Thanks to all who noticed and kindly commented on my leaving the Vortex-L
list (apparently actually getting off the list takes rather longer than I
expected …).
Since you ask, I’m quitting because I simply don’t have the time to keep up
with all of the posts to the list most of which are
Correct me if I'm wrong but they didn't really achieve OU because the
target only got 10% of the incident energy so the actual energy gain was in
a subsystem rather than in the whole system.
[m]
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at
Is there an explanation somewhere of how this machine is supposed to work?
Who's funding the projects?
[m]
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 1:29 PM, a.ashfield a.ashfi...@verizon.net wrote:
RAR are progressing with the construction of their second gravity
engine and posted four new photos today.
January 31, 2014
General Fusion Founder to Speak at TED Conference
Chief Scientist to highlight progress on much-anticipated fusion energy
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA--(Marketwired - Jan. 31, 2014) - When TED, the
world's primary idea exchange, moves to its new home in Vancouver this
year, the
fusion. At what point does rational
thinking take over from the bad habits of the past?
Ed Storms
On Jan 31, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Mark Gibbs wrote:
January 31, 2014
General Fusion Founder to Speak at TED Conference
Chief Scientist to highlight progress on much-anticipated fusion energy
Follow-up to the sailors affected by radiation poisoning on the USS Ronald
Reagan: US Sailors’ Lawsuit Dismissed in Fukushima Radiation Exposure
Case ...
http://legalinsurrection.com/2013/12/us-sailors-lawsuit-dismissed-in-fukushima-radiation-exposure-case/
[m]
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 5:10 PM,
Oxyntix just got a 1M UKP venture capital investment ... it looks like
there are deep pockets that believe the company has got something.
[m]
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The reference patent states:
The development of fusion power has been an area of
Which aspects of the 'results' do you think are true and why?
[m]
On Saturday, November 9, 2013, Nigel Dyer wrote:
I am not sure that a translation would be of much help. With LeClair I
think you need to try and separate out the hypothesies as to the mechanism
from the observations of
last inch. When life gives you lemons, make some lemonade,
man.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Why does the MFMP produce such execrable writing? That article reads that
it was translated from Urdu into English.
[m]
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Kevin
Vortex
[m]
On Thursday, November 7, 2013, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'mgi...@gibbs.com'); wrote:
So, from other threads on this list it sounds like it's possible that the
detected radiation might not be extraordinary?
What do you mean
Really? Is LeClair's experiment that easily replicated? If it can be done
for $250 why has no one else done it?
[m]
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
If these experimenters wanted to produce gammas, they only need to
replicate the LeClair cavitation
and
others. Gamma rays have been sporadic and unpredictable. I do not know of
any that appear on demand. I hope these come from the vasty deep when you
do call for them.
(When you invoke them, as we say in the programming biz.)
Mark Gibbs may have the impression that it is not extraordinary
if this statement holds water. He says that
replication is extremely dangerous and he does not want to see anybody go
through what he when through..
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Really? Is LeClair's experiment that easily replicated? If it can be done
people monitor for magnetic fields?
[m]
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Yes, I meant not significant ... that was what I took away from Bob
Higgins' comment:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg
as beneficial use and must, therefore, be licensed by the
patent owner.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
But that doesn't answer the question: If it only costs $250 to replicate
LeClair's experiment why hasn't it been done?
[m]
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:31 PM
Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
That's the logical implication of what Axil's saying.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
So, in reality, the LeClair effect can't be duplicated either because
LeClair won't permit it or because it doesn't actually exist.
[m
think he was referring to no radiation leakage outside of his
reactor vessel. I believe his reaction is well optimized and produces
prodigious gamma photons whose energy is below 20keV and almost all of it
is thermalized in his reactor shell.
Bob
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Mark Gibbs
experimenter might find a way to overcome LeClair’s controls.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
I was querying Axil's original claim:
If these experimenters wanted to produce gammas, they only need to
replicate the LeClair cavitation reactor. $250 dollars will do
anything let alone cnoid de Broglie Matter wave soliton wave
packages ... if anyone has any links or explanations of what this means
(or is supposed to mean) I'd love to hear it.
[m]
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Mark Gibbs
Why does the MFMP produce such execrable writing? That article reads that
it was translated from Urdu into English.
[m]
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The pundit writes an
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Good to see you back in the vortex!
Thanks ... actually, I never left ... just lurking and waiting for the
world to change.
[m]
Comment:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory this month achieved a positive net
energy yield from hot fusion. See:
https://lasers.llnl.gov/newsroom/project_status/index.php
National Ignition Facility.
They still have much work to do to make it an economic power source.
Alain,
Thanks, very kind of you to say so.
[mg]
On Friday, October 18, 2013, Alain Sepeda wrote:
Just a thanks for his honest work of reasonable skeptic, thus treasonable
convinced bu evidences...
It allows that article to exist:
See http://spaceweather.com/ ... it's bogus.
[mg]
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:31 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
David,
You probably did not listen to the video
- the scenarios they discuss are not as upbeat as yours.
There are a number of additional videos/articles on the subject.
Quite
/blog/96) but the focus there is
considerably different so unless it has a significant bearing on IT the
topic won't get covered.
Thanks for all your plaudits, criticisms, and comments in my Forbes
postings over the last couple of years.
Regards,
Mark Gibbs.
What do people expect these demos will show? What could make them
convincing or unconvincing?
If you reply either publicly or privately, please let me know if I may cite
your name if I quote you.
[mg]
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
My dear friends.
How do you know this?
[mg]
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Defkalion has a much superior technology. You can just ignore Rossi.
2013/7/18 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
This puts to rest Guglinski's worry that Rossi might drop dead, and the
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2013/07/15/why-cold-fusion-has-to-die/
[mg]
Can anyone explain how this machine is supposed to work?
[mg]
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Sterling says they are building one in Illinois:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:RAR_Energia_Ltda_Gravity_Motor
We've got a page full of gravity
Everything you're talking about equates intelligence with problem solving
which is essentially a very narrow view of what intelligence involves and
that's fine if problem solving is the only measure of intelligence you care
about. The problem with this perspective is that it excludes other aspects
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:20 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
*Curious what others think about that water moving up in the spout as it
crosses onto land. I don't think the humidity changes that much so I do not
think it is due to a change in condensing (which would be vacuum
I've seen some buzz that implies Swedish District Heating may take up Hydro
Fusion's E-Cat offer but when I chased it down everything pointed to just
one article self-published by Russ George [1] that actually only suggests
SDH as a suitable candidate. Anyone know anything more?
[mg]
[1]
While this whole argument has become somewhat ridiculous the assertion that
... to idly discuss these claims without proper verification is very
careless because of some theoretical economic impact has got to be the
most ridiculous so far. If this were a real concern then science fiction
should be
Am I missing something here? Surely if the control cell is producing some
small amount of energy from an LENR process due to contamination but it's
less than that being produced by the experimental cell then while a
baseline might be hard or even impossible to establish wouldn't a
significant
was
not a reasonable explanation for the excess.
-Mark I
** **
*From:* mark.gi...@gmail.com [mailto:mark.gi...@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *Mark
Gibbs
*Sent:* Wednesday, June 26, 2013 4:31 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:MFMP cells in Europe and US now showing signs of
excess heat
If it can be agreed that the IR measurements were, to within some
reasonable margin of error, accurately measuring output power then the only
issue in dispute is how much input power was provided. If, and this
obviously may not happen, Rossi were to allow another test and the only
point at which
I've been following the endless arguments about how the tests could have
been rigged and it seems like every theory has been repeated over and over
again but no one who claims it's a fraud seems to be willing to admit they
just don't know even though they have no actual evidence of fraud and can't
[mg]
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
I've been following the endless arguments about how the tests could have
been rigged and it seems like every theory has been repeated over and over
again . . .
I have
I don't know if you ever looked at my fakes document (the lost post which
never DID show up ...)
Did you post that on Technobabble? I never saw anything like that ... only
the two posts we discussed.
[m]
The mere appearance of being normal doesn't mean someone is normal.
[mg]
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:27 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
It’s the weekend! Time for a brief break!
** **
For all those Vorts who might be interested in some OT far out
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
... Richard Aho … or “Smokie” CEO or MIST - tries to defend his device
to skeptics. It is not easy to do. There are many red flags and the
so-called testing stinks.
