On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
Iwamura's results are certainly interesting and worthy of replication, and
there have been replication attempts, some of which appear to have failed
(or, in a recent case, just published in the CMNS journal, there
How to build a fusion reactor in your garden shed.
Interesting post at:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/04/robert-godes-of-brillouin-energy-comments-on-lenr-research/
"Jed on April 10, 2012 at 11:24 pm
Robert,
You state: increase more spillover of atomic
I did not know so many methods have been proposed.
The Skylon reusable space plane seems like the most practical and low-cost
method discussed here. I think a space elevator would ultimately have the
lowest cost per ton, and it is the safest and most elegant solution. But it
calls for materials
At 04:43 PM 4/10/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
On 4/10/2012 4:39 PM, Alain Sepeda wrote:
Defkalion on their forum gave a similar explanation,
talking about the heat caused by H2 breaking before loading and,
recombination after degasing...
It can't possibly be recombination! Both the power and
I think the best deal would be hold the rails by the use of balloons, which
would be anchored between high mountains.
2012/4/11 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
I did not know so many methods have been proposed.
The Skylon reusable space plane seems like the most practical and low-cost
Mark,
To be a bit contrarian: this looks like bad science to me.
I think it is part assumption error, and part a relic of cavity
super-radiant emission (Dicke-Preparata) by nanotubes, which emission is
partially focused on a good blackbody emitter. If fact most of the effect
could be
At 11:40 PM 4/10/2012, Eric Walker wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Abd ul-Rahman
Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
It's crucial. I know of only one *partial*
theory that actually makes quantitative
predictions, beyond Preparata's expectation of
helium,
The experiments used DC current, which is why the 'remote' heating was
unexpected.
-m
From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 10:39 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Remote Joule heating in Carbon nanotubes
Inductive heating usually
Daniel Rocha wrote:
I think the best deal would be hold the rails by the use of balloons,
which would be anchored between high mountains.
I doubt this would work. Balloons are not stable. They get blown around.
They do not stay exactly in position. If the end of the tube moves
around even a
There would be hundreds of balloons along the rail. They also could work as
power collectors to the train, solar power.
As for the stability, I really doubt that fixed structures would be a
better solution. Something so long would accumulate vibrations from too
many sources and it would hardly be
I was under the impression the research done by Iwamura et al was
among the most convincing in the LENR field!
harry
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com
wrote:
Iwamura's results
The most interesting distinction in all of physics comes into focus with
Ni-H, assuming that it is NOT a nuclear reaction (as normally understood).
There is no proof that Ni-H is primarily nuclear, and many indications that
it is not, and there are also indications that there is some secondary
Inductive heating is caused by magnetic coupling between the source current and
the load or heated item. Resistive heating is due to the current actually
flowing from the source through the load and does not require magnetic
coupling. The thought process mentioned in my last sentence
I think that the biggest problem with Space Elevator is that it is too
slow. I takes quite a lot of time to climb into geosynchronous orbit. It is
better to get into LEO as fast as possible. I think that fast climbing is
too demanding for the materials and slow is just too slow in order to get
I don't believe Inductive Heating only occurs in AC, as in Alternating. The
current does not have to be alternating as in reversing directions
periodically. All that is require is a time varying current, which could be
Direct current, as long as it is varyinng. The important thing is the
Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that the biggest problem with Space Elevator is that it is too
slow. I takes quite a lot of time to climb into geosynchronous orbit.
Edwards and Westling (p. 49) say the first generation climbers should go
200 km/h. They have to go 100,000
Von:Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Gesendet: 17:24 Mittwoch, 11.April 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy presentation
I'm not concerned with the official
record, per se. However,
From Jones:
The most interesting distinction in all of physics comes into focus with
Ni-H, assuming that it is NOT a nuclear reaction (as normally understood).
