http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/4113/shooterv6.png
Place your palm to the side of your monitor with palm facing edge of the
monitor.
Another person from the list has emailed me privately to say they felt
something very subtle in their hand inline with the horizontal line running
through an
To the RIGHT side of your monitor.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:00 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/4113/shooterv6.png
Place your palm to the side of your monitor with palm facing edge of the
monitor.
Another person from the list has emailed me
LOL – Copper is incredibly mobile with a vapour pressure several orders of
magnitude higher then Nickel at the same temperature. Even at 950C the copper
vapour is spreading is spreading copper everywhere… almost as annoying as all
the inconsistencies in Rossi’s patent.
From: David Roberson
BTW an added interesting detail.
I am finding that my hand can deflect the energy making there little to
feel.
So to feel it, one should have your hand a few feet away from the screen
inline with the assumed output and bring it in closer.
Just waving it up and down close to the right side of the
Have tried every image you posted and feel nothing besides the heat
from the monitor's backlight.
In hope,
Mark Jordan
On 19/4/2013 09:51, John Berry wrote:
BTW an added interesting detail.
I am finding that my hand can deflect the energy making there little
to feel.
So to
Hmm... this may be the first time that the particular detail about copper
metal vapor has come up, but it raises the issue (if Rossi could be
believed) ... about copper vapor and an internal laser.
It could be inadvertent lasing but providing a window in his reactor could
indicate that it is
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:05 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
To the RIGHT side of your monitor.
Does it matter if your monitor is a CRT, LED or LCD?
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Rothwell has been saying for some time that the underneath the clown
costume, Rossi is a brilliant inventor and that the is method in his
madness.
To clarify, that is what people who have worked with him tell me. He does
have a solid track record in
I had multiple orgasms that lasted 2 hours.
2013/4/19 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:05 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
wrote:
To the RIGHT side of your monitor.
Does it matter if your monitor is a CRT, LED or LCD?
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
Or is the copper vapour forming a catalytic layer on the Nickel to have
Hydrogen absorbed faster
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.comwrote:
So, this is why Rossi claimed to have nickel converted into copper and
recently says this is not the case
You've got a hypothesis: A specific configuration, presented as treatment
of experimental subjects, produces an effect -- even if only an enhancement
of the placebo effect.
The null hypothesis upon which to base the control experiment: Even though
a placebo effect may be present and in fact
The previous post on copper-hydride lasing was unclear.
The suggestion is that there is a remote possibility that Rossi could be
achieving internal photon coherency from copper hydride vapor. He would want
the coherency and not the beam. The photon coherency inside the reactor
would then be
John
Left side of the monitor for the energy flow, correct? That's where I got the
sensation. Warm on the left, cool on the right. I agree that there is
allegorical information to suggest that Aether does respond to the mind. Look
at the Orgone research, and M-State materials. All fringe
umm... what? I'm missing something. A drawing is supposed to be generating
an energy flow?
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:00 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/4113/shooterv6.png
Place your palm to the side of your monitor with palm facing edge of the
John
Ok, I didn't read the email discussing the approach to the test. Makes some
sense. I was one of those waving my hand up and down 3 inches from the side of
the monitor, LOL. I'll try a few things at home this weekend where my
co-workers wont think I'm completely nuts! By the way, LENR,
I apologize, I just started reading these posts.
That is an interesting idea, but I continue to have a difficult time
accepting the concept that there is one special velocity to use as a
reference.
Really? I'm going to have to delve into this, because my primary issue with
relativity and physics
I do feel a minor vibration in my right palm when holding both hands to teh
monitor. I KINDA feel what i could describe as a sucking feeling on my
left, it is too minor to differentiate from placebo to me, but the
vibration was an effect of muscles i could see on the skin, so a positive
effect of
You do a double blind trial by automating the process and covering the
screen.
Program a computer to randomly display one of your images or a blank
screen every minute of so. The computer will keep a record of what was
displayed during each time interval.
During the interval test subjects will
I think you should also do a version where passive images are printed
paper and kept in sealed envelopes.
A video image is an active image in the sense that it requires an
electrical power source to be present. As a result a video image might
channel or focus EM fields and radiation in such a way
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2013 9:08:35 AM
Someone informed me that the ISCMNS article at Wikipedia is up for
deletion:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_International_Society_for_Condensed_Matter_Nuclear_Science
I did not know there is an article on
On Fri 4/19 Alex said [snip] I continue to have a difficult time accepting the
concept that there is one special velocity to use as a reference.[/snip].
Alex,
That is not what I am saying, in fact the velocities are so
different below the Planck scale we have wormholes forming to
Steorn might have relevant in 2007 when that video was made. Since then they
failed to deliver any working devices, disbanded their validation jury and fan
club, and dumped the Orbo tech in order to pursue overunity water heaters. At
this point only Sterling Allan takes them seriously.
Logic
From: David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 7:53:22 AM
How would the nickel/hydrogen mixture be at a lower temperature than
the region that completely surrounds it? Heat would travel toward
the cooler center until it was in equilibrium.
Dave
In between the
Thanks for giving it a try.
And thanks for reporting back.
I have had some people who have been unable to feel anything for an
extended number of tries, but still felt it eventually, or occasionally
(comes and goes).
I don't expect you to be so persistent as that.
John
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at
All should work, but it does make a difference.
LED/LCD seems best, I have not yet tried it on a CRT.
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:05 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
wrote:
To the RIGHT side of your monitor.
Does
have you tried printing it out?
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:20 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
All should work, but it does make a difference.
LED/LCD seems best, I have not yet tried it on a CRT.
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri,
This has been disclosed in the thread: Re: [Vo]:Any experimenters, aether
theorists here?
