Re: [Vo]:Feynman on conservative vs non-conservative forces

From: Axil Axil Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2017 12:52 PM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Feynman on conservative vs non-conservative forces A magnetic monopole can emerge from a quasiparticle alignment of photon spin as experiment shows

Re: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be lumped together?

They needn't be lying. Measuring energy flow with a plasma is challenging. From: a.ashfield Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2017 1:19 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be lumped together? Brian, Apart from some

Re: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be lumped together?

Hi Robin, *Sorry to have mis-associated the credit for this observation!* It is a good one. Bob On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 1:47 PM, wrote: > In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:33:46 -0600: > Hi, > [snip] > >The predicted properties of the hydrino or

RE: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be lumped together?

Adrian— I thought the very same thing. The established physics community ignores logic that would upset their apple cart with their rotting apples, and a growing hoard of golden eggs. In this regard IMHO Mills and Rossi should be lumped together. However, their new breed of geese, may be

Re: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be lumped together?

Supposedly the plasma is >3500C. As it runs without any input power why do you not think it generates any (excess) heat? AA On 3/26/2017 7:35 PM, Brian Ahern wrote: They needn't be lying. Measuring energy flow with a plasma is challenging.

RE: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be lumped together?

Jones— I assume you lump Rossi’s one-month Lugano test in with your definition of scam-built “half-truths” tests. We will see. Bob Cook. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Jones Beene Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2017 6:49 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be

Re: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be lumped together?

As for "non-radiation" of dense hydrogen, according to Mayer the binding energy of the electron in dense hydrogen is around 3.7 keV. A single x-ray of this energy is emitted on densification, which is contrary to Mills view of multiple steps. Once radiated, of course, the dense hydrogen then

Re: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be lumped together?

a.ashfield wrote: ...Supposedly the plasma is >3500C. A plasma at 3500C is commonplace and found in every house - but almost meaningless in terms of energy content... yet typical of Mills' genius at deception. The plasma in a common 5 watt CFL can be >6000C. Electrons in a plasma can be

Re: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be lumped together?

A...". there is good evidence that the SunCell produces a large amount of excess heat..." Amazingly, even RM offers no data or measurements on this issue. He could show water flow calorimetry to an accuracy of 50% within two days of set up and calibration. I would offer to pay for it and

Re: [Vo]:Feynman on conservative vs non-conservative forces

A magnetic monopole can emerge from a quasiparticle alignment of photon spin as experiment shows Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave like magnetic monopoles http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Frank Znidarsic

Re: [Vo]:Vital Dust

While not having read the book the nature of the origin of life has taken up a bunch of my own time on this world.  One thing one should remember is the role of much higher levels of radioactivity in those early days. Consider that many higher nuclides no longer present on the surface would still

[Vo]:LENR Sunday edition

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-26-2017-lenr-sunday-edition.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be lumped together?

In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:33:46 -0600: Hi, [snip] >The predicted properties of the hydrino or any sub-ground-state hydrogen >suggest that it will be really hard to detect. According to Meulenberg, >these states lack sufficient angular momentum to have a photon

Re: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be lumped together?

RM showed a COP of 3 using bomb calorimetry. This was before he discovered how to activate self sustaining plasma. On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Brian Ahern wrote: > A...". there is good evidence that the SunCell produces a large > amount of excess heat..." > > >

Re: [Vo]:Feynman on conservative vs non-conservative forces

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Frank Znidarsic wrote: > All static forces are conservative. An electrical dielectric of contains > forces of opposite charge which only reduces the strength of the static > electrical force. > > There is no opposite polarity for gravity so

Re: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be lumped together?

Brian, Apart from some calorimetry on the SunCell in the early days, would you not think a