*A mistake that many scientists make is assuming that a theory applies for
all possible magnitudes and/or combinations of physical variables which
affect the material under test.*
**
In reply...
Today, most worldwide national scientific funding is allocated toward high
energy physics. The
On 2012-01-12 08:16, David ledin wrote:
video from NASA about lenr (cold fusion)
http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html
Wow!, Just... wow!
Cheers,
S.A.
David, I wonder how did you find that video?!
That NASA site is really a chaotic. There ugly presentation reflects
bad implementation: trying to search for LENR related keywords and
nothing comes out.
mic
2012/1/12 Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com:
On 2012-01-12 08:16, David ledin
On 2012-01-12 10:16, Michele Comitini wrote:
David, I wonder how did you find that video?!
That NASA site is really a chaotic. There ugly presentation reflects
bad implementation: trying to search for LENR related keywords and
nothing comes out.
I found it here, it comes out as a single
It is even directly featured on the Technologygateway main site:
http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/
On the right, headlined with the words: *NASA's Method for a Clean
Nuclear Energy For Your Power Operated Technology
http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html*
Wolf
David, I
We're getting quite used to teasers. Here is another one on FreeEnergyTruth:
http://freeenergytruth.blogspot.com/2012/01/quality-not-quantity.html
The title 'quality, not quantity' seems to relate to the fact that not a
lot of articles were posted, lately, on FET. Among the labels attached to
I didn't follow the discussions on the potential catalyst here (as I am
no physicist), but could carbon be the missing ingredient (as C is being
mentioned in the video)? Have there ever been publications on a H-Ni-C
LENR experiment? Or is this something that NASA is working on and hasn't
Finally there is movement at the station.
http://www.mountainman.com.au/mansnowy.html
Now all are starting the hunt for the FPE / LENR Colt that got away.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fs_-DKUimeo
One day someone will do something like this for the LENR mob and their
journey to catch the Colt.
Dr. Randell mills named carbon as catalyst in his patent
Catalysts recipes from Dr. Randell mills
http://www.fileden.com/files/2011/11/19/3227177/Catalysts%20recipes%20from%20Dr.%20Randell%20mills%20.pdf
On 1/12/12, Wolf Fischer wolffisc...@gmx.de wrote:
I didn't follow the discussions on the
For some reason the technologygateway.nasa.gov site is not loading for
me. It just times out. It's been doing that all morning. Is there
another link to this video on another site?
video from NASA about lenr (cold fusion)
http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxeKeuh_2Bw
It's been uploaded onto YT now.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Energy Liberator energylibera...@gmail.com
wrote:
For some reason the technologygateway.nasa.gov site is not loading for
me. It just times out. It's been doing that all morning. Is
On 2012-01-09 12:09, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
In a short email of Francesco Celani [1] about WSEC 2012, it is
mentioned that the Piantelli group is in collaboration with
STMicroelectronics [2]. It seems he also talked about his recent
experiments, but no details have been
Dick Smith will give to the charity group $200,000 if Mr Bryce, a
member of the Australian Skeptics confirm e-cat work as claimed by
rossi.
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/energy-smart/mullumbimby-helping-to-save-world-20120112-1pxj2.html
http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/sensors/PhySen/docs/LENR_at_GRC_2011.pdf
What is this about?!? The W-L theory?
- Jed
Yes.
2012/1/12 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
What is this about?!? The W-L theory?
- Jed
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
Ever since talk began about increasing cathodic charge carriers emerging
with temperature at high loadings I've been trying to recall the name of
the early researcher who attached an anode directly to his cathode as well
as having an anode in the electrolyte, and I finally found the cite in
Excess
100 watts per gram (, = . outside of old British Empire) would be about
the same as the 100kW/kg that Rossi is claiming.
It is a great pity that these great results from Focardi, Preparata et al
15 years ago were not followed up on by others back then - can only have
been because other
*google translated
*
** The President of BIT World Congress (Xiaodian Mei) has surveys, very
insistent, details of our experiments, in particular the technique to
build pseudo-inert nanoparticles of materials at low cost.* *Considers
very interesting the alloy Cu-Ni but wants to know more
Wow - they went straight from their latest 2011 tests on gas loading [I didn't
see any results listed] to a proposed engine tests at Sterling lab in
Cleveland - in the pdf they show what appears to be separate crank cases for a
compressor piston on one end of reactor- cylinder and an expander
is it new. I remember seeing a paragraph on lenr (as real) there
http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/sensors/PhySen/research.htm
but I don't remenber of the attached PDF?
is it new? (maybe is it alzheimer for me?)
