Hello group,
You might want to watch this page for new ones in the short/medium term:
http://www.google.com/patents/sitemap/en/Sitemap/G21/G21B/G21B_3.html
Recently added (Publication date: Jul 25, 2013):
* * *
Yogendra Narain SRIVASTAVA, Allan Widom
Nuclear reactor consuming
On 2013-07-25 15:46, Craig wrote:
Didn't Rossi use this method in the Oct 6, 2011 demo? He called it an
'RF Generator, which he brought in when it appeared the heating wasn't
going to start the reaction as fast as he had hoped.
It was a probe (I don't remember exactly for what), not a RF
On 2013-07-25 16:28, Teslaalset wrote:
I rather think in such case Rossi used a piezoresonator.
Rossi likely uses piezoelectric catalyzer(s) as described in recent
published patent application of Pekka Soininen.
I had to dig this for you from where I remember reading about it:
Hello group,
As a reminder, this is the URL where today's demo (intended for the
ICCF18 audience) will be broadcast live, in English:
http://new.livestream.com/triwu2/Defkalion-US
Some tech details about the streaming
Some tech details Hello everybody, for your information, this streaming
On 2013-07-23 14:13, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
I actually meant 10:00 EDT.
That's 14:00 UTC / 16:00 CEST (local time), or about 1 hour and 40
minutes from now.
I hope this clears things up,
S.A.
On 2013-07-24 02:49, blaze spinnaker wrote:
If all the water was vaporized, the output thermal power would have
been above 27 kW.
Sounds very thrilling!
They've also been conservative about heat losses through the insulating
reactor enclosure, not accounted for. During the inactive Argon run
On 2013-07-23 02:04, James Bowery wrote:
That's not what the article says:
http://it.ibtimes.com/articles/53211/20130722/fusione-fredda-defkalion-video-streaming-presentazione.htm
It says a 4:1 ratio:
Gamberale is talking about the notorious scientific paper by De Ninno et
al. (ENEA),
On 2013-07-21 20:38, Alan Fletcher wrote:
Cop of 1.1 Good enough for science, but not dramatic enough for PR.
According to an insider [...] it will actually show a ~6-7x energy gain,
which is 1.1x
As usual the critical part will be measuring input energy.
They will use this energy meter:
On 2013-07-16 22:58, H Veeder wrote:
Copied from a facebook group.
Harry
Officially confirmed.
A couple more links in Italian confirming this news, but not exactly
adding yet a whole lot of new details:
http://22passi.blogspot.it/2013/07/fusione-fredda-diretta-streaming-22.html
On 2013-07-17 02:50, Rob Dingemans wrote:
It looks a bit to me that somebody pulled this organization into the
game to make the claims ridiculous, which in turn could work as a
boomerang and could result in people not taking CICAP serious at all.
In Dutch we would say schoenmaker blijf bij je
On 2013-07-17 03:50, blaze spinnaker wrote:
They should be sending in engineers from companies which specialize in
calorimetry and power measurement.
Cynical skeptics have often complained that a magician or some sort of
fraud expert should have been present during public LENR demos to check
On 2013-07-15 16:01, DJ Cravens wrote:
I asked Defkalion directly and got a non committal reply- neither
confirming or denying.
We do not disclose what we will present in NI Week and ICCF-18.
This is unconfirmed news, but it seems there will be a Defkalion GT demo
in Milan, Italy on July
On 2013-07-16 03:23, blaze spinnaker wrote:
Unconfirmed rumor at this point, but if true: (face palm)
Towards the end (minute 32:50 onwards) of the following podcast (in
Italian) of a radio show about science and technology (Moebius [1],
from Radio24, an all-news radio station owned by the
On 2013-06-28 07:02, Hamdi Ucar wrote:
Thanks
You forgot to include a link:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.6364
In a recent report titled Indications of anomalous heat energy production in a reactor device containing hydrogen loaded nickel powder [arXiv:1305.3913], G. Levi and co-workers put forth
On 2013-06-27 00:42, Jones Beene wrote:
Whether or not nickel-hydride with 7% by atomic volume hydrogen will give
much net gain is debatable - but the lack of hydrogen gas in the cell after
vacuum purge may not be enough for a good control (if the nichrome was
previously alloyed with
On 2013-06-27 00:55, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
Jones' point about ANY exposure to H is acknowledged...