Now where have we heard that before ... ?
He may or
Are there any indications the Reifenschweiler effect produces excess heat
along with the decrease in radioactivity?
[m]
On Sunday, June 9, 2013, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I do not see where I can add a comment to that article in ColdFusionNow
but anyway, here are three papers from Otto:
:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Might I suggest using a smaller point size and any typeface other than
Comic Sans (it's a typeface that give us type nerds bad dreams).
I think Comic Sans is a perfect typeface for this list, since it scares
away anyone who
Might I suggest using a smaller point size and any typeface other than
Comic Sans (it's a typeface that give us type nerds bad dreams).
[mg]
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Roger B rogerbi...@hotmail.com wrote:
But, seriously, that was an excellent description. Can you supply a link
to it?
Even though I'm still wearing my skeptic's hat (that's the one with the
propeller on top) isn't the argument about the need for calorimetry made
irrelevant the amount of energy observed to have been generated? In other
words, even with more precise measurements the exact energy output couldn't
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:22 PM, DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com wrote:
yes, calorimetry is not needed IF you believe the claims, methods, and the
effect.
The claims are that the device produces significantly over unity, the
methods have been alluded to but Rossi is definitely not public with
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Ah, now we have it ... it's the questions of reproducability and
controlability,
But these questions have no bearing on whether the effect is real or not.
We're talking about
What is a Hydroton? I googled the term and all I could find were references
to a clay-based plant growing medium much prized by marijuana growers ...
[mg]
On Thursday, May 30, 2013, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.comjavascript:_e({},
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Cude has waved his hands and said there might be a method of deception
that he has not thought of yet. As I have often pointed out, such
assertions cannot be tested or falsified. There might be an error in Ohm's
law we
Daniel,
The link you gave (May 31st, 2013 at 2:53
PMhttp://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=806cpage=10#comment-708958)
doesn't have a posting with the text you quoted and I can't find that text
on the site. Can you send a link to the letter from Rossi you quoted?
Thanks.
[mg]
On Fri, May
Rossi is infuriating. And his caps lock key is stuck.
[mg]
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
No, that's all I had. Probably he deleted. Well, I hope someone else
printed the screen...
2013/5/31 Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com
Daniel,
The link you
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
I suspect hand waving began as a derisive reference to occult
activities since these might involve the waving of hands and/or a wand. .
You would be completely wrong. In fact, that is perhaps the most ridiculous
Mark,
If I get a chance may I quote you?
[mg]
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Mark Iverson markiver...@charter.netwrote:
There have been more than 60,000 papers published on high-temperature
superconductive material since its discovery in 1986, said Jak Chakhalian,
professor of physics at
Sunil,
May I quote you in a Forbes posting? If I may, may I cite your name?
Thanks in advance.
Yours,
Mark Gibbs.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Sunil Shah s.u.n@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
My first post, after a couple of year's hiding in the shadows..
Just want to settle a couple
...@gibbs.com
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 11:50:29 -0700
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hartman's not a vet...
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sunil,
May I quote you in a Forbes posting? If I may, may I cite your name?
Thanks in advance.
Yours,
Mark Gibbs.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Sunil Shah s.u.n
Does anone have any more in-depth bios of the group that tested the E-Cat.
This is what I have so far:
Giuseppe Levi
Assistant Professor
Department of Physics and Astronomy
Bologna University
Bologna, Italy
Bio:
Which author is a vet? I didn't find any such thing ...
[mg]
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Andrew andrew...@att.net wrote:
Rossi has stated that the testers brought their own cables. A poster here
asserts that they were Rossi's cables. As usual, this issue is not
addressed by the paper.
on the hit list.
Wrong. I don't have time to educate you but you are simply wrong.
[mg]
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Andrew andrew...@att.net wrote:
**
I am with Mark. Kevin needs to grow some ethics.
Andrew
- Original Message -
*From:* Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com
We both thank you.
[mg]
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I wrote:
That's pretty good! Bravo for Mark Giggs . . .
And for Mark Gibbs. Him too.
- Jed
a
different address. Please standby until he has a chance to respond.