2012/1/12 Randall Fink randylf...@comcast.net
**
On 2012-01-12 16:42, Alain Sepeda wrote:
/google translated
A better translation for that paragraph:
[...] The chairman of the BIT World Congress (Xiaodian Mei) pressed, with MUCH
PERSISTENCE, for details about our experiments, and in particular about the techniques
[used] for building up
On 2012-01-12 16:51, Alain Sepeda wrote:
is it new? (maybe is it alzheimer for me?)
Not really. It first appeared on the internal NASA document search
engine a few months ago, but got soon removed after it went popular due
to coverage by 22passi blog (through suggestion by Francesco
World Pd reserves are about 1 billion troy
ounceshttp://palladium-bar.blogspot.com/2007/09/palladium-reserves-and-palladium.html.
Pd density is 12.02gm/cm^3. If it were all dedicated to power production
at 100,000W/cm^3 the Pd cold fusion nameplate capacity would be:
([1E9 * ounce_troy] *
As Terry and I have mentioned many times: Why doesn't Mills simply include
the entire periodic table as his list of catalysts ?
There is nothing on there that is ruled out.
After all, for 10 years Mills was using sodium as a control to show how good
potassium was! ... and then suddenly, without
You can reach the video from here: http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/
and it's headlined like this Feature Stories: NASA's Method for a Clean
Nuclear Energy For Your Power Operated Technology
This is, well... sort of weird. I wonder if anyone in NASA's PR department
or higher management has
PS: What does NASA have against buses?
http://i.imgur.com/PVMDi.jpg
I was wondering how long it would take Maryyugo to wade in with nonsense like,
I wonder if NASA management; she, he or it just doesn't get it. NASA
management knows all about this, and this type of public info is not introduced
willy nilly. I know many of these so called management people.
I
Les Case also used C, although as core of his granules which were coated
with Pd and he used D gas loading.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Wolf Fischer wolffisc...@gmx.de wrote:
I didn't follow the discussions on the potential catalyst here (as I am no
physicist), but could carbon be the
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Randy Wuller rwul...@freeark.com wrote:
I am sure this is all going to be really hard for her and the moletrap
people, the possibility of an energy breakthrough goes against their dark
age thinking. My advice to her and them is get used to it.
What
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
([1E9 * ounce_troy] * [{12.02 * gramm} / {(centi*meter)^3}]^-1) * ([100 *
{kilo watt}] / [{centi*meter}^3]) ? watt
= 2.5876415E14 W
over 200 terawatts.
Unfortunately, I think Preparata meant 100 not 100,000. The comma is a
decimal point. I do not
I wrote:
This is a crude estimate but I believe it does show that there is not
enough palladium to produce all the energy we need. If it turns out
palladium is the only suitable metal, we would have large centralized
generators producing most of our energy, supplying it as electricity for
use
I should add that I _did_ attempt to find Preparata's original paper online
and was unable to do so.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:37 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, I got double-whammied:
1) It was Beaudette that said 100,000 watts per cm^3 (that string is
outside of the
MaryYugo wrote:
What do you think that video clip says of a technical or scientific nature,
if anything? It's just wishful thinking without data, isn't it?
What you fail to acknowledge is that NASA would not put out a video like
that if they didn't have the data to back it up!
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
MaryYugo wrote:
“What do you think that video clip says of a technical or scientific
nature, if anything? It's just wishful thinking without data, isn't it?”
** **
What you fail to
At 10:05 AM 1/12/2012, Mary Yugo wrote:
What silliness, Randy. What do you think that video clip says of a
technical or scientific nature, if anything? It's just wishful
thinking without data, isn't it?
Based on the title, it's keyed off Zawodny's patent.
Technical or scientific nature?
At 06:20 AM 1/12/2012, David ledin wrote:
Dick Smith will give to the charity group $200,000 if Mr Bryce, a
member of the Australian Skeptics confirm e-cat work as claimed by
rossi.
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/energy-smart/mullumbimby-helping-to-save-world-20120112-1pxj2.html
Hmmm
From: James Bowery
I should add that I _did_ attempt to find Preparata's original paper online
and was unable to do so.