That being said, does anyone know the exact procedure by which the material
in the control cell was prepared and the cell assembled??? Obviously, the
nichrome wire was shipped to them, but was it
On 2013-06-27 01:09, Jones Beene wrote:
No - I was suggesting that in previous experiments to this one - the same
nichrome wire could have been used. Did they start out with a virgin wire
for this experiment or not? Often experimenters cut corners and reuse items
from previous runs.
I haven't
On 2013-06-26 22:37, Jones Beene wrote:
If you are in contact with them – please ask if they are still using
nichrome as a control.
Both cells (Activated [A] and Control [B] - there is one of each both in
EU and in the US, so four in total) have a NiCr wire (for
passive/indirect heating
On 2013-06-27 02:33, Mark Gibbs wrote:
So, as I understand from the data [1] over the test runs the US cell saw
a gain of about 4.9% (1.49W/30.25W) and the EU Cell saw about 6.1%
(1.82W/30.05W).
That's about what they've written in the 18:15 UTC update here:
Hello group,
The presentations shown during the June 3 LENR meeting at the European
Parliament in Brussels can now be downloaded, in pdf format, from the
ENEA website through the following URL:
On 2013-06-04 21:12, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
Here are the remaining links, just in case:
New advancements on the Fleischmann-Pons Effect
3) Graham K. Hubler
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2013/06/new-advancements-on-fleischmann-pons_5.html
New advancements on the Fleischmann-Pons
On 2013-06-05 21:29, Harry Veeder wrote:
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/follow/follow-4/271-s-g-cells-preliminary-test-findings-for-run-2
The first test run of the Steel and Glass cell suggested that it took
approximately 6% more power to maintain the same volume of water at the
same
Hello group,
Daniele Passerini of 22passi blog is posting photos and slides from
yesterday's meeting at the EU parliament on LENR, from an anonymous
source, along with other misc. information. As of writing only photos
from McKubre's and Violante's presentation are available, but apparently
On 2013-06-01 16:20, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I heard rumors that they were going to have an actual demonstration at
the NI conference. Their previous presentations and audiovisual material
has not been impressive in my opinion. Perhaps I missed something, but
as far as I know they have not
Hello group,
It appears that this email by prof. Guglielmi of the University of Bath
is being circulated in several blogs. In short, the author wonders
whether Levi et al. did with their E-Cat investigation a good job from
an ethical point of view. I don't necessarily agree with the message,
On 2013-05-26 23:21, Jed Rothwell wrote:
A Swedish correspondent sent me this link:
http://www.energikatalysatorn.se/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2t=560sid=5450c28dab532569dee72f88a43a56f0start=330
Thanks for linking these observations. I think they are very important.
I wonder why they haven't
On 2013-05-24 00:46, Mark Gibbs wrote:
Does anone have any more in-depth bios of the group that tested the
E-Cat. This is what I have so far:
Good job with the latest blog post. What about other professors and
researchers cited in the ArXiv paper? Surely they wouldn't want to be
associated
Test message
If this email gets in, there are some comments by Hanno Essen on the
latest third party report on phys.org:
http://phys.org/news/2013-05-rossi-e-cat-energy-density-higher.html
S.A.
Hello group,
Have a look here (Google translated):
http://www.elforsk.se/Aktuellt/Svenska-forskare-har-testat-Rossis-energikatalysator--E-cat/
Swedish researchers have tested Rossi energy catalyst - E-cat
Researchers from Uppsala University and KTH Stockholm has conducted
measurements of
Hello group,
Given the ongoing interest on Vortex-l, I think these comments by Hanno
Essén on the latest third party report in a recent article by Phys.org
might be worth of attention:
http://phys.org/news/2013-05-rossi-e-cat-energy-density-higher.html
I have followed the Rossi E-Cats for a
(this is my second attempt to send this message. I think the server is
having problems with some emails)
Hello group,
Have a look here (Google translated):
http://www.elforsk.se/Aktuellt/Svenska-forskare-har-testat-Rossis-energikatalysator--E-cat/
Swedish researchers have tested Rossi
On 2013-05-23 21:45, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
A couple more links.
Some more background on the ecat.com website:
http://ecat.com/news/elforsk-publish-news-about-the-ecat-test
What is Elforsk?
