thomas malloy wrote:
Kyle Mcallister wrote:
Vortexians,
OK, this is getting a little crazy-go-nuts.
1. Margaret Sanger was responsible for some good, yes.
and Ed Storms responded
The problem is that some people would be very willing to leave you
and people with your belief system alone.
However,
thomas malloy wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
snip
Lets start over at the beginning. There are these two super human
entities who both want to be G-d, Unfortunately there's only room for
one, One's going to toss the other into a black hole, him and all his
followers with him.
Now this all
On Sunday 10 April 2005 18:52, Edmund Storms wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
snip
Lets start over at the beginning. There are these two super human
entities who both want to be G-d, Unfortunately there's only room for
one, One's going to toss the other into a black
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forget about the strange looking floating creature hovering next to the cliff that seems to be defying the laws of gravity, the one you can't catch nor eat. Focus on that hungry looking Saber-tooth tiger crouched on top of the cliff. Yeah, THAT ONE! The one that seems to
Message-
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 1:14 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: OT: If I were Pope.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forget about the strange looking floating creature hovering next to the cliff
that seems to be defying the laws
Praise Bob and pass the slack!Keith Nagel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Stephen,Uh oh, time for a Hymn,Onward Christian soldiers,Onward Buddhist priests,Onwards, fruits of Islam,Fight 'till you're deceased.Fight your little battles,Join in thickest fray,for the greater glory,of
From: Stephen A. Lawrence
...
Of course.
Do not see the fnord. If you see the fnord, the fnord
will eat you. You must not see the fnord.
Makes you wonder -- are there fnords in the information
we find on the Internet, too, or are they restricted to
physical media? I can't see them
At 7:56 PM 4/5/5, Harvey Norris wrote:
[snip]
Find ANY magic cube; if you think it exists.
[snip]
Hopefully you have seen the article by Eric W Weisstein, Semiperfect Magic
Cube, from Mathworld, A Wolfram Resource,
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/semiperfectmagiccube.html
Regards,
Horace
Ah! The answer really *is* 42!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Answer_to_Life,_the_Universe,_and_EverythingHorace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopefully you have seen the article by Eric W Weisstein, "Semiperfect MagicCube," from Mathworld, A Wolfram
You've put up a fabulous series of posts on several topics in the last
week or two, Jed. Thanks.
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Regarding the central tenet of religion, the existence of God, I have
not studied this in any depth, but as far as I can tell, arguments for
the existence of God are logical
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
This actually has been studied, but I can't give the reference off
hand. In every generation some number of people experience theophanies;
IIRC the number amounts to a few percent of the population. Whether you,
personally, accept such experiences as being really
Michael Palin writes:
There are Jews in the world, there are Buddists,
There are Hindus and Mormons and then
There are those that follow Mohammad, but
I've never been one of them.
I'm a Roman Catholic,
And have been since before I was born,
And the one thing they say about Catholics is
They'll
From: Jed Rothwell
...
It is quite rational, but the conclusion you reach
depends upon your preconceptions, background, training
and expectations. In my mother's case she integrated
it into her pre-existing picture of reality and concluded
it must be a clinical problem rather than a
Well, if my cat is any indication, they're real. She chases things I can't see frequently![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no idea if what my mother was seeing really existed or not.
Do you Yahoo!?
Better first dates. More second dates. Yahoo! Personals
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no idea if what my mother
was seeing really existed or not. Doesn't really matter. However, the
fact that western influenced scientific rationale would simply proclaim
that my mother was experiencing nothing more than a
hallucination is, in my view, a cop
out.
Like in science, the conclusion one reaches depends on the assumptions
made at the beginning. The beliefs of each religion and the rules
supposed to be God-given suffer from this same limitation.
In this article the author makes the argument that the rules of the
Catholic Church, i.e. no
Grimer wrote:
But the most effective weapon
against the disease has not been the Aids lobby's 20-year promotion of
condom culture in Africa, but Uganda's campaign to change behaviour and
to emphasise abstinence and fidelity - i.e., the Pope's
position.
I know nothing about religion, but I know
Edmund Storms wrote:
How many more people must suck
the resources out of the earth before the Church changes its policy? I
suggest that even science can not mediate the damage if population grows
at a sufficiently rapid rate.
Some of the ecological damage from overpopulation is permanent.
Vortexians,
OK, this is getting a little crazy-go-nuts.
1. Margaret Sanger was responsible for some good, yes.
She was also crazy. Not the kind of person I would
want to spend much time with. Very pro-eugenics. If
you support that, then congratulations, go build
yourself a private Gattaca. Leave
Kyle Mcallister wrote:
Vortexians,
OK, this is getting a little crazy-go-nuts.
1. Margaret Sanger was responsible for some good, yes.
She was also crazy. Not the kind of person I would
want to spend much time with. Very pro-eugenics. If
you support that, then congratulations, go build
yourself a
--- Kyle Mcallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vortexians,
5. Are you guys actually reading this? I don't get
many replies
GOD comes from the inside out; not the outside in.
Exoteric politics resides with the misidentification
of the spirit with the body. We are not the body.
If you
21 matches
Mail list logo
