Hi,
If you go to
https://register.epo.org/espacenet/application?number=EP08873805lng=entab=doclist
then select 15.04.2013 Reply to communication from the Examining Division and
load all pages
I get the distinct impression that Ni-62 was made specific in order to
distinguish this patent
and that water flow calorimetry is required... (heard it too).
so there is no way to please them.
that is on purpose.
exhausting.
2013/5/20 Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
Debunkers will say water flow calorimetry conceals a trick.
Harry
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:31 PM, David L
it is done.
good prediction.
2013/5/21 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Mary Yugo will claim that Rossi alone is doing this, and the scientists
are being duped. That can only mean he has a magical ability to change the
reading in a clamp-on ammeter, a voltmeter, and an IR camera that is
Mary Yugo is indeed the bravest skeptic- she commented
a lot on my blog. Very inspiring mode of thinking. Others (Cude?)
have much slower reactions.
Peter
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.comwrote:
it is done.
good prediction.
2013/5/21 Jed Rothwell
A bright analysis, dear Jed! An anticipated answer to the paid
killers (only Mary Yugo has surfaced till now, brave girl sui
generis) I would gladly invite you to extend this writing to a
*guest editorial *for my blog, even if you had not accepted the
LENR vs LENR+ dichotomy till now.
Cousin Peter
Just one question to all the experts around.
can you correct my reasoning. I'm not experienced in that domain.
The report claim a COP above 5 in one experiments.
My goal is to rule-out COP=1
since the measure is done by thermography I think naively that to explain
such an error :
- one way to
From Peter:
... (only Mary Yugo has surfaced till now, ...
Where? A link? What did she say?
Someone should start a thread pointing to what the Rossi skeptics, like
Cude, Yugo, or S. Krivit have decided to say about these latest
developments. I haven't been able to find anything. so far.
Comment on my blog to this most recent paper.
My answers to Mary
I wrote to Steve Krivit signalling this Report, no answer.
I sincerely fear this very talented journalist is depresed
obsessed, who knows...
Peter
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:38 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
Hi Ed,
I got lost trying to address everything so am just going to
focus on this paragraph [snip] Just how the field can cause a force is
difficult to explain. Photons obviously do not work as an explanation. Now you
suggest that the force is related to gravity and inertia.
This is Krivit's reaction on the Forbes article:
Steven B. Krivit http://blogs.forbes.com/people/stevenbkrivit/9 hours ago
This is a partially independent measurement, performed on a device that was
built by and controlled by Rossi, and located in Rossi’s facility. The
measurement was performed
Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Here you've used average emissivity. I think a rock-bottom lower bound (or
something along those lines) would use ε=1. I do not readily see a way to
extract such a calculation for the March 2013 run from the data presented
in the paper.
I guess you
According to this they had to build a new E-cat from scratch
and test it on a continent where Rossi has no access
(Antarctica for example)
Hatred poisons the intellect, Krivit is really obsessed.
Peter
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Patrick Ellul ellulpatr...@gmail.comwrote:
This is Krivit's
Gasp! Why this Cold Fusion thing is clearly some sort of conspiracy !!!
Chris, some 4 years ago you wrote something about Paul Feyerabend.
What would this philosopher say about the slogan of ICCF-18? I
need your help for a blog paper. if you want to help please write me in
private.
Peter
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Chris Zell chrisz...@wetmtv.com wrote:
**
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I get the impression that Rossi is trying to get a patent without
disclosing his
secret sauce, and the patent office isn't happy about it.
I doubt they care. It would not be a valid patent if he does not disclose
everything he knows. I do not know whether they
Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
- one way to be wrong would be to make a temperature error. since power in
in T^4, error is 5^1/4, about 1.5, thus +50%/-33%, assuming no convection.
Yes, temperature measurement is critical. That is why they checked the
surface temperature with a
[Here is a message I posted in 2011]
Celani detects gamma emissions during the January 14, 2011 Rossi Test
Villa reported no gamma emissions or other radiation significantly above
background from the Rossi device. Celani, however, said that he did detect
something. Here are the details he
I wrote:
Another thing I forgot to mention is that they ignore heat from the ends
of the cylinder and from the large flange. I'll bet those two would add
~100 W.
Okay, unaccounted for losses during the calibration at 810 W were 58 W. Not
~100 W. The calibration was stepped up through
If there is an afterlife, Feyerabend might be laughing at anything that
suggests 'method' !
If I had the time and skills, I'd write a blog/book on what I call Atheist
Theology - a deliberate oxymoron.
If science is wholly based on reductionism and materialism, then it is
functionally
At the Forbes site, Krivit takes no prisoners, and leaves himself no path
of retreat:
This is a partially independent measurement, performed on a device that
was built by and controlled by Rossi, and located in Rossi’s facility. The
measurement was performed by some of the parties that have
posting it here on Vortex for purposes of using it elsewhere...
Finally! Independent Testing Of Rossi's E-Cat Cold Fusion Device: Maybe The
World Will Change After All
31 comments, 0 called-out
On 2013-05-21 04:09, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I just read this paper for the third time. This is a gem. [...]
Luboš Motl seems to think otherwise, but I think he's adopted an
excessively negative view probably due to personal bias against CF/LENR
in general:
OK Peter, let's explore the dynamic creation process you suggest.
First, a condition must be present that allows the NAE to form by
release of Gibbs energy. If this condition exists, than it will not
decompose under the same condition. The condition must change before
the NAE can
It seems that by the table provided concerning the emissivity of metals,
dark materials are within .85 - .95% even at 1000C. So, the 10% error,
claimed by the paper, is accurate.
2013/5/21 Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com
On 2013-05-21 04:09, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I just read this
Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com mailto:mix...@bigpond.com
If you go to
https://register.epo.org/espacenet/application?number=EP08873805lng=entab=
doclist
I get the distinct impression that Ni-62 was made specific in order to
distinguish this patent application from
Haven't commented here in a while, pretty excited that after a couple of
years of Rossi's shenanigans it's all perhaps about to happen. But I come
from a hard test and measurement background (mechanical and electrical
engineer, specialising in thermodynamics) and am by nature quite skeptical,
so
Ni-62
If we assume that speculation about Rossi is correct, what
materials other than Ni-62 could be used?
If it is p + X reaction, what other isotopes other than Ni62
could be used?Or perhaps it is really a p+p reaction with Ni-62 donating
something???
Anyone have any suggestions? Dennis
2013/5/21 Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com
http://motls.blogspot.com/**2013/05/tommaso-dorigo-**
impressed-by-cold-fusion.htmlhttp://motls.blogspot.com/2013/05/tommaso-dorigo-impressed-by-cold-fusion.html
Tommaso Dorigo is another apparently highly regarded skeptic who isn't
2013/5/21 Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com
http://motls.blogspot.com/**2013/05/tommaso-dorigo-**
impressed-by-cold-fusion.htmlhttp://motls.blogspot.com/2013/05/tommaso-dorigo-impressed-by-cold-fusion.html
Tommaso Dorigo is another apparently highly regarded skeptic who isn't
From: DJ Cravens
Ni-62
If we assume that speculation about Rossi is correct, what
materials other than Ni-62 could be used?
If it is p + X reaction, what other isotopes other than Ni62
could be used?
Or perhaps it
I would shorten the title from
“Applying the Scientific Method to Understanding Anomalous Heat Effects:
Opportunities and Challenges.”
to
“Understanding Anomalous Heat Effects: Opportunities and Challenges.”
Harry
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
The original German title of Feyerabend's book is Wider den Methodenzwang.
Skizzen einer anarchistischen Erkenntnistheorie.
The standard English translation is Against Method. Outline Of An
Anarchist Theory of Knowledge
I have been told by someone who speaks German that a better translation is
http://prometeon.it/news.php In Italian ...
