You have to trust their *assumptions* to get a lot
of excess energy. And their assumptions are highly implausible,
The only reason to do a blank test is to test the competency/honesty
of the experimenter.
harry
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
Easiest and most useful way to do blank test is that there are two eCats
running in parallel. First eCat is running
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
The only reason to do a blank test is to test the competency/honesty
of the experimenter.
A blank test can be faked as easily as any other, so it would not test the
honesty
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, if you trust the reported *measurements
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
If you came from a community that did not use levers and never
developed the rudiments of lever science, how would you react upon
hearing
This link
http://citi5.org/launch/?p=1833
gives this link at its source
http://e-catsite.com/2011/11/17/rossi-rival-to-announce-cold-fusionlenr-findings/
which in turn gives this link as its source:
http://citi5.org/launch/?p=1826
an almost circular reference
Harry
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Rossi claims his device produces more energy (in the form of heat)
than it consumes (in the form of electricity). This is a performance
claim
Jed,
Do you have this italian paper in the LENR library?
http://www.22passi.it/downloads/2-CHIMICA%20E...MISTERI.pdf
Harry
Rossi and Ampenergo, or the the people behind Ampenergo at any rate,
are not strangers. He has known them since the late 90s.
Harry
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com
wrote:
Steven
save your fingers too
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zE1LbC4Fvs
harry
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:31 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
A lot of the keyboard banging could be avoided if folks would simply preface
their comments with 3 attributes:
Business vs Science viewpoint
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Both Rossi and Defkalion are doing their best to keep all the decision
making in their own hands and out of the hands of their propagandist
detractors.
Could you be kind enough to define propagandist detractors and how it
I bet they keep you dying from boredom.
Harry
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
You have the attitude of a hostile witness.
My unicorns make me testy. They're invisible and keep playing mean tricks
on me.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Esa Ruoho esaru...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
I find much about Rossi laughable and the whole ongoing story is immensely
amusing. That's true regardless of how it turns out.
Well, the design of the
I can forsee a time when thermal energy production on the planet might
be limited by law to prevent global warming.
By then the Earth will a preserve and most people will live off-world.
Harry
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:15 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 3:27 AM, jwin...@cyllene.uwa.edu.au wrote:
On 11/13/2011 2:57 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
I have a print-out of Steorn's report dated Oct. 31, 2008. At the moment
I can't locate the pdf file, but I downloaded it from their website two or
three years ago, and the name Mr
http://coldfusionnow.wordpress.com/
Letters to the Senate request hearings on DOE and USPO.
November 10, 2011
tags: cold fusion, DOE, LENR, Senate Energy Committee, USPO
by Ruby Carat
This past week Cold Fusion Now sent letters to all the US Senators on
the Energy Sub-Committee requesting
Ruby Carat ( 'Cold Fusion Now' Blogger) will be speaking at a TEDx
event in Ft.Lauderdale, Florida December 10.
Harry
http://www.tedxftl.com/speakers.html
Ruby Carat
Commercial Cold Fusion – The Viable Alternative Energy
A new energy technology based on cold fusion science has been
The officiate annouces the website is unofficially official.
Harry
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 6:44 AM, David ledin
mathematic.analy...@gmail.comwrote:
Andrea Rossi
November 12th, 2011 at 6:22 AM
Dear Italo:
This is not yet our official website, contains many errors to be
corrected, contains
This must be another name for the fraud complex:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impostor_syndrome\
quote:The impostor syndrome, in which competent people find it impossible
to believe in their own competence, can be viewed as complementary to
the Dunning–Kruger
effect
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 3:09 AM, jwin...@cyllene.uwa.edu.au wrote:
On 11/12/2011 11:50 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
I think Steorn stumbled upon a real anomally but they erred in assuming
that measurement alone was sufficient to demonstrate the reality of energy
creation.
Since there seems
801 - 900 of 2957 matches
Mail list logo
