Re: [Vo]:AI is replacing the Boss

No need for the bosses then. AI run firms with no manager, no directors and no shareholders would be far more efficient and able to out compete human run companies. The opportunity for worker owned business without management is a plus not a negative. On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 at 05:11, Axil Axil

Re: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons

Have to so the math. > > Kind Regards walker > > On 14 November 2016 at 12:49, Ian Walker <walker...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> With that size of sphere, 6000m radius, I am guessing, from experience >> the density of interactions will be only a l

Re: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons

range. If LENR works in the way suggested it may be that rules about no lead tungsten within x meters might apply. Unless we go for Axil's 10ft dense walls option. Have to so the math. Kind Regards walker On 14 November 2016 at 12:49, Ian Walker <walker...@gmail.com> wrote: &g

Re: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons

Hi all With that size of sphere, 6000m radius, I am guessing, from experience the density of interactions will be only a little above natural background. You need to know the surface area of the sphere. Then the distribution curve for the straight line from the source; then calculate peak and the

Re: [Vo]:White house report on AI

Hi all In reply to a.ashfield's point on Drones being used as weapons. Russia has been using PKT armed (Medium machine gun about the same as an M240) Kamov KA 137 drones since the 1990s. The US analysts were shocked at the advanced capabilities Russia showed, eg not their best stuff, in the

Re: [Vo]:2nd "ERV" as well as being incomplete has obvious risks of being fraudulent.

Hi all Should have included this in the above text. https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg109304.html Source for what "Jed Said" My apologies. This head cold is slowing me down :) Kind Regards walker On 14 April 2016 at 17:42, Ian Walker <walker...@gmail.com>

Re: [Vo]:2nd "ERV" as well as being incomplete has obvious risks of being fraudulent.

Hi all Should have included this in the above text. Source for what "Jed Said" My apologies. Kind Regards walker On 14 April 2016 at 17:40, Ian Walker <walker...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all > > In reply to Jed > > "... as I said. I.H. says > &g

Re: [Vo]:2nd "ERV" as well as being incomplete has obvious risks of being fraudulent.

ir qualifications? 7) Can you point me to a nuclear plant they worked on? 8) Can you point me to a report on LENR they have done in the past? Just the beginning of questioning your assertions. Kind Regards walker On 14 April 2016 at 16:34, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ia

Re: [Vo]:2nd "ERV" as well as being incomplete has obvious risks of being fraudulent.

Hi all As to the supposed ERV 2 we have seen no proof it exists. In fact the first we hear of it is from Jed, who then starts to back-pedal quite a bit about it. I personally think Jed has misunderstood what IH has said perhaps under the instruction of APCO Worldwide as a spun story to trap the

[Vo]:2nd "ERV" as well as being incomplete has obvious risks of being fraudulent.

Hi all Jed Rothwell is posting various comments about a supposed 2nd ERV. As described by Jed Rothwell this report has several problems. 1) First of all according to what Jed Rothwell reports it was commissioned solely and apparently secretly by IH with obvious risks of bias. 2) It breaks the

Re: [Vo]:Fabio Penon

Hi all Fabio Penon was the primary engineer that IH helped select, on which to base their Due Diligence, for purchase of the E-Cat license and IP access, they were so happy with his work, and that of the team they selected and that they agreed for him to run; that they spent $10 million dollars

Re: [Vo]:IH selected Fabio Penon to lead the team they chosed for the test of the E-Cat

choice for the ERV and they were fully satisfied with him. There is no wiggle room here Jones Beene the facts are facts. Kind Regards walker On 10 April 2016 at 17:10, Ian Walker <walker...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all > > In reply to Jones Beene > > There is only your ima

Re: [Vo]:IH selected Fabio Penon to lead the team they chosed for the test of the E-Cat

for the ERV asnd they were fully satisfied with him. Kind Regards walker On 10 April 2016 at 17:09, Ian Walker <walker...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all > > In reply to Jones Beene > > There is only imagination here. I deal in facts. > > Fabio Penon was the primary engineer tha

Re: [Vo]:IH selected Fabio Penon to lead the team they chosed for the test of the E-Cat

asnd they were fully satisfied with him. Kind Regards walker On 10 April 2016 at 16:57, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > *From:* Ian Walker > > > The key fact remains - Fabio Penon was the primary engineer that IH > helped select and approve for the E-Cat Te

[Vo]:IH selected Fabio Penon to lead the team they chosed for the test of the E-Cat

Hi all The key fact remains Fabio Penon was the primary engineer that IH helped select and approve for the E-Cat Test. IH felt so secure in the capabilities of the team they selected that agreed with their assessments to the tune of $10 million. Rossi has continued to use the Nuclear Engineer,

[Vo]:Selective memories IH selected and agreed to the team to test the E-Cat

Hi all Some people seem to suffer from a selective memory glitch. HIGH TEMPERATURE E-CAT MODULE Test of July 16th, 2012 for E-Cat Certification Was with a three man test team of: :Fabio Penon , M.Eng. (Nuclear Engineer, Product Certification Specialist) E-Cat Electronic Control System Specialist

Re: [Vo]:Open Letter from Brian Ahern

Hi all In reply to Jed Rothwell On the matter of who was the target of the March 10 statement by I.H. I think it can be reasonable argued that the target was Krivit, as Krivit himself admits he sent one of his missives where he said he was going to write a report stating Rossi and IH had split

Re: [Vo]:Open Letter from Brian Ahern

Hi all If this letter is real then: For any scientist to prejudge results as Ahern just apparently has, inevitably means bias. Given the nature of this open letter one must of course consider whether Ahern has had ulterior motives in approaching experimentalists and replicaters to offer his

Re: [Vo]:NY Times, "How Saudi Arabia Turned Its Greatest Weapon on Itself"

, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ian Walker <walker...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> So oil will drop to 15% of its expected value from that 2014 high. >> > > When the demand for a commodity rapidly drops by 85%, it does not follow > that

Re: [Vo]:NY Times, "How Saudi Arabia Turned Its Greatest Weapon on Itself"

-guest-post-by-ian-walker-the-end-of-the-fossil-fuel-age/ A couple of things to take away in relation to the above discussion: 1) the advice to Saudi Arabia was to move to a market decline strategy and to lower the price of oil both to kill off their competitors by stacking it high and selling cheap

[Vo]:Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions and Nuclear Spectroscopy Technical Progress Report from the 1960s

Hi all Has anyone seen this paper before? http://www.osti.gov/scitech/servlets/purl/12513302/ Kind Regards walker

[Vo]:Los Alamos National Laboratory Numerical simulations for low energy nuclear reactions including direct channels to validate statistical models

Hi all Do not remember this slide set about low energy nuclear reaction being available before. Do any of you recognise it? Numerical simulations for [lexicon]low energy nuclear reactions[/lexicon] including direct channels to validate statistical models By Kawano, Toshihiko For Los Alamos

[Vo]:Lawrence Livermore report on Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions At The Highest Microscopic Level

Hi all Suddenly lots of reports with [lexicon]Low Energy Nuclear Reactions[/lexicon] being discussed. https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/790602.pdf Whatever is going on? [image: :D] I will post up a few more [image: ;)] Keep watching. Kind

Re: [Vo]:A 21st Century Case for Gold: A New Information Theory of Money.

Hi all In all honesty we need to consider a post capitalism world. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/video/2015/aug/12/paul-mason-capitalism-failing-time-to-panic-video?CMP=fb_us Kind Regards walker On 13 August 2015 at 17:32, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com wrote: No - Craig I

Re: [Vo]:Investigation by NC Department of Health into IH/Rossi/Vaughn/etc

Hi all As has been noted on Ecatworld in a post by US_Citizen71 http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/02/04/rossi-responds-to-publication-of-inspection-report/ and as many thought from the disjointed ambiguous and odd phrasing in the letter as well as missing pages, the letter appears to be a Photoshop

[Vo]:One of Stephan Pomp's, three arch sceptic co authors, appears to have switched sides

Hi all According to forum posts that were discovered by Sifferkol, just now; one of Stephan Pomp's, three arch sceptic co authors, appears to have switched sides and is now saying Rossi and Carl-Oscar Gullström will win next years Nobel prize! Hmm... http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/?p=454

