In reply to Robert Lynn's message of Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:56:00 +:
Hi,
[snip]
I believe Rossi operates at about 25bar (350psi).
Doesn't his patent app. say 2-20 bar? If so then one could probably get
something to work (for demonstration purposes) near the lower end of the scale.
It may not be
Engineer wrote:
And I know you read the big V; so, did you figure it out before you read it?
DefkalionGT:
We respect big V and its role/commitment in CF/LENR for so many years.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Engineer wrote:
And I know you read the big V; so, did you figure it out before you read
it?
DefkalionGT:
We respect big V and its role/commitment in CF/LENR for so many years.
Yeah, that was the Arrg! Go on! reference
Peter, How about this cheap heating element. Fits inside a 1/4 copper tube
perfectly.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/350505999493?ru=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%3A80%2Fsch%2Fi.html%3F_from%3DR40%26_trksid%3Dm570.l1313%26_nkw%3D350505999493%26_sacat%3DSee-All-Categories%26_fvi%3D1_rdc=1
Jojo
handle this type of pressures
Question : Do you think Rossi heats the chamber while the H is pressuised at
2000 psi
Thanks Pete
From: jth...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:DGT Screenshot
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:27:03 +0800
Peter, How about this cheap
has other sizes.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Peter B
To: Vortex Ron
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 5:52 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:DGT Screenshot
JoJo Thankyou for helping , it might just do the trick
I have a young electrical engineer helping me out once
while the H is
pressuised at 2000 psi
Thanks Pete
--
From: jth...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:DGT Screenshot
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:27:03 +0800
Peter, How about this cheap heating element. Fits inside a 1/4 copper
tube
be careful with the effect of hydrogen on any metal (make hydrides, make
brittle, leaks and then self-ignite- H can burns a µg/min according to
wikipedia, check airliquide.com for safety of H2...)
maybe (I have no clue) H2 can transform the characteristics of a
thermocouple, especially at high
This is bad practice ! (and it is not a small point). Often thermocouple
is used generically.
Thermocouples are NOT adequate for this kind of measurement, in the long
term. They are cheaper but degrade too easily.
For reliable measurement of hydrogen at higher temps - you should use RTDs.
I my previous job as a IC engine development engineer we used platinum RTDs
(also called PRTs) for most water and air temperatures (200°C), but
thermocouples for all exhaust temperatures (500°C) where errors of 1-2°C
don't really matter.
While platinum RTDs are best, they are several times the
Robert Lynn wrote:
A cheap thermocouple with error of 1-2°C is OK for an amateur
experiment measuring reactor temperatures that are in the range
4-700°C . . .
Many professional HVAC engineers use K-Type thermocouples. They are not
only for amateurs.
- Jed
Feb 2012 11:56:00 +
Subject: Re: [Vo]:DGT Screenshot
From: robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
2000-6000psi hydrogen is pretty dangerous, be very careful about your design
and setup, make sure all your valves seals and fittings are able to withstand
those pressures, keep
noticed that ebay seller has different lengths at different watts ,
should help for the future (if we ever find a reaction )
Thanks again
Pete
From: jth...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:DGT Screenshot
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 18:45:07 +0800
Pete, you're welcome
JoJo wrote:
Axil, Please, by all means keep the speculations and the embarrassing
experimental advice coming. I have learned a lot from you and many other
people here. Vortex has been the most useful forum as far as gaining
insight into replicating Rossi.
And PeterB wrote:
I have only been
Thanks Mark
That should help quite a bit
Pete
From: zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:DGT Screenshot
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 20:05:10 -0800
JoJo wrote:“Axil, Please, by all means keep the speculations and the
embarrassing experimental advice coming. I have
You should not hold the champagne. Rossi said that once his reaction was
going out of control and Levi, I think it was him, injected Nitrogen to
stop the reaction. So, I don't think this is exclusive to Argon, rather, it
is by cutting off H and substituting it for something else.