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=ittl=enjs=nprev=_thl=enie=UTF-8eotf=1u=http%3A%2F%2Fprometeon.it%2Fnews.php
18 / 5/13 - The direct testimony of Professor. Stremmenos
For the first time in a long time, Christos Stremmenos, a physicist who
Kevin,
Publishing a summary or abstract of my piece would have been fine (under
the concept of Fair Use) but posting my article in full to a list (and a
public list at that) is a breach of both my copyright and Forbes'. I'd be
less annoyed if you'd waited a week or two but for heaven's sake, this
Thank you Jed to remind me this exchange you had with Celani. I was not
fully aware of every detail. When I was reading, an idea come to me mind.
Could it be possible that the secret sauce of Rossi is a gamma emitter? I
explain myself: Secretly, Rossi could have opened his reactor to adjust
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1103.0187v3
Casimir effect from macroscopic quantum electrodynamics
Authors: T.G.
Philbinhttp://arxiv.org/find/quant-ph/1/au:+Philbin_T/0/1/0/all/0/1
(Submitted on 1 Mar 2011 (v1 http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.0187v1), last
revised 9 Jun 2011 (this version, v3))
Abstract: The
yes Ni62 has the lowest binding energy/nuc.
Fe 56 has the lowest mass per nuc. (due to p n masses).
if some isotope of Fe or other material can be found to be active, there is a
chance that alloys with some isotope of Fe and something that is permeable to
p's might be useful.
My
Hi,
On 21-5-2013 18:31, Jones Beene wrote:
As to the first part - yes - Ni-62 is a singularity in the
periodic table, being the one isotope with the highest binding energy per
nucleon of all known nuclides (~8.8 MeV per)
Ok, then the following questions pops into my mind:
Why is it that
Perhaps Rossi
was adding some catalyst.
For
example, perhaps his source of Ni 62 is slightly radioactive (say it
was prepared via neutron activation of other Ni isotopes say
there was some Ni 63m in it).
Then it might register
when the catalyst was accessed.
Dennis
that is interesting.I think that Ni 56 then quickly to Ni 60 is the end
product of a Si cycle involving alpha additions. That is why there is more of
it.
But yes, why could 62 be good?
Dennis
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 19:51:43 +0200
From: manonbrid...@aim.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Mark:
Welcome to da internets. I hope you don't 'loose' your reputation.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Kevin,
Publishing a summary or abstract of my piece would have been fine (under
the concept of Fair Use) but posting my article in full to a list
My prediction:
So many oil dollars will jump on this possibility of unleashed
radioactive doom that they will squash any progress in cold fusion.
That aspect is not a particularly a good thing. But it will happen.
Abetting this will be the horde of semi-literate tea party types, ready
to
PopSci isn't impressed :
http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-05/cold-fusion-machine-gets-third-party-verification-inventor-says
..
The paper, which is not peer-reviewed, leaves out crucial details, for example
referring to unknown additives instead of specifying what chemicals actually
Revised from a prior posting:
Naïve metaphorical approach to Rossi's claim of Ni-62 thermal gain: Imagine
a number of strong springs subject to compressive loads. The strongest
spring gives the fastest return to normal geometry following compression.
What is the limiting factor on how close to
It is necessary to see radiation being emitted by the ECATs in a more
controlled environment. Why assume that radiation is potentially a safety
issue when it has not been detected except possibly in this one case? Are
there other reports that can be correlated?
Had Celani been in the room
Maybe most of the Ni-62 has been converted in nature since it is the most
reactive.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, May 21, 2013 1:56 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:substitutes?
that is interesting.I think that Ni
My very first post here, so be gentle. By way of introduction, I was on
Usenet back in the PF days and made some money off palladium futures - I
mention this to indicate that I've been in this space before. It seems so
very long ago. I used to post with the moniker LordSnooty back then. I
Axil,
nice citation, the math is beyond my pay grade but I believe
the gist of the paper is that macro Casimir materials and geometries can now be
calculated much more easily, and this agrees with what authors of Advances in
Casimir Effect were predicting in 2009 as methods for
Oops typo: should have been over 100 hours
- Original Message -
From: Andrew andrew...@att.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 11:14 AM
Subject: [Vo]:E-Cat general observations
My very first post here, so be gentle. By way of introduction, I was on
Usenet back in
http://cold-fusion.ca/floridagate-puts-rossi-under-scrutiny-299000
*“Floridagate” puts Rossi under scrutiny*
The matter was investigated by Mr James Stokes who reported “Dr Rossi
stated the active ingredients are powdered nickel and a tablet containing a
compound which releases hydrogen gas
These conversations are getting all mixed up. Let me start a new thread for
this one.
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
In addition, the formation and destruction process must remain in balance
because otherwise the process will stop once all the NAE are destroyed.
It they do not
http://shutdownrossi.com/e-cat-science/110-quotes-by-rossi-about-gamma-rays-and-transmutations/
110+ Quotes by Rossi about Gamma Rays and Transmutations
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://cold-fusion.ca/floridagate-puts-rossi-under-scrutiny-299000
Lovable : Is it an April fool ? (Look at the date of comment of Andrea
Rossi)
2.
Andrea Rossi
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=614cpage=1#comment-209521
April 1st, 2012 at 5:51 PM
Dear Steven N. Karels:
We use regular Ni, then we make series of treatment. The cost of treatment
From: Andrew andrew...@att.net
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 11:14:14 AM
My very first post here, so be gentle.
Yeah ... sre ...
3. You'll notice that the plot for Plutonium has the axes
erroneously swapped.
It's been fixed in the article. Also the Power density for Plutonium
On May 21, 2013, at 5:09 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a gem.
Indeed. This paper proves that Mr. Krivit's criticism on bad calorimetry was
utterly false but Rossi has a method to import excess electricity into device
that does not register on measurements. I.e. he has
My interpretation of this quote is as follows:
Rossi starts off with 5 micron nickel powder. He then forms nickel
nanowires on the surface of this micro-powder using a propriety surface
treatment.
This treatment uses ionized nickel that Rossi sprays on the surface of the
micro-powder. He selects
On May 21, 2013, at 8:41, Michele Comitini michele.comit...@gmail.com wrote:
I see they are starting to call themselves out as being not competent in the
field. Like saying they do not know. That's a good sign.
Someone should write a manual for walking back an extreme position. This move
On May 21, 2013, at 11:39, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
Rossi just keeps getting COP 6 with all his devices.
There were two main test runs. One achieved a COP of ~6 and the other, slightly
longer one, of ~3.
Eric
From pictures in the Levi's report, the wires are not galvanic shielded
between the eCat and the controller. Thus frequency of the waveform (if any)
is low. And the waveform should be easily determined by a simple
oscilloscope.
2. I don't have a problem with this verification being done at
DJ Cravens
The LENR reaction is driven by geometry not material.
The high school reactor uses tungsten without isotope separation. The key
to the process is to use micro and nanoparticles is a wide range of
sizes to support dark mode EMF amplification.
Additional theory is available upon
James Bowery made this comment in the Forbes article. This is well said,
and hilarious.
A textbook physics 101 exercise that should be a piece of cake for you,
MaryYugo: Assuming the electrical measurements were performed by a PCE-830
Power and Harmonics Analyzer by PCE Instruments with a
In some cultures and sub-cultures (not speaking about counter-cultures)
NOT changing your opinions is considered a virtue. An example:
http://news.newenergytimes.net/2013/05/21/rossi-manipulates-academics-to-create-illusion-of-independent-test/
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
I dispute your COP 6 point. Dave Roberson has pointed out in a series
of posts that /in a thermally controlled heat generating reaction/ the
COP of 6 is about the best you can reliably aim for. Values above that
are too near thermal runaway, and of course lower COP is less
efficient.//A telling
Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
That was the motivation behind the hot-cat : the current operating
temperature of around 300C is likely a good fit with the Siemens turbine
they are purportedly experimenting with.
The pressurized water in a conventional fission reactor is about 320°C I
http://motls.blogspot.com/2013/05/tommaso-dorigo-impressed-by-cold-fusion.htmlMotl's
critique seems to hinge on the actual output power being far less than the
estimate.He asserts that the actual emissivity is far less than unity, and so
it's reasonable to supposethat the actual output power is
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
In some cultures and sub-cultures (not speaking about counter-cultures)
NOT changing your opinions is considered a virtue. An example:
I have talked about Rydberg mater very often here at vortex.