This list has benefited you in the past. I suspect your gain exceeds your
loss.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Kevin,
Publishing a summary or abstract of my piece would have been
...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Terry,
Thanks. The issue has become a moot point and Bill needn't bother.
I really don't care what you do to the offender; but, injuring this
list is not in your best interest. After all, didn't you get
, this is
the Internet ... you can cite a link as Alan Fletcher did so people can get
directly to the original article (which, BTW, has been updated). Copying
the entire piece to hundreds of people just wastes bits.
William, please delete Kevin's post from the archive.
Yours,
Mark Gibbs.
On Tue, May
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Andrew andrew...@att.net wrote:
There's another way to perpetrate the output hoax, and that's to secrete
infrared lasers in the ceiling and heat the device up remotely.
Lasers?! Don't you think that seems just a little farfetched? And it
raises, once again, as
reputation.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Kevin,
Publishing a summary or abstract of my piece would have been fine (under
the concept of Fair Use) but posting my article in full to a list (and a
public list at that) is a breach of both my copyright and Forbes
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Arnaud Kodeck arnaud.kod...@lakoco.bewrote:
Rossi has recently stated in JONP that local hot spots in its reactor were
the main issue. If a spot come to a certain upper threshold, the reactor
goes out of control.
Does anyone know what happens when Rossi's
So, in run away mode the reactor can do/always does emit radiation (of what
type? X-rays and/or gamma?) is it possible that the casing of the reactor
and the other components would not become radioactive? Is there any
information as to what type of detector Celani used? If the spectators at
the
Consider yourself asked ... oh, and what type of radiation was/would be
involved?
[mg]
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
If you require the theory behind this overview, just ask.
Are the fine details of the Toyota experimental set up known? Has anyone
tried to replicate that configuration?
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
Others said that the Toyota research and the NEDO program were stopped
because progress was too slow (I
Interesting lack of objectivity:
During the congress I met Andrea Rossi for the first time. In my
estimation he is kind, competent and reputable.
[mg]
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Further to the thread about gammas, here are these money quotes
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Interesting lack of objectivity:
During the congress I met Andrea Rossi for the first time. In my
estimation he is kind, competent and reputable.
Why do you say this reflects
http://www.rdmag.com/news/2013/03/nanotubes-generate-huge-electric-currents-osmotic-flow
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18524911.600-13-things-that-do-not-make-sense.html?full=true
And #13 is ...
[m]
13 Cold fusion
AFTER 16 years, it's back. In fact, cold fusion never really went away.
Over a 10-year period from 1989, US navy labs ran more than 200 experiments
to
Bugger. Missed that. I assumed that they'd link from a current article [1]
to a current article, not to history and now I find that that original
article, which was linked to a current article wasn't any such thing ... it
was also from 2005! I am now very suspicious of New Scientist but welcome
http://www.universetoday.com/100298/is-a-comet-on-a-collision-course-with-mars/
There is an outside chance that a newly discovered comet might be on a
collision course with Mars. Astronomers are still determining the
trajectory of the comet, named C/2013 A1 (Siding Spring), but at the very
least,
(Sing to the tune As Time Goes By)
And so, it's come to this
A miss is just a miss
When a comet's passing by
The fundamental laws apply
Across the sky ...
[mg]
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Jed Rothwell
jedrothw...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'jedrothw...@gmail.com');
wrote:
So, a
I don't think this link has been posted to this list yet:
http://futureinnovation.larc.nasa.gov/view/articles/futurism/bushnell/low-energy-nuclear-reactions.html
** **
[m]
http://www.rdmag.com/news/2013/02/light-particles-illuminate-vacuum
In an article published in the PNAS scientific journal, researchers from
Aalto University and the VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland showed
experimentally that vacuum has properties not previously observed.
According to the
“People have often thought there’s no upper bound for wind power—that it’s
one of the most scalable power sources,” says Harvard University applied
physicist David Keith. After all, gusts and breezes don’t seem likely to
“run out” on a global scale in the way oil wells might run dry.