Google-books has one of Preparata's most popular books on QED online. There
is a chapter on LENR
http://books.google.com/books?id=u-MvobTFGLEC
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
I should add that I _did_ attempt to find Preparata's original paper online
and was unable to do so.
ICCF-6 Progress In New Hydrogen Energy, p. 136
Title: Everything you always wanted to know about cold fusion calorimetry
ICCF6 was published by the
-to-save-world-20120112-1pxj2.html
This doesn't make sense. Why would Rossi care about $200K? He already
said he doesn't want to do any more tests. And he claims he has a more
than $20 million client! Maybe these folks have not been following
Rossi's blog, LOL.
At 12:24 PM 1/12/2012, Jones Beene wrote:
From: James Bowery
Google-books has one of Preparatas most popular
books on QED online. There is a chapter on LENR
http://books.google.com/books?id=u-MvobTFGLECpg=PA153source=gbs_toc_rcad=4#v=onepageqf=false
But like a lot of google books : Pages xxx
I notice that on slide 11 they used a Hydrogen purification system as a proxy
for PF's electrolytic cell. I also notice that the Palladium membrane is
heated with a heater. I wonder if Rossi's heater is for a related purpose to
the process.
Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Calculating very generously- how many tons of palladium could be used in
Cold Fusion generators worldwide?
All of them. We will have no other use for the stuff.
Again, what could be, realistically the W/g power obtained by1 g of Pd?
That's easy.
-Original Message-
From: Alan J Fletcher
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Dick Smith will give to the charity group $200,000 if
e-cat work as claimed by rossi
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/energy-smart/mullumbimby-helping-to-save-w
orld-20120112-1pxj2.html
Hmmm ... why all the Ausie eCat Interest
I wrote:
A catalytic converter has 3 to 7 ounces of Pd = 200 g.
WHOA! That can't be right. The stuff costs $641 per oz. A catalytic
converter is a lot cheaper than that.
Let me reset and try again.
- Jed
Okay, I mixed up ounces and grams. Various sources say:
Catalytic converters cost between $400 and $900, depending on the size of
the vehicle. Average is around $500 retail replacement cost.
Catalytic converters have 1/20 of a troy ounce of palladium. That's 1.6
g. another source says 1.9 g and
Hehe...NASA seem to have touched a nerve with you Mary. Is that the sound
of establishment dogma crumbling I can hear.
From: Mary Yugo [mailto:maryyu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 13 January 2012 3:15 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:video from NASA about lenr (cold fusion)
You
Preparata was one of the greatest minds from what is becoming the hotbed of
new fizzix thinking. He was in a long line of Italian physicists who took
the unconventional to the max and did not back down from peer ridicule. It
did not begin and end with Fermi, but he must have been a prime
At 12:46 PM 1/12/2012, Jones Beene wrote:
Hmmm ... why all the Ausie eCat Interest? Where's OUR GUY?
Maybe he *is* Dick Smith...
Hmmm ... $200K is the same amount AeCG was willing to spend on a centa-cat.
(Need to check on his yachts )
I agree with MY that the video is empty...
The one of spawar is a gemstone, a rich content...
however as you notice the fact that it is published is important for a big
organization.
be careful anyway, because NASA is big and sick, and polit-buro control
is weak now.
the low quality of the video
The salient fact here is that all of the exhaust gas has to contact with
the palladium, or the gas would not be catalyzed (cleaned up). So you have
gas with 80% of the heat from the burned gasoline coming in contact with ~3
g of Pd or Pt.
Here is another way to estimate maximum thermal output
At 01:37 PM 1/12/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 12:46 PM 1/12/2012, Jones
Beene wrote:
Hmmm ... why all the Ausie
eCat Interest? Where's OUR GUY?
Maybe he *is* Dick Smith...(Need to check on his yachts
)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Smith_%28entrepreneur%29#Australian_products
On
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I know, most cars traveling ~80 miles an hour burn ~4
gallons of gasoline per hour.
That's 20 mpg. You must be thinking of SUVs. :-)
T
Hi, just to add some useful data
using some data used for electric car(french) in european small car market
http://sfp.in2p3.fr/Debat/debat_energie/websfp/Livet-elect.htm
for small urban cars (the kind who consume 3-4litter/100km)
Cx is around 0.33 for profiled cars, ( 0.5 for SUV), front
.
