What I am curious about is whether the reduced radioactivity that
Reifenschweiler observed for tritium and heavier nuclei meant that the
radioactive decays were actually suppressed, or that the energetic decay
products were thermalized in the small monocrystalline particles via some
hypothetical
so two article of the same FAQ are not coherent.
http://faq.ecat.com/112273/how-much-ni-is-in-the-cell/
http://faq.ecat.com/112449/how-much-nickel-and-hydrogen-will-it-take-to-generate-one-megawatt-of-heat-continuously-for-six-months/
is'nt there a known issue with an error of unit that rossi
I wish Peter Hagelstein replied: That's OK, Mr Rossi, fine! No more
public test! Let me put it this way: would you let me test before buy
as you advertise?!.
That would have put AR in the corner, no escape. Is MIT afraid of
being fouled ending up paying $2M for a scam? If it works those $2M
As a potential purchaser, I have had no problems with Rossi agreeing for
us to test our E-Cat. $2m is pocket change for MIT. I suggest there a
lot more that went on than what has been revealed. Many US based LENR
firms will be doing everything they can, calling up all their IOUs to
slow Rossi
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Berke Durak berke.du...@gmail.com wrote:
David Roberson proposed a theory where a water clog forms
because of condensation.
Because of this clog, pressure and temperature rises until
the clog is cleared
I'm pretty sure your depicted scenario is not
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embeddedv=2cOEHQmnG-I#t=106s
I went back and looked at the Levi interview
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vYJIG3ymOk starting at 3:00). Levi says:
3:00 feb 2011 test w/o steam
4:00 system started in an almost explosive way
6:00 15 kw for 18 hours
6:20 we connected the system directly to the water pipe with flux
[flow]
No, Ag, Focardi just said that the Earth nucleaus is composed of Ni and Fe,
therefore Ni is one of the most abundant elements and will be available
forever.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
Note temps were recorded every 2 seconds and the quality of the produced
steam was measured to contain 1.2 to 1.4% water. Present were: Rossi, Levi,
Kullander, Essen, Leonardi, Focardi and Bianchini so I accept
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
That trend has been uniform except maybe for the October 28
test, in which, of course, data collection and details were not
witnessed by anyone credible.
Maybe the trend is not uniform, but even in the megacat, the
Got it. There was 11% Fe found in the Ni powder analysis the Swedish
guys did.
AG
On 11/24/2011 8:42 PM, Marcello Vitale wrote:
No, Ag, Focardi just said that the Earth nucleaus is composed of Ni
and Fe, therefore Ni is one of the most abundant elements and will be
available forever.
On
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Alain dit le Cycliste
alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
for those that repeat that CF is impossible ,
Not impossible, just unlikely, in the absence of good evidence.
I can answer simply :
- it breaks no basic rule of todays most validated models : Quantum
On 11/24/2011 03:13 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
I wonder if Rossi will change his tune on testing if Defkalion starts
conducting public tests.
A little competition is worth a million MYs
And a new measurement unit is born. Let this be my modest attempt at a
definition:
One MY is defined as the
Jed would say to this that there was no money involved in denying any of
the phenomena brought as example. And he would be right, of course.
It must also be pointed out that superconductivity, and the color of Au,
and the color of silver nanoparticles depend on quantum mechanical effects
whose
See:
http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3352744.ece/BINARY/Kullander_lecture_23nov.pdf
It was boring, that Kullander used sodium cooled fast reactor as an
example of 4th gen nuclear power, because it is probably inherently
failed concept. LFTR is way better concept, because there is required
much less manufacturing and reprocessing nuclear fuel.
Also he seem to be still out of
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Berke Durak berke.du...@gmail.com wrote:
David Roberson proposed a theory where a water clog forms
because of condensation.
Because of this clog, pressure and temperature rises until
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
It might not be so confusing if one realizes, assuming all is as AR
says, he has a very narrow window to make money off his eCat.
I get that. I really do. But he was meeting with an elected official from
the state of Massachusetts. A couple of miles away
but good way to generate PR that will attract more credulous investors
-- strike a bold pose of independence, thumbing nose at the
establishment... just helping Mary Yugo...
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
It
OH! I think there is a little bit of new information! Take a look at page
50! Data on 6 old experiments.
But, I didn't understand something. Eric Lerner never talked anything about
LENR, as far as I know, see page 58. In fact, Eric aims to work with fusion
7000x hotter than what is found in
That is really a stain in his reputation, at least for a few months. I was
going to put my name in the 10K e-cat market research... Not anymore. It
doesn't matter if he really has something real if he cannot prove that he
can provide a reliable, functional and safe product.
