Alain,
Your linked piece set up a straw man. I have been around too long and
seen to much of the world jump on board the latest consensus. With LENR
the evidence that is works is sufficient to think it does. That can't
be said for individuals like Rossi and Mills - yet. I don't know for
color blind in a sea of red flags
It seems some consider that a place wher you can debate is a place where
the enemy have control, especially if he raises a mass of clear evidence
that are very very annoying.
LENR community have to clean it's glasses, like APS have to.
Very interesting find thanks for that. I'm definitely all curious now.
Is it right the larger object is almost pure Hydrogen this is very curious for
a young object.
Or is it a small a very old 1st generation object from primordial gas?
The implications that dusty plasma may play a role in
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-30-2017-lenr-note-and-info.html
peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Yup I think helium content could play apart. I'm not sure how much gets mixed
up to the surface.
It's going back decades since I followed this stuff but if I remember right
more normally I think they look at the size, mass and colour of the stars as in
the Hershel Russell diagram to determine
Ahh just a correction it's the Hertzsprung Russell diagram.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hertzsprung–Russell_diagram
Im definitely rusty on this.
Sent from my iPhone
On 30 Mar 2017, at 20:09, Stephen Cooke
> wrote:
Yup I
wrote:
> I wonder how they know the age?
>From the make up of the gasses, I believe. Young stars have more hydrogen.
I suppose if cold fusion is playing a role that method may not be accurate.
- Jed
Stephen,
Good counter-point to Robin's suggestion of a young age. A younger
object would most likely have to be made-up of 2nd or 3rd generation
super-nova debris, and therefore it couldn't be both pure and young.
If we go back to the implications of there being a previously unknown
A good review of cold fusion theories was presented in IE 132. Several
presenters mentioned vibration but none mentioned vibration at a dimensional
frequency of 1,094,000 meters per second.
Several presenters mentioned a Bose condensate but non mentioned a
vibrationally reinforced high
I am selling a few Parrot Teacher apps.
https://www.amazon.com/Znidarsic-Science-Books-Parrot-Teacher/dp/B06VY5Y5JG/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8=1490914669=8-2=parrot+teacher
After my readers informed me about the Peek a Boo Parrot I am rethinking my app.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNEIByUh_zw
A massive fire broke out this evening under an elevated portion Atlanta's
main interstate highway, I-85. The intense heat weakened and then brought
down a segment of the highway. I suppose the mechanism was similar to the
destruction of the World Trade Center towers. The Atlanta newspaper account
So, it was conventional chemicals, not fuel? I stand corrected.
There was speculation in the news earlier that it was fuel.
In other surrealistic Atlanta energy related news, someone caused an
evacuation today by claiming he had "red mercury." I kid you not. See:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
> I bring this up here because preliminary indications are that the fire was
> caused by a fuel pipeline leak.
>
Nope. I work 1/4 mile away and drive by every day. It was miles of PVC
innerduct used for fiber optics
13 matches
Mail list logo