On 17 December 1992 Vattenfall, Svenska Kraftnät (Swedish national grid),
Association
On 2013-05-23 17:09, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
(this email appeared on the list six hours later than when I sent it)
On 2013-05-22 21:25, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Many of the comments at Forbes are toxic. The Skeptics have not given
an inch. Mary Yugo remains convinced it is fraud. She imagines she has
found many problems with it.
Partially unrelated, but by the amount of comments, shares and facebook
likes, I
On 2013-05-22 21:47, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Maybe there are more comments because people find the Disqus interface
easier to use than Forbes'. It allows corrections, and a popularity
vote. It is widely used these days.
Disqus is indeed more user friendly, but the amount of Facebook likes is
in
On 2013-05-22 22:11, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Ah! I did not think of that. That is probably a good metric. It is
still self-selected, and not a random group, but the extremists will
have only one vote each. If the number of likes is sufficiently high I
guess the effects of extremists at both ends
On 2013-05-21 04:09, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I just read this paper for the third time. This is a gem. [...]
Luboš Motl seems to think otherwise, but I think he's adopted an
excessively negative view probably due to personal bias against CF/LENR
in general:
Hello group,
Today, international Business Times Italy featured an article about the
recently released third party report about several E-Cat HT tests
performed in Ferrara by Levi et al.:
http://it.ibtimes.com/articles/49127/20130521/fusione-fredda-e-cat-andrea-rossi.htm
(in Italian)
On 2013-05-16 05:34, Peter Gluck wrote:
This morning, quite early, Daniele Passerini publishes a mystery list
of 15 persons:
http://22passi.blogspot.ro/2013/05/la-risposta-fa-36213.html
Many of them are well known in our circles.
He says these persons were driving a car for the coming (June
On 2013-05-10 15:53, Peter Gluck wrote:
However enhanced excess energy is the first, sine qua non step.
Rumors circulating about the Professors' Hot Cat report pre-publication
text on the Web accessible for very selected persons. Not confirmed yet.
I'm not asking for nor expecting any further
On 2013-05-03 20:06, Jack Cole wrote:
Looks like AR has delivered on his promise.
http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/05/e-cat-shipping-pictures-posted-on-the-jonp/
This photo just posted by Daniele Passerini is way more interesting:
Hello group,
Dr. Francesco Celani is reporting and encouraging to share that he found
out that small amounts of liquid hydrocarbons such as Acetone can
provide significant improvements to anomalous heat generation in
gas-loaded LENR devices. No further details are available at the moment
On 2013-04-13 00:12, Jed Rothwell wrote:
See also:
http://lenr-canr.org/?page_id=187#PhotosAccidents
Maybe Celani has some photos to share that you could add to this page?
Cheers
S.A.
Hello group,
Bruce Fast, blogger (I don't know anything more about him, sorry),
visited Defkalion Canada offices in Vancouver and wrote a brief but
informative report about it. Most of the information appears to have
already been covered by Sterling D.Allan of PESN in his last week's the
Hello group,
Defkalion GT CEO Alex Xanthoulis agreed to be interviewed by Sterling D.
Allan of PESN regarding the company's current status and future plans,
and won't be giving any more information to the mainstream media until
August, when DGT will be presented to the public (with a live
On 03/26/2013 03:50 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Akira: Do you know who Prometeon is? (The organization that issued
this announcement.) Did they do the tests? Will they issue a report?
They are the sole authorized E-Cat reseller/licensee for Italy
I don't know if they will issue reports. Apparently
On 2013-03-25 08:01, Harry Veeder wrote:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=791#comments
Andrea Rossi
March 24th, 2013 at 10:53 PM
Prometon s.r.l issued a related press release (in Italian):
http://www.22passi.it/downloads/Comunicato_stampa_Prometeon_25_3_2013.pdf
Cheers,
S.A.
On 2013-02-23 09:39, Alain Sepeda wrote:
David on LENRNews.eu hav published a Swedish defense report :
http://www.lenrnews.eu/swedish-defence/
This report would have not been surprising if it was just about plain
nano/micrometric nickel powder experiments. The effects of hydrogen on
nickel
Hello group,
Defkalion GT chief technical officer John Hadjichristos occasionally
writes comments and answers questions on Peter Gluck's blog EGO OUT [1].