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/energy-smart/mullumbimby-helping-to-save-world-20120112-1pxj2.html
Hmmm ... why all the Ausie eCat Interest? Where's OUR GUY?
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
Being a quite achiever. Lots happening and in progress.
Are you involved in this test? Will you give us a special report if so?
T
Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
Being a quite achiever. Lots happening and in progress.
I assume you mean QUIET achiever. Not quite quite. Quite quiet.
- Jed
We are not directly involved but suspect some of our work has leaked a
bit. There have been a few probing emails as of late. This group could
be the source or it could be other groups that are starting to form. The
market size and variety is HUGH. FPE devices will completely reshape how
we
On 12-01-12 05:05 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Jed Rothwelljedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I know, most cars traveling ~80 miles an hour burn ~4
gallons of gasoline per hour.
That's 20 mpg. You must be thinking of SUVs. :-)
Most cars nowadays ARE
It is my dyslexia. Always get letters back to front. Many times spell
check can't pick it up. I need to type much slower and reread everything
I type several times. Even then I miss some words.
AG
On 1/13/2012 9:46 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
January 12th, 2012 at 5:51 PM
Andrea Rossi
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563cpage=11#comment-168783
Dear Mattia Zirzi:
1- Yes, every 6 months the domestic E-Cat will have to be refilled
2- the refilling operation will be made by the Customer himself or by
his usual plumber, or
Casual readers may have missed this. The story here is that someone
has apparently gone from Australia to Italy to visit Rossi and test the
machine. Quote:
The entrepreneur Dick Smith has sent a consulting aerospace engineer, Ian
Bryce, who has a science background, to assess the machine on his
At 02:33 PM 1/12/2012, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
Being a quite achiever.
Alternative typo : Being quite AN achiever.
Yes it is a BIG change. The reactor design must be VERY different. It is
a good development. Go Rossi Go.
AG
On 1/13/2012 9:57 AM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
January 12th, 2012 at 5:51 PM
Andrea Rossi
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563cpage=11#comment-168783
Dear Mattia Zirzi:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
Most cars nowadays ARE SUVs.
Yeah, they jolt my Scion Xb as they flash by.
T
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
That's 20 mpg. You must be thinking of SUVs. :-)
I like round numbers. I have the 2002 Edition of the Annual Energy Review
printed out with lots of post-it notes. Under AUTOS, TRUCKS on p. 61 it
shows Passenger Cars, Fuel Rate (miles per gallon) for
Dick Smith is legendary. If he gets behind Rossi, it will make our
efforts seem like child's play. He can open doors at any level of
industry or government. He is not afraid to back the underdog, attach
the status quo and to have a go mate. With this getting into the SMH
and Dick Smith sending
At 03:46 PM 1/12/2012, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
Yes it is a BIG change. The reactor design must be VERY different.
It is a good development. Go Rossi Go.
It must be an integrated Nickel+Hydrogen cartridge.
What a wanker report
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/01/12/smith_offers_ecat_prize/
The only BS is that from this publication.
Agreed. I emailed this guy and told him exactly what I thought of his report. It's so full of ridicule and innacurate information that no wonder ordinary folks can't get behind LENR. If you look back at his previous articles he's the closed minded type. Probably has a subscription to Bob Park and
How he has managed to do this will be very interesting to see. I can
only imagine the whole sealed reactor assembly must be replaced and then
recycled. The mentioned $10 does seem to be way too low a price unless
the sealed reactor is a throw away item (throw away into the recycle
trash bin).
If Dick Smith comes out of his sort of semi retirement, puts his money,
influence and passion behind the E-Cat, Aussie will become a E-Cat hotbed.
AG
On 1/13/2012 10:35 AM, Craig Brown wrote:
Agreed.
I emailed this guy and told him exactly what I thought of his report.
It's so full of
On 12-01-12 06:49 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Stephen A. Lawrencesa...@pobox.com wrote:
Most cars nowadays ARE SUVs.
Yeah, they jolt my Scion Xb as they flash by.
Huh. Annoying, aren't they.
Well, if you want to add a little more getupgo (right-past-them)
At 04:00 PM 1/12/2012, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
What a wanker report
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/01/12/smith_offers_ecat_prize/
The only BS is that from this publication.
Well, it does end :
Since the Herald won't say it, The Register will: do
not invest any money in E-cat until someone
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
Huh. Annoying, aren't they.