2011/11/24 Jed
My question: Did Sen. Bruce Tarr ask Rossi any questions to which Rossi
provided surprising (to B. Tarr) answers?
When an attorney calls a witness, he knows the answers before he asks the
questions. The same applies to public hearings where an elected official
invests his political capital in
I am sorry if my statement annoys you Mary. You suggest that you might be
willing to accept the slim possibility that Rossi is honest. I will give you
the benefit of the doubt if you promise that your statement reflects your real
opinion. On the other hand, Mr. Cude has made it quite clear
You are correct in your observation Mary. The device has grown in size
remarkably and some of its characteristics are likely improved. The cute
little unit that first showed up could not retain much hot water to deliver on
demand. Rossi has made a point of the fact that the device takes a
Rick sez:
I am captivated by [Cude's] exceptional
lucidity of mind -- soon, he will give the Defkalion delusion an
equally exquisite shave
Your personal objectivity on these matters is something to behold, as what
appears to be your undying faith in the infallibility of your heroes.
Rich,
Lou, Axil,
I think Jones Beene has previously cited thermal anomalies of
both heating and cooling, the cooling anomaly is less pronounced than the
heating anomaly. Likewise reports of accelerated half lives of radioactive
gases are more pronounced than reports of
2011/11/24 Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com
Not impossible, just unlikely, in the absence of good evidence.
I don't agree. SC was not understood, but the idea that quantum
transitions could be inhibited at low temperature was not contrary to any
calculations of reaction rates or
Fran,
Last month the Barker patents were dredged up again in this context.
This experiment is like the Reifenschweiler effect on steroids, and has been
replicated often, but of course – it is a great stretch to think it could be
applicable to Nickel-64 – which is an isotope that is “not
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
If Rossi does not want MIT to test his reactors, he should never have met
with state officials. It was an embarrassing waste of everyone's time.
I dunno. Assuming they paid for the ticket, it was a cheap way for
him to
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
This is like saying that because a theatre gradually filled with
people over two hours it is implausible to believe the same theatre
emptied of
Jed said
.But he was meeting with an elected official from the state
of Massachusetts. A couple of miles away from the most prestigious
university of technology in the world, run by the state.
Uh, Jed, MIT is private. Or maybe you meant UMass?
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Jed
Jed sez:
If Rossi does not want MIT to test his reactors,
he should never have met
with state officials. It was an embarrassing waste
of everyone's time.
I suspect Rossi would beg to differ. Seems to me that Rossi has always been
operating on Rossi time.
From Terry,
I dunno.
Happy T-day to the US folk. Don't overdo it :-)))
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 5:54 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
Jed sez:
If Rossi does not want MIT to test his reactors,
he should never have met
with state officials. It was an embarrassing waste
Once again, the forum rules seem to apply only to believers. How
would they react if I launched a vociferous, irrelevant and pejorative
tirade against them here?
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 3:13 AM, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
On 11/24/2011 03:13 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
I wonder if Rossi
Eric,
I agree with your assessment of what is wrong with 911 conspiracy theories.
The problems with these theories is how to coordinate so many people
involved in the conspiracy without any of them revealing what happened.
In the case of the Rossi story we have mostly him behaving in a completely
Maybe there will be an English translation. In the meantime, can anyone
tell me if Kullander addresses the superb concerns and excellent
measurement methods proposed by Grabowski et al (US Naval Research
Laboratory) here?
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GrabowskiKrobustperf.pdf
I think everyone
That Melich, in the paper, is Rossi's friend, tested the ecats, in 2009, I
think, and it is an enemy of Krivit. Krivit hates that guy. Krivit, 1 day
after the first test in January, noticed that he was associated with Rossi,
and since that very moment, he showed a negative attitude towards Rossi.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote:
That Melich, in the paper, is Rossi's friend, tested the ecats, in 2009, I
think, and it is an enemy of Krivit. Krivit hates that guy. Krivit, 1 day
after the first test in January, noticed that he was associated with
I think Jed can answer better than I do. But the reason is Krivit doesn't
like that guy it is that he thinks Melich a cover agent of the US
government to suppress cold fusion. But they are very probably associated,
as you can see in the list of Rossi's list of advisors in his blog as well
as some
Thanks Axil, Fran, Jones,
- for lots of intriguing information.
You have put lot of effort into this.
On the quantum entanglement/nonlocality issue - possibly relevant is:
Undetectable quantum transfer through a continuum
http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.2901 - but interesting even if not.
