Steven,
No, I was not the middle sibling - the oldest of two.
This is the first time in my life I have been called a peace maker.
I think that is not all accurate. However, I believe that finding logical,
sensitive and productive solutions is important.
I am fine being controversial but it is not a
graphics depicting who is buying
the 2016 presidential race
Hi Mark, my old nemesis. ;-)
Regarding the "rant" word accusation see the following link out in the Vortex
archive:
https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg105057.html
specifically, your statement:
ieves with
either party.”
Can you please clarify???
B Well,
-mark
From: Lennart Thornros [mailto:lenn...@thornros.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 9:39 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:OT: Interesting interactive graphics depicting who is buying
the 2016 presidential rac
Hi Mark, my old nemesis. ;-)
Regarding the "rant" word accusation see the following link out in the Vortex
archive:
https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg105057.html
specifically, your statement:
> 3- but then, what comes to mind whenever I see anything (OT) from you,
Hi Lennart
I haven't been ignoring you. Just lack adequate time. Now that I'm retired it
sometimes feels as if I have less time at my disposal than ever. ...not that
I'm really complaining about it.
I have to ask you. Were you the middle sibling growing up in your family?
Always the
“I cannot imagine there is anyone person who would identify his believes
> with either party.”
>
> Can you please clarify???
>
>
>
> B Well,
>
> -mark
>
>
>
> *From:* Lennart Thornros [mailto:lenn...@thornros.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 13, 2015 9:39 A
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:OT: Interesting interactive graphics depicting who is buying
the 2016 presidential race
Mark and Steven,
I think you both miss the point. 'You think the dollars spent on election
campaigns are a non-issue.
I think it is terrible to spend money
y painless glucometer. I am doing what I can to make that happen.
B Well,
-mark
From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson [mailto:orionwo...@charter.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 9:06 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:OT: Interesting interactive graphics depicting w
Mark and Steven,
I think you both miss the point. 'You think the dollars spent on election
campaigns are a non-issue.
I think it is terrible to spend money to be informed of two candidates with
almost the same agenda. Yes we spend money - if nothing else we talk about
tax free contributions.
More i
Mark,
I'm impressed by your earnestness in wanting to get clarification. I'll just
focus on one exchange. What motivated me to go on the offensive, so to
speak, was the first comment you made, which was:
> The NYT article is so blatantly one-sided, but of course, you know that...
> at leas
12, 2015 3:22 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:OT: Interesting interactive graphics depicting who is
buying the 2016 presidential race
Hello again Mark,
I stand by what I have said before. To repeat myself, to endlessly
reinterpret what I have said before lies madness. I'
.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:OT: Interesting interactive graphics depicting who is
buying the 2016 presidential race
Good morning Steven,
I think you are referring to this statement of mine:
". I believe you are the one who has, by far, pontificated at length about
political/religious issues;&q
m content to leave it at
that."
Agreed!
B Well Always,
-mark
From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson [mailto:orionwo...@charter.net]
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 8:53 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:OT: Interesting interactive graphics depicting who is
buying the 201
Hi Mark,
I must ask: where was the alleged "rant" in my original post? I pointed to a
link that showed some interesting graphics about where political money is
coming from. In your mind, does pointing to a link now constitute another
"rant" coming from me? Do the links I submit for the Vort Col
ncern you just a teensy weeny little bit?"
Yes, it most certainly does concern me. and yes, I do follow the money,
REGARDLESS of which party is flows to.
Best Always,
-mark
From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson [mailto:orionwo...@charter.net]
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2015 6:3
Hi Mark,
> The NYT article is so blatantly one-sided, but of course, you know that...
> at least, I hope you do.
It's been my experience that when someone feigns praise upon another
person's alleged intelligence but then immediately turns around and
questions whether the praise they had ju
I think the most fantastic thing about it is that we all paid for electing
a president. Roughly $10 each (new born and elderly included). Is it fun
for those money?
I am sure the money did very little to improve the quality of the election.
Still two guys who's biggest concern is to be elected and
Steven,
The NYT article is so blatantly one-sided, but of course, you know that...
at least, I hope you do.
The internet makes it so easy to read multiple and diverse sources in order
to be better informed...
When one looks at the TOTAL picture of campaign finance, there is NO
significant differ
18 matches
Mail list logo