Re: [Vo]:"Burning"hydrogen with argon ?

2020-06-13 Thread Jones Beene
In a closed-cycle piston engine, particularly a Stirling-type, the suggestion is that there could be an inherent thermodynamic advantage in having sequential reactions which are exothermic on formation and then endothermic milliseconds later, on the expansion stroke. A resonance could then

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Non-locality

2020-06-13 Thread H LV
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 6:27 PM Jürg Wyttenbach wrote: > I recently had and still have some discussion on researchgate about > superluminal signal transmission by scalar waves. It is well known and even > classically allowed that the group/phase speed can be greater than the > speed of light. >

Re: [Vo]:Orchestrated Objective Reduction

2020-06-13 Thread Jones Beene
bobcook39923 wrote: > “OBFUSCUTION” is the name of the game these days, I’m sorry to say.  The > Nordskies are no exception.   Well yes, but they (Norront) are not a University nor charitable organization. They are investing major private funds in the hopes of getting a good return. We

RE: [Vo]:Orchestrated Objective Reduction

2020-06-13 Thread bobcook39...@hotmail.com
Jones--- “OBFUSCUTION” is the name of the game these days, I’m sorry to say. The Nordskies are no exception. Bob Cook From: Jones Beene Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 7:14 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Orchestrated

Re: [Vo]:Orchestrated Objective Reduction

2020-06-13 Thread Terry Blanton
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 11:08 AM Jones Beene wrote: > OK in a world where paper companies with much less to offer (Nicola Motors > for instance) can raise billions on a worthless IPO, then the sorry record > of Mills is not such a scandal. Just a major disappointment. > Back in the day, I would

Re: [Vo]:Orchestrated Objective Reduction

2020-06-13 Thread Jones Beene
Given the incredible track record of the guy - I would not want to be on the opposite side of any argument with Elon... and he is strongly critical of the potential of H2 in transportation. But that relates only to fuel cells and he is probably correct on that point. However, the one (huge)

Re: [Vo]:Orchestrated Objective Reduction

2020-06-13 Thread Terry Blanton
Hmmm, I guess my humor is unclear...you spelled 'Nikola' as 'Nicola'. However, I will give you partial credit for bringing the thread back on topic with your Orch OR analogue. On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 1:17 PM Jones Beene wrote: > Given the incredible track record of the guy - I would not want

Re: [Vo]:Orchestrated Objective Reduction

2020-06-13 Thread Terry Blanton
Oh, and I have been hoping for hydrogen hype for three decades now. So far we are just as likely to have warp drive powered by di-lithium.

Re: [Vo]:Orchestrated Objective Reduction

2020-06-13 Thread Terry Blanton
For the record, Lazar's Corvette with hydride storage for the ICE engine. https://youtu.be/Ytg23mDd1a4 >

Re: [Vo]:Orchestrated Objective Reduction

2020-06-13 Thread Jürg Wyttenbach
Fuel cell cars will run much farther the Li powered battery car as the tank in cargo vehicle has no real size limit. On the other side the Chinese leader in battery technology just announced a 90$ /kwh battery. This is a turning point where all electric cars become much cheaper than ordinary

[Vo]:"Burning"hydrogen with argon ?

2020-06-13 Thread Jones Beene
An interesting proposition for an advanced transportation fuel would be presented to us - IF (big if) hydrogen can be routinely converted into a denser form on a catalyst, and then expanded in a piston engine configuration. This concept would relate to using argon as a "pseudo oxidizer." Argon

Re: [Vo]:"Burning"hydrogen with argon ?

2020-06-13 Thread Jürg Wyttenbach
ArH_3 ^+ is long time stable and Ar H_3 ^+ is the driving factor in Mills original SUNCELL reaction. In fact H_3 ^+ is the most abundant form of Hydrogen in deep space. About H* we do not yet know. In Mills theory this emission would be related minimally to multiples of 27.2 eV so even if the

Re: [Vo]:Orchestrated Objective Reduction

2020-06-13 Thread Robin
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sat, 13 Jun 2020 13:51:39 -0400: Hi, >Oh, and I have been hoping for hydrogen hype for three decades now. So far >we are just as likely to have warp drive powered by di-lithium. Imagine the consequences of running into a pebble, or even a gas cloud, at

Re: [Vo]:Orchestrated Objective Reduction

2020-06-13 Thread H LV
There are many ways to reduce the consumption of fossil fuels. Maybe I am just sentimental, but I think if we electrified everything life would be clean but sterile. Personally I think there is market for synthetic fuels (which have net zero carbon emissions), because the distribution system is

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Non-locality

2020-06-13 Thread ROGER ANDERTON
i.e. the modern version of Ptolemaic epicycles On Sunday, 14 June 2020, 01:31:32 BST, ROGER ANDERTON wrote: >>I wonder what they mean by "information" when they say in the introduction >>that the "information speed" never exceeds the speed light.<< I think its bluff. Go back to

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Non-locality

2020-06-13 Thread ROGER ANDERTON
>>I wonder what they mean by "information" when they say in the introduction >>that the "information speed" never exceeds the speed light.<< I think its bluff. Go back to Einstein 1905 when he started all this relativity madness, he never said anything about there being "information speed".