Which aspects of the 'results' do you think are true and why? [m]
On Saturday, November 9, 2013, Nigel Dyer wrote: > I am not sure that a translation would be of much help. With LeClair I > think you need to try and separate out the hypothesies as to the mechanism > from the observations of what happened. Too often LeClair confuses the > two. There is a lot to be said for the 'Method/Results/Discussion' format > of presenting information. > If we are convinced that at least some aspects of the 'results' are real > (I am), I tend to feel you need to start again from first principles on the > 'discussion' section. > > On 08/11/2013 23:13, Axil Axil wrote: > > LeClair said as follows: > > “The experiment gave off powerful crested cnoid de Broglie Matter wave > soliton wave packages that were doubly periodic and followed the Jacobi > Elliptic functions exactly, mostly in the form of large doubly-periodic > vortices. Hundreds of wave trains and vortices appeared everywhere and are > permanently burned into walls, objects and trees surrounding the lab”. > > > > What could it all mean - a translation. > > cnoid > > IMHO, this is a misspelling of Conoid > > > > In geometry <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometry>, a *conoid* is a Catalan > surface <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catalan_surface> all of whose > rulings intersect a fixed > line<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_%28geometry%29>, > called the *axis* of the conoid. If all its rulings are perpendicular to > its axis, then the conoid is called a right > conoid<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_conoid> > > > > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conoid> > >
