Ed's theory requires peer review. The soliton theory of LENR is
incompatible with Ed's theory as it stands now but with a little adjustment
Ed could be promulgating the correct LENR doctrinaire. Ed is a prominent
voice in the LENR community, if Ed can be converted to the truth, then
others may
but from my perspective, you always seem to think there is only one way
of perceiving/interpreting the evidence.
Most LENR theories are based on emergent LENR phenomena that exist far
above the primary causation. The Root cause of LENR is a single all
encompassing mechanism. The many cause
Axil -- You're all over the place. Seriously. Ed's theory has been
peer-reviewed by JCMNS, Infinite Energy, and he submitted/presented a white
paper at ICCF-18. I'd need a much clearer definition of what the soliton
theory of LENR is before I trust that could disprove anything. Do you
actually
*Seriously. Ed's theory has been peer-reviewed by JCMNS, Infinite Energy,
and he submitted/presented a white paper at ICCF-18.*
Herein lies the problem with the LENR community. It is mired in the
misconceptions of the deuterium/palladium history of LENR that has
developed over the last 25 year,
Designing a reactor that performs well is a very difficult and time
consuming job, Just ask Rossi and DGT.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 1:26 AM, Steve High diamondweb...@gmail.com wrote:
At 1:31 of part 1 of his July 21 demonstration Mills tells us that in
order for the Sun Cell to produce 10
Axil -- Yes, I know you have an axe to grind with Ed. That was my point.
It's really quite amazing how you can call out Storms' theory for not
being peer-reviewed (even though it has been several times as I pointed
out) and not see the irony. When can we here on vortex expect a draft of
your white
This is great. Note the accumulated charge of pure, life-enhancing energy
... [radiated] into the environment along a plane perpendicular to the
direction of flow.
Vortex is the wacky overunity devices study group. I did not expect such
things to become a personal hobby, or to take such
Eric -- That Schauberger diagram link is a visual and intellectual feast as
far as I'm concerned. That quote you pulled from it is sort of my
case-in-point for why I used the analogy. If nanomagnetic vortices, induced
by non-linear collective modes, are transducing or transforming vacuum
And I think the quote along a plane perpendicular to the direction of flow
is relevant. I believe this coincides with, say, Moray King's hypothesis
of a orthogonal flux of the vacuum energy. Eric Dollard uses almost the
exact same terminology in describing his complex (i.e. part imaginary)
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
I am anonymous and as such I avoid the complications and the pitfalls of
ego and reputation. Whatever Ed says about me does not stick.
Perhaps you are anonymous. But you have left a trail of breadcrumbs as to
your identity
Being Dutch, I recently got some extra motivation to do the opposite.
Op zondag 27 juli 2014 heeft Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com het
volgende geschreven:
An interesting article:
How active is cold fusion research in Russia?
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
An interesting article:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/foreigners/2014/07/russia_s_corrupt_control_of_europe_how_vladimir_putin_keeps_the_continent.html
From what I see, not very active, but it's a bit tricky due to the language
barier. Rarely I see quotations or discussions from Russian forums.
I found that Google trends is a good indicator to see where LENR or Cold
Fusion is being searched for:
https://www.google.nl/trends/explore#q=LENRcmpt=q
From: Steve High
At 1:31 of part 1 of his July 21 demonstration Mills tells us that in order for
the Sun Cell to produce 10 megawatts of electricity it will need to create 25
megawatts of light energy, as the PV cells have a 40% conversion ratio. I
presume that will leave 15 megawatts to
Jones, the tragedy in this is, as you yourself have suggested on several
occasions, Mills is probably a genius and effect he is exploring is
probably real although not well explained (or maybe it is). His product
is still far from ready for prime time. In a sane world the government
would see the
Given the powers-that-be that control government decision-making, it could
be that gullible investors are humanity's last best hope. Perhaps it would
be better to keep quiet about the elephant in the room. A real conundrum
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Steve High diamondweb...@gmail.com
The good news he is helping to prove what doesn't work and might happen
upon something that does
On Sunday, July 27, 2014, Steve High diamondweb...@gmail.com wrote:
Given the powers-that-be that control government decision-making, it could
be that gullible investors are humanity's last best
Yes that is so true – in a sane world, this technology would have been
supported at a respectable, even if far lower level than hot fusion. Few
hundred million instead of 10 billion (or 20 down the tubes with nothing to
show)/
Take a close look at Janssen’s microwave thruster at Rowan – how could
I don't think I have ever seen this description of the plasma collision of
d-d. I was reading about the nature of the strong force and trying to
understand the plasma fusion branches when I developed this mental picture.
