Hello Jojo:
One thing to consider is the opposite of high speed kinetic movement. K. P.
Sinha induced LENR by using a laser and REMOVING energy from the system. And
Kim theorizes that Bose-Einstein Condensates are the primary cause, which
points again to a REMOVAL of energy from the system.
I believe unless you remove energy from the condensate, the energy radiated
from the collapse of matter will instantly heat the condensate and quench
further collapse since you reach new thermodynamic stability. Possibly the
only way to counteract that (beyond removing heat) is a stronger
Nobel Prize in Physics)
--- On Tue, 8/28/12, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
From: ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Tuesday, August 28, 2012, 12:09 PM
I believe unless you remove energy from
On the face of it, there seems to be an engineering dilemma associated with
the concept of removing kinetic energy from atoms in designing a mechanism
to produce power from heat.
But we can do what we want to do if we take another tack. At the end of the
day, the formation of an entangled
]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Tuesday, August 28, 2012, 4:45 PM
On the face of it, there seems to be an engineering dilemma associated with the
concept of removing kinetic energy from atoms in designing a mechanism to
produce power from
I agree. I believe a metallic lattice is probably a crude first attempt at
harnessing this effect but will be discarded quickly once other types of
engineered confinement and/or isolation is designed.
I also can't stop thinking about what TerraWatt and the original Papp
Engine are/were possibly
Terawatt.com sure reminds me of Steorn.com
T
They appear more legit to me and with alot of big names on the board, for
what that is worth.
I am going to guess if that device sees wear and tear and premature
failures, they will occur between the surfaces of those magnets on the
magnetic oscillator where all of the uncertainty takes place...
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:52 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
They appear more legit to me and with alot of big names on the board, for
what that is worth.
Yeah, but what is their involvement. I know lots of people who sit on
boards if companies who have no idea of why they are
Franco,
Yes - in a short post about a complicated subject, it is hard to cover all
the bases. I think Kim is incorrect on some of the details, but his take on
it is intriguing.
It is certainly possible that we should be talking about multiples of 2
bound protons, instead of only 2 - or
Le Aug 23, 2012 à 10:16 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com a écrit :
http://cdn.intechweb.org/pdfs/17002.pdf
The above paper attempts to prove that carbon nanotubes are superconductive
at very high temperatures by imbedding nickel nanoparticles in the outside
wall of a multi walled nanotube
All in all, this Zhao paper reinforces the strategy of JoJo and/or anyone
else who may be considering it - to work with hydrogen and CNT. I hope that
a number of experimenters can get hold of adequate material to try, and will
report results, even if negative.
If you want to tie this paper into
Jones,
I don't understand how you can call 2 protons (which combine to form
a bosonic quasiparticle) a 'condensate' (transient or otherwise) since
protons are Fermions and only 1 quasiparticle boson is formed from 2
protons. A single boson (pair of protons) is not a condensate. In Kim's
The CNT hypothesis it is interesting in that it provides a way engineer the
nano-feature cavities. However, a problem may exist with this strategy if
Peter Hagelstein's theory is correct. According to Hagelstein, the excited
fused nucleus relaxes to a ground state by emitting multiple phonons
From: Jojo Jaro
PS: On a different note, what would a p + p fusion reaction look like. I
have designed a new reactor with a view sight glass, hopefully, I'll see
some fusion reactions taking place.
This is where the problem arises. Sadly, you will probably never see it,
even if you
Jojo, I recommend you to discuss the problem of LENR-2 openly and directly
with Edmund Storms- he is the most documented and knowledgeable in the
field of LENR and is very open minded. And nice. Plus he has good means for
doing experiments that can confirm or not the idea
Peter
On Fri, Aug 24,
Peter Hagelstein says that transmutation of nickel to copper is overall
endothermic.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
** **
If you want to show the heat came from the transmutation - that is a far
different story, and Piantelli or no one else has come
Well, Bob - this would depend on which isotopes of Ni are involved, as some
reaction could be gainful - but one thing that almost every expert agrees
on, is that if-and-when Nickel does transmute to Copper, one cannot end-up
with a natural copper isotope ratio as the ash.
Moreover, there will
I have heard that it depends on which isotopes of nickel are involved.
harry
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com wrote:
Peter Hagelstein says that transmutation of nickel to copper is overall
endothermic.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Jones Beene
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 9:46 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
From: Jojo Jaro
PS: On a different note, what would a p + p fusion reaction look like. I
have designed a new reactor with a view sight glass, hopefully, I'll see some
- Original Message -
From: Jojo Jaro
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2012 4:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
It seems to me that 2He being a Noble gas would be stable and not decay back
to 2 H+ ions. If what you
: Jones Beene mailto:jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 9:46 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are
King
From: Jojo
on.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2012 5:28 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
From: Jojo Jaro
If I am understanding you correctly, you are saying that p +
p would
http://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0112178.pdf
On Thursday, August 23, 2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
**
Does anyone have access to this paper?
