Hopefully it will become free energy device. Dozens of amateur researchers ( Steorn included ) have established that it is possible to circumvent Lenz's law. The hope is this will eventually lead to a free energy device.
But even if you can't use a violation of lenz law to generate free energy, this achievement alone deserves attention from mainstream engineers and physicists, which it isn't getting. It is a strange state of affairs. Harry On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:21 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > I am confused about the purpose of the experiment. Is this some kind of free > energy device? If it really works, you should be able to drive the input > with the output and have it to accelerate in speed or at least keep freely > moving. If this can not be done, then most likely there is a difficulty in > reading the true power output and input. > > Dave > > -----Original Message----- > From: Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Sun, Dec 11, 2011 12:53 pm > Subject: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load > > acceleration under load effect, by deepcut66 > > http://youtu.be/vBDOOSOhbz0 > > <<The previous setup had physical limitations although it was > excellent for demonstrating the AUL [acceleration under load] effect. > This setup lends itself better to harnessing the effect for > power-generation. > > I've done away with the Bedini drive circuitry and replaced it with a > 12v/6w motor from an Audi message-pump system : > > http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/12v-DC-electric-motor-UK-SELLER-/110739940158?pt=UK... > > This gives me twice the RPM for a third of the input power, coupled > with the fact that the rotor has 24 poles, arranged N/S i can now get > higher frequencies. > > This is running at around six or seven hudred Hz. > > According to the meters more power is coming out than going in, but we > all know how deceptive things can be and i can't do proper > measurements until i get my hands on a scope, which i will get in the > new year.>> >
