Hi Horace, 1-26-11
Please define lambda0 and sigma+
Thanks, Jack Smith
The nuclear reactions involving Helium-3 are arguably the most important
reactions in the universe - the sine qua non for the heat and light
necessary for life.
Yet Helium-3 has been seldom mentioned in LENR and all the prior emphasis
has been towards converting deuterium directly to Helium-4,
In the Levi paper they use the word flux to mean flow rate and they
report the flow rate inconsistently. On p. 3 it says that in [Test 1],
on December 16:
the water flux was set and measured by collecting, and then weighting,
an amount of water in a container in a given time.
The measured
Greetings Vortex,
I have numerous attempts to post the Levi Rossi report website to my
linkedin webpage.
It ia 10am EST linkedin should not be down for maintaince- will try
again...I really can t understand this.
Ron Kita, Chiralex
other posts have been ok.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
But hey – that is the value of newsgroups, no? … the sounding board for the
outrageous suggestion that can become tomorrow’s “told-you-so”.
Yeah, it's like dueling with a machine gun: you get lots of misses
but it's that
Hi Jones,
Can certainly understand trying to develop alternative hypotheses based on what
nature prefers to
do, however, if I understand correctly, you are choosing a reaction process
that is occuring in the
sun? Many involved with LENR have argued with the skeptics that the usual
fusion
I don't think anyone mentioned this article, and since its fundamental to QM,
as well as to much of
the hypothesizing going on around here, I think its worthwhile to take time to
read it:
Which-way detector unlocks some mystery of the double-slit experiment
One thing worth noting is the Efimov's factor of 22.7
I am wondering about its larger significance. Does that factor 'ring a bell'
with anyone?
The only thing found so far in googling, and this could be relevant - is
that for Helium: the mass conversion factor is 22.7. This conversion
factor is
The short answer is that the solar model/comparison at this stage is far
more metaphorical than real.
The situation instantly changes from metaphorical to ok let's take a closer
look if and when 3He turns up in the ash
From: Mark Iverson
Hi Jones,
Can certainly understand
It still returns 403 Forbidden code to me.
But, I have sent the .pdf to your email address.
T
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Ron Kita chiralex.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings Vortex,
I have numerous attempts to post the Levi Rossi report website to my
linkedin webpage.
It ia 10am EST
The name of Rossi's blog, journal-of-nuclear-physics.com, has drawn a
lot of criticism. Steve Krivit insinuated that Rossi is trying to make
people confuse his plot was an old Russian physics journal. I think the
title is pretentious. however, I just noticed that the heading of the
blog says:
Does anyone recall if the subtitle: Nuclear experiments blog was
there all along, or is it a recent addition. I don't remember.
Actually, I don't care either way.
Actually, I kinda hope it is a recent addition. From my POV it would
suggest that perhaps Rossi does actually give a hoot what people
On Jan 26, 2011, at 2:18 AM, Taylor J. Smith wrote:
Hi Horace, 1-26-11
Please define lambda0 and sigma+
Thanks, Jack Smith
Just replace the lambda and sigma with the appropriate greek
letters above to get the standard particle designations. These are
made up of two up quarks with a
On Jan 26, 2011, at 2:18 AM, Taylor J. Smith wrote:
Hi Horace, 1-26-11
Please define lambda0 and sigma+
Thanks, Jack Smith
The short answer is to substitute the greek letter for lambda and
sigma above, to obtain the A longer answer is provided below.
This was covered starting on page
Steven V Johnson wrote:
Does anyone recall if the subtitle: Nuclear experiments blog was
there all along, or is it a recent addition.
Nothing in the wayback machine . . .
Google cache has it on Jan. 20.
- Jed
It just hit me... Horace is working for Rossi!!!
Here are the facts:
- Horace has published a few papers on Rossi's 'journal' (website).
- About 10 months ago, Horace says he's gonna be very 'busy' during spring and
summer and won't have
much time to chime in on vortex-l...
- Horace was so
On Jan 26, 2011, at 7:58 AM, Mark Iverson wrote:
I don't think anyone mentioned this article, and since its
fundamental to QM, as well as to much of the hypothesizing going on
around here, I think its worthwhile to take time to read it:
Which-way detector unlocks some mystery of the
No way:
1) Horace is no fool
2) He lives in Alaska
3) The reactor puts out enough heat for one home
4) That baby would have no chance of leaving the premises till spring
:)
-Original Message-
From: Mark Iverson
It just hit me... Horace is working for Rossi!!!
On Jan 26, 2011, at 1:56 PM, Mark Iverson wrote:
It just hit me... Horace is working for Rossi!!!
Here are the facts:
- Horace has published a few papers on Rossi's 'journal' (website).
- About 10 months ago, Horace says he's gonna be very 'busy' during
spring and summer and won't have
On Jan 26, 2011, at 1:59 PM, Roarty, Francis X wrote:
Horace,
Thanks! I finally followed this subject without my eyes glazing
over and I resaved your explanation as Quarks and Hadrons to my
desktop for future reference.
This is all explained in my articles in context, and at a high
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
- When do we finally hear from Horace?
When I was worried about him (note dates):
fromTerry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
to hheff...@mtaonline.net
dateMon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:24 PM
subject Missing
On Jan 26, 2011, at 3:28 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Mark Iverson
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
- When do we finally hear from Horace?
When I was worried about him (note dates):
fromTerry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
to
Glad you took it the right way... I couldn't stop laughing myself!
With the utterly dismal reporting going on about this demo, I wonder how long
it'll be before
someone asks Rossi on his blog, I hear Hugh Heffner works for you! I'm in!
:-)
Sooo, regarding your comment,
It is also a
You're most welcome...
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Horace Heffner [mailto:hheff...@mtaonline.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 3:22 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: new double-slit experiments reveal modified electron behavior
On Jan 26, 2011, at 7:58 AM, Mark
Horace,
No offense taken and I certainly don't want to waste your
limited time extensively debating the casimir effect from a perspective you
clearly view as impossible at the atomic scale. Your citation is from the
same material I was sent in house and you appear to have the same
On Jan 26, 2011, at 6:25 PM, francis wrote:
Horace,
No offense taken and I certainly don’t want to waste
your limited time extensively debating the casimir effect from a
perspective you clearly view as impossible at the atomic scale.
Your citation is from the same material
We have presented evidence that the proton may be considered as a
Schwarzchild entity... Nassim Haramein [oops, into nonduality...]:
Rich Murray 2010.01.26
N. Haramein, The Schwarzschild Proton, AIP CP 1303, ISBN
978-0-7354-0858-6, pp. 95-100, December 2010.
27 matches
Mail list logo