Yet the
A question for Ed:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The definition of success rate in these experiments is fuzzy. Ed stated
with 90 cathodes. He tested them and identified 4 that met all of his
criteria. These 4 worked robustly, and repeatedly. So,
looking for the critical
feature, but I believe they have not yet looked at small enough scale to
see the active sites, which I believe are in the 1-5 nm range.
Ed
On Feb 21, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Mark Gibbs wrote:
A question for Ed:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw
BTW, did everyone see the Gizmag article NASA's basement reactor (
http://m.gizmag.com/article/26309). It's a bit fluffy and hand-waving but I
was intrigued by this section:
According to Zawodny, LENR isn’t what was thought of as cold fusion and it
doesn't involve strong nuclear forces. Instead,
When I recently suggested in response to Peter Gluck's question [1] that a
testable theory was a necessity for LENR to be recognized as a great
invention [2], it sure seemed like you all disagreed.
It sure sounds like you now think a theory is required ...
[m]
[1]
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
It makes no sense to demand a testable theory or a demonstrably practical
device. Science does not work that way. It usually starts with discovery
and then progresses to theory, to practical device. (On rare occasions
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
They did not need to put first-principles theories of flight in their
patent. Gibbs seems to think this has been a requirement all along.
O'Malley is making unfounded assumptions. Gibbs never wrote or implied any
such
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
They did not need to put first-principles theories of flight in their
patent. Gibbs seems to think
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Gibbs didn't say anything about the Wright Brothers ... that was Ed
Storms:
Wrong person! Ed was speaking loosely.
Ah, so if Ed speaks loosely it's OK and forgivable but if I do
Too late: http://www.indiegogo.com/robotdragonfly/x/1658702 ... basic
version to be priced at $250 without camera and a camera-less silent
version at $280 (perfect for stealth toxic chemical delivery). Surveillance
version with two cameras (one HD) with an on-board computer that may be
powerful
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
Yes, but more exactly a trial-and-errorist.
Which is hardly god-like ... it seems to me that the Catholic god
(omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent) is what a true god should be ...
the alpha and omega ... all other
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Chris Zell chrisz...@wetmtv.com wrote:
However, that still allows for a transcendent impersonal God who operates
as a system - and might even answer prayers.
A true god would not answer prayers as he would have created the conditions
that required your
How about throwing in some predictions on world resource use, nuclear
power, wind power, robots, the erosion of funding for HF, or the zombie
apocalypse?
[mg]
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The IT predictions are interesting!
I have sworn off
http://www.polratings.com/predictions
Currently they're all IT predictions but anyone care to predict what will
happen in CF in 2013? If you have an insight, fire away:
http://www.polratings.com/predictions/prediction-submission/
[mg]
Does anyone know what the status is of the Nanor device at MIT? Has it been
kept running? Has anyone duplicated the device and successfully run it?
Thanks in advance.
[mg]
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Swartz has been very secretive. His web site:
http://world.std.com/~mica/jettech.html
Yep, that's a lot of ... er, stuff.
Probably the
, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
And the video is AWOL. Sigh.
Damn. Well the .pdf is there:
http://coldfusionnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/HagelsteinPdemonstra.pdf
here and
there for support, but there is no NANOR video included (I didn't get
through it to the end though!)
From the release on his website, it seems that there may be some video
from the Swartz portion of the course soon.
On 1/31/13 7:28 PM, Mark Gibbs wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7
is magnificent, technology works for us.
Peter
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Mark Gibbs
mgi...@gibbs.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'mgi...@gibbs.com');
wrote:
I must be behind the curve ... and what might KILOR and MEGAR be?
[m]
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Peter Gluck
peter.gl
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
**
What if the entire corpus of physics is loaded, and Watson concludes that
LENR is the superior energy solution for the future of humanity, far more
so than hot fusion or fission ?
**
What if Watson concludes
not be surprised, so it's kind of boring.
2013/1/17 Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
**
What if the entire corpus of physics is loaded, and Watson concludes
that LENR is the superior energy solution for the future of humanity, far
On Friday, December 28, 2012, Peter Gluck wrote:
but it raises the question if/when will enter LENR such lists?
When there is a testable theory or a demonstrably practical device.
So far, LENR is, to be perhaps somewhat poetic, no more than a
willow-the-wisp ...
[mg]
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