I think this one posted today might be worth of some attention:
On 2013-02-08 11:49, Moab Moab wrote:
It seems LENUCO might be up to get funding from ARPA-E. Maybe. First
he'll need enough votes.
http://futureenergy.ultralightstartups.com/campaign/detail/861
It would have been in LENUCO's best interest to let people know about
this in advance!
What a
Listen here:
http://archive.thespaceshow.com/shows/1932-BWB-2013-01-18.mp3
(90 minute MP3 46.1MB)
The Space Show website:
http://www.thespaceshow.com/
Cheers,
S.A.
On 2013-01-03 15:03, Peter Gluck wrote:
Defkalion's E-Cat is launched in Italy too:
http://www.nextme.it/scienza/energia/4914-e-cat-defkalion-italia
They have a website - coming soon:
http://www.mose-energy.com/
Additional information from user Renzo of E-CatWorld blog:
The Defkalion
On 2012-12-17 15:53, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I cannot access Quantumheat.org for some reason. If anyone here can
access it, please copy Storms' analysis to it.
It works for me. Storms' analysis has already been linked a couple times
in their latest blog post.
The MFMP team should better contact
On 2012-12-16 17:29, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Note that Ed left a comment here:
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/177-write-up-of-eu-cell-baselines
[...]
It's the right time for suggestions and test requests to improve their
experiment:
On 2012-12-14 21:24, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
Did anyone ever find it?
It's Power (Red) (bar) instead of Power (Red) (W). Bars instead of
watts.
Red is the active wire.
Cheers,
S.A.
On 2012-12-13 13:25, Craig wrote:
They shut the power off from around 4:30 am EST until around 5:45am EST.
Does anyone know why?
It appears they tried loading it with pure H2 instead of an H2-Ar
mixture (75%-25%). This might (according to Dr.Celani) increase over
time the apparent excess
On 2012-12-13 16:02, Jed Rothwell wrote:
This is only my impression, but these graphs look far too smooth to be
cold fusion. All of the actual cold fusion reactions I have seen
fluctuate much more than this. They increase, decrease and sometimes
stop for no apparent reason. This looks like an
On 2012-12-12 22:08, Arnaud Kodeck wrote:
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/176-eu-cell-2-active-wire-run
Promising results are shown from EU cell of MFMP !
It seems that even taking into account the most conservative baseline to
determine output power by curve fitting (to the
On 2012-12-12 22:47, Craig wrote:
The have 48 watts of input power now and are getting out 52 - 54 watts
on their conservative estimate. Their optimistic estimate shows them at
around 67 - 70 watts out.
The conservative estimate is *really* conservative. Basically, it's the
calibration with
On 2012-12-12 22:57, Arnaud Kodeck wrote:
I would be a little more conservative. The excess power must be kept for
more than an hour or two, to at least remove any chemical reaction that may
occur.
As shown now, the excess power has decreased just above 4W. That excess heat
might not stay long.
On 2012-12-12 22:57, Arnaud Kodeck wrote:
As shown now, the excess power has decreased just above 4W. That excess heat
might not stay long. Cross finger that it will happen.
It looks like it increased again. Now it's at almost 8W. No apparent
change in input power or external conditions.
On 2012-12-12 23:39, Harry Veeder wrote:
I am confused about the location(s). Where exactly is/are the Celani
replications occuring?
In Europe (France) and in the US (Minnesota).
The replication apparently showing excess heat as of now is the European
one, which is very close to the original
On 2012-12-13 03:29, Craig wrote:
This is so strange. I set the data in View Test Celani Cell #2, found here:
http://data.hugnetlab.com/
to view back 4 hours. Then I selected only P_Xs Low. Notice that the
excess power is oscillating between 4 watts and 8 watts, in a very
precise rhythm, with
On 2012-12-11 05:02, David Roberson wrote:
I am seeking a bit of feedback from the Vortex crowd.
For more feedback, next time try writing a new thread (by writing a new
post to the mailing list at vortex-l@eskimo.com with the write
function or its equivalent in your email client) instead of
On 2012-12-07 16:02, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I do not like this graph on page 2:
http://www.22passi.it/pirelli/2%20layers%20constantan%20wire%20EDX%20and%20extra%20heat.pdf
I attempted to reinterpret the (new) graph on page 2 to make it easier
to understand. I admit that at first I had almost no
On 2012-12-08 11:15, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
I attempted to reinterpret the (new) graph on page 2 to make it easier
to understand. I admit that at first I had almost no idea of what it was
trying to convey. Now I think I do:
http://i.imgur.com/A0OBf.png
Combining data from the table
On 2012-12-08 17:40, Ron Kita wrote:
Greetings Vortex-L
I just saw the photographs:
http://nextbigfuture.com/2012/12/lenr-transmutation-replication-and.html
Did Vortex show this before?