Hydrogen can form Rydberg matter. It is the SOLID form of clustered
hydrogen. This hydrogen cluster is actually a alkali metal.
Yes, hydrogen can form into nano-particles.
These hydrogen nano-particles behave just like nickel
Robert Lynn wrote:
And I can think of a number of ways of cheating to get heat into the
reactor: Altering the electrical measurement equipment supplied . . .
How could this fool a clamp on ammeter and a voltmeter attached directly
to the wire? If you know how to fool these instruments you
I'm generally thinking that, if the glowing ( and melting?) object in the photo
is the reactor, then whatever hidden wires are feeding it would tend to be
glowing and smoking, too. Just bein' heuristic, here. There's a reason why we
have electrical codes and wire gauges - so your house doesn't
Andrew andrew...@att.net wrote:
*Doesn't he have this backwards?* At constant output power, as the
emissivity reduces, output power
will apparently reduce, meaning that what is measured is progressively less
than what's actually output.
Yes, he has it backwards. Emissivity of 1 means the
Axil,
Although I was aware that alkali metals like calcium can form
Casimir geometry I missed the fact that Rydberg hydrogen could also take this
form in your previous mentions of Rydberg matter and it could be an important
missing piece if true.. it certainly trumps the Mills
Motl is a pretty racist guy saying all the Italians are part of the mafia
family.
Very offended.
Giovanni
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrew andrew...@att.net wrote:
*Doesn't he have this backwards?* At constant output power, as the emissivity
notice the jump in Nickel stocks... example NILSY up about 1.5% today.
I wonder.
Dennis
Somewhere in all these recent comments, Jones Beene made interesting
observations about the cost of nickel isotopes. I cannot find the comments.
The gist of it was that if Rossi device requires an unusual metal isotope
the cost may not be much cheaper than conventional energy.
I believe that is
From: Andrew andrew...@att.net
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 12:16:45 PM
http://motls.blogspot.com/2013/05/tommaso-dorigo-impressed-by-cold-fusion.html
He also makes a big fuss about the convection being different between December
and March.
They ran at different temperatures, and were
Ni 62 has zero spin but the others have a nuclear spin component. So I should
be relatively easy to come up with a way to separate them.
D2
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 16:15:20 -0400
From: jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Isotope separation technology can be improved
An important issue is how one could possibly hoax such measured values of input
and output energy and power densities.
Since the supply powering the E-cat is off-limits, they measure only wall
power. That means that one could secrete a discrete power source inside the
supply box, and its power
Oh and notice gold is down, Ni up and most metal are flat today. It is though
someone out there
is selling some gold to buy Ni and Ni stocks.
Just a guess.
Dennis
From: djcrav...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:substitutes?
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 14:13:51 -0600
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
In some cultures and sub-cultures (not speaking about counter-cultures)
NOT changing your opinions is considered a virtue. An example:
http://news.newenergytimes.net/2013/05/21/rossi-manipulates-academics-to-cre
ate-illusion-of-independent-test/
Back in the day, Dennis, I turned $10K into $150K in a matter of weeks.
Palladium futures!
Andrew
- Original Message -
From: DJ Cravens
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 1:19 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:substitutes?
Oh and notice gold is down, Ni up and most
The temperature limitation of fission nuclear plant is due to temperature of
vaporization of water. The reactor must always be filled with liquid water.
At the pressure inside a fission reactor, the limiting temperature is just a
little above 300°C. The water is slowing the neutron. Without water,
I don't understand why 62Ni would make a difference in the reaction. Are
we now seriously considering that the Ni nucleus participates in the
nuclear reaction that causes the heat? Dr. Storms proposes that physical
cracks in the lattice are the NAE and the money crop of the reaction does
not
Andrew andrew...@att.net wrote:
Since the supply powering the E-cat is off-limits, they measure only wall
power. That means that one could secrete a discrete power source inside the
supply box, and its power output would evade measurement. That's the input
hoax.
Mary Yugu suggested this,
Well, If I had the $$. but of course I have spent most of my savings on
nano Ni, gas systems, and experimental things.. Oh and expect to use the
reminder on a NI Week trip and set up.