The Ni-64
Am 24.11.2011 19:22, schrieb Mary Yugo:
I tried translating from the Swedish PDF to English with Google. It's
not entirely satisfactory but it does suggest that Kullander did
consider Grabowski's paper or the same concerns from theory. If I
understood him, Kullander concluded that Rossi
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.dewrote:
Am 24.11.2011 19:22, schrieb Mary Yugo:
Did he not discuss the fact, that the electrical energy was not enough for
boiling?
It was barely enough for 60°, at this water flow rate.
I think this is evident and
Rossi, writing on his blog (which I copied from ecatnews.com). As I once
theorized, and Jed Rothwell strongly disagreed with, it seems as if
Defkalion may have made mockups based on the promise of getting an active
core from Rossi -- something Rossi may have reneged on resulting in the
failure of
Am 24.11.2011 19:48, schrieb Mary Yugo:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Peter Heckert
peter.heck...@arcor.de mailto:peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Am 24.11.2011 19:22, schrieb Mary Yugo:
Did he not discuss the fact, that the electrical energy was not
enough for boiling?
It
Am 24.11.2011 20:10, schrieb Peter Heckert:
Btw, it is interesting to see in figure 6 that the differential
steepness at 10:36 abruptly and exactly doubles.
It looks as if a second 300W heater was activated. This is enough for
some boiling.
If there was water overflow this would be
Dear Mary,
It is a bit difficult to discuss with you things from the past or from the
present, therefore I bet with you that *till 31 august next year there will
be at least 6 teams who know Rossi's secret *or have
found an equifunctional and equivalent additive to his and are able to
obtain
Am 24.11.2011 20:36, schrieb Peter Heckert:
Am 24.11.2011 20:10, schrieb Peter Heckert:
Btw, it is interesting to see in figure 6 that the differential
steepness at 10:36 abruptly and exactly doubles.
It looks as if a second 300W heater was activated. This is enough for
some boiling.
If
Peter,
To ensure equivalent value, you should specify the brand. I would
suggest Sauza Tres Generaciones Plata.
T
Thanks, I am very ignorant in matter of tequila, but will ask the help of
the Web. BTW one of the most idiotic laws of the EU says no alcoholic
beverage with more than 40% alcohol.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Peter,
To ensure equivalent value, you
Peter wrote:
Scientific experiments must be documented for eternity, not for a single
day.
This is something that Rossi seemingly not understands.
I can't believe these kinds of statements are still made!
What Peter doesn't understand, and has been mentioned by numerous people,
numerous
Am 24.11.2011 21:20, schrieb Peter Gluck:
Thanks, I am very ignorant in matter of tequila, but will ask the help
of the Web. BTW one of the most idiotic laws of the EU says no
alcoholic beverage with more than 40% alcohol.
False. There is so-called Stroh RUM (straw rum) with 50% and with 80%
Another possible problem with the paper at
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/EssenHexperiment.pdf is that they don't say
where and how they measured input power with their ammeter. Maybe they say
it elsewhere. Rossi has two heaters in the device -- a startup heater in
the middle and a safety (?!?!)
http://evworld.com/article.cfm?storyid=2035
Excerpt:
Andrea Rossi may have his doubters, detractors and skeptics,
but the client for whom he demonstrated his 1MW e-Cat energy
system apparently isn't one of them. Not only did the mysterious
client take delivery of Rossi's first 1MW heat
Am 24.11.2011 21:30, schrieb Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint:
Peter wrote:
Scientific experiments must be documented for eternity, not for a
single day.
This is something that Rossi seemingly not understands.
I can't believe these kinds of statements are still made!
What Peter doesn't understand,
If Rossi's kludge turns out to be really cold fusion, I'm going to become
partial to absinthe.
That a huge surprise never heard of it!! Thanks, I still have to learn.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.dewrote:
Am 24.11.2011 21:20, schrieb Peter Gluck:
Thanks, I am very ignorant in matter of tequila, but will ask the help of
the Web. BTW one of the
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.dewrote:
** Then, why does he invite scientists? Kullander and Essen are rather
high level scientists. For what does he need Levi?
Exactly. Not to mention his invitation a while back to Josephson.
Fire all scientists
Am 24.11.2011 21:34, schrieb Mary Yugo:
Another possible problem with the paper at
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/EssenHexperiment.pdf is that they don't
say where and how they measured input power with their ammeter. Maybe
they say it
[snip]
My suspicion is that KE did it correctly with the
Too dangerous, have seen chromatograms of it myriads of toxic compounds.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
If Rossi's kludge turns out to be really cold fusion, I'm going to become
partial to absinthe.
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
I see it is an Austrian product, will ask my blog partner georgina who
writes much better than me and in Bankdirektorin in Vienna.
