On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:21 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Li7 + Ni58 = Ni59 + Li6 + 1.75 MeV
Li7 + Ni59 = Ni60 + Li6 + 4.14 MeV
Li7 + Ni60 = Ni61 + Li6 + 0.57 MeV
Li7 + Ni61 = Ni62 + Li6 + 3.34 MeV
Li7 + Ni62 = Ni63 + Li6 - 0.41 MeV (Endothermic!)
This series stops at Ni62, hence all
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:11 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I also suspect that he originally used D iso Li, but changed to Li when he
found
that D produces protons that are too energetic and produce too much
secondary
radiation.
Another astute observation. To elaborate on what might have
European Patent Office is more than willing to process.
Piantelli got one of his patents on Ni-H granted in January 2013 (EP2368252)
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
Would Sweden qualify? The demo plant was originally stated to be in
Sweden a couple
The isotopic shift observed is only a side effect of the real reaction that
are taking place. From others LENR experiments one can suspect that
hydrogen is the fuel and that Ni is just modified by whatever is in its
vicinity.
Do you remember all the internet ink was used to debate the copper ash
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you remember all the internet ink was used to debate the copper ash in
the nickel powder; now all that is for naught.
Yes, and thankfully so. Ni(p,ɣ)Cu can go away and die a peaceful death.
(Not to say that it doesn't
Sample 2 was the fuel used to charge the E-Cat. It’s in the form of a
very fine powder. Besides the analyzed elements it has been found that the
fuel also contains rather high concentrations of C, Ca, Cl, Fe, Mg, Mn and
these are not found in the ash.
This indicates that also virgin powder was
the only reasonable question, probably because I'm not expert, is the
impact of the alumina transparency.
anyway if one forget the absolute temperature and power, just comparing
colors at given power says the E-cat works.
that is my sanity check.
what is funny , or sad, is that when facing
this question can change the COP, not the bottom line :
at lower input power, the temperature is much higher for the active version.
2014-10-10 7:40 GMT+02:00 Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is wonderfully
[ Post-Forbes, of course ]
Could ultra-cheap, clean energy be just around the corner? The return of Rossi
and the E-Cat
http://www.networkworld.com/article/2824558/infrastructure-management/could-ultra-cheap-clean-energy-be-just-around-the-corner-the-return-of-rossi-and-the-e-cat.html
I just got in from a night of singing and dancing (literally) and didn't notice
this had already been reported. (Answering my emails in sequence)
- Original Message -
Could ultra-cheap, clean energy be just around the corner? The return of Rossi
and the E-Cat
Eric--
It may not be so high in the local mag. field if the Li7 is lined up properly
with the Ni nucleus.
The question remains, what is the mechanism that transfers mass energy to
thermal energy at Mev levels without gammas?
The paper on neutron hopping that Jones identified may help answer
Hi,
What to think of this remark:
Moreover, Rossi has also made claims, predictions, and announcements
that have had no discernible basis in reality. Thus, every
announcement and demonstration by Rossi over the last three years has
been surrounded by a whirl of claims, counterclaims, and
It may be hard to get ro operating temp with only the electric power supply
and no LENR.
Bob Cook
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE SmartphoneRobert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Excellent point. Would be easy enough to do a second control run even now
to add some
Michael Nelson, Alternate Discipline Leader for SLS Propulsion at NASA’s
Propulsion Research and Development Laboratory, notes, “I was impressed
with the work that was done to insure the measurements claiming a 3.2 to
3.6 COP were accurate. Aside from the fact that this could not have been
Seriously. See:
http://korea-dpr.com/biography.html
I have not seen any mention of this in the mass media.
- Jed
From: Blaze Spinnaker
Michael Nelson, Alternate Discipline Leader for SLS
Propulsion at NASA’s Propulsion Research and Development Laboratory, notes,
“I was impressed with the work that was done to insure the measurements
claiming a 3.2 to 3.6 COP
On 10/10/2014 09:49 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
There is no joy in Mudville for this fan. This is because it is now apparent
that there is no real proof of energy gain in the Levi report. There is
slight evidence, but no proof. Most of that evidence comes from
transmutation, but as we know,
Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
If Gibbs knows it's nonsense, why did he write it?
You would have to ask him.
I suppose he does not want the skeptics to attack him.
- Jed
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1177868
On 10/10/2014 09:46 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Seriously. See:
http://korea-dpr.com/biography.html
I have not seen any mention of this in the mass media.
