[Vo]:Further Comment made on Quora concerning Non-Symmetrical Separations in Space.

  I see that Victor Toth has had his “comments” thread disabled for the same answer given in this thread. I wanted to ask him why the following example showing a non-symmetry between observers is not true? So since I can’t ask him I am repeating this question for the readers which sort of

[Vo]:LENR_FALSE INFALLIBILITY, USELESS CRUELTY

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-14-2017-lenrlenr-false.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

Does it necessarily require a violation of CoE? It could be we don't know enough about nuclear matter to know how to build or take apart nuclei with much less energy. With a sledge hammer and a great deal of force a structure can be assembled or broken down without knowing much about the nature

Re: [Vo]:NEDO project update

I wrote: > This is project to be funded at $1 million per year for 20 years, with 15 > different research categories. So I guess we are talking about $67,000 per > year. > Sorry, I misread that. The grants are for 1 or 2 years, and there are 15 categories. The amount of the grant is either 100

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 9:48 PM, wrote: Fusion of 2 Si-28 to Fe 56 produces about 18 Mev excess mass energy, or > about 1 muon mass for for 18 fusion transitions. Muons that were to carry > away mass may not be noticed. > If muons were to carry away that mass, they

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Eric Walker wrote: If we assume 1.3 tons excess iron following Narayanaswamy, then the amount > of energy released into the environment for this first reaction would be: > > 1300 kg 56Fe = 23241.288159 mols 56Fe > 23241.288159 mols

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:20:26 -0700: Hi, [snip] > >Bob Higgins wrote: >> It is interesting to consider the implications were some >> nucleosynthesis taking place in this report. The steel mills are a >> place on the surface of the Earth that most resembles the

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

Which brings us back to another source of heat for Earth's core. According to "America's Genius" the corona of our sun is in effect a giant factory for hydrinos, which get carried to earth via the solar wind, where they are deposited in the oceans of earth, and being dense and small, will

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 14 Mar 2017 18:04:14 -0700: Hi, [snip] > >Which brings us back to another source of heat for Earth's core. >According to "America's Genius" the corona of our sun is in effect a >giant factory for hydrinos, which get carried to earth via the solar

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

Pluto has an x-ray source - which is a surprise and it is in the range of Rydberg energies from Millsean transitions from nickel and iron 200-300 eV. Pluto is mostly ice, not dense - but could have iron/nickel debris from meteorite impacts over the past few billion years.

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

Does anybody want to talk about where the internal heat inside Ceres and Pluto comes from. http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/07/pluto-alive-where-heat-coming Pluto is alive—but where is the heat coming from? On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 9:04 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > > Which

RE: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

The issue of the Coulomb barrier being a concern in transitions of a coherent system makes no sense IMHO. Two-body interactions yes, but for a many bodied entangled systems no. Bob Cook Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: mix...@bigpond.com Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 8:19 PM To:

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 6:06 PM, H LV wrote: Does it necessarily require a violation of CoE? > It could be we don't know enough about nuclear matter to know how to build > or take apart nuclei with much less energy. > It's not necessarily a matter of COE; e.g., perhaps

RE: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

Fusion of 2 Si-28 to Fe 56 produces about 18 Mev excess mass energy, or about 1 muon mass for for 18 fusion transitions. Muons that were to carry away mass may not be noticed. Bob Cook Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: H LV Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 4:06 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:34 PM, wrote: Two Si atoms gives a Ni atom, not an Fe atom. However if the formation of > Ni56 > involved enhanced/altered electron capture to Fe56:- > > Ni56 => Co56 (2 MeV; half life 6 days) > > Co56 => Fe56 (4.6 MeV; half life 77 days) > > ...and

[Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

It is interesting to consider the implications were some nucleosynthesis taking place in this report. The steel mills are a place on the surface of the Earth that most resembles the core of the Earth. For a long time, there has been speculations regarding the source of the heat in the core of

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

Bob Higgins wrote: It is interesting to consider the implications were some nucleosynthesis taking place in this report. The steel mills are a place on the surface of the Earth that most resembles the core of the Earth. For a long time, there has been speculations regarding the source of

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

Holmlid is not dead yet; why not? Why is no radiation detected by Holmlid even when he has detected muons by the ton? On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:16 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 9:48 PM, wrote: > > Fusion of 2 Si-28 to Fe 56

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Axil Axil wrote: Holmlid is not dead yet; why not? Why is no radiation detected by Holmlid > even when he has detected muons by the ton? > You make an excellent argument that Holmlid is NOT seeing muons! :) Eric