[Vo]:Failure to fulfil the Galileo test

Hi all If you refuse to look through the telescope then you have failed the Galileo test; you have stopped being a scientist and practising a religion. A little classical style play from 20,000 years ago. Prometheus (An inventor and log bridge builder) I have invented fire! Stephan Pomp, (A

[Vo]:ExtremeTech headlines with LENR success

Hi all Cold fusion reactor verified by third-party researchers, seems to have 1 million times the energy density of gasoline Andrea Rossi’s E-Cat — the device that purports to use cold fusion to generate massive amounts of cheap, green energy – has been verified by third-party researchers,

Re: [Vo]:another Law breaker?

Hi David I did a search for good-bye-second-law-of-thermodynamics It came up in google with this http://www.laserfocusworld.com/articles/2014/09/good-bye-second-law-of-thermodynamics.html I clicked on the link in google and it took me to the page that I quote the first few lines of: Home

Re: [Vo]:gossip from Paul, at E-Cat world

The Reference to Neutron production is telling. This gives an area to research for others and a clue as to the process, eg one that is capable of producing Neutrons of an energy n. Neutron decay is: n0 → p+ + e− + νe. p and e could be the more important energy producers in LENR! What energy

Re: [Vo]:gossip from Paul, at E-Cat world

Hmm... Boron. On 18 September 2014 09:32, Ian Walker walker...@gmail.com wrote: The Reference to Neutron production is telling. This gives an area to research for others and a clue as to the process, eg one that is capable of producing Neutrons of an energy n. Neutron decay is: n0 → p+ + e

Re: [Vo]:gossip from Paul, at E-Cat world

Hmm... Lithium Hmm... Graphite and Beryllium or maybe a Hydrocarbon. Moderation may well be the key and granular size and percentage in the mix. On 18 September 2014 09:43, Ian Walker walker...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm... Boron. On 18 September 2014 09:32, Ian Walker walker...@gmail.com wrote

[Vo]:Is Rossi Vindicated by the Goldilocks nature of LENR in his choice of an Edisonian approach?

Hi all If the mention of Neutron emission by Paul on e-catworld is correct; then is Rossi fully vindicated by the Goldilocks nature of LENR in his choice of an Edisonian approach to LENR development? I say Goldilocks nature of LENR because I conjecture that control of the Neutron emission is the

Re: [Vo]: The Absurdity of Darwinian Evolution.

Hi all I just added Jojo the fairytale numpty to my spam filter I no longer see him other than when he is mentioned in others posts. Kind Regards walker On 26 August 2014 21:37, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote: I just saw 1 unsubscribe. Where did you see others? 2014-08-26 15:06

Re: [Vo]: The Absurdity of Darwinian Evolution.

Hi all If everyone adds him to their spam filters he will disappear back in to his own little fairytale world of utter irrelevance. See Evolution works thank Darwin. Kind Regards walker On 26 August 2014 22:15, Ian Walker walker...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all I just added Jojo the fairytale

[Vo]:Ignore Jojo Iznart's fairy tales about what e-catworld actually said, unless you enjoy being conned.

Hi all In Reply to Jojo Iznart: You just love making stuff up. You would have a great future writing for the Daily Mail, they write lots of fairy tales too. This is what it says in the report Jojo Iznart is referring too in full rather than Jojo Iznart's spin *Update #17 (August 20, 2014)* I

[Vo]:MIT Paper by

Hi all I came across this: http://dspace.mit.edu/openaccess-disseminate/1721.1/71632 ;) Kind Regards walker

Re: [Vo]:New Paper on LENR theory submitted to arxiv and Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science

...@pacbell.net wrote: From: Ian Walker Ahern is also not mentioned in the paper. Would you care to mention where you think the paper supports Ahern's view? OK. Dubinko starts out - the first sentence of his paper with this quote: “A new mechanism of LENR

[Vo]:New Paper on LENR theory submitted to arxiv and Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science

Hi all An interesting new theory paper has been submitted to Cornell's Arxiv http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1406/1406.3941.pdf Also submitted to the Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science Submitted to Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science (16.06.2014) Low energy nuclear

[Vo]:Re: New Paper on LENR theory submitted to arxiv and Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science