Subject closed and I apologize for wasting your time, colleagues.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.dewrote:
Am 24.11.2011
I did say I was not going to reply to you but your last statement is
just 100% BS. The reactor and the Blue Box sat on a table. There was ONE
power cord that was plugged into the wall. It went to the Blue Box (then
the RFG was inside the Blue Box) and then to the reactor. There were no
other
Jed we don't know what happened at those meetings. All you have revealed
it what one person said. There is a LOT more going on here that has been
revealed. Rossi is old school Southern European and keeps his cards VERY
close to his chest. Yanks blast everything all over the web. Very
different
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
If Rossi's kludge turns out to be really cold fusion, I'm going to become
partial to absinthe.
Absinthe makes the heart grow fonder.
T
No one is suggesting we ignore it!
And who's to say that one of those magnet motors or water cars doesn't do
what is claimed?
This forum is primarily interested in discussing the facts and evidence,
preferably with supporting references and calculations, in order to
establish the level of
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Too dangerous, have seen chromatograms of it myriads of toxic compounds.
I recommend a more healthy hallucinogenic, Jagermeister!
T
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
BTW Rossi has no problems with me doing Black Box testing of a E-Cat and
he knows I'm on Vortex. It's real, so you doubters get over it. You are
wrong.
We doubters will only be wrong if you actually get an
Agreed AG!
In fact, on several of the earlier tests, the reactor was lifted up off of
the table so one could see that there were no hidden wires or pipes
attached.
SO, there are only two possibilities here:
1) Mary is aware of this and purposely is spreading mis-information,
2) Mary isn't aware
You are way beyond being an open minded doubter.
AG
On 11/25/2011 7:40 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW Rossi has no problems with me doing Black Box testing of a
E-Cat and
Good one Terry!
-m
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 1:07 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi denies Defkalion has any technology-- again
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com
Nothing like a really good Barossa Shiraz.
AG
On 11/25/2011 7:37 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Mary Yugomaryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
If Rossi's kludge turns out to be really cold fusion, I'm going to become
partial to absinthe.
Absinthe makes the heart grow
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
It is SELDOM a black or white situation… just because past claims of
magnet motors and water cars have been shown to be mistaken or fraudulent,
doesn’t mean that ALL such claims can be concluded to be the
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Agreed AG!
In fact, on several of the earlier tests, the reactor was lifted up off of
the table so one could see that there were no hidden wires or pipes
attached.
SO, there are only two possibilities
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
You are way beyond being an open minded doubter.
Why? You have never seen an actual E-cat in person have you? You have
never touched one much less tested one? What makes you so sure you will
ever get one to
A friend wrote to me: Only Andrea could meet with a senator to ask for
financial incentives to build a factory and refuse to allow them to test,
huh?
- Jed
Am 24.11.2011 22:08, schrieb Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint:
No one is suggesting we ignore it!
And who's to say that one of those magnet motors or water cars doesn't
do what is claimed?
I must admit, I have never seen a magnet motor or water car.
Because I dont see these devices that where
I have read almost all the papers, looked very carefully at all the
videos and photographs, observed how the mains power was applied and saw
the Blue Box and E-Cat sat on tables that would eliminate any hidden
external power source. There was a single mains connection to the Blue
Box and the
Heh! When I was a Technical Manager at ITT our lab reported directly to Park
Ave headquarters.
Our new (we had 5 in as many years) technical director went to a critical
meeting in Brussels, and came back gloating about how he had thrashed them.
A week later we were reporting to Brussels.
Marcello Vitale mvit...@ucsbalum.net wrote:
Uh, Jed, MIT is private. Or maybe you meant UMass?
You are right. It is a 19th century land grant college, like Cornell.
Technically private but a lot of it is tied in with the state. (Cornell has
schools entirely funded by New York, and annual
We don't know that was what went down.
AG
On 11/25/2011 8:03 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
A friend wrote to me: Only Andrea could meet with a senator to ask
for financial incentives to build a factory and refuse to allow them
to test, huh?
- Jed
Slide 45 is the one I adapted from New Energy Times it's in my steam
quality document! - Original Message -
See:
http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3352744.ece/BINARY/Kullander_lecture_23nov.pdf
A break from the e-cat vortex... this is a very important discovery.
Downloadable pdf of press release:
http://goo.gl/HgFdf
html version:
http://goo.gl/RRUwW
mic
You think Levi, Kullander, Essen, Leonardi, Focardi and Bianchini are
lying about the results or these people are idiots? What hidden wires?
