]
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 10:23 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:quite good info, but some bad news from Italy
Frank Acland
October 8th, 2014 at 11:21 AM
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations on another report that demonstrates the reality of your
invention!
One question: The reactor we
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 11:09 AM
To:vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:quite good info, but some bad news from
Italy
I speculated upon a system architecture somewhat similar
.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Jun 10, 2015 3:09 pm
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:quite good info, but some bad news from
Italy
Dave, , Axil, etal--
I prefer the idea of spooky action at a distance
Cook
,
From: David Roberson
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 11:09 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:quite good info, but some bad news from Italy
I speculated upon a system architecture somewhat similar to this many months
ago on vortex. There the concept
container
wrt ssm through some extraordinary type of linkage .. I think Axil called
it an EMF backbone.
Fran
*From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, June 09, 2015 10:23 PM
*To:* vortex-l
*Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:quite good info, but some bad news from
Italy
Frank
...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, June 09, 2015 10:23 PM
*To:* vortex-l
*Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:quite good info, but some bad news from
Italy
Frank Acland
October 8th, 2014 at 11:21 AM
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations on another report that demonstrates the reality of your
invention!
One
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 10:23 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:quite good info, but some bad news from Italy
Frank Acland
October 8th, 2014 at 11:21 AM
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations on another report
In reply to David Roberson's message of Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:20:35 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
At the same core temperature this device should put out that many times as
much heat energy as its smaller brothers. The surface area appears larger,
but the ratio of volume to surface area must be several
Roberson
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 1:20 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:quite good info, but some bad news from Italy
Bob,
I have not reached any conclusions regarding the actual process that is taking
place within Rossi's reactors. It might be as you are suggesting
Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 11:57 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:quite good info, but some bad news from Italy
Rossi came up the Mouse and Cat architecture to solve the control problem. The
open source LENR community have experienced a large number
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 8 Jun 2015 23:56:45 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Rossi came up the Mouse and Cat architecture to solve the control problem.
Rossi cam up with the cat and mouse architecture to attain reasonable COPs. It
has nothing to do with control. In fact control is more
How did Rossi solve his contol problem?
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 6:30 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 8 Jun 2015 23:56:45 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Rossi came up the Mouse and Cat architecture to solve the control problem.
Rossi cam up with the cat and mouse
and mouse system
operational? Too many statements without any valid support.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jun 9, 2015 7:16 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:quite good info, but some bad news from Italy
How did Rossi solve his
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Tue, 9 Jun 2015 09:54:27 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Rossi: resonances can generate virtual entities whose energy is higher
than the sum of the energy of the singles.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:45 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
It is not all that
@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jun 9, 2015 7:16 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:quite good info, but some bad news from Italy
How did Rossi solve his contol problem?
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 6:30 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 8 Jun 2015 23:56:45 -0400:
Hi,
[snip
, and the
HotCat doesn't have the combination, then it make sense that the HotCat
would be
easier to control.
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jun 9, 2015 7:16 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:quite good info, but some bad news from
that the HotCat would be
easier to control.
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jun 9, 2015 7:16 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:quite good info, but some bad news from Italy
How did Rossi solve his contol problem?
On Tue, Jun
.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Jun 8, 2015 11:57 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:quite good info, but some bad news from Italy
Rossi came up the Mouse and Cat architecture to solve the control
problem. The open source
. The replicators are fighting
enormous temperature problems while he is playing with normal materials.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Jun 8, 2015 11:57 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:quite good info, but some bad news
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Tue, 9 Jun 2015 22:23:11 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Thank you.
All combined,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
[snip]
Oh well, another theory bites the dust! :)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
I am disappointed in Rossi because Rossi has allowed the open source LENR
community to be misled by the Lagano report. We know now that the mouse is
the only reactor type that is powered under the Rossi latest reactor
architecture. The Cat is not powered and depends on the mouse as its
activator.
The post above was removed from E Cat world.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
I am disappointed in Rossi because Rossi has allowed the open source LENR
community to be misled by the Lagano report. We know now that the mouse is
the only reactor type that is
The post was not removed -- it just went into the moderation queue (not
sure why -- sometimes it is automatic). Now it is showing.
Kind regards,
Frank
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The post above was removed
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The post above was removed from E Cat world.
Do you mean:
That was your post on E-cat world? (Or someone else's?) And the editor
there removed it?
That's not good.
- Jed
For today
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/06/how-could-we-help-francesco-celani.html
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The open source community should move on from showing the inflated power
production numbers that Lagano has promulgated, and concentrate on getting
the “mouse” to activate N numbers of Cats so that LENR can show some real
Rossi came up the Mouse and Cat architecture to solve the control problem.
The open source LENR community have experienced a large number of reactor
blowouts when the reactor is fully loaded with fuel.
The open source community could keep at the single reactor method for N
number of years, or do
27 matches
Mail list logo
