Here is the one I remember
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/STAFF/VISITING_FELLOWSPROFESSORS/pdf/MileyClusterRydbLPBsing.pdf
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MileyGHcondensedm.pdf
There are others but I hope this one will do for
On 7/20/14, 8:22 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com
mailto:foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
/Earlier he had chastised theorists for throwing out the laws of
thermodynamics, and here he does essentially the same thing./
If the
*But thermodynamics says energy cannot spontaneously accumulate in one
location. Yes, unusual quantum mechanical effects happen. Odd things can
occur once in a while. But, given the number of required reactions to make
the observed heat, it would be a violation of the laws of thermodynamics to
The summary is correct. Its a pity really because theory suggests that
there should/could be such an interaction, which is why there have been
many attempts to try and measure it. In all the examples that I have
found the result comes out the same: no measureable coupling.
Nigel
On
I have built myself a marx generator which produces an output voltage of
the order of 20kV and which can produce a very nice fat spark if the
output electrodes are close enough. I have a conventional geiger
counter and I find it beeps if it is within 5cm of the high voltage
output. The
Mills announced two weeks ago that there would be another public
demonstration on July 21; but I can't find a reference to it on his
website. Has it been cancelled, or has there been an oversight to avoid
offering a way to view it?
Craig
Actually, there's an announcement of the demonstration on the front page
of the website, and there's no mention of it being televised.
Craig
On 07/21/2014 07:13 AM, Craig Haynie wrote:
Mills announced two weeks ago that there would be another public
demonstration on July 21; but I can't find
Patience, Grasshopper.
I see you posted your query around 6:13 AM Monday morning. How about a
little breakfast first. I get cranky in the morning if I don't get my Raisin
Bran. ;-)
From past BLP behavior what is likely to transpire is that a private
demonstration will be conducted today as
I'm pretty sure it will be recorded. It would be stupid not to.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
svjart.orionworks.com
zazzle.com/orionworks
-Original Message-
From: Craig Haynie [mailto:cchayniepub...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 6:51 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re:
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Dyer
Oddly I could not find any reference to this artefact on the internet. Is
this just something that everyone knows but no-one writes down?
Nigel,
Yes, This is an artifact of RF noise operating on the circuit of the meter.
This information can be
as far as I understand for naive people, the thermodynamic law assume all
particles are acting randomly like in a liquid, or a hot latice...
however if there is an insulated environment where particles can act in a
coherent way, then they each coherent/intricated group considered as one
particle
Finally finished The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction over the
weekend and find it to be a mixed bag - brilliant in places, but
disappointing in others. There is no cutting-edge to be found here, if
that is what you are looking for. I was, and maybe that is my problem. It
can be
Jones, all your points are well taken, we certainly don't have to agree on
everything and there is much in the field that is still up for grabs, and
I think its possible we have different effects going on in PdD vs. NiH as
well. I really like how Ed's theory fits PdD, and you may be right about
*The summary is correct. Its a pity really because theory suggests that
there should/could be such an interaction, which is why there have been
many attempts to try and measure it. In all the examples that I have found
the result comes out the same: no measureable coupling.*
The measurement
There is a restrictive assumption in your analysis that limits
possibilities. The LENR process may be carried by a dozen different
elements, mostly transition metals, not only nickel. Nickel may have
advantages over the other active elements but the NiH reaction should be
looked upon as a
Interesting. Thanks again for the links to Miley's measurements. I think
Hagelstein was talking about this phenomenon a bit in one of his MIT
lectures, but I don't think he correlates it with superconductivity, but
rather a general lowering of resistance based on loading and other factors
(pretty
I like Axil's approach. Lots of stuff popping in and out around here.
Lots of hydrogen everywhere also. I think our oceans are made up of
hydrogen from our inflated and condensed quantum gravity field from
our Sun and our weather phenomena. Maybe Dark Matter is the
attractive force when it is
Except that Axil's approach, as it seems to me, is confined to plasmatic
NiH systems. This is all fine and good and has a certain value. However it
doesn't have much to say about a variety of PdD or no stimulation / low
temperature systems. Regardless of which one is more commercially
viable, I
The phenomena you describe is what Jo Papp used in his engine to activate
his electrodes, that is, to make them more reactive. Interestingly,
lightning rods in the 1930s contained alpha emitters to better attract the
lightning. I believe that this common practice back in the 30s is
where Papp got
I thought this was cool. I always like a picture/video over an
equation. I realize both are important
Quark pool (soliton pairs)
http://youtu.be/909o_kbCdFg
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
Except that Axil's approach, as it seems to me, is confined to
Nanophasmonics experiment has observed EMF concentration of 10^^9 orders of
magnitude in the space between two gold nanoparticles. This is a
experimentally verified fact.