Well, if you want to add a little more getupgo (right-past-them) to your
Scion you might consider retrofitting an electric conversion from AC
Propulsion:
On 12-01-12 04:07 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Okay, I mixed up ounces and grams. Various sources say:
Catalytic converters cost between $400 and $900, depending on the size
of the vehicle. Average is around $500 retail replacement cost.
Catalytic converters have 1/20 of a troy ounce of
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
Doesn't BMW have a car on the market which recaptures the exhaust heat?
Or do I have that mixed up with something? (Or did they ditch it as not
cost effective or too heavy or something?)
Nope, you're not senile
A pretend paper mocking LENR research.
Harry
PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL
CONFERENCE ON LIE-ADMISSIBLE TREATMENT
OF IRREVERSIBLE PROCESSES (ICLATIP - 3)
Kathmandu University, Nepal, April (2011) pages 163-177
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/ICNF-3.pdf
why doesn't he just pay Rossi 200 000 if the test is successful?
harry
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Casual readers may have missed this. The story here is that someone
has apparently gone from Australia to Italy to visit Rossi and test the
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
why doesn't he just pay Rossi 200 000 if the test is successful?
It's free money for charity otherwise. Do you clip coupons?
T
Would someone tell me if this a sincere paper? Perhaps I have grown
cynical over the last year, because of Rossi's dismissal of scientific
practice and the new level of secrecy surrounding LENR research, but
I'm remain very skeptical. To me the pictures look like dummy
apparatuses which mock
You mean he wants to get a tax credit?
harry
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
why doesn't he just pay Rossi 200 000 if the test is successful?
It's free money for charity
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Would someone tell me if this a sincere paper? Perhaps I have grown
cynical over the last year, because of Rossi's dismissal of scientific
practice and the new level of secrecy surrounding LENR research, but
I'm remain
Has anyone even tried to replicate Preparata's configuration that he claims
he successfully reproduced FIFTY TIMES???
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
I should add that I _did_ attempt to find Preparata's
Krivit has doomed his career by his attacks on Rossi and his constant push to
support Widom Larsen theory.The fact is Andrea Rossi has proven beyond any
reasonable doubt that his Ni-H technology works as claimed. When Rossi's home
E-Cat units start going on the market, Krivit is going to have
Did a quick read of entire paper...
Santilli has been around quite awhile, and is a Ph.D. physicist; check out
the Wikipedia page on him. The paper is describing his recent tests with
his 'hadronic reactor', which is based on his own theories. Apparently, two
independent labs were used to
I find it disgusting how NASA is spewing W L propaganda. Of course it is the
logical theory to adopt, since the last thing NASA would ever want to do is
admit that cold fusion is real. They would rather say little gray aliens are
providing the power, than to admit fusion is taking place.
Does anyone know why NASA mentioned carbon along with nickel and hydrogen?
Is NASA proposing the use of carbon as a catalyst?
Have any of these scientists went into any greater detail?
How come none of Santilli's papers are in the LENR-CANR library?
eg. http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/ICNF-1.pdf
Has he attended the ICCF meetings? Has Jed or any of Jed's associates met him?
Harry
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12,
If this is true then don't you think Santilli's claims are even more
extravagant (to use one of M. Y.'
s favorite adjectives) than Rossi's claims?
harry
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Did a quick read of entire paper...
Santilli has been
Look at the transmutations . Holey sheet!
AG
On 1/13/2012 4:04 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
If this is true then don't you think Santilli's claims are even more
extravagant (to use one of M. Y.'
s favorite adjectives) than Rossi's claims?
harry
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Mark
Jed can answer that, but it wouldn't surprise me if he was the guy who
threatened Jed with a lawsuit when Jed wanted to include his papers on
lenr.org... he is definitely a rogue researcher, and a bit course, but some
of that probably comes from the way his work has been treated by mainstream
See Lawsuits here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruggero_Santilli
A very ugly story- I remember that being a member of the advisory board I
have had to pay 12,000 USD fine. The lawsuit did not started but Gene was
very upset and stressed by this affair.
An even uglier story- Richardson's
Well, at least Santilli is a degreed physicist with considerable credentials
from places like MIT and Harvard; the following Bio is from his Wikipedia
page:
=
Santilli studied physics at the University of Naples and went on to attend
the Graduate School in Physics of the
94 matches
Mail list logo