I don't really understand what you mean by strong Coulomb field in the
I wrote:
The timeline for these video 1 is:
0:00 - 0:37 Mills theory blather.
0:37 - 1:11 Demonstrations. Much more background noise.
1:12 - 1:20 Mills business blather. Kind of ridiculous, in my opinion. . .
.
I sound judgemental here. Let me say that I have no objection to theory
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
The “40%” conversion ratio should make it clear to anyone
who follows solar cells that Mills is blowing smoke. Affordable cells for
use in mass production are below 20% efficiency.
On average, about 15% according to
I didn't have the patience required to view the whole thing so I may have
missed where he described how he metered energy in and energy out.
Did he even bother?
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
wrote:
I wrote:
The timeline for these video 1 is:
0:00 -
On Jul 27, 2014, at 9:51, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't really understand what you mean by strong Coulomb field in the
background.
I'm thinking of a gradient of Coulomb charge off to the side of the oncoming
d's which is sufficient to polarize them as they approach
http://phys.org/news/2014-07-source-sky-x-ray.html
*The source of the sky's X-ray glow*
The sky is full of x-rays. There is a 50 year old mystery to be solved;
where do all those x-rays come from?
New research shows that the major source of the x-rays seen brightly in our
skies originate
Excellent recommendations, Jed.
That's what I was looking for.
I agree, discussing theory may be interesting to some but probably not crucial
for most. I'd think most investors just want to be assured that the data
collected from the demonstrations is accurate because that immediately
curiously,
From my Sunday Paper:
Growing number of solar panels a concern for Wisconsin utilities
http://www.jsonline.com/business/growing-number-of-solar-panels-a-concern-for-wisconsin-utilities-b99295581z1-265066971.html
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
svjart.orionworks.com
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/07/140724213957.htm
Source:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Summary:
A new material structure generates steam by soaking up the sun. The structure
-- a layer of graphite flakes and an underlying carbon foam -- is a porous,
insulating material
-Original Message-
From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
curiously,
From my Sunday Paper:
Growing number of solar panels a concern for Wisconsin utilities
http://www.jsonline.com/business/growing-number-of-solar-panels-a-concern-for-wisconsin-utilities-b99295581z1-265066971.html
http://www.ladir.cnrs.fr/pages/fillaux/157_PAC_2007_1023.pdf
*Proton transfer across hydrogen bonds: From reaction path to Schrödinger’s
cat*
Why does the LENR electrolysis process benefit from and usually require a
potassium bicarbonate catalyst to amplify the LENR reaction?
Potassium
I wonder if there is an efficiency price to be paid in the solar cells when
they are exposed to a huge pulse source of light? Do the solar cell network
capture all the light blast at maximum luminosity? Can that light blast be
distributed evenly among N numbers of solar cells?
Can any optical
This is such a poorly written article that one has to dig a bit deeper to
find important details – such as the radiation signature - and there are two
bands of interest, according to this
http://www.physics.miami.edu/~galeazzi/x-rays/dxb.html
They would be at ¼ keV and ¾ keV which is 250 eV and
I thing that Jed is off base in his understanding of the audience dynamics
involved. It seems to me that Mills theory is more like a religion
whose recitation of its doctrinaire is very pleasurable to the Church
audience.
Consider the hours long religious services conducted in the large
Can this system support supercritical steam generation. How hot are the hot
spots?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercritical_steam_generator
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Frank roarty fr...@roarty.biz wrote:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/07/140724213957.htm
*Source:*
Surely it would make a steam punk fans day.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Can this system support supercritical steam generation. How hot are the
hot spots?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercritical_steam_generator
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 2:29 PM,
http://www.quora.com/Physics/What-if-anything-is-wrong-or-incorrect-about-the-recent-2013-news-about-Andrea-Rossis-energy-catalyzer-device-that-has-undergone-limited-peer-review
when they see the tree that hide the forrest
That guy writes like a complete putz. There's no way that a thermal
imaging camera is off by a factor of 10. I use them sometimes at work.
