x as measured/inferred by the
>>resulting weak emissions! Perhaps a 'third' miracle is needed, oh shit, will
>>it ever all be revealed.
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: mix...@bigpond.com <mailto:mix...@bigpond.com>
>>[mailto:mix...@bigpond.com <mailto:m
, January 18, 2017 8:19 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren - nuclear
spallation and resonance
Gamma mitigation might lie in how nuclear reactions occur inside a Bose
condinsate.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:11 PM, <mix...@bigpond.com
<
t;it ever all be revealed.
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 6:36 PM
> >To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> >Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren -
>
t;it ever all be revealed.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 6:36 PM
>To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren - nuclear
>spallation and reso
, will
it ever all be revealed.
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 6:36 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren - nuclear
spallation and resonance
In reply to Russ Geor
In reply to Russ George's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 17:53:41 -0800:
Hi Russ,
[snip]
>Agreed that is the second miracle required! But is there any standing
>reported evidence for strange mishugenonistic neutron resonance, aka
>reflected neutrons, that subsequently behave in a manner effecting
...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 5:27 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren - nuclear
spallation and resonance
In reply to Russ George's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 07:50:11 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>
In reply to Russ George's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 07:50:11 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Indeed where is the neutron activation, lots of nuclei in the neighborhood
>yet neither activation nor knock on's is very odd. One miracle to a
>customer, getting neutrons out of nuclei is the 'one miracle'.
The
18, 2017 9:51 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren
– nuclear spallation and resonance
Hello George,
I am sure you are a more experienced guy in regards to LENR than I am. Probably
a better sailor. If it only comes down
I is, I am, I are.
>
>
>
> --- an Old Answer to an Old Question
>
>
>
> From: Lennart Thornros [mailto:lenn...@thornros.com
> <mailto:lenn...@thornros.com>]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 8:34 AM
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex
;
> --- an Old Answer to an Old Question
>
>
>
> *From:* Lennart Thornros [mailto:lenn...@thornros.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 18, 2017 8:34 AM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren – nuclear
> spallatio
,
And when I spits, I spits tar.
I'se hard, I is, I am, I are.
--- an Old Answer to an Old Question
From: Lennart Thornros [mailto:lenn...@thornros.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 8:34 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren – nuc
I don't understand the details on the ponderomotive force LENR theory, so
this is pure wishful thinking.
Maybe it can support some other theories which need a new way to make
nucleus interact.
I first think about Edmund Storms Hydroton theory.
The great problem with Hydroton and the Slow Fusion,
Hello Mats,
I think this is interesting. I understand the critic from Jones and Russ
but at least it is a theory and it is based on the result of Lugano. Maybe
it was not such a flawed demo just made so it has too many openings for
critic. This also enhances the profile of Rossi. He has support
AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren - nuclear
spallation and resonance
OK they have a patent application now - after almost two years - but where
is the experimental data?
When this was first announced in 2015, my comment then was the
15 matches
Mail list logo