2012/1/31 ecat
products or companies that might fit the bill
Thanks for you help
Pete
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:48:34 -0800
Subject: Re: [Vo]:DGT Screenshot
From: ecatbuil...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Ta-Da ... yes it is argon. It is a Mills catalyst, and we know they use it.
Hold
So, Jones (and others) what do you think we are seeing here?
http://imgur.com/g26QI
[img]http://imgur.com/g26QI[/img]
Temperature vs time?
T
Direct Link:
http://i.imgur.com/g26QI.jpg
T
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
So, Jones (and others) what do you think we are seeing here?
http://imgur.com/g26QI
[img]http://imgur.com/g26QI[/img]
Temperature vs time?
T
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Direct Link:
http://i.imgur.com/g26QI.jpg
My guess is the red (Ch2) is the input from the Variac and blue (Ch1) is
the reactor temp.
Or do you think it has something to do with the democrats and republicans?
;-)
T
I'm pretty sure they are both temperatures. Heater temp (red) and
reactor temp (blue) is my guess.
The heater is in the 100C range, the other in the 400C range.
The spikes are a puzzle though... Maybe transient interference from
turning on or off the heater? It doesn't seem possible for the tip
Yes, it is basically the same kind of temperature spike seen by Janssen in
the BLP video but probably both traces are from RTDs mounted in different
locations.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfjOIoPwolg
From: Terry Blanton
Direct Link:
http://i.imgur.com/g26QI.jpg
T
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at
You can read it blourrily - Channel 1 inner, Channel 2 external
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Yes, it is basically the same kind of temperature spike seen by Janssen in
the BLP video but probably both traces are from RTDs mounted in different
I meant, blurred - gee i wrote that email in a rush!
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Patrick Ellul ellulpatr...@gmail.comwrote:
You can read it blourrily - Channel 1 inner, Channel 2 external
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Yes, it is basically the
to tell you goodnight
From: ellulpatr...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:06:17 +1100
Subject: Re: [Vo]:DGT Screenshot
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
I meant, blurred - gee i wrote that email in a rush!
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Patrick Ellul ellulpatr...@gmail.com wrote:
You can read
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Robert Leguillon
robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:
As for the sparks: In this tests there where supposed to be two and we got
two. In other tests, we can maintain the sparks very very close to each
other and for as long as we want.
They also told us to tell
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Yes, it is basically the same kind of temperature spike seen by Janssen in
the BLP video but probably both traces are from RTDs mounted in different
locations.
I asked about the second spike and whether they added H to
At 04:20 PM 1/30/2012, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:04 PM,
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Yes, it is basically the same kind of temperature spike seen by
Janssen in
the BLP video but probably both traces are from RTDs mounted in
different
locations.
In the BLP video
At 04:35 PM 1/30/2012, Robert Leguillon wrote:
As for the sparks: In this tests there where supposed to be two and
we got two. In other tests, we can maintain the sparks very very
close to each other and for as long as we want.
Frequencies! I smell Frequencies!
They also told us to tell you
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
I asked about the second spike and whether they added H to cause it.
They admitted they did something; but, it did not involve adding H.
Well, since they say they do not use RF then what would it be? The
Letts/Cravens effect involves lasers. None
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Ta-Da ... yes it is argon. It is a Mills catalyst, and we know they use it.
By Jove, I think you have it!
Should I ask? Or simply say Arggg go on!
I think I shall.
eg
T
Ta-Da ... yes it is argon. It is a Mills catalyst, and we know they use it.
Hold the champagne.. Piantelli says argon stops the nuclear process...
http://www.rexresearch.com/piantelli/piantelli.htm
In the pictures the yellow tubing appears to be for vacuum. But later
in the video a tube goes
In the first video that I watched, when the camera panned left to view the
gas cylinder on the floor, they blurred out the vid shortly after the tank
came into view... so are they conscious of what gets onto a video??? Yes...
-mark
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene
33 matches
Mail list logo