Short version: After 18-19 years of researching the aether (which is a
gas/fluidic substance that makes up everything) I have found that
Terrahertz EM fields (AKA visible light) can effect (structure) the
Yes, printed works.
Although differently in many ways, good lighting helps as does a decent
printer, additionally I am sure some images are all too subtle in their use
of colours for printing to work well.
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 9:29 AM, leaking pen itsat...@gmail.com wrote:
have you tried
This paper uses a meta analysis of all the evidence and concludes that any
evidence for psychokinesis can be explained as publication bias. Should the
conclusion be taken seriously?
Similar arguments have been used to prove that PF effect is not real,
i.e include all the failed attempts to
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:57 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
So, let me ask you again for an acceptable control experiment but in
different terms:
What sort of picture does your theory predict will be very similar to the
experimental treatment picture, but lack the essential
I find it intriguing that they didn't cite Radin's paper:
http://www.boundaryinstitute.org/bi/articles/rngma.pdf
that explicitly addresses publication bias aka the file drawer problem in
meta analysis -- and that was despite referencing several of Radin's other
papers both before and after.
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
The null hypothesis upon which to base the control experiment: Even
though a placebo effect may be present and in fact much larger . . .
This is drifting off topic, so let me rename the header.
I do not think the placebo effect exists. I read several
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:02 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:57 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
So, let me ask you again for an acceptable control experiment but in
different terms:
What sort of picture does your theory predict will be
Well placebo effect is one thing when we're talking about physical maladies
and quite another when we're talking about subjective impressions, as was
the topic.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
The null
Mark, I have made a new one especially for you.
Now this image deals heavily with colour so it may not work if your monitor
or videocard is at fault.
Feel about 1.5 to 2 feet away from the image, this will make it easier to
tell the sensation apart from the monitor and will give the image more
Do you have any idea whether the inactive one would frequently be made
active by variations in display setttings?
Not very likely.
There are various difficulties, not that it should stop you but you should
be aware of them.
Aetheric energy can couple over large distances, additionally it
https://maps.google.com/maps?q=67+franklin+st+watertown+massie=UTF-8hq=hn
ear=0x89e378195bfc6943:0x45ca5a08ed9dc5fe,67+Franklin+St,+Watertown,+MA+0247
2gl=usei=8N1xUZjhLsmw2QXZw4A4ved=0CDQQ8gEwAA
Someone posted the google satellite view - of the address of where the
suspect was hiding in a boat
The CIA (or it's predecessor) had apparent genuine interest in the ideas
from Get Smart (as crazy as that sound).
I can't help but wonder if the TV Program Person of Interest is causing
similar but more secretive interest.
Of course the TV program could be a fictional disclosure of something
I said that the placebo effect had about doubled in effectiveness over what
it had been.
Someone asked for the source.
I am sure a better search of google will turn up more info on that, but
here is an article about it getting more effective without (I think)
mentioning a doubling:
Actually, it does say that: One estimated that the so-called effect size (a
measure of statistical significance) in placebo groups had nearly doubled
over that time.
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 1:18 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
I said that the placebo effect had about doubled in
In reply to David Roberson's message of Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:18:08 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Does anyone know how a free electron in space can absorb a photon of moderate
energy? I was thinking of the interaction between a light photon and a free
electron when it occurred to me that it might be
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
The null hypothesis upon which to base the control experiment: Even
though a placebo effect may be present and in fact much larger . . .
This is drifting off topic, so let me
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Well placebo effect is one thing when we're talking about physical maladies
and quite another when we're talking about subjective impressions, as was
the topic.
True. That's why I started another thread. I meant placebo in the medical
sense. But in other
Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
That is, an effect in which a prognosis improves because the patients
think they are being treated when they are actually taking by fake medicine
(something with no efficacy). One hypothesis is that people respond well
because they think the doctor
If the studies I read are correct, this indicates the disease they are
trying to cure with this particular drug usually goes away on its own. The
placebo effect is not getting stronger. They happen to be treating a
disease in a group of people where nature usually does a better job than
medical
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
How long will it be before we can see the entire action live from a
satellite in real time?
I am indeed a wacko like Orr, but you should fly with me:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg78280.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orr_(Catch-22)
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
How long will it be before we can see the entire action live from a
satellite in real time?
I am
This is obviously a complex issue.
But I think that strong belief as with hypnosis and other suggestions can't
be discounted (faith healers).
There are people who have apparently died from being made to think they
they were having blood drain from their bodies.
And if someone goes into surgery
I suppose an alternative hypothesis would be that these particular diseases
are psychosomatic.
- Jed
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Alexander Hollins
alexander.holl...@gmail.com wrote:
I do feel a minor vibration in my right palm when holding both hands to teh
monitor. I KINDA feel what i could describe as a sucking feeling on my
left, it is too minor to differentiate from placebo to me,
Please read this entire email, but if you don't, just read this:
*So what evidence exists for there not being an entrained aether?*
*None.*
You could argue that nothing really proves anything.
Even atoms are still just considered a theory, sure a popular one with tons
of evidence.
Atoms are of
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:03 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
You could argue that nothing really proves anything.
Even atoms are still just considered a theory, sure a popular one with
tons of evidence.
Yes, good point. When it comes down to it, nobody has seen an atom. It's
On 4/19/2013 10:03 PM, John Berry wrote:
So what evidence exists for there not being an entrained aether?
None.
Hi. I'm new here. Hello! Howdy.
Today is the first day I've heard of entrained aether. My naive
questions are:
1. How much mass does it take to entrain aether?
2. Does the
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:03 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
You could argue that nothing really proves anything.
Even atoms are still just considered a theory, sure a popular one with
tons of evidence.
54 matches
Mail list logo
