Steven V Johnson wrote:
Mauro sez:
This is a good summary.
Maybe you could publish a version of it somewhere at lenr-canr.org. It
surely will not hurt, and could help first comers with doubts about the
validity of the sources and the information presented.
...
I agree!
Write it up, Jed!
Jed
I agree with all you said. You certainly don't have to be at the
defensive, justifying all your actions. This is specially so when you have
done nothing wrong.
But cold fusion is a controversial field, and sadly with a bad reputation.
This comes for a number of reasons, some of which are
Mauro Lacy wrote:
But cold fusion is a controversial field, and sadly with a bad reputation.
That is not the fault of the cold fusion researchers, and there is
nothing they -- or I -- can do about it. Acting defensively as if we
have something to apologize for, or as if we need a extra
Jed sez:
Steven V Johnson wrote:
Mauro sez:
This is a good summary.
Maybe you could publish a version of it somewhere at
lenr-canr.org. It surely will not hurt, and could help
first comers with doubts about the validity of the sources
and the information presented.
...
I agree!
Steven V Johnson wrote:
But IMHO, it seems to me that occasionally you DO care what others
think.
I care what some people think. Especially intelligence analysts. My
point is that it would be politically inept to bring up these issues
on LENR-CANR.org. Imagine a contractor shows up at your
Jed sez:
But IMHO, it seems to me that occasionally you DO care what
others think.
I care what some people think. Especially intelligence analysts.
My point is that it would be politically inept to bring up
these issueson LENR-CANR.org. Imagine a contractor shows up at
your door to do an
Steven V Johnson wrote:
Wouldn't it be nice to have something already prepared? Like
references? ...as well as why those who are saying I'm a crook
should be discounted?
I guess I could throw this document at 'em, couldn't I? Minus the
hoosegow part. People don't even know what that means
People here raised this question in earnest, and
I have been mulling it over. It is a legitimate concern after all.
From time to time, skeptics have asked me to
prove that a document is real or that I actually
have permission to upload it by providing them
with an e-mail. I have told them I
This is a good summary.
Maybe you could publish a version of it somewhere at lenr-canr.org. It
surely will not hurt, and could help first comers with doubts about the
validity of the sources and the information presented.
I never doubted the document was legit. In the name of truth, what
happened
Mauro sez:
This is a good summary.
Maybe you could publish a version of it somewhere at lenr-canr.org. It
surely will not hurt, and could help first comers with doubts about the
validity of the sources and the information presented.
...
I agree!
Write it up, Jed!
That is, during one of
10 matches
Mail list logo
