;
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: mixent
>To: vortex-l
>Sent: Wed, Jul 20, 2016 12:04 am
>Subject: Re: [Vo]:The principle of the mutual energy
>>For example in my past self resonant coil experiments very efficient energy
>>transfer bet
t: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 7:28 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The principle of the mutual energy
I may be remembering wrong, but I believe that the evanescent magnetic
field strength falls off as 1/r^3 and the coupled evanescent power falls
off
ird power
> at large distances.
>
> Dave
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: mixent
> To: vortex-l
> Sent: Wed, Jul 20, 2016 12:04 am
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:The principle of the mutual energy
> >For example in my past self resonant coil experiments very e
: Wed, Jul 20, 2016 10:55 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The principle of the mutual energy
Robin,
It is my experience that the coupling falls off as 1/r to the third power at
large distances.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mixent
To: vortex-l
Sent: Wed, Jul 20, 2016 12:04 am
Subject: Re
Robin,
It is my experience that the coupling falls off as 1/r to the third power at
large distances.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mixent
To: vortex-l
Sent: Wed, Jul 20, 2016 12:04 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The principle of the mutual energy
>For example in my past self reson
>For example in my past self resonant coil experiments very efficient energy
>transfer between two air coils at a distance does not fit to magnetic coupling
>working for transformers, nor to standard electromagnetic wave transmission
>despite of presence of substantial electric and magnetic fiel
This reminds me of Bill Beaty’s piece on “energy sucking” antennas which is
much better written. It is a real phenomenon if it is explained precisely.
http://amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html
From: H Ucar
This theory appears to contradict to basic facts, I wonder authors did found a
7 matches
Mail list logo
