I would like to add some brain dribble to this issue. In solid matter the
nuclei exist in a lattice and undergo oscillations. Adding heat increases the
frequency and amplitude of these motions.
At absolute zero these oscillations continue as a zero oscillation condition is
prohibited by the
Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 6:15 PM, "harv...@yahoo.com [teslafy]"
wrote:
Comments added to Stabilized Xenon- Krypton Discharges What was not noted
in
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Bob Higgins
wrote:
I think the real concern for weaponization is not the first thought
> everyone jumps to, which is explosive magnifier.
>
In addition to the possibilities that have been mentioned, there is another
that comes to mind
LENR folks are giving way too much adulation to:
Andrea Rossi
Randall Mills
Robert Godes
All three have succeeded with no independent data. They all refuse simple
obvious testing. Mills is perhaps the biggest show of all. His SunCell has
never been tested. It would be child's play to hook
Russ George wrote:
Whoa indeed, nanoseconds are way to slow for fission!
So what? Who needs fission when you can achieve complete nuclear
disintegration - as Holmlid claims to do with a small laser.
With fission of U, the energy release per nucleon is in the range of
200MeV. With laser
The detonation of a fission device includes the compression of the pit to
1/3 of its original volume. This compression is done using systemic
explosives shockwaves. There is also neutron reflectors/amplifiers involved
to keep neutrons inside the pit.
In LENR, by their very nature, the lack of
Eric Walker wrote:
> In addition to the possibilities that have been mentioned, there is
> another that comes to mind should at some point LENR be harnessed as a
> practical source of energy. Consider small, quiet drones the size of
> hummingbirds, which are able to
The concept of temperature is a classical physics concept as far as I know.
This reflects my own brain dribbles. I try to avoid brain dribbles about
zero-point energy being the result of Heisenberg’s brain dribbles spun as
principle.
Bob Cook
From: Brian Ahern
Sent: Wednesday, January
The explosive potential of the cold fusion reaction is centered on the
percentage of energy that is produce by the LENR reaction in the various
energy releases format.
By energy formats I mean the place where the output energy goes such as sub
atomic particle production, heat, light, and/or RF.
Edward Teller! For goodness sake.
- Jed
This is not a repeat of the suggestion that dense hydrogen is the same
species as "dark matter" ... but there is a good case for that proposition.
It is about "dark" as in evil. If there is a foreseeable downside to
LENR, it is the possibility of weaponization. Not just that - it is the
easy
Jones Beene wrote:
> In the past, observers of the LENR scene - who delve into almost every
> remote possibility for anomalous energy - have not wanted to talk about the
> possibility of a cold-fusion bomb.
People have talked about this from time to time, albeit
It is said he had a stroke and awoke in a hospital.
A nurse asked, “Are you the famous Dr.
Edward Teller?”
He said, “No…….I am the infamous Dr. Edward Teller”.
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2017 11:01 AM
To: Vortex
Subject:
I brought up the issue of weaponization of LENR in the panel session at
ILENR-12. The general consensus was, "the cat is out of the bag"; I.E. too
late for that concern.
I think the real concern for weaponization is not the first thought
everyone jumps to, which is explosive magnifier. For
Conflating nuclear chain reaction energy release with cold fusion mechanisms
is what leads to silly speculation, aka trolling, over weaponization of cold
fusion. It is the far reaching neutron chain reaction process that is common
to fission/fusion weapons that makes them so potent. In cold fusion
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LochakGlowenergyn.pdf
This report addresses Higgins comment regarding the #1 issue. It would appear
neutrons are not involved in the LENR reactions reported using Ti foils. See
the discussion on page 7&8 of the report.
Russ- That was a good find.
Bob Cook
Russ George wrote:
Conflating nuclear chain reaction energy release with cold fusion
> mechanisms is what leads to silly speculation, aka trolling, over
> weaponization of cold fusion. It is the far reaching neutron chain reaction
> process that is common to fission/fusion
Higgins—
If neutrons are involved in making fissile isotopes, I would imagine that it
may be tough to keep the newly created fissile material from fissionning right
after its creation.
I can imagine metastable isomers having a role.
Bob
From: Bob Higgins
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017
As the SunCell R moves forward over the coming months, certain hard to
understand problems will develop in that effort that will show that the
SunCell is really a LENR based system. As a foreshadowing of these
development problems, I will make a prediction about how the SunCell works
as a LENR
Axil, The titanium experiment you suggest has been done, by me, while Ti is a
useful cold fusion material it has a far lower NAE cross-section and while this
is useful in limiting thermal destruction it works against the vitality of the
technology. Lots of work required down that trail. I am
I can guess a large coherent—QM entangled—system could host a large reaction
throughout that system, but not beyond it boundaries. Beyond the initial
coherent system would have to be other coherent systems which would require
resonant conditions, possibly provided by the thermal pulse or
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/01/jan-04-2017-lenr-info.html
peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Whoa - an observer must possess a great deal of blind hope to imagine
that weaponization of LENR is impossible simply because neutrons are
lacking. In fact, dense hydrogen is physically similar to the neutron.
Most importantly, the number of documented runaway LENR reactions makes
the
Whoa indeed, nanoseconds are way to slow for fission!
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 1:14 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The dark side of dense hydrogen
Whoa - an observer must possess a great deal of blind hope to imagine
If you patented your work, you may has a prior art claim on your technology
over Mills. Transmutation occurring in your system will show that you have
the goods in terms of theory(LENR) as opposed to Mills(hydrino) with no
transmutation theoretical basis.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Russ
The real problem with LENR is the LENR reaction's preference for the even
isotopes U238, U232 of the odd isotopes. That make LENR a transuranic
element enrichment risk.
>From my reference:
" It was found that the activity of both U isotopes decreased with respect
to that of Cs. However, the
Most assuredly definitive Ag transmutation isotope shift data is in hand, no
dispute possible in that! One path is clearly the insertion of a deuteron into
some relatively high Z nuclei. Surely that has a coherent pathway. As for prior
art (rigged patent system nonsense) there is more than one
Cold fusion is a piss poor cousin in the enrichment game with fissionable
species to paths with abundant neutrons.
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 1:55 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The dark side of dense hydrogen
The real problem with
28 matches
Mail list logo