- Jed
He's not there on the wayback machine, either.
https://web.archive.org/web/20140208052408/http://korea-dpr.com/biography.html
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Craig Haynie
Any type of transmutation is totally astonishing, and will change the world
as we know it, if people follow up on it and verify it.
Well - you are correct on that, assuming this is verified - but it goes without
saying that we were expecting to
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
In short, the IR being picked up by the camera and then being raised to 4th
power by the calculations was a bogus reading, which was essentially the
glow of the resistance wires.
Then why did it agree with the thermocouple, and why did it register
Ah. Good point.
Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
He's not there on the wayback machine, either.
https://web.archive.org/web/20140208052408/http://korea-
dpr.com/biography.html
I wrote:
. . . why did it register similar high temperatures in places that were
not incandescent?
I refer to Fig. 7.
- Jed
From: Jed
The calibration was done at 486 W and and then the cell was run at 790 W for
two days. That seems reasonably close to me. The temperature should have been
about the same. I cannot imagine any mechanism that would make it go so much
higher, other than anomalous excess heat.
He unsubscribed because of Jojo at the time.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
They haven't removed his visage or news of his existence from the Korea
Friendship Sites yet.
Robert Dorr
On 10/10/2014 7:08 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Ah. Good point.
Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com
mailto:cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
He's not there on the wayback machine,
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Geeze you are sounding almost as bad as Levi - in not seeing the obvious
... “about the same” is absurd, given what happens later. The difference
between 486 and 790 is enormous when the delta-T is being raised by a
formula which includes a fourth power
I wrote:
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Geeze you are sounding almost as bad as Levi - in not seeing the obvious
... “about the same” is absurd, given what happens later. The difference
between 486 and 790 is enormous when the delta-T is being raised by a
formula which includes a
Jed was talking in watts, W ~ T^4, T is the fourth root of W so it is
logarithmic
not exponential in your jargon.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Jed
The calibration was done at 486 W and and then the cell was run at 790 W
for two days.
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/10/10/tom-darden-of-industrial-heat-comments-on-e-cat-test/
Of all the ones that I wanted to hear, was this. Tom Darden is not
speaking based on this report. He's obviously intimately familar with the
ecat, the 1mw install, and all the
Original link:
http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/blog/techflash/2014/10/raleigh-investor-darden-still-bullish-on.html?page=all
Triangle Business Journal is a credible journal.
“I’m serious — it’s about air pollution and coal,” Darden says. “Our
company is called Industrial Heat. Our job is to
The Isotopic shift is interesting, but that's actually what I'm least
impressed with from what I've read so far. It certainly hints at a
nuclear reaction, but it's a bizarre finding. The excess heat is pretty
obvious/irrefutable, but these isotopic measurements are very far from a
sure-thing. If
Transmutation is a huge part of lenr. Spawar has published patents all
over it. I'm sure it's why the Nasa scientist is excited about it,
because he's seen it before and know it's likely true to a point.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
The Isotopic
*Transmutation is a huge part of lenr.*
It's a part of lenr for sure. I don't know if I'd say huge because
we've never, ever, measured transmutation products that are commensurate
with excess heat. This is Widom-Larsen logic based on wishful thinking and
very little empirical evidence.
*Spawar
They've either changed the wording on their statement, or Google
Translate does not agree with the previous translation. The statement
from Elforsk now sounds much more passive; not like they plan to take
any action.
More knowledge is needed to understand and explain.Let us engage more
http://coldfusionnow.org/transmutation-of-nuclear-waste-lenr-spawar-navy-patent/
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
*Transmutation is a huge part of lenr.*
It's a part of lenr for sure. I don't know if I'd say huge because
we've never, ever, measured
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1Sect2=HITOFFp=1u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.htmlr=1f=Gl=50d=PALLRefSrch=yesQuery=PN/8419919
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The embodiments of the invention relate generally to the field of
electrochemistry.
Generated particles may be captured by
Thanks for the link, but again, I'm not really arguing over the patent,
that's beside the point. I'm just saying where their *most extensive*
work has focused over the years. The patent doesn't really suggest anything
about a possible LENR mechanism, just that it's part of the cold fusion
Vorts,
At least Gibbs gave us honorable mention…
“Thus, every announcement and demonstration by Rossi over the last three years
has been surrounded by a whirl of claims, counterclaims, and accusations of
fraud along with [drum-roll]
endless theorizing in the alternative
I generally agree with your sentiment, and about the obfuscation. Though
I'm feeling more optimistic now that Darden has personally put his
credibility on the line. Clearly he is excited. And given the 1mw
install they've been doing he must have a pretty good idea of what's going
on.I
* generally agree with your sentiment, and about the obfuscation. Though
I'm feeling more optimistic now that Darden has personally put his
credibility on the line. Clearly he is excited. And given the 1mw
install they've been doing he must have a pretty good idea of what's going
on.I
Here is a reduction ad absurdum example of why this experiment was
unbelievably poorly designed.
