The good news he is helping to prove what doesn't work and might happen
upon something that does

On Sunday, July 27, 2014, Steve High <diamondweb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Given the powers-that-be that control government decision-making, it could
> be that gullible investors are humanity's last best hope. Perhaps it would
> be better to keep quiet about the elephant in the room. A real conundrum
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Steve High <diamondweb...@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','diamondweb...@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> Jones, the tragedy in this is, as you yourself have suggested on several
>> occasions, Mills is probably a genius and effect he is exploring is
>> probably real although not well explained (or maybe it is). His "product"
>> is still far from ready for prime time. In a sane world the government
>> would see the enormous potential in his work, and provide him with the same
>> support it provides countless other nascent technological ideas that have
>> life-saving potential. He shouldn't have to use sophisticated hucksterism
>> to propel his work forward. Alas this is the same refrain we have spoken of
>> a thousand times already.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jone...@pacbell.net');>> wrote:
>>
>>>   *From:* Steve High
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> At 1:31 of part 1 of his July 21 demonstration Mills tells us that in
>>> order for the Sun Cell  to produce 10 megawatts of electricity it will need
>>> to create 25 megawatts of light energy, as the PV cells have a 40%
>>> conversion ratio. I presume that will leave 15 megawatts to be dissipated
>>> as heat (it has to go somewhere, right?) With that much heat wouldn't the
>>> reactor itself nearly glow with the intensity of the sun? I'm just a simple
>>> country doctor so probably I'm missing something.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Steve – You probably do not take this too seriously, so you are not
>>> missing the fact that it is not science – it is hucksterism with a dose of
>>> sophistication. The “40%” conversion ratio should make it clear to anyone
>>> who follows solar cells that Mills is blowing smoke. Affordable cells for
>>> use in mass production are below 20% efficiency. The Boeing/Spectrolab
>>> triple junction cells which have produced 40% on occasion are not available
>>> at reasonable cost. And even if they become available - they are actually
>>> rated for 32% continuous and are now extraordinarily expensive – 500 times
>>> more than silicon per watt. NASA can pay that but can you?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So instead of dissipating 15 megawatts to get 10, less the reprocessing
>>> overhead (assuming that it works at all for more than a few days) it would
>>> be closer to dissipating 40 MW to get 5… which isn’t bad if it were true.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> But given Mills’ track record, do not sign a check just yet. If history
>>> is an indicator - you will never see it being sold. Mills has raked in a
>>> few million more from a few more suckers, in this round of investment, and
>>> in 2015 there will be something else. SunCell what? Maybe in a museum some
>>> day.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to