*One key point that any successful LENR theory must address is the ways and
means involved with the concentration of power. There must be a mechanism
in nature that gathers weak levels of power from the ambient environment
and concentrates that power to a high enough level to affect the nucleus of
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 16 Sep 2013 14:34:52 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
*One key point that any successful LENR theory must address is the ways and
means involved with the concentration of power. There must be a mechanism
in nature that gathers weak levels of power from the ambient
*Hydrinos result from an experimental misinterpretation of the
Nanoplasmonic conversion of infrared radiation converted into the blue
light frequency range released to the far field by the whispering gallery
wave effect ater that infrared EMF is transformed by Fano resonance.*
* *
*If you think
It sounded very soothing
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
*Hydrinos result from an experimental misinterpretation of the
Nanoplasmonic conversion of infrared radiation converted into the blue
light frequency range released to the far field by the
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:47:22 -0400:
Hi Axil,
*Hydrinos result from an experimental misinterpretation of the
Nanoplasmonic conversion of infrared radiation converted into the blue
light frequency range released to the far field by the whispering gallery
wave effect
Fractional charge carriers discovered
Oct 24, 1997
Last month, two groups of physicists revealed the first direct evidence
that an electric current can be carried by quasiparticles with fractional
charge.
Electric charge normally comes in an indivisible unit: the charge of an
electron. Indeed,
Also see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laughlin_wavefunction
the *Laughlin
wavefunction*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laughlin_wavefunction#cite_note-1
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:51 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Fractional charge carriers discovered
Oct 24, 1997
Last month, two
Eric,
Perhaps the following recent posting, and its comments is of interest -
WhatÂ’s the Google-Brillouin Connection?
http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/09/whats-the-google-brillouin-connection/
Eric Walker wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:46 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
I'm perplexed
Godes focus on theory make me feel cautious.
anyway COP of 2 have been tested by SRI, that is the only serious claim I
am aware of...
I' afraid that like for BLP, the focus on theory may just slow down
progress.
Anyway in the past some technology get working despite bad theory... But
recently it
For those who missed it, yesterday's video interview of Brillouin founders
is at:
Brillouin Energy Interview on Smart Scarecrow Show
http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/09/brillioun-interview-on-smart-scarecrow-show-tonight-live-thread/
The reason for this interview is that Brillouin needs some money for
development of their gas phase reactor.
Brillouin is proposing that their reaction is a variant of the Widom-Larsen
theory, where a fast electron combines with a proton to become a neutron
(reverse beta decay). The Brillion
The interview is by Gary with Robert Godes (inventor) and Bob George
(business).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXAg_424_2o
I'd recommend watching from 0:30 to 0:45... then 1:02- 1:08
Highlights:
Brillioun calls their LENR CECR, for Controlled Electron Capture Reaction
The theory is described
I'm perplexed that Google wouldn't provide funding after observing some
of the experiments.
Were they either (a) unconvinced, (b) already allied with others,
(c) directed not to engage with Brillouin, (d) reluctant for other reason?
If I recall correctly, Godes claims the absence of tritium is
Keep an open mind, but a closed wallet.
Their gas phase system has the potential to conform to Nanoplasmonic
principles. However, I do not yet detect a good chance for plasma
condensation of the catalyst to nanoparticles. But at least they say that
they use a catalyst.
The reactor
Does anyone else see that the explanation given by Godes is pure word
salad having no relationship to reality. The description is in direct
and basic conflict with what is known and accepted in science. I'm
flabbergasted that money is being spent and discussion is taking place
based on
The other thing that bothers me is their claim that the device converts
energy into mass. A kind of nuclear refrigerator they say. That would be
an endothermic reaction. As far as I know, no one has observed significant
endothermic reactions except for chemical reactions in the initial loading
of
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Does anyone else see that the explanation given by Godes is pure word salad
having no relationship to reality. The description is in direct and basic
conflict with what is known and accepted in science.
I do not know enough about theory to judge
http://coldfusionnow.org/brillouin-energy-patent-granted-in-china/
*Essentially, it is a tube containing the catalytic material with the metal
nickel that allows for control over the flow of hydrogen gas as well the
Q-pulses, the electromagnetic pulses that start and drive the reaction. *
This
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
This is standard WL theory. 700K electron volts are needed to make neutron
production from electrons and protons energetically possible.
I know. I guess the total output is continuously exothermic. But at one
point in the video it sounds like they are
This is standard WL theory. 700K electron volts are needed to make neutron
production from electrons and protons energetically possible.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The other thing that bothers me is their claim that the device converts
energy
Its not like Jed to miss something like that. I sense a Disturbance in The
Force.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:10 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Axil is correct.
If Brillouin and W-L are correct, the e+p--n conversion taps 782 KeV
electromagnetic field energy. Temperature does not
Axil is correct.
If Brillouin and W-L are correct, the e+p--n conversion taps 782 KeV
electromagnetic field energy. Temperature does not decrease.
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
This is standard WL theory. 700K electron volts are needed to make
neutron
production
Jed,
Google apparently did not archive it, but I recall reading a posting by
Godes to Goat Guy who was a caustic skeptic on an eet blog (I think.)
Godes realized that Goat Guy lived nearby and offered to let him inspect
his lab and test procedures. Goat Guy did not respond.
Now that Brillouin
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Its not like Jed to miss something like that. I sense a Disturbance in
The Force.
Okay, I admit, I wasn't paying close attention to the video. I find it
irritating.
I am updating all of the ICCF3 Abstracts, which is tedious. Another reason
I am
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:46 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
I'm perplexed that Google wouldn't provide funding after observing some
of the experiments.
I didn't hear anything about Google's decision after the neutron
measurements -- perhaps they did go ahead with funding after all? I
25 matches
Mail list logo