Oh, well.
I have long since given up on trying to make any money from this field.
Dennis
From:
I wrote:
If he only increased the concentration of one rare isotope, without
eliminating the others, I assume that would work.
The point being that present day isotope separation techniques work by
processing the same material over and over again, gradually increasing the
concentration of
Guys,
Without getting too philosophical Cost is almost a relative thing. When
the demand is there, the cost will come down to some reasonable level. When
the politicians favor it, the cost will be even lower.
Aluminum was more expensive than gold when it was first put into production.
Good point, Bob. Simple arguments can show that the amount of energy
claimed by Rossi can not result from the Ni+p=Cu reaction regardless
of the isotope. Ironically, people will accept Rossi's claim that
transmutation is the source of energy while questioning whether he
makes any energy
You're missing my point. A power meter looking at wall power is blind to any
internal power source in the box that directly supplies the device with
additional power.
There's another way to perpetrate the output hoax, and that's to secrete
infrared lasers in the ceiling and heat the device up
Andrew andrew...@att.net wrote:
**
You're missing my point. A power meter looking at wall power is blind to
any internal power source in the box that directly supplies the device with
additional power.
What sort of internal power source?
A generator? That would noisy and obvious.
A
yes, I have doubts about Ni + p or Ni + 2p reactions. most of these seem
endothermic to me.
I would be more inclined to think there some kind of p+p like event. (OK
Ed... p e p )
Dennis
CC: stor...@ix.netcom.com
From: stor...@ix.netcom.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re:
http://pesn.com/2013/05/21/9602321_E-Cat_Validation_Creates_More_Questions/
- Original Message -
From: Andrew
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 12:41 PM
Subject: [Vo]:E-Cat in the press
If you have studied the ash from the Ni/H reactors you must conclude that:
Any elements having an even number of nucleons with spin zero will react in
LENR.
LENR has a far greater energy density than U235 because cascades of LENR
reaction products will fission from a very high atomic weight to a
If you want to go the hoax path perhaps a ground loop with some current
going through the metal supports, or through the gas connects.
I doubt it.
And 96 hours is fairly long. Not as long as I would wish, but still longer
than any chemistry I can think of.
That glow in the picture is
*The Energy Catalyzer has been tested, successfully, yet again. However,
the report has created more questions about the enigmatic technology, such
as how can the E-Cat melt ceramic -- with a melting point of 2000 degrees C
-- when the fuel of the E-Cat, nickel, has a much lower melting point?*
A hidden wire at 10 KV would need to carry only 50 mA. That's small.
A battery would need to supply (say, conservatively) 500 W for 116 hours, or
200 MJ. Lithium batteries are about 2 MJ/Kg, so that's 100 Kg of battery. I
agree that's unlikely but don;t have enough information to make the
Just the opposite. Water is a moderator/ Only slow neutrons (thermalized)
produce the fission reaction.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Arnaud Kodeck arnaud.kod...@lakoco.bewrote:
**
The temperature limitation of fission nuclear plant is due to temperature
of vaporization of water. The
The strongest technical argument for the veracity of this report is that
the power measured going into the device is 360W and that the way it was
measured was from the wall socket through an industry standard power
analyzer (PCE-830 Power and Harmonics Analyzer by PCE Instruments).
Detractors
From: Bob Higgins
I don't understand why 62Ni would make a difference in the reaction. Are we
now seriously considering that the Ni nucleus participates in the nuclear
reaction that causes the heat
IMO this is a Mills type reaction (BLP), involving deep hydrogen
redundancy - and
My argument against what Motl claims (what I wrote on his post):
I think Lumo you are wrong on this issue of epsilon. The camera doesn't
know about temperatures but can measure power. If you use a higher epsilon
(1 being the highest) than the real one you are actually underestimating
the
After all this is Physics so he should be able to speak in a competent
manner about it. But everybody can make a logical mistake, the problem with
Motl is that he is too sure about himself and too arrogant, almost in an
aggressive way.
Giovanni
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Randy Wuller
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