There is no proof that Ni-H is primarily nuclear, and many indications that
it is not, and there are also indications that there is
That does not seem to be issue. EW do not mention it. The only
materials issue is space junk poking holes in the ribbons. Space
junk has to be cleaned up, and it could be with a multi-ribbon
space elevator. You would have to devote one ribbon to an
interceptor craft for several months.
How
Forgive my simplistic understanding, but based on this hypothesis, all one
needs to do is Ionize a bunch of Atomic Hydrogen and set them on a collison
course with each other; and each collision should produce an excess energy,
correct??
If so, then all one needs is to make sure you have a lot
I recall two other configurations for space elevators other than a straight
cable from equator to 2xGeoSynchronous orbit,
one is a giant hoop rotating such that at the surface of Earth, it's almost
stationary so you can hitch a ride, actual speed would be about 1000
miles/hour around the hoop; the
Vorl Bek vorl@antichef.com wrote:
How do you stop meteorites from hitting the ribbons?
You cannot stop them. See EW section 10.2. You have to make the ribbon
survive the impact with a hole. In other words, you have to make it
stronger than needed for the weight of the climber, and shaped
The very first or pilot ribbon would be only 2 cm wide in the atmosphere
to reduce wind impact, 5 cm in space, and 10 cm in danger zone from space
junk. 1 micron thick throughout. So a 1 cm hole would be a serious problem.
The first 230 climbers would carry only additional ribbon, which is
From: Jojo Jaro
Forgive my simplistic understanding, but based on this hypothesis, all one
needs to do is Ionize a bunch of Atomic Hydrogen and set them on a collison
course with each other; and each collision should produce an excess energy,
correct??
That has never worked for net
Which brings to mind a thread we had here a few months back on a discovery that
a 60% copper and 40% nickel alloy was discovered to dissociate Molecular
Hydrogen on contact. (Can anybody remember that thread?)
If this is so, a lot of energy may be provided by this mechanism and the rest
may
I wouldn't be too sure about that not working for net gain, Jones. What Mr.
Jaro has proposed is essentially the Langmuir atomic hydogen torch. Many are
convinced that the Langmuir torch is over-unity. However, I think it's obvious
that cavity containment is the way to go.M.
--- On Wed,
I think we are saying the same thing. I used AC as in alternating current to
specify that it must be time changing in comparison to steady flowing DC
current. The requirement is that the source current must be changing in time
to induce a voltage in nearby conductors. I believe that
Space elevators for earth are probably unworkable, though they could
be pretty good for Mars (from Phobos) and maybe for the moon.
A space-elevator must climb about 4km, even at 200km/hr that will
take more than a week and requires a huge amount of power to be
supplied to the climber. That
Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
A space-elevator must climb about 4km, even at 200km/hr that will
take more than a week . . .
For freight, this is a non-issue. It takes a week or more to ship goods
from China to the U.S. but that does not bother anyone.
Note that after a
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Wed, 11 Apr 2012
13:35:50 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
I concur that this mass/energy conversion process is probably based on
specific distances involved, as you seem to be implying. Trying to
chart out the unique nexuses points of where these distances
At 01:34 AM 4/11/2012, Eric Walker wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Abd ul-Rahman
Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Iwamura's results are certainly interesting and
worthy of replication, and there have been
replication attempts, some of which appear to
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
At 01:34 AM 4/11/2012, Eric Walker wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Iwamura's results are certainly interesting and worthy of
At 07:58 PM 4/11/2012, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
At 01:34 AM 4/11/2012, Eric Walker wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Iwamura's
There are many problems with this paper.
The most glaring error is that they heated their sample to 1000C for 10 minutes
before measuring. They do this to remove sulphur, which should not be present
under tightly controlled conditions (incidentally they claim to explain the
presence of
At 10:09 PM 4/11/2012, Finlay MacNab wrote:
There are many problems with this paper.
The most glaring error is that they heated their sample to 1000C for
10 minutes before measuring. They do this to remove sulphur, which
should not be present under tightly controlled conditions
35 matches
Mail list logo
