In reply to froarty...@comcast.net's message of Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:20:27 +
(UTC):
Hi,
[snip]
Robin,
If you mean the basic reason you can't have a real sub ground state the
kinetic energy argument is here http://www.phact.org/e/z/hydrino.htm E=
-me^4/2h^2 OR
This derivation
PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Nickel has unique physical properties
Hi Fran,
On your web site you state:
The hydrino as defined by Dr Randell Mills has a real fractional quantum
state (sub-ground state) which is impossible.
Why is it impossible in your opinion?
(BTW private email
-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
To: froarty...@comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 2:43:37 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Nickel has unique physical properties
In reply to froarty...@comcast.net's message of Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:35:20
+
(UTC):
Hi Fran,
I
On Oct 28, 2009, at 5:20 AM, froarty...@comcast.net wrote:
Robin,
If you mean the basic reason you can't have a real sub ground
state the kinetic energy argument is here http://www.phact.org/e/z/
hydrino.htm E= -me^4/2h^2
The argument against this is that the electron wavefunction is
At 01:27 PM 10/26/2009, Terry Blanton wrote:
Yes, specifically (p.5):
The AEH provides a possible explanation for the varied effectiveness
of the alpha, beta, and gamma
phases of CF loading. I suggest that in the initial loading phase the
adsorbed hydrogen is, as
suggested by others,
Hi Fran,
On your web site you state:
The hydrino as defined by Dr Randell Mills has a real fractional quantum
state (sub-ground state) which is impossible.
Why is it impossible in your opinion?
(BTW private email to your email address is rejected for security reasons).
Regards,
Robin van
...@bigpond.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 4:26 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Nickel has unique physical properties
Hi Fran,
On your web site you state:
The hydrino as defined by Dr Randell Mills has a real fractional quantum
state (sub-ground state) which is impossible.
Why
At 02:51 PM 10/26/2009, Terry Blanton wrote:
What I fear is that, with the various geometries, electron
configurations, confinement pressures, etc., optimized, we might still
be looking at a probability of fusion in the population which would
never yield a cost-effective replacement for dinosaur
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Looking at the Earthtech attempted SPAWAR replication,
You might search the archives for the term Little Effect and find
enlightenment.
Terry
At 07:49 PM 10/27/2009, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Looking at the Earthtech attempted SPAWAR replication,
You might search the archives for the term Little Effect and find
enlightenment.
The vortex archive seems to
Ok - I will assume the role of vortician shrink for a while ... and will
try to convey what it is that can be witnessed with angstrom bifocals, so to
speak.
This attempt at verbalization of an iterative sequence of events at the nano
level may not far removed from Horace's AEH, but it is a
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Siggy the Trick-Cyclist Nano-vision Specialist
Okay, Sigberto, now add in the complication of ZrO2 and the fact that
the crystalline structure changes with temperature. It gives one the
impression of the antagonist in
Yes, specifically (p.5):
The AEH provides a possible explanation for the varied effectiveness
of the alpha, beta, and gamma
phases of CF loading. I suggest that in the initial loading phase the
adsorbed hydrogen is, as
suggested by others, alternately in H and H+ form, but primarily in H+
form.
I think the loading percentage, concentration or pressure of hydrogen
that can be achieved is not the most important thing. Bubble
pressures of over 7 GPa (690,000 atmospheres) have been achieved by
hydrogen implantation in aluminum (see reference material below).
That was not enough by
(conductive doping).
Best Regards
Fran
Alternate THEORY for Hydrino based on Relativity http://www.byzipp.com/hydrino/
-Original Message-
From: Horace Heffner [mailto:hheff...@mtaonline.net]
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 2:14 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Nickel has unique
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
I think the loading percentage, concentration or pressure of hydrogen that
can be achieved is not the most important thing.
What I fear is that, with the various geometries, electron
configurations, confinement
It might be noted that, for pure Ni, the crystal structure is quite
similar to Pd whose face is only 36 pm larger.
Terry
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Given the looming importance of the Arata-Zhang finding - of a special
importance for a particular
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
It might be noted that, for pure Ni, the crystal structure is quite
similar to Pd whose face is only 36 pm larger.
Would it be your opinion then, that the A-Z alloy (84% Ni, 16% Pd) would
have a slightly tighter internal cavity than pure
Jones Beene referred to the Arata Zhang material with 84% Ni, 16% Pd. I
believe this is their most effective alloy yet. It is described in the
ICCF-15 abstracts, p. 35, quoted in full:
PRODUCTION OF HELIUM AND ENERGY IN THE “SOLID FUSION”
Y. Arata, Y.C. Zhang, and X.F. Wang
Center for Advanced
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
It might be noted that, for pure Ni, the crystal structure is quite
similar to Pd whose face is only 36 pm larger.
Would it be your opinion then, that the A-Z alloy (84%
Just a thought: has anyone ever tried aiming neutrons from a Farnsworth
Fusor at a loaded sample of nickel/H or palladium/D? I assume a Fusor could
be tuned to emit neutrons of any kinetic energy one chose?
Fusion is regarded as so difficult because the temperature needed to
overcome the
At 03:07 PM 10/25/2009, Jones Beene wrote:
Would it be your opinion then, that the A-Z alloy (84% Ni, 16% Pd) would
have a slightly tighter internal cavity than pure palladium? That could be
important, if true.
Arrgh, my kingdom for a knowledge of electrochemistry! Suppose I
wanted to try
At 03:56 PM 10/25/2009, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Jones Beene referred to the Arata Zhang material with 84% Ni, 16%
Pd. I believe this is their most effective alloy yet. It is
described in the ICCF-15 abstracts, p. 35, quoted in full:
PRODUCTION OF HELIUM AND ENERGY IN THE SOLID FUSION
Y. Arata,
On Oct 25, 2009, at 1:56 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
It might be noted that, for pure Ni, the crystal structure is quite
similar to Pd whose face is only 36 pm larger.
24 matches
Mail list logo