Yes; see thread:
[Vo]:Independent validation of thermal anomalies from Celani's
constantan wires
On 2012-12-07 16:02, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I do not like this graph on page 2:
http://www.22passi.it/pirelli/2%20layers%20constantan%20wire%20EDX%20and%20extra%20heat.pdf
There are no calibration points above 0.5 W input, and no live run data
points below that. You have to have calibration
On 2012-12-08 22:01, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Those are the same data points shown in the other graph.
Indeed the graphs doesn't show this very clearly, but if you compare
both of them carefully (check again!), in this case all data points are
aligned with the linear/no excess heat trend line.
On 2012-12-08 23:27, Jed Rothwell wrote:
They are doing this now? Or do you mean they did it before but those
data points are not published yet.
That's what they did. The graphed calibration data points are in the
document I previously linked. It's certainly not the full data set. It's
On 2012-12-05 16:01, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
A quick update from Celani forwarded to 22passi:
Dear Colleagues,
just after the chaotic discovering of the name of the original Company
(06 December 2012) that make replication of our experiment, I realised
that some of the documents
On 2012-12-07 16:02, Jed Rothwell wrote:
[...] I am not happy with this. I need more information to judge it, but it
gives me a bad feeling.
I feel your confusion. Hopefully the full slides bound to be presented
(and released to the public) on December 14th [1] will help clarify this.
On 2012-12-07 18:42, Jed Rothwell wrote:
What is this? Details please. Who is Ortez?
Have a look at the following link. Notice something?
http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/10/leonardo-corp-releases-new-hot-cat-report/
Cheers,
S.A.
On 2012-12-05 16:13, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/yA7HS.jpg
I tried making an improved, clearer chart with data from this slide,
showing the relationship between wire temperature and excess power. I've
also extrapolated an additional data point at 400 °C:
http://i.imgur.com
Hello group,
According to a recent email by Francesco Celani posted on 22passi, it
appears that thermal anomalies from his treated constantan wires hav
been successfully and independently validated by some researchers
affiliated with a major multinational corporation.
Source (in italian):
On 2012-12-05 16:01, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
An improved version of Celani's ICCF17 presentation in a scientific
paper format was also posted on the same blog:
http://www.22passi.it/pirelli/ICCF17CelaniArtD.pdf
These are the slides mentioned in the opening post, edited to show
On 2012-12-05 16:50, Peter Gluck wrote:
Dear Akira,
I cannot open the file with the results-
Try this:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/48w8fsbd5jigwr8/pirelli_wire_a.pdf
how great is the excess heat?
1.16W at 350 °C
Wire mass = 0.055 g
length = 200 mm
diameter = 0.2 mm
Input power not
On 2012-12-05 16:01, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
The results of this independent validation will likely be presented
during this event, on December 14th:
http://www.22passi.it/coherence2012/Coherence%202012_Brochure.pdf
Have a look at the bottom left portion of the second page
On 2012-12-05 16:47, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Ain't that nice!
This should encourage the M.F.M. people to keep at it.
It appears they have been already aware of these results for weeks, but
they had an agreement to not disclose them before mid-December (too late
now). Maybe that's where much of
Courtesy of DGT:
The following article appeared in TO BHMA-Science at December 2nd, 2012
(http://www.tovima.gr/science/article/?aid=486578).
For the non-Greek speaking people, here bellow is a translated in English
version of this article. In this translation, one more explanatory paragraph
On 2012-12-04 10:26, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4t=4367
PDF version (containing a few photos) now available in the link above.
Direct link:
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/download/file.php?id=33
(you might need to be logged
On 2012-12-04 23:34, Terry Blanton wrote:
Well, well. When I go to their site I see a page announcing a new web
site coming soon.
Did you save the .pdf? If you could send to me I can post on google
docs. Or you could if you do that sort of thing.
I expected that something like this would
On 2012-10-25 17:05, Jed Rothwell wrote:
1. It is lot harder to accomplish than it sounds. I can summarize it in
a single sentence, apply the Arata technique to nickel but that
describes years of effort.