NOTE: The experiment could still be gainful, but the Levi’s results do not
prove anything, as presented. The thermocouple does not help – it is
admitted by Levi that it was accurate only on the two
Jones -- I can't say your objections to Rossi being present when it was
open are unfounded. I think that was a rather stupid move/agreement between
the parties. Creates all kind of innuendo which they could/should have
avoided. With that said I'm not so sure it really presented him with much
Regarding transmutation,
Even if Ed Storms discounts transmutation as an LENR energy production
mechanism, transmutation is the source of energy in LENR that has showed
up in experimental data since 2010 involving some generalized isotopic and
elemental changes encompassing some 40 or 50
Lithium 6 might be a fission produce as a heaver Z element like iron breaks
up releasing 3 protons and 3 neutrons.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Regarding transmutation,
Even if Ed Storms discounts transmutation as an LENR energy production
mechanism,
Axil -- I don't think it's fair to keep pointing at Storms as the only one
who discounts transmutation as the mechanism -- he's only
the most vocal. There are many non-vocal, well-qualified people in the
community who don't believe it either. It's the main reason so many people
reject Widom-Larsen
What I wanted to see in a TIP Ni/H transmutation experiment is a well
calibration real time second by second NMR element assay as the
transmutation proceeds. NMR resonance analysis is well-known in chemistry
research. This is possible to do when the associated analysis software is
written,
Wasn't DGT going to do something like this before they imploded?
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
What I wanted to see in a TIP Ni/H transmutation experiment is a well
calibration real time second by second NMR element assay as the
transmutation proceeds.
Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
Jones -- I can't say your objections to Rossi being present when it was
open are unfounded. I think that was a rather stupid move/agreement between
the parties. Creates all kind of innuendo which they could/should have
avoided.
As far as I know, the
*As far as I know, the people doing these tests do not care about innuendos
or the opinions of Jones Beene, or anyone else. I believe they have good
reasons for imposing restrictions (as Lewan put it). These reasons
override any concerns about public relations or public opinion.*
*I am glad they
DGT either has no more money or loads of money. I believe DGT is now well
funded. Yes as exceptional scientists and system engineers they have
developed a tool for transmutation analysis. And when DGT soon emerges from
the dark, they will take away Rossi's candy both theoretically and
While I'm not nearly as optimistic as you are, I hope you're correct. The
mass-spec they promised in their past ICCF paper had me excited. I won't
hold my breath though.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
DGT either has no more money or loads of money. I
Does anyone know if there will be a press release or QA where the
experimenters can answer questions?
It would be extreme negligence to allow Levi or Rossi to open the
reactor or handle the ash.
Two things that lends credence to Jones' fear-- Rossi's constant may
be positive or may be negative
The microscopic photos of Rossi’s nickel particles were very revealing.
These pictures show a mix of burnt-out particles and still functional
particles. IMHO, because Rossi is running his reactor at a very high
temperature, his particles have a definite half-life based on the
operational
I think you exagerrate to the point of non sense.
even if goatguy make a real point it is just changing the values of the
temperature and the power.
not the fact that COP1, and even 1
one reactor with less energy in, get more bright than one with more power
getting in.
maybe COP is not 3.2 but
Brad, I think part of the problem was control. When you use the hot cat
to actually heat something I suspect it messes with the ability to control
the reaction. The best they can do is let it radiate, which is why the
thermal cameras.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Brad Lowe
The continued use of these two remote IR temperature sensors leads me to
suspect a large output of IR radiation witch would have interfered with
directly wired instrumentation
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Brad Lowe ecatbuil...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone know if there will be a press
Very perceptive and a great insight into why the test was setup the way
that it was. Rossi has not solved his control issues yet.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Brad, I think part of the problem was control. When you use the hot cat
to
Brad Lowe ecatbuil...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone know if there will be a press release or QA where the
experimenters can answer questions?
It would be extreme negligence to allow Levi or Rossi to open the
reactor or handle the ash.
Extreme negligence toward who, under what law or what set
If there is a real transparancy issue as GoatGuy suggest then the inner
must be of much higher temperature then the surface.