When workers in nanoplasmonics did a survey of various nanoantenna shapes,
a maximum amplification factor of 10^^15 was
This paining of solitons is what forces the Higgs field to give solitons
mass.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 2:13 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought this was cool. I always like a picture/video over an
equation. I realize both are important
Quark pool (soliton pairs)
That demonstration is creating what are called Falaco Solitons -- akin to
topological defects of space-time, etc. Yes, like I said, it's an
interesting phenomenon and has some applicability to the quantum domain for
example, but I'm still not convinced its the thing in LENR. It might act
as a
It is my belief that LENR is caused by magnetic screening. Cravens system
has a number of LENR processes which includes black body resonant sized
micro particles, hydrogen as an dielectric, and magnetic particles, and
nanowire. These processes are weak but they center on magnetic force
Maybe. Time will certainly reveal the mechanism.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
It is my belief that LENR is caused by magnetic screening. Cravens system
has a number of LENR processes which includes black body resonant sized
micro particles, hydrogen as
You haven't accumulated sufficient dots. Consider, DGT has publically
revealed many clues that are consistent with magnetic causation in LENR,
including NMR related ones such as Ni61 LENR inactivity, intense RF
production, intense magnetic field production, the presence of EMF solitons
collocated
more...
Hydrogen in LENR inactive because it is NMR active. Hydrogen must form
Rydberg matter is such a way that copper pairs of hydrogen nuclei are
formed to transform the hydrogen nuclear spin arrangements into a NMR
inactive state.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Axil Axil
Dear Jones,
I find that your analysis of the book is correct unfortunately for the fiedl
and we have only a partial explanation of what has happened and no
prediction/instructions for a research strategy having chances to helo
researcher to solve the endemic problems of LENR we all know well.
I
Yes, it is unfortunate for the field, Peter.
However, it should be acknowledged that no one in LENR has done more than to
further the field than Storms. And no one in LENR is more knowledgeable, but
the bottom line is that “none of us is as smart as all of us,” and if Storms is
wrong about
Sorry, Axil. The purpose of lightning rods are not to attract
lightning. To the contrary, they are for dissipating the charge
buildup in the surrounding earth and thus create a lightning shield.
One company has made quite a business of building dissipation arrays.
Quoting Franklin:
The electrical fire would, I think, be drawn out of a cloud silently,
before it could come near enough to strike
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, Axil. The purpose of lightning rods are not to attract
lightning. To the
The conclusion is that there is no GUT for LENR. I suspect we have at
least 3 unrelated events which we call the forest.
Terry your reference is misapplied to radioactive lightning rods. There are
apparently more than one technology to protest against lightning. I am sure
your reference describes a superior technology compared to alpha emissions
through radium. The purpose of this alpha emission rod is to capture
Let the bickering begin...
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Quoting Franklin:
The electrical fire would, I think, be drawn out of a cloud silently,
before it could come near enough to strike
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Terry Blanton
My theoretical ambition is to provide a unified theory for Ni-H, Pd-D,
exploding foils, cavitation, biological LENR, Dark Matter, Dark Energy,
grand unification of the four forces, exploding solid water and noble
gases(aka Papp technology), origin of the elements, expansion of the
universe, and
Don't forget crop circles
On Monday, July 21, 2014, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
My theoretical ambition is to provide a unified theory for Ni-H, Pd-D,
exploding foils, cavitation, biological LENR, Dark Matter, Dark Energy,
grand unification of the four forces, exploding solid water
I was thinking about a proof for the existence of God but I don't want to
over reach at this early juncture.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 7:37 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't forget crop circles
On Monday, July 21, 2014, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
My theoretical
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
I really like how Ed's theory fits PdD, and you may be right about the more
exotic elements of NiH, but lets face it, we don't have much solid
experimental work to pull from in NiH.
I look forward to reading Ed's book. It
Ambitious. Ambition is good if it drives you to truthful self-education.
So you think SPPs are a start in this direction?
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
My theoretical ambition is to provide a unified theory for Ni-H, Pd-D,
exploding foils, cavitation,
Okay, so maybe I'm not so level-headed. But violations of thermodynamics
tend to get under a scientist's skin, and Ed is pretty cavalier (so are
you, by the way) in accusing some theorists of violating it and then he
just casually states that the laws of thermodynamics don't apply to his
favored
What I would do is investigate whether this alpha discharge happens when
the arc reaches across a vaccuum.
http://www.quantum-potential.com/ACT%20NASA.pdf
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 4:07 AM, Nigel Dyer l...@thedyers.org.uk wrote:
I have built myself a marx generator which produces an output
*http://phys.org/news/2014-07-mysterious-dwarfs-cosmic-rethink.html
http://phys.org/news/2014-07-mysterious-dwarfs-cosmic-rethink.html*
*Mysterious dance of dwarfs may force a cosmic rethink*
The referenced article describes another asthophysical mystery that is
anwered well by the soliton
Since the Higgs boson is routine now, I think it might be appropriate to
call the SPP the GOD particle.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ambitious. Ambition is good if it drives you to truthful self-education.
So you think SPPs are a start in this
Perhaps you wouldn't mind, while you're at it, explaining why I end up with
so many mismatched pairs of socks after doing the laundry. Now THAT's
something that would change the world.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Since the Higgs boson is routine now, I
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1402.2301v2.pdf
*DETECTION OF AN UNIDENTIFIED EMISSION LINE IN THE STACKED X-RAY SPECTRUM
OF GALAXY CLUSTERS * (new - 6/2014)
The referenced article records the detection of a weak unidentified
emission line at E = 0:03 keV in a stacked XMM-Newton spectrum of 73 galaxy
The explanation seems simple, at least to me, if they didn't orbit at the
same plane, they'd be destroyed. If the orbit was not in that plane, it
would experience a highly irregular attraction from the bigger galaxy. But,
perhaps, I am missing something.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
46 matches
Mail list logo