This might sound like a naive question, but isn't the Arata technique
documented? And if
Hello group,
The 8-page article published on the November issue of Popular Science is
now publicly available for reading on the official PopSci website. For
sure, user reactions in the comment section don't seem very
enthusiastic, to say the least:
On 2012-10-23 18:05, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
Not related with the opening post, but this came just in from Google Alerts:
http://discovermagazine.com/2012/nov/27-big-idea-bring-back-the-cold-fusion-dream
A cautiously neutral article on cold fusion on Discover Magazine, mainly
On 2012-10-22 14:14, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
As a side note, it appears that the entity which funded Michael A.
Nelson's traveling expenses was not the Free Energy Foundation, but
rather the New Energy Foundation. This correction comes from Mark
Gibbs of Forbes. See [1
Hello group,
It appears that the pdf documents with redacted names wasn't the only
one which sort of leaked from early uploads put on the official
Defkalion GT forums and hastily replaced with different ones. Apparently
there was another one, formatted as a presentation and signed by Micheal
On 2012-10-22 14:14, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
The document (I suggest saving a copy in case it gets deleted):
http://ecatnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Summary-of-Visit-to-Defkalion.pdf
By the way, I think it's important to point out that this document is
dated March 2012, while the other
On 2012-10-22 14:24, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Every page in this document is marked Extremely
Confidential. Evidently that does not mean much at Defkalion.
I don't get all this confidentiality either.
Cheers,
S.A.
On 2012-10-22 14:14, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
The document (I suggest saving a copy in case it gets deleted):
http://ecatnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Summary-of-Visit-to-Defkalion.pdf
Compare the document above with this one:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/government/NASA/20110922NASA
On 2012-10-22 06:29, Patrick Ellul wrote:
Thanks for this. If anyone comes across a transcript of the portion
where he talks about LENR, it would be very handy.
A partial transcription I found on E-CatWorld:
“LENR, which we’re working on here, we’ve got 22 years now of experiments on
Low
On 2012-10-22 20:44, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Storms, E. and B. Scanlan, /Nature of energetic radiation emitted from a
metal exposed to H2/. J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci., 2012(submitted).
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEnatureofen.pdf
I don't think I have the expertise needed to discuss this
Hello group,
After contacting Michael A. Nelson directly and receiving confirmation
that he attended as an independent witness to Defkalion GT testings, it
looks like Mark Gibbs changed his tune a bit. Full article here:
Hello group,
Today, an official announcement about test results was posted on the
Defkalion GT forum:
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17t=4143
As previously promised, we are attaching two files that contain a signed
protocol and a preliminary report by one independent
On 2012-10-19 14:12, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Exec Sum of Defkalion Test Review - Sept 2012.pdf [52.49 KiB]
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/download/file.php?id=31
By the way, I wonder if the way DGT blacked out some information in the
pdf above was *very* weak on purpose.
Cheers,
S.A.
On 2012-10-19 14:12, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
Today, an official announcement about test results was posted on the
Defkalion GT forum:
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17t=4143
Two videos have been added:
Explanation of the calorimetry set-up:
http
On 2012-10-19 14:12, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
2012-09-07_Test Report Validation_Signed_No Names.pdf [3.52 MiB]
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/download/file.php?id=30
An earlier version with names of this test report has been posted on
ecatnews.com, pulled from the browser cache of a user
On 2012-10-19 17:17, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
http://ecatnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/2012-09-07_Test-protocol-signed.pdf
On page 18:
Test observer, Michael Nelson, was asked to come in lieu of Micheal Melich due
to Dr. Melich's current constraints [...]
Michael Melich is on Rossi's
On 2012-10-18 10:42, Mint Candy wrote:
*Take note:
Check Patent bottom right.
http://lenr.scienceontheweb.net/
M.*
A more convenient link to the patent:
http://www.google.com/patents/US20120033775
Cheers,
S.A.
On 2012-10-17 10:22, Peter Gluck wrote:
FYI: Prof. Francesco Piantelli's US Patent Application is here:
http://images3.freshpatents.com/pdf/US20110249783A1.pdf
I've already seen this before. Look:
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/PiantelliSmethodforp.pdf
Cheers,
S.A.
1 - 100 of 612 matches
Mail list logo