To get a feeling of this issue I tried to look at the published picture of
the cat and see if there was a region of lower temperature
at the upper part of the ecat in the
Those good fellows over at E-Cat world stated that Rossi uses a
magnetic pulse to startup his reactor. I did not know this. Many of the
E-Cat World readers memorize Rossi’s every word. This is a great thing but
I confess that I cannot do it myself. Such an important revelation about
Rossi theory
As far as I know the biggest source of coal pollution comes from coal fired
electricity plants. However, Tom Darden seems to be talking about coal
burning just for heat. I suppose this is still a major problem in China.
Harry
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I am glad they published this report. They were under no obligation to do
so. We are beggars and beggars cannot be choosers.
This is another reason why most scientists will ignore this report because
they see
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:48 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am glad they published this report. They were under no obligation to do
so. We are beggars and beggars cannot be choosers.
This is another
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
This is another reason why most scientists will ignore this report
because they see themselves as a community of equals.
The community that ignores experimental falsification of their theories
is, indeed, a community of equals.
Yes! And a
I Agee. It was mentioned he uses the coil to heat as well as feed it a
pulse train, probably a square wave pattern, which is a good way to induce
EMF into the mix
On Friday, October 10, 2014, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Those good fellows over at E-Cat world stated that Rossi uses a
what impact does it have about the question whether the blank when powered
with more energy, is brighting much less than the one with one gram more of
magic powder ?
to the point that the things inside the reactor bright more than the
resistors ...
if the skeptics are really skeptic, they have
From the TIP report on page 1
The heat generating process is initiated by heat from resistor coils around
the reactor tube. In addition, the resistor coils are fed with some fed with
some specific electromagnetic pulses
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
It is worth noting that some FP cells got hot enough to boil off the
electrolytic solution and then remained hot for a while.
Harry
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Very perceptive and a great insight into why the test was setup the way
that it was. Rossi
Good way to induce electrical currents in nano antennas and arcing across
gaps in powder depending on pulse frequency and carrier frequency matched
to size of particles/receivers
On Friday, October 10, 2014, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
From the TIP report on page 1
The heat generating
Yes, this mechanism is central to the way I believe that the E-Cat works.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:13 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Good way to induce electrical currents in nano antennas and arcing across
gaps in powder depending on pulse frequency and carrier frequency matched
I have been studying this trying to figure if some of the 30,000,000 watts
of 200-800 Hz pulsed EMF @ 3GHz carrier wave from a radar station might be
collected by 1-4 wave height in ocean and dissolve a shallow coral reef
skeleton made of CaCO3 just like this unit that gets 4 stars on amazon
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
$64 question: Was Rossi present at the time the reactor was opened?
Yes, the reports says he was.
If so, and this has been reported on E-Cat World, then that means the
sample
which Bianchini tested was not independently obtained – and could have
Gibbs also said in the above referenced message:
If something hot in LENR comes up and anyone cares to nudge me, I’d
be grateful but until then I’ll be keeping my fingers crossed for a
breakthrough ...
I'm sure he was nudged. ;-)
H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I know the biggest source of coal pollution comes from coal
fired electricity plants. However, Tom Darden seems to be talking
about coal burning just for heat.
I believe he means burning coal and other fossil fuel for all purposes,
including
In reply to H Veeder's message of Thu, 9 Oct 2014 22:56:00 -0400:
Hi Harry,
[snip]
Maybe it can all be done with shrunken lithium...
...Lithino
harry
Yes, that thought had also occurred to me, however it doesn't explain the need
for Hydrogen. But there is another possibility...if a shrunken
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
*Our* company.
Exciting times!
He's not relying on some report by a bunch of scientists. Tom Darden is
no fool, He's yale graduate / head of a billion dollar hedge fund.
I am curious Mr. Spinnaker. Why are you so impressed by the
Hi,
among the skeptic argument one of the only that is not laughable is the one
of goatguy...
maybe is it because I don't understand it well...
He seems to say
- that alumina is not a grey body, but transparent, and that emissivity
must be mixed with translucidity when considering the radiation
I find it funny that anonymous GoatGuy is literally one of the best-read
skeptics out there and get's so much play, but in my view he deserves it
because he's pretty good and the skeptical community generally sucks.
Still don't think his objections discredit the report, but I wouldn't mind
seeing
The 7 professors who wrote the TIP report are supposed to be answering such
criticisms. They should have set up a website for just that purpose.