Hi all Also Indexed at http://scienceindex.com/stories/4260551/Low_energy_nuclear_reactions_driven_by_discrete_breathers.html And available by https://scirate.com/search?q=au:Dubinko_V+in:cond-mat Kind Regards walker On 17 June 2014 12:21, Ian Walker walker...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all

Re: [Vo]:Re: New Paper on LENR theory submitted to arxiv and Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science

Hi all Further work on “discrete breathers” (DBs) here. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23585770?dopt=Abstractholding=npg Kind Regards walker On 17 June 2014 12:28, Ian Walker walker...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all Also Indexed at http://scienceindex.com/stories/4260551

Re: [Vo]:New Paper on LENR theory submitted to arxiv and Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science

Hi all This paper supports many of the concepts and views that Edmund Storms brought to vortex. I hope Edmund continues to follow the vortex and has read the paper. Kind Regards walker On 17 June 2014 12:21, Ian Walker walker...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all An interesting new theory paper has

Re: [Vo]:New Paper on LENR theory submitted to arxiv and Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science

Hi all In reply to Jones Beene on the matter of who the author is referencing: I agree the paper does not reference *Mills *other than in passing where the author states in the introduction: Numerous experimental data on low energy nuclear reactions assisted by the crystalline environment [1-3]

[Vo]:Swedish Professors Chomping at the Bit

Hi all On the matter of scepticism: No one is denying people the right to be scientifically sceptical of LENR but to be a sceptical scientist you must conform to the Galileo Test and put your eye to the telescope. For the radio reporter to speak out against a report that has not been published,

Re: [Vo]:Swedish Professors Chomping at the Bit

does it work the builders will then ask you tell Me. LENR is not science, it is top secret project engineering. On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Ian Walker walker...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all On the matter of scepticism: No one is denying people the right to be scientifically sceptical

Re: [Vo]:nice essay Jed

Hi all Have not read the whole thread yet; might it be that the forces involved cause the Hydrogen to get sucked/pushed away from the surface into the bulk of the hydrate in preference to starting the reaction and that in the case of bulk materials the reaction only takes place when the bulk of

Re: [Vo]:nice essay Jed

Hi all This would explain the apparent success of the high fractal surface powders. Kind Regards walker On 8 May 2014 10:40, Ian Walker walker...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all Have not read the whole thread yet; might it be that the forces involved cause the Hydrogen to get sucked/pushed away

Re: [Vo]:Ever-vigilant Wikipedia editors

Hi all To quote Bob: The Times they are a changing. Kind Regards walker On 1 May 2014 18:21, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: I'll be darned. They have a page for Mizuno, and one for the ICCF conferences too. The ICCF page was there years ago but someone deleted it. It is back.

Re: [Vo]:Lewan book

Hi all I posted some of this earlier but I think people missed it as I posted it with different heading to every one else in the thread. I particularly want people to pay attentions as to why I think Rossi's patent is in point of fact a perfect patent trap, set to succeed at the MOMENT OF

Re: [Vo]:More on the Mizuno presentation

Hi all I think Rossi's reference to Jet engines may be with regard to matters that came up in the NASA seedling presentation, particularly the Brayton Cycle. It took up a big chunk of the NASA report: http://nari.arc.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/SeedlingWELLS.pdf I think a cloak of

Re: [Vo]:EFA SRL E-Cat Shipping Documents?

Hi all No Possibility of Hoax since we already know Industrial Heat, LLC/Cherokee Investment Partners admits taking delivery of the Rossi's Ecat technology and the photographs have been matched to members of the Management board of Cherokee Investment Partners. I wonder who the Partners are on

Re: [Vo]:New Celani paper

Hi all In Reply to Jed: Good that there was so much replication from so many diverse sources. As well as the fact it was accepted on the Journal of Chemistry and Materials Research on the website of the International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE).

[Vo]:New LENR paper by Francesco Celani et al in the Chemistry and Materials Research at the

I thought I would bring this paper to the attention of Vortex members. Improved understanding of self-sustained, sub-micrometric multi-composition surface Constantan wires interacting with H2 at high temperatures: experimental evidence of Anomalous Heat Effects Francesco Celani, E.F. Marano, A.