Re: [Vo]:Why Scientists Must Share Their Failures

Here is the picture of the latest failed experiment. http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/temp/silver.jpg to left hydrogen and helium cylinders. Center signal generator. I was set to square wave for the max possible summation with harmonics. To right silver wire in bottle. Silver was is in a

RE: [Vo]:Why Scientists Must Share Their Failures

Jones and Nygel— I worked for a good engineer for 18 years. His moto was: “It takes a $M worth of mistakes to make a good engineer,” and that was 50 years ago and applied to engineers and scientists, mostly engineers. The problem now-a-days is that the R persons foster mistakes, since more

Re: [Vo]:Why Scientists Must Share Their Failures

So if that was done with cold fusion... IMO failures in experimental sciences are too specific for it to be meaningful. It might have limited application, but mostly, I don't see it, too often success and failure is just an inch apart. John Berry On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Nigel Dyer

Re: [Vo]:Why Scientists Must Share Their Failures

Excellent article. I have found that it is possible to find out some of the failures by going to conferences and talking with people. For every field there is usually someone who knows what has been done, and what has worked and what has not. The problem is that this is very hit and miss

Re: [Vo]:Why Scientists Must Share Their Failures

I built a Marx generator powered by a cheap 7kV generator http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/DC-3V-7KV-7000V-Boost-Step-up-Power-Module-High-voltage-Converter-Generator-S52-/122391848213?hash=item1c7f1f6515:g:LqUAAOSwo6lWOc7o It worked quite succesfully for a couple of days experiments, during which I

Re: [Vo]:Why Scientists Must Share Their Failures

Anatomy of a failed experiment. Hydrogen loading effects the plasma frequency. I don't believe the nonsense about hydrinos and cracks. Sub atomic particles and the like are just more nonsense at this energy level. Thermal frequencies are terahertz 10 to the twelfth power hertz. At

Re: [Vo]:Why Scientists Must Share Their Failures

Thanks, The home made thing I have charges up to 10KV at a hundred or so joules. I was using it 20 years ago for ball lightning experiments. When it goes off the electronic doorbell rings with a 60 hertz grown even though it is no were near the discharge. I don't like and am going to let

[Vo]:2 ISSUES OF EGO OUT TODAY

First a present for the PdD faithful: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-16-2017-lenr-dr-vitalii-kirkinskii.html and second a shortened current issue: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-16-2017-lenr-current-simplified.html HAPPY EASTER! peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania

Re: [Vo]:Why Scientists Must Share Their Failures

The problem is that with many experiments, the result may clearly be not successful, or the experiment may have ended prematurely, but it is NOT a complete failure and has an avenues for improvement. Null results often point to avenues for improvement. Most often, this is not an "either/or"

Re: [Vo]:Why Scientists Must Share Their Failures

Sharing now: Tried a silver 22 gauge wire in hydrogen and then helium at one atm. I put the wire and the gas in a small plastic bottle upside down so in case it blew up it would project no shrapnel. Wires for the RF stimulation enter at the bottom. The wire was stimulated with RF (1 to

[Vo]:Why Scientists Must Share Their Failures

This may be the problem with the app. Oh what a pain. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26990816/mediarecorder-issue-on-android-lollipop -Original Message- From: Frank Znidarsic To: vortex-l Sent: Sun, Apr 16, 2017 10:49 am Subject:

Re: [Vo]:Why Scientists Must Share Their Failures

In the specific case of LENR/cold fusion, vortex-l provides an excellent source of this sort of information. There have been a number of times when I have searched the archive to find whether something had been tried or considered and found the information from a discussion at some point in

Re: [Vo]:Why Scientists Must Share Their Failures

>>>The problem now-a-days is that the R persons foster mistakes, since more >>>mistakes mean more money to make more mistakes.  same method as used by mainstream theorists: keep piling on mistakes to existing theories to create things like dark matter, dark energy et al that  then need more