RE: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren - nuclear spallation and resonance

This explanation does not apply to the ‘moving particles’ that are clearly involved which though mostly remaining and reacting within the solid state matrix are also found as strange ‘particle emissions.’ A hydrino doesn’t bear the characteristics of a penetrating particle which clearly said

RE: [Vo]:[Vo]Microwave innduced ransmutation

I don’t think anyone is really speaking of “target” nuclei in cold fusion. That’s been off the table since the beginning. It’s just semantics as to how to describe the ‘many bodies.’ Most assuredly there are moving reactive/fusing ‘particles’ the evidence for that is clear. Those particles are

[Vo]:Fw: [teslafy] Posted Reply to Tesla Tech, Infinite Energy and Weird Science! Facebook Group.

 Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/ On Wednesday, January 18, 2017 11:21 PM, "harv...@yahoo.com [teslafy]" wrote:   Harvey D Norris's answer to How efficient is air-core transformer? How can

Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren - nuclear spallation and resonance

Gamma mitigation might lie in how nuclear reactions occur inside a Bose condinsate. On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:11 PM, wrote: > In reply to Russ George's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 18:50:44 -0800: > Hi Russ, > [snip] > >Mischugenons however unlike 'hydrinos' do produce

RE: [Vo]:[Vo]Microwave innduced ransmutation

Robin— I think it’s a mistake to consider a coherent system with target nuclei. Target nuclei make sense in two or three body reactions, but not in a solid state coherent system with many bodies coupled together with a single energy and spin state at any given instant. Bob Cook Sent

RE: [Vo]:Speaking of Two Miracles - Knock knock knockin on heaven's door

There’s only one miracle.That is a many-bodied reaction with no kinetic energy to conserve—only spin and potential energy and angular momentum—not really a miracle. Bob Cook From: Russ George Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 6:11 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Speaking of Two

Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren - nuclear spallation and resonance

In reply to Russ George's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 18:50:44 -0800: Hi Russ, [snip] >Mischugenons however unlike 'hydrinos' do produce irrefutable isotopic >shifts in recipient nuclei, During Hydrino fusion, two things can happen:- 1) A proton fuses with the target nucleus, resulting in a

Re: [Vo]:[Vo]Microwave innduced ransmutation

In reply to Russ George's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 18:22:23 -0800: Hi, >Something smelts here. :) Yes, I guess Al might have been lost through vaporization, but K increased 3 fold. Since they used two separate bulbs, any differences could also be a simple result of variance in manufacture.

RE: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren - nuclear spallation and resonance

Mischugenons however unlike 'hydrinos' do produce irrefutable isotopic shifts in recipient nuclei, though the quantity of shifted isotopes is much lower than the apparent mischugenon flux as measured/inferred by the resulting weak emissions! Perhaps a 'third' miracle is needed, oh shit, will it

Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren - nuclear spallation and resonance

In reply to Russ George's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 17:53:41 -0800: Hi Russ, [snip] >Agreed that is the second miracle required! But is there any standing >reported evidence for strange mishugenonistic neutron resonance, aka >reflected neutrons, that subsequently behave in a manner effecting

RE: [Vo]:[Vo]Microwave innduced ransmutation

Something smelts here. -Original Message- From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 6:12 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:[Vo]Microwave innduced ransmutation In reply to a.ashfield's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:15:42 -0500:

Re: [Vo]:[Vo]Microwave innduced ransmutation

In reply to a.ashfield's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:15:42 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Microwave Induced Nuclear Transmutation in Compact Flourescent Lamps >https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz7lTfqkED9WUlh4c3dJWlh5Rjg/view > > From MFMP facebook. They talk a lot about the minor changes in P, Si, S,

[Vo]:Speaking of Two Miracles - Knock knock knockin on heaven's door

When one needs more than one miracle you might need divine assistance. http://physics.aps.org/articles/v7/39 -Original Message- From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 5:27 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent

RE: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren - nuclear spallation and resonance

Agreed that is the second miracle required! But is there any standing reported evidence for strange mishugenonistic neutron resonance, aka reflected neutrons, that subsequently behave in a manner effecting the lack of 'energetic gamma'-less absorbing of neutrons save perhaps invoking quasi-dark

Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren - nuclear spallation and resonance

In reply to Russ George's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 07:50:11 -0800: Hi, [snip] >Indeed where is the neutron activation, lots of nuclei in the neighborhood >yet neither activation nor knock on's is very odd. One miracle to a >customer, getting neutrons out of nuclei is the 'one miracle'. The

Re: [Vo]:mk:

Do not click in this link. It's malware. On Jan 18, 2017 3:14 PM, "anthony bolek" wrote: http://www.partitodemocraticomorlupo.it/okvcshe.php I do not want the peace which passeth understanding, I want the understanding which _bringeth

RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Microwave experminets

Hi Frank, I suspect microwave research is more of a “driven “ system to force anomalous effects like the reactionless thrust in EM drive and would expect very low efficiency. Fran From: Frank Znidarsic [mailto:fznidar...@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:04 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com

[Vo]:mk:

http://www.partitodemocraticomorlupo.it/okvcshe.php I do not want the peace which passeth understanding, I want the understanding which _bringeth peace.Tamia Caflisch

[Vo]:LENR INFO< SEARCH FOR THE WRIGHT BROTHERS OF LENR

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/01/jan-18-2017-who-is-lenrs-genuine-wright.html -peter - Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

[Vo]:Microwave experminets

I tried some microwave experiments years ago. I converted the microwave tube to full wave operation. Experiments were done with a high voltage needle point in the microwave field and a high current arc in a microwave field. A persistent arc was look for. No anomalous energy was detected.

[Vo]:[Vo]Microwave innduced ransmutation

Microwave Induced Nuclear Transmutation in Compact Flourescent Lamps https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz7lTfqkED9WUlh4c3dJWlh5Rjg/view From MFMP facebook.

[Vo]:Squeezed frequencies and quantum cooling

"Anomalous cooling" is a neglected subject with a contentious history since it implies that anomalous positive energy is available elsewhere in the system in which the cooling is seem. One does not expect to see 600 volts pulsing through a large copper coil at the same time its temperature

[Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren – nuclear spallation and resonance

As for scientific theory and theoreticians Mark Twain said it best, "There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture out of such trifling investment of fact." From: Lennart Thornros [mailto:lenn...@thornros.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren – nuclear spallation and resonance

I talked briefly with Lundin today. He explained that he and Lidgren are not going ahead together for various reasons at the moment. However, he’s convinced that the most likely explanation for excess heat is transmutation rather than fusion, and that transmutation involves spallation and

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren – nuclear spallation and resonance

Hello George, I am sure you are a more experienced guy in regards to LENR than I am. Probably a better sailor. If it only comes down to years I am rather close or just a tack ahead (67 years). I am not drawing any conclusions, I just try to evaluate the circumstances. Not always do you need to

[Vo]:Investigation Discovery Channel

On the show "Unusual Subjects" Stone Cold Fusion entails the murder of a cold fusion researcher, more then likely it will be Eugene Mallove.  Just happened to see this when a friend came over talking about a show he saw on the channel, and I was previewing the daily shows to see if it was

[Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren – nuclear spallation and resonance

Lennart, the old adage ‘any old port in a storm’ is simply not practical. We’ve been weathering the storm against cold fusion for nigh unto 30 years. We don’t need any old port/theory, some of us have chosen to just weather the storm and lumber on. How Long Have You Been a Sailor ? All

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren – nuclear spallation and resonance

I don't understand the details on the ponderomotive force LENR theory, so this is pure wishful thinking. Maybe it can support some other theories which need a new way to make nucleus interact. I first think about Edmund Storms Hydroton theory. The great problem with Hydroton and the Slow Fusion,

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren – nuclear spallation and resonance

Hello Mats, I think this is interesting. I understand the critic from Jones and Russ but at least it is a theory and it is based on the result of Lugano. Maybe it was not such a flawed demo just made so it has too many openings for critic. This also enhances the profile of Rossi. He has support

Re: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren – nuclear spallation and resonance

Ooops, I thought I was replying to Mats,and didn't see it was a link from Vortex. As Jones Beene points out it is lacking proof. Perhaps the new experiment they talk about will provide it. I thought it interesting that they forecast the production of light in view of what we have hear about

[Vo]:Imaging defect creation in Palladium

FYI, "In a study published Jan. 16 in Nature Materials, researchers at Argonne's Advanced Photon Source, a DOE Office of Science User Facility, reveal they have captured - for the first time ever - images of the creation of structural defects in palladium when the metal is exposed to

Re: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren – nuclear spallation and resonance

Mats, Most interesting. This sounds like one of the most plausible theories to me. I haven't looked at the figures yet but surely this must lean heavily on what Rossi has already done? Adrian On 1/18/2017 7:43 AM, Mats Lewan wrote: The LENR patent application by Lundin and Lidgren

[Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren - nuclear spallation and resonance

Indeed where is the neutron activation, lots of nuclei in the neighborhood yet neither activation nor knock on's is very odd. One miracle to a customer, getting neutrons out of nuclei is the 'one miracle'. From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 7:22

Re: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren – nuclear spallation and resonance

OK they have a patent application now - after almost two years - but where is the experimental data? When this was first announced in 2015, my comment then was the same then as it is now: "The theory looks a lot like a mashup of W-L cold neutrons and Hagelstein’s neutron hopping, neither of

[Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren – nuclear spallation and resonance

The LENR patent application by Lundin and Lidgren referenced in this blog post: https://animpossibleinvention.com/2015/10/15/swedish-scientists-claim-lenr-explanation-break-through/ is now public here: