DOS was more a CP/M clone than Unix... Unix is structurally multiprocess
with virtual memory, and macro kernel.
it is not CP/M or DOS
2014/1/25 Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:34 PM, leaking pen itsat...@gmail.com wrote:
I've never heard anyone malign his
Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Gates was at the helm of Microsoft when it acquired DOS. DOS came out many
years after and was an anorexic imitation of UNIX.
That is incorrect. They brought it out within months, not years. IBM wanted
an operating system for the upcoming PC. Microsoft
You can't really compare DOS and UNIX. UNIX was built so researchers
could share time on a big server system through dumb terminals.
DOS was built for a single user on a low resource personal computer.
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric Walker
You are bringing me back to my Kaypro Computer days. Good Stuff
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Gates was at the helm of Microsoft when it acquired DOS. DOS came out
many years after and was an anorexic
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Gates was at the helm of Microsoft when it acquired DOS. DOS came out
many years after and was an anorexic imitation of UNIX.
That is incorrect. They brought it out within
There were a number of operating systems around at that time but few that
would run on the 8086/8088 hardware. One with multitasking was the iRMX86
OShttp://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/intel/iRMX/142721-003_iRMX_86_System_Programmers_Reference_Manual_May81.pdfsupplied
by Intel with its
From ecatworld.com ---
PRESS RELEASE: Industrial Heat Has Acquired Andrea Rossis E-Cat Technology
This just out!
Industrial Heat Has Acquired Andrea Rossis E-Cat Technology
RESEARCH TRIANGLE, N.C., Jan. 24, 2014 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/
Industrial Heat, LLC announced today that it has
Now we see clearly why Mills arranged his hasty demo, weeks before he should
have.
Perhaps the aggressive approach of Industrial Heat will at least get more
information out there to assimilate.
-Original Message-
From: pagnu...@htdconnect.com
From ecatworld.com ---
PRESS RELEASE:
A couple of links for Industrial Heat and Cherokee Investment Partners.
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=127890
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=245130378
http://www.cherokeefund.com/index.htm
Thanks.
I notice the advisory committee is a remarkable collection of talent. See -
http://cherokeechallenge.com/team/
This gives Rossi a lot of credibility.
I wonder how this will impact various industries and markets.
-- Lou Pagnucco
Craig wrote:
A couple of links for Industrial Heat and
But, isn't this a good thing?
It forces potential investors to act quickly, or lose out.
-- Lou Pagnucco
Jones Beene wrote:
Now we see clearly why Mills arranged his hasty demo, weeks before he
should have.
Perhaps the aggressive approach of Industrial Heat will at least get more
So if Rossi sold the rights to the product, then doesn't this mean that
he's out of the business? If so, then it seems like quite a waste of
time. If the product is credible, then he threw away billions.
Craig
On 01/24/2014 04:38 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
This gives Rossi a lot of
Craig cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
So if Rossi sold the rights to the product, then doesn't this mean that
he's out of the business?
Well, it could mean he is a stockholder instead of the boss.
If so, then it seems like quite a waste of time. If the product is
credible, then he threw
Doesnt say what he acquired it for, probably cash, royalties, and stock. if
he's smart.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Craig cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
So if Rossi sold the rights to the product, then doesn't this mean that
he's out of the business? If so, then it seems like quite a
On 01/24/2014 05:01 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
If so, then it seems like quite a waste of time. If the product is
credible, then he threw away billions.
Not if he sold it for billions. I don't see what you mean. The terms
of sale have not been make public. I have no idea what they are,
Rossi had already sold the US rights over a year ago to Ampenergo, and they
are the ones who apparently sold to IH not Rossi.
AFAIK Rossi apparently retains his most of rights in Europe and Asia but he
has sold out in some countries.
It will be interesting to know the status of China.
leaking pen itsat...@gmail.com wrote:
Doesnt say what he acquired it for, probably cash, royalties, and stock. if
he's smart.
You mean, it does not say what THEY acquired the rights for from Rossi, and
ROSSI probably got cash, future royalties, and stock. I think that would be
normal in a
Lou I agree with you. Must be good to have business people take over at
this time.
Craig, I think you see this with the wrong colored glasses. To realize that
one does not have the capacity (Money, knowledge, network, credibility,
personality etc.) and therefore sell when one has put in what one
Craig cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe, but it seems highly unlikely that Industrial Heat has access to
that kind of money. Not too many people have access to 'billions'.
You misunderstand. No one would pay billions up front. That would be in the
form of royalties if the product
I wrote:
In other words, they get ownership now, but they have to pay now and also
in the future.
And if they don't pay billions, he gets ownership back.
This is the sort of thing Edison did when he founded General Electric. He
joined forces with Big Money. See:
Somehow I think millions plus your name to live on throughout history would be
slightly more important than Billions at age 60+
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Lennart Thornros
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 2:07 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Lou I agree with you. Must be
Jed,
On a more selfish note, you probably have had a number inquiries from
industries since the first FP press conference, which do you think will
benefit if LENR proves to be what it claims?
Some obvious losers I think are coal, fission, petroleum, maybe utilities.
The winners might be
blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
Somehow I think millions plus your name to live on throughout history
would be slightly more important than Billions at age 60+
Why not have both?!? Billions in royalties plus having your name live on.
Why do you have to choose?
Rossi is not a fool. He knows
I've never heard anyone malign his programming skills. moral character,
visual design skills, absolutely, but never his coding chops.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
Somehow I think millions plus your name to live
Bill Gates is very much focused on his legacy. Mr. Rossi 'effect' no
doubt is as well.
At a certain age, you appreciate your mortality and see things a bit
different than younger folk do.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:34 PM, leaking pen itsat...@gmail.com wrote:
I've never heard anyone malign
pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
On a more selfish note, you probably have had a number inquiries from
industries since the first FP press conference, which do you think will
benefit if LENR proves to be what it claims?
I have not had that many inquiries from industry. More often from
leaking pen itsat...@gmail.com wrote:
I've never heard anyone malign his programming skills. moral character,
visual design skills, absolutely, but never his coding chops.
I believe I have seen jealous people attack his programming skills as well.
People often denigrate Microsoft as a whole.
Gates should do no further philanthropy until he puts his wealth and
influence behind shifting the tax base off of economic activity (income,
capital gains, sales, value added, inheritance, etc.) and onto (liquidation
value assessed) wealth with the bulk of government revenue disbursed as
Looks like Frank Acland was right on target with the Cherokee information
from a couple of weeks ago. Excellent work digging through the clutter.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:25 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
From ecatworld.com ---
PRESS RELEASE: Industrial Heat Has Acquired Andrea
http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/news/2014/01/24/onfirmed-raleighs-cherokee-buys-into.html
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like Frank Acland was right on target with the Cherokee information
from a couple of weeks ago. Excellent work
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/news/2014/01/24/onfirmed-raleighs-cherokee-buys-into.html
Interesting comments here:
Confirmed: Raleigh’s Cherokee buys into controversial nuclear tech device
Executives at Cherokee Investment
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Skeptics of Rossi’s technology, including Forbes contributor
http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2013/11/29/why-im-certain-that-the-rossi-e-cat-doesnt-work-as-advertisedTim
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:34 PM, leaking pen itsat...@gmail.com wrote:
I've never heard anyone malign his programming skills. moral character,
visual design skills, absolutely, but never his coding chops.
Gates was at the helm of Microsoft when it acquired DOS. DOS came out many
years after
33 matches
Mail list logo
