Re: [Vo]:Hey, it didn't blow up! And by the way, there does seem to be a permit.

2011-10-29 Thread Peter Heckert
Yes, this is the big question. If it worked, why didnt it blow up? I have calculated elsewhere in this forum that it is technical possible to dissipate the heat with a big ventilated air heatexchanger. This is believable to me. But the big unsolved question for me is: Steam temperature was

Re: [Vo]:Hey, it didn't blow up! And by the way, there does seem to be a permit.

2011-10-29 Thread Jed Rothwell
Charles Hope lookslikeiwasri...@gmail.com wrote: Jed, in your opinion, why does Rossi bother with these demoes, if they don't impress fence sitters, and he doesn't need new investors? It seems to clear to me why he did these demos. Different reasons: Oct. 6 was a demonstration. It proved

Re: [Vo]:Hey, it didn't blow up! And by the way, there does seem to be a permit.

2011-10-29 Thread Mattia Rizzi
Rossi says here that they issued some sort of conditional permit, with restrictions. That is the sort of thing you would expect for an experimental device. That sounds plausible. It is what I would expect a responsible government official to issue. Jed, please. How can rossi had a permit if

Re: [Vo]:Hey, it didn't blow up! And by the way, there does seem to be a permit.

2011-10-29 Thread Craig Haynie
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 15:20 +0200, Mattia Rizzi wrote: How can rossi had a permit if inside the nuclear site there isn’t even a SINGLE “Nuclear Warning” panel? Nuclear Warning Panel? This is still an unknown phenomenon, and the idea that it's nuclear is still speculation. It is not known to be

Re: [Vo]:Hey, it didn't blow up! And by the way, there does seem to be a permit.

2011-10-29 Thread Jed Rothwell
Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com wrote: How can rossi had a permit if inside the nuclear site there isn’t even a SINGLE “Nuclear Warning” panel? I don't know. I have not seen his application or permit. You have a good point. It might be prudent to set up some signs. I am not sure where you

Re: [Vo]:Hey, it didn't blow up! And by the way, there does seem to be a permit.

2011-10-29 Thread Peter Heckert
Am 29.10.2011 16:32, schrieb Jed Rothwell: Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com mailto:mattia.ri...@gmail.com wrote: How can rossi had a permit if inside the nuclear site there isn’t even a SINGLE “Nuclear Warning” panel? I don't know. I have not seen his application or permit. You

Re: [Vo]:Hey, it didn't blow up! And by the way, there does seem to be a permit.

2011-10-29 Thread Mattia Rizzi
Still, as far as anyone knows, cold fusion never generates dangerous radiation. So it is a little silly to apply the safety standards of fission or plasma fusion to it. This is like saying that hydrogen airships can explode, so we should take extreme precautions when working with helium balloons.

Re: [Vo]:Hey, it didn't blow up! And by the way, there does seem to be a permit.

2011-10-29 Thread Daniel Rocha
Gamma rays may have a subjective definition.You can say that Gamma Rays are photons emitted by state transitions of the nucleus and X-Rays are photons that comes from electrons. X-Ray machines emits what would be otherwise consider gamma rays, around 140KeV. For example,

Re: [Vo]:Hey, it didn't blow up! And by the way, there does seem to be a permit.

2011-10-29 Thread Jed Rothwell
Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com wrote: No matter of what his going on inside the reactor. Rossi made spectacular claims. He said that he generate heat by gamma emission. Yes, he did. Experts think that is unlikely, but he did say that. But did he tell that to the government when he

[Vo]:Hey, it didn't blow up! And by the way, there does seem to be a permit.

2011-10-28 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: This test has been a colossal disappointment. I know Rossi pretty well by now, so I was expecting something like this. Given who Rossi is and how he thinks, this wasn't a colossal disappointment. Also, this was not a colossal disappointment to me because, hey, it did not blow up.

Re: [Vo]:Hey, it didn't blow up! And by the way, there does seem to be a permit.

2011-10-28 Thread Jed Rothwell
I mean that I predicted GE would NOT want to get involved. Look at the Manutencoop profile: http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=9156703 Recently founded, growing rapidly, still hungry. Privately owned, leaving them free to make big decisions and take

Re: [Vo]:Hey, it didn't blow up! And by the way, there does seem to be a permit.

2011-10-28 Thread Charles Hope
Jed, in your opinion, why does Rossi bother with these demoes, if they don't impress fence sitters, and he doesn't need new investors? Sent from my iPhone. On Oct 28, 2011, at 22:37, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: I wrote: This test has been a colossal disappointment. I

Re: [Vo]:Hey, it didn't blow up! And by the way, there does seem to be a permit.

2011-10-28 Thread Joe Hughes
At first I was disappointed it wasn't a major US company for selfish reasons - cause I want one as soon as possible :) but their profile does make a lot of sense. More info on them posted on the ecatnews site with a shout out to Jed. http://ecatnews.com/?p=1129 Joe On 10/28/2011 10:50 PM,