my five cents:
a) aim at reproducibility, whatever the COP or power-level.
b) produce a working hypothesis
c) investigate 'ash' and side-effects: radiation, energy bursts, etc.
d) repeat (a), (b), (c) until convergence a robust 'theory-experiment'- loop is
established.
e) aim for 'commercial'
now who engages on what level:
To be provocative:
SRI/McKubre is somewhere at level (a) to (b), less so at (c).
Here commmercial -ahem- 'secrets' seem to set in.
And when SRI does this, it puts itself outside the scientific method of
rigorous interpersonal replication.
It is of no help to
Frank,
How about just using black hose running in a back and forth direction
from the bottom of your roof to its apex, with a temperature
sensitive valve at the apex point, and a black hose, from the
apex, running down the sunny side of your house into the hot water
container in your
Guenter Wildgruber gwildgru...@ymail.com
mailto:gwildgru...@ymail.com wrote:
And when SRI does this, it puts itself outside the scientific method
of rigorous interpersonal replication.
SRI and Godes are presently engaged in commercial RD, not rigorous
fundamental scientific research.
On 09/19/2012 10:58 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
[...]
This has nothing to do with me. I am not in charge of policy at the
U.S. Patent Office. They are the source of the problem. The purpose of
a patent is to promote progress in technology by sharing information
while protecting intellectual
No. Patentability criteria are: Novel, non-obvious and useful. The
utility of a patent does not exist if it doesn't actually work.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.comwrote:
I wonder why the Patent Office cares if the device actually works? The
criteria
Power evaluations should not be done by electronic power meters, but with
current probes and DSO's.
Only in such case one can determine the correct power consumption from the
grid.
In such setup, even power consumption in pulses can be measured accurately.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:00 PM,
Craig,
I noticed several times in the cat patent, they mention invisible
light. That's interesting, possibly an invalid patent, or possibly,
one could patent one, using visible light.
Bob
On 09/19/2012 10:58 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
[...]
This has nothing to do with me. I am not in
On 09/19/2012 11:44 AM, Robert Dorr wrote:
Craig,
I noticed several times in the cat patent, they mention invisible
light. That's interesting, possibly an invalid patent, or possibly,
one could patent one, using visible light.
Bob
I'm sure you've seen this. You take a laser pointer and
Yep,
lawyers involved in what I call the 'scientific method' seems to be a bad idea.
See:
...
In the 19th century, the invention of perpetual motion machines became
an obsession for many scientists. Many machines were designed based on
electricity. John Gamgee developed the Zeromotor, a
It is hard to get money for cold fusion research.
How about financing science using e.g. kickstarter crowdfunding schemes? I
just donated $11 for space elevator project that is planed to be build at
full scale so that it is operational around 2020. Capacity for payload
would be around two tons
Dreadful choice, Jouni.Best choice in Universe is here;http://rwgresearch.com/open-projects/the-papp-noble-gas-engine/Just sent this winner $100 two weeks ago,. You just exposed your ignorance but possibly your brain is flawed. Stay away from hallucinogens.MeowJouni Valkonen Wed, 19 Sep 2012
I usually really enjoy reading the articles on the Casey Research site,
although the latest article from their Chief Energy Investment
Strategist is a total hit piece IMHO. Really burns me up - I think I'm
going to have to send her an email in response to it.
That seems to be a conservative think tank or something of the sort. I
guess this kind of assessment towards alternative energy is not unexpected.
2012/9/19 Joe Hughes jhughe...@comcast.net
I usually really enjoy reading the articles on the Casey Research site,
although the latest article
What is your basis for concluding that this is a conservative think tank?
or is it just another one of your baseless opinions. The article appears to
be a moderate piece written from the perspective of a skeptic of Rossi's
shinanigans. A sentiment many of us here reflect. I do not see any
A company formed by some SPAWAR alumni (and others), Global Energy
Corporation claims to have a green fission technology nearly ready for
testing in smaller markets -
GUAM POWER AUTHORITY EXPLORES NUCLEAR POWER
Next generation facilities could reduce power costs
Please, I am not a liberal nor a conservative. And I did not have in mind
the homophobic conservative kind but the economic thoughts usually
associated with conservative think tanks.
2012/9/19 Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
**
What is your basis for concluding that this is a conservative think
FYI:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57514677-93/corruption-in-wikiland-paid-pr-
scandal-erupts-at-wikipedia/
.and this is probably more common than we think:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-19527797
As with anything on the net, if you want ALL the facts, you need to visit
If I had a nickel for every time ...
Yeah, yeah ... you know the line. If I had a nickel for every time so-and-so
inventor came up with a clever recipe for LENR success, I'd be a
millionaire.
So ... with that caveat in mind, here's a cheap tip about what to do with
another cheap tip - all those
I'm having a hard time making sense of this on several levels.
For a one thing, the Mosier-Boss results (including the paper you link
below and previous papers, all found in a page on their site) document fast
neutrons, not thermal neutrons. For another thing, fission would put the
lie to their
Not so good for us.
The inquisitors that block LENr feel they have a sacred mission to protect
the population from manipulation and herery...
they will became even more fanatic.
I'm not too much afraid about greedy people, because they are a little
rational, more about honest closed minds.
The
this order is bad in real lifen and the rejection of LENR is caused by that
pseudo-rational pathology...
in real life the inventors discover a phenomenon,
try to make it useful...
if it work, they are happy and try to optimize until all is blocked... if
not they are blocked...
when they are
James Bowery wrote:
No. Patentability criteria are: Novel, non-obvious and useful. The
utility of a patent does not exist if it doesn't actually work.
Correct. I think useful means usable. That is, the invention does
something, however trivial. It works. The purpose it is applied to may
In reply to fznidar...@aol.com's message of Tue, 18 Sep 2012 23:36:46 -0400
(EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
I can think of no way to place the hose on the roof and get it to work. If
the hose is lower than the tank it conveys hot water to the tank and shuts
down the loop current when the sun goes down thus
Good points, Jeff
Maybe, I'm assuming incorrectly, bu from Mosier-Boss paper excerpt -
These results indicated that there were at least two channels - an
aneutronic channel that produced heat (the so-called true Fleischmann-Pons
effect) and another channel that favored formation of energetic
In reply to pagnu...@htdconnect.com's message of Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:33:12
-0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Good points, Jeff
Maybe, I'm assuming incorrectly, bu from Mosier-Boss paper excerpt -
These results indicated that there were at least two channels - an
aneutronic channel that produced heat (the
In reply to c...@inbox.lv's message of Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:04:33 +0300:
Dear cat in box,
Are you dead or alive? Enquiring minds desperately want this question answered.
;^)
[snip]
Dreadful choice, Jouni.
Best choice in Universe is here;
In reply to Craig Haynie's message of Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:13:21 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
These are nonsense, and threaten the whole concept of intellectual
property, whereas original, creative, labor intensive, design, is denied.
..now you understand the true purpose of the patent office! ;)
Regards,
Robin,
This is one of Chan's alter ego sign in names. The persons that go by the
name Reliable, Chan, Phen, Ny min, Mint Candy, cy cle and other chinese
names are one and the same person.
How do I know this, simply that everytime I post a criticism of Chan's
method, or the Flat Plate Heat
A quick look at Celani's chart on page 31 of his report leads to a few
interesting thoughts. In that chart he plots the excess power as one variable
versus time. The shape of the waveform suggests that his device has most
likely achieved a state of self sustaining operation for brief periods
Frank,
How about just using black hose running in a back and forth direction from the
bottom of your roof to its apex, with a temperature sensitive valve at the apex
point, and a black hose, from the apex, running down the sunny side of your
house into the hot water container in your
Frank;
I made the assumption you are on a city type pressurized water
system, therefore no need to lift to roof. If your not, I see the
dilemma. Pretty hard to do without some type of pump.
Bob
At 05:24 PM 9/19/2012, you wrote:
Frank,
How about just using black hose running in a back
I live in the city with gas hot water. Its not for me but its for an isolated
cabin. It has a pressurized system, however, I want to transfer hot water to
the tank even when the water is off.
I think the loop idea may work. It will only transfer a fraction of its flow
rate to the tank and
I've put together some graphs of exothermic proton and deuteron capture
reaction networks for several materials together with associated decay
chains. See:
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BzKtdce19-wySThpSnd3bUxJdDQ
A PDF can be obtained by choosing Download from the File menu at the
left. If
Hi Eric,
I made a quick calculation and believe that your balance adds up. The net
process is equal to the production of a He4 atom from two deuterons. Each
deuteron releases 2.224 MeV to build from parts while a He4 atom releases
28.2933 MeV if constructed from basic parts. So if you
Piantelli also found the two channel effect in his radiation experiments.
This behavior was caused by the speed in which hydrogen loading was done in
nickel. Slow loading produced radiation and fast loading produced heat.
Where are the tritium and the neutrons?
This reaction has two branches that occur with nearly equal probability:D +
D→ T+ 1HD + D→ 3He+ n Then 2
1D + 3
1T → 4
2He + 1
0n http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron Cheers:Axil
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:50 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
37 matches
Mail list logo
