http://jnaudin.free.fr/steorn/indexen.htm
I think, this is easy to debunk.
They say, they have a toroidal magnet. An ideal toroidal magnet has no
external field and so there can be no back electromagnetic force.
Now this is untrue. In this magical moment, where the permanent magnet
passes by
My dear Friends,
My offer for this Sunday:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/09/thin-hopes-for-fat-e-cats.html
- what I think about the recent E-cat news.
And obviously the issue No 473 of my newsletter- interesting but not my
merit:
Hi Walter!
Am 18.09.2011 14:04, schrieb Walter Eager:
Regarding your Debunking of Steorn
You have some great theory my friend. It sure makes a lot of sense,
and I do agree with some of what you are
saying (because it makes sense).
Just one thing. Have you actually tested your theory?
No. I do
From Catania,
...
As I've said before I think thermal inertia neatly explains it all.
I don't know of anyone who was not disappointed in the abrupt ending of the
experiment, after input power had been turned off. Yeah, yeah, I know, they
tell us it was late in the evening and they needed their
I saw the termination as a resignation that there is no anomalous heat. It
showed there is no self-sustaining reaction since the temperature drop is
correlated with power off. The write-up that Lewan gives shoes his lack of
general physics knowledge and that he is most likely a paid biased
Am 18.09.2011 17:25, schrieb OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson:
From Catania,
...
As I've said before I think thermal inertia neatly explains it all.
I don't know of anyone who was not disappointed in the abrupt ending of the
experiment, after input power had been turned off. Yeah, yeah,
-Original Message-
From: fznidarsic fznidar...@aol.com
To: vortex-l-request vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Sep 18, 2011 8:37 am
Subject: hammering me and cold fusion in Germany
Quote from planet hunter
Regarding cold fusion is indeed so, that in recent years,
From Catania:
...
The write-up that Lewan gives shoes his lack of general physics
knowledge and that he is most likely a paid biased spokesperson.
That is your speculation. However, since you seem convinced of such
speculation, how do you plan on going about convincing... let me rephrase
Am 18.09.2011 19:03, schrieb OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson:
From Peter: ...
Also it shows us, the experiment still cannot run unattended.
As far as speculation goes, I find myself in sympathy with such speculation.
What I find interesting about such speculation is that it suggests to me
Am 18.09.2011 19:26, schrieb Peter Heckert:
Yes, Rossi repeatedly said selfsustained mode is unstable it can runaway.
Therefore now he runs it selfsustained only for 50% of time now.
Thats what he says. He must have done experiments for this.
He has Labview on his computer.
So I would think he
I noticed that only some of my posts are showing up in the archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/maillist.html
Any post which starts a new tread name appears to be unlikely to show
up.
I am sending some duplicate posts of some prior posts to check this
theory.
Weird!
I resent the Henry Dircksand BLP's CIHT posts and they did not
show up, while the Test of archive dropping posts post immediately
did.
I wonder if mail-archive.com is now screening screening mail for
unwanted domain name URLs?
On Sep 18, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:
http://www.blacklightpower.com/Press%20Releases/
BlackLightHydrinoElectricity112910.htm
http://www.greenbiz.com/news/2010/02/25/ebay-walmart-google-among-
early-adopters-fuel-cell-bloom-boxes
http://www.earthtech.org/capabilities/vwfc/
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
It appears mail-archive.com is now screening out mail which uses
tinyurl.com.
I go to the trouble to provide a redundant tinyurl reference as a
courtesy, to avoid problems readers might have with line-wrap. This
is a significant loss of function I think.
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
The following quote was sent to me by Scott Little.
A more self-willed, self-satisfied, or self-deluded class of the
community, making at the same time pretension to superior knowledge,
it would be impossible to imagine. They hope against hope, scorning
all opposition with ridiculous
I did some plausibility calculations for Rossis 1 MW plant.
Thermal Energy of saturated steam @1bar, @100 centigrade = 2675 J/g
(taken from an industrial steam table)
10^6 J*s^-1 / 2675 (J/g) = 374 g/s.
Volume of steam = 1.7l / g
So steamflow = 636 l/s = 636 cm^3 / s
If the crosssectional
Am 18.09.2011 21:19, schrieb Peter Heckert:
So steamflow = 636 l/s = 636 cm^3 / s
If the crosssectional area of the output pipe is 10^2 cm, then the
steam speed is 6.36 m/s.
Oops immediately after posting I found an error ;-)
1l = 1000 cm^3
636000 cm^3/s / 100 cm^2 = 6360 cm/s = 63.6
On Sep 18, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
I did some plausibility calculations for Rossis 1 MW plant.
Thermal Energy of saturated steam @1bar, @100 centigrade = 2675 J/
g (taken from an industrial steam table)
10^6 J*s^-1 / 2675 (J/g) = 374 g/s.
Volume of steam = 1.7l / g
So
On Sep 18, 2011, at 10:54 AM, MJ wrote:
First the eCat, now BLP. What's next? Antigravity?
http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/975-
undergroundbases
MJ
I wouldn't be the first time! 8^)
See the vortex-l rules:
http://amasci.com/weird/wvort.html
Side note: the 52 E-cats at 80 kg each should have a mass of 4160 kg! I
wonder what the shipping cost on that is?
Must be cheap (compared to sending a space aircraft across the ocean).
Those containers are standard they can carry up to 25000 kg. A big
ship carries thousands of those.
see for
Am 18.09.2011 23:22, schrieb Horace Heffner:
Assume the condensed water is being fed back at 100°C.
The energy to vaporize water at 100°C is 2260 J/g. If 1 MW is heating
100°C water then I estimate the flow has to be 442.5 gm/s, with a
volumetric flow of 737.5 liters/sec. This gives a flow
Horace wrote: »Side note: the 52 E-cats at 80 kg each should have a mass of
4160 kg! I wonder what the shipping cost on that is?»
Can anyone estimate what would be the building costs of this fake Megawatt
plant? If it is asumed that there is inside conventional fuel water boiler,
that can produce
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:54 PM, MJ feli...@gmail.com wrote:
First the eCat, now BLP. What's next? Antigravity?
http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/975-undergroundbases
Harrumph! Not one mention of reptilians.
T
Woops, sorry Alan. I should be more careful.
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.netwrote:
Hi Colin,
Alan Fletcher gets the credit for that scenario.
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
On Sep 16, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Colin
Hello group,
I have a question, its not so important but it keeps bugging me.
In the movie
Heavy Watergate
Written by
Mallove, Rothwell Frank
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6562030534380820378
At min 4:24
John Maddox
Editor of Nature magazine
says: It [cold fusion] will remain dead
You must take a look at the animation on right side of page, about half way
down.
The caption reads:
Slow-motion replay of valence electron motion. Time has been magnified by
a factor of approximately 10^15 in this sub-atomic-resolution time
microscope to make this intra-atomic dance perceivable
26 matches
Mail list logo