Rossi did.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
I find it funny that anonymous GoatGuy is literally one of the
At 02:22 PM 10/10/2014, Alain Sepeda wrote:
Hi,
among the skeptic argument one of the only that is not laughable is the
one of goatguy...
maybe is it because I don't understand it well...
He seems to sayÂ
- that alumina is not a grey body, but transparent, and that emissivity
must be mixed with
I hate to say it, but I'm leaning to inconclusive for the report as a whole.
Controls: I don't have any problems with the experimental controls as
a whole, and in particular Rossi's involvement, which was supervised
at all times. There is no chance that secret power was fed to the system.
Jones, you are discussing one of the main concerns about the accuracy of the
test as far as I can ascertain. Someone needs to review the behavior of the
alumina when illuminated from within to prove that we are not being confused.
This should not be too difficult since any light source that
Alain,
There are several answers to your question.
1. Alumina is not completely transparent and so heats to equilibrium.
2. The run with the dummy unfueled E-Cat takes care of any IR
measurement error.
3. I believe they did use calibrated dots at some point.
Adrian Ashfield
Again how serious this is depends on the temperature difference between the
inner and outer shell no. If that was serious you would expect
the top edge of a picture of the hot cat to have unsharp color shade
because the top edge should represent the heat of the outer shell. I have
not find such an
From: Foks0904
I find it funny that anonymous GoatGuy is literally one of the best-read
skeptics out there and get's so much play, but in my view he deserves it
because he's pretty good and the skeptical community generally sucks. Still
don't think his objections discredit the report, but
Alan,
I am unclear of if you think there is incompetence or fraud, which can be
suspected?
Best Regards ,
Lennart Thornros
www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com
lenn...@thornros.com
+1 916 436 1899
202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648
“Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 9 Oct 2014 23:04:12 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
don't you remember when Rossi said...
He said that he tested a number of secret sauce element which all
basically worked.
Lithium is just one of a number of elements that do basically the same
thing.
Lithium is not
At 03:06 PM 10/10/2014, Lennart Thornros wrote:
I am unclear of if you think there is incompetence or fraud, which
can be suspected?
Incompetence.
(I only mentioned fraud to show I thought it unlikely).
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Thu, 9 Oct 2014 23:22:20 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
When I
run the numbers, I'm seeing that out of 3184 isotopes in Mathematica, 2965
are exothermic under neutron capture versus 95 that are endothermic.
...but note that energy is required to remove the neutron from
Not scientific -- but a search of google images for alumina
transmission indicates that you can get pretty much any profile you
want (Include transparent sapphires, of course), and that the actual
profiles vary wildly.
One would thus have to characterize the ceramic actually used, and
then
Yes and the thickness of the alumina and the time constants of heat
transfer dTouter/dt = K(Tinner - Touter) or similare suitable equation.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Not scientific -- but a search of google images for alumina transmission
indicates
Looks like his sister tried a coup d'etat:
http://www.independent.ie/world-news/asia-pacific/north-korean-leader-kim-jongun-flees-after-attempted-coup-by-sister-30652068.html
At 03:48 PM 10/10/2014, you wrote:
Yes and the thickness of the alumina and the time constants of
heat transfer dTouter/dt = K(Tinner - Touter) or similare suitable equation.
Fundamentals of Ceramics
Michael Barsoom
About 600 pages.
I found a probably bootleg copy on the web, but you'll have
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Sat, 11 Oct 2014 09:14:28 +1100:
Hi,
[snip]
C13 might make an interesting replacement for the Lithium, as might Si29, if it
works at all. If so, then it is far more abundant than any of the others[1],
and
like Li should allow clean reactions:-
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
In reply to H Veeder's message
* Maybe it can all be done with shrunken lithium... Lithino
... or maybe the apparent Rossi reaction of Ni58 - Ni 62 can be
accomplished with a known particle, which is halo-lithium or Li-11.
This
Jones is right...
If the reactor material is transparent to infrared to any degree, the
remote temperature sensor would be looking at the temperature somewhere
inside the ceramic tube. Since the amount of radiate heat is proportional
to the surface area of the radiating body at the air boundary,
http://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/83021/1/Sintering%20to%20transparency.pdf
See page 528
Al2O3 is transparent to mid range infrared between the 2 and 5 micron
wavelengths. That is the operating temperature of the E-Cat.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:29 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
...but note that energy is required to remove the neutron from the source
isotope, so a lot of those 2965 isotopes will be useless, depending on
which
isotope supplies the neutrons.
Yes, this is true. I forgot to mention that the
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