The mains cord went to the Blue Box and then to the reactor. Everything
was visible. Look at the photos. What not checking for hidden wires? You
can see
Exactly.
AG
On 11/25/2011 7:42 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
Agreed AG!
In fact, on several of the earlier tests, the reactor was lifted up off of
the table so one could see that there were no hidden wires or pipes
attached.
SO, there are only two possibilities here:
1) Mary is aware of
So far, nobody seems to be able to predict Rossi's actions as well as Mary can.
The rest of us are stumped, but her hypothesis explains the behavior.
On Nov 24, 2011, at 17:07, Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
We don't know that was what went down.
AG
On 11/25/2011
Hi,
two researchers from the Max Planck institute say, they have made
metallic hydrogen at a pressure of 220GPa.
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-11-pair-hydrogen-metal.html
This was tried before, but never had success.
Metallic hydrogen is believed to be superconducting at room temperature.
Rossi's behaviour with regards to blocking independent testing is explained by the fact that he's sitting on potentially the world's most valuable IP and doesn't have a US or European patent yet. There is no need for the pseudosceptics to look for conspiracy theories.
Seems Google lost the html version of the document... you can find it
going to the agile site:
http://agile.rm.iasf.cnr.it/
mic
2011/11/24 Michele Comitini michele.comit...@gmail.com:
A break from the e-cat vortex... this is a very important discovery.
Downloadable pdf of press release:
Link below is to the first video. These are from Nov 15 and I have not
seem them mentioned here before -- sorry if this turns out to be redundant.
No time to view it all or to list all the videos. I think there are 8,
each from around 6 to 10 or so minutes long. Why not all at once? I don't
You send us an ITALIAN paper of data from an ITALIAN satellite? I think it's
FAKE!
I won't believe it until they give me the satellite so I can do some
independent tests in my own orbit.
(Happy thanksgiving , by the way . )
On 2011-11-24 23:47, Mary Yugo wrote:
don't know. If someone has time, I'd like to know where the Rossi
coverage is. I watched the first video and he promises to give some
time to that issue:
I've seen these videos a few days ago. They're quite interesting as a
whole. I've also found out
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Craig Brown cr...@overunity.co wrote:
Rossi's behaviour with regards to blocking independent testing is
explained by the fact that he's sitting on potentially the world's most
valuable IP and doesn't have a US or European patent yet. There is no need
for the
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.comwrote:
This is the segment where he speaks about Rossi:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?**v=N3N3dWlIPUQhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3N3dWlIPUQ
Thanks Akira. You're on top of things as usual.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
You think Levi, Kullander, Essen, Leonardi, Focardi and Bianchini are
lying about the results or these people are idiots?
They don't have to be idiots to be fooled. Scientists are more easily
fooled than most
2011/11/24 Alan Fletcher a...@well.com:
You send us an ITALIAN paper of data from an ITALIAN satellite? I think it's
FAKE!
This one is a FAKED FAKE so it's REAL! :-)
(Happy thanksgiving , by the way . )
Of course! Thanks you! And happy thanks giving to all!
mic
some peopl here imagin that rossi can be a scammer...
It does not seems credible, according tou his strange behavior itself.
if you try to profile him from his behavior, you find more a weak-paranoid
style persister in process com.
He does not behave like the usual weak-sociopath style promoter
I have not found any strange behavior in my commercial dealings with
Rossi. I totally understand and accept what he asks of his customers and
he accepts my requirements on him. I know he works 16 hours a day as I
do (if needed) as there are about 8 hours a day when there is no almost
immediate
2011/11/25 Craig Brown cr...@overunity.co:
Rossi's behaviour with regards to blocking independent testing is explained
by the fact that he's sitting on potentially the world's most valuable IP
and doesn't have a US or European patent yet.
This is unfortunate but true point. The economical
Hi group,
As a physicist I feel obliged to spread the word on cold fusion and
explain what it is to the general public. In that attempt I wrote the
linked paper, please have a look and give me your blunt feedback. Also
please use the paper however you see fit.
http://bit.ly/cold-fusion
Thanks,
In this segment:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3N3dWlIPUQ
He discusses some of Piantelli's nuclear evidence around minute 3. Then he
goes on to discuss Rossi.
At 5:40 he calls Rossi a dodgy character but later he says he is
brilliant.
He lists of the experiments that has not been made public
One word to describe your paper.
EXCELLENT.
AG
On 11/25/2011 10:32 AM, Bastiaan Bergman wrote:
Hi group,
As a physicist I feel obliged to spread the word on cold fusion and
explain what it is to the general public. In that attempt I wrote the
linked paper, please have a look and give me
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