He's saying that if I point it at a wall at room temperature, it could read
240 degrees C or minus 200 degrees C. What a crock of shit. The heat at
this
Jones:
I get the impression that Mills has been sitting on his hind quarters for
at least a decade. He's brilliant. He knows how to attract investors to
pie-in-the-sky projects that in the end, do not pan out. Now he's seeing
Rossi with his demos, promises, $20M engagement with Industrial
Years ago I would have responded by pointing out that they confirmed the IR
camera with a thermocouple; that the circuit cannot supply enough
electricity to make the cell incandescent; and so on. Now I no longer have
the gumption. Not many people will read this sort of thing anyway.
- Jed
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
http://iccf15.frascati.enea.it/ICCF15-PRESENTATIONS/S8_O2_Cook.pdf
If you have nothing better to do this weekend, here is a 71 page paper
which Rossi says gives a correct explanation of gain with Ni-H. I do not
have the
Regarding my own personal cliff notes of watching the July 21 BLP demo:
Note, these notes are not all-inclusive. They simply reflect some of my
personal observations and what I was able to jot down.
http://youtu.be/GxuoMzm2HNE
* * * * * * *
Starting at: 1:02:00 - Mills begins
COP was from 1.06 to 1.68. No wonder they never pursued it.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Yes that is so true – in a sane world, this technology would have been
supported at a respectable, even if far lower level than hot fusion. Few
hundred million
If you miniaturize that down to a few atoms, perhaps a spark across one of
Storms's favored cracks, then you have a great visual depiction of a
1Dimensional Luttinger Liquid BEC but with a spin component that I have not
accounted for so far.
as an example:
Sounds like yer gettin' old and need a designated disciple replacement.
How old are you? Maybe it is the case that not many currently READ it, but
in the future MANY, MANY millions WILL read it. You need to replace your
dissipated vision with a bushy-tailed trainee who sees the forest for the
Let's get right down to the study of antennas and *Antenna Basics*. Suppose
one day you're walking down the street and a kind but impatient person runs
up and asks you to design an antenna for them. Sure, you quickly reply,
adding what is the desired frequency, gain, bandwidth, impedance, and
In video 1, Randy shows a bomb calorimeter measurement of an explosion. It was
clear from the reading of the temperature rise that the output of that single
explosion was 623J (I think, don't remember exactly). So, it appears
incontrovertible that the output is around 700J as Mills claims.
Part two, July 21 2014 BLP demonstration:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TKgrOjac6Yfeature=youtu.be
Of particular interest to me was...
Timeline:
00:09:15 - 00:10:53
Someone in the audience asks Mils about the recycling of the fuel, what's
all involved.
Mills responds (these
Can the recycling process function properly at 2000 cycles a second? Can a
rinse cycle clear the powder from the walls in 5 micro seconds? Will the
rinse cycle be a bottle neck in the overall firing rate?
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
Find a way to keep the powder suspended in the chamber magnetically like
Joe Papp did.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Can the recycling process function properly at 2000 cycles a second? Can a
rinse cycle clear the powder from the walls in 5 micro
More...
If there is 15 megawatts of waste heat to get rid up per cycle, water will
only exist as super heated steam. Washing the walls of the reaction chamber
with liquid water will not be possible.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Find a way to keep the
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 27 Jul 2014 22:28:42 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Can the recycling process function properly at 2000 cycles a second? Can a
rinse cycle clear the powder from the walls in 5 micro seconds? Will the
rinse cycle be a bottle neck in the overall firing rate?
Personally,
They should try for no cycling. I makes for a better system.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:38 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 27 Jul 2014 22:28:42 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Can the recycling process function properly at 2000 cycles a second? Can a
rinse cycle
MAYBE there is a MW, but for microsecons. From the videos on the PDF, it
seems that the electrodes get oxidized in seconds. I really doubt they can
keep the machine functioning longer than a few minutes.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
I don't get it.
Why do people think Mills is relevant when, if he has made any energy in vs
energy out measurements at all, they are so buried in other material that
any reasonable man would give up long before finding them?
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:38 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply
If you place your bet on Miills, you put it on someone with an
incredibly lousy history. Period.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
In video 1, Randy shows a bomb calorimeter measurement of an explosion.
It was clear from the reading of the
54 matches
Mail list logo