Charge screening effect in metallic carbon nanotubes.
I think this paper may hold the key to engineering the right size carbon
nanotube.
Jojo
You Da man! Mucho Thanks.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: ChemE Stewart
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
http://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0112178.pdf
On Thursday, August 23
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
http://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0112178.pdf
On Thursday, August 23, 2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
Does anyone have access to this paper?
Charge screening effect in metallic carbon nanotubes.
I think this paper may hold
: Re: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
WOW, this paper is a gold mine, and most of it went over my head. This
quantum mechanical concepts are way past my paygrade. Maybe Jones, Fran or
Axil and others can chime in. Our resident expert who is trained in
relativity is also
From: Jojo Jaro
Imagine a mat of Carbon nanohorns enveloped by high pressure molecular H2
gas. A considerable amount of H2 molecules will enter the nanohorn pipe
and would almost be trapped there .
Jojo - One practical approach you might consider is to contact any or all of
the
-
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 11:46 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
From: Jojo Jaro
Imagine a mat of Carbon nanohorns enveloped by high pressure molecular H2
gas. A considerable amount of H2
- Original Message -
*From:* Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Friday, August 24, 2012 11:46 AM
*Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
** **
*From:* Jojo Jaro
Imagine a mat of Carbon nanohorns enveloped by high
: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 11:46 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
From: Jojo Jaro
Imagine a mat of Carbon nanohorns enveloped by high pressure molecular H2
gas. A considerable amount of H2 molecules
Axil
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
http://cdn.intechweb.org/pdfs/17002.pdf
The above paper attempts to prove that carbon nanotubes are superconductive
at very high temperatures
You are describing a horny gremlin...
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
**
Gang, There has been a lot of discussion about various LENR results
lately. In these discussions, I think a consensus is building up that the
key to successful LENR is topology.
There has been flurry
Dear Jojo,
a) It has only a symbolic importance perhaps but *topology *i*s the key *as
idea and as expression was first stated in my
1991 paper.
b) what you say about LENR made in carbon nanostructures
is very interesting- however what are the experimental facts
that support this bright idea?
I realize Axil has been harping on Rydberg matter for months. Inverted
Rydberg matter sounds even more interesting to me. Miley states that once
the D(-1) inverted state is created in voids it may reside permanently. I
also wonder what happens if it resides in a void and that void
to worry about whether we were right or wrong. We would know we
were wrong for sure.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Peter Gluck
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
Dear Jojo
Let me ellucidate another reason why I believe in Carbon Nanohorns is the right
NAE.
Understand that a Carbon Nanohorn is essentially a long long pipe with an open
end on one end. H2 in molecular form can diffuse into the carbon nanohorn or
pass thru from the open end and accumulate inside
I agree with most of that although i expect carbon nanotubes to remain
rigid while heated. I think having a metallic lattice crack/void
completely filled inverted irydberg matter and then having that voild
collapse arond it when it thermally expands due to heating and electrical
stimulation is
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 21, 2012 8:30 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
Dear Jojo,
a) It has only a symbolic importance perhaps but *topology *i*s the
key *as idea and as expression was first stated in my
1991 paper.
b) what you say about LENR made
Message -
From: ChemE Stewart
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
I agree with most of that although i expect carbon nanotubes to remain rigid
while heated. I think having a metallic lattice
is an environment that screens the coulomb barrier repulsion
to allow these ions a chance to fuse.
Jojo
- Original Message -
*From:* ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 21, 2012 9:49 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
Jojo,
All I can do is to wish you (the action) success, because we need it.
Topology is the key, however the wall is the door- that is it participates
: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
I agree with most of that although i expect carbon nanotubes to remain
rigid while heated. I think having a metallic lattice crack/void
completely filled inverted irydberg matter and then having that voild
collapse arond it when
kw linear generator model from vortex.
Chung
--- On Tue, 8/21/12, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
From: Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Tuesday, August 21, 2012, 7:28 AM
No, I don't believe
@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 9:08 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
Peter,
No experimental facts yet. I am working from a theoritical top-down approach.
However, I believe it shouldn't take long to get some kind of proof of
concept, which I should
: Peter Gluck
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
Dear Jojo,
a) It has only a symbolic importance perhaps but topology is the key
as idea and as expression was first stated in my
1991
See:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0608229
+++
.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Peter Gluck
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
Dear Jojo,
a) It has only a symbolic importance perhaps but topology
to lick this problem and solve it.
Or not. You'll know when I win the Nobel Prize :-)
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: pagnu...@htdconnect.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 1:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
Jojo
-
From: ChemE Stewart
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 2:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
Just as a first pass I calculated a minimum crack/void volume if you were
filling the crack/void with inverted Rydberg Matter
were right
or
wrong. We would know we were wrong for sure.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Peter Gluck
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
Dear Jojo
51 matches
Mail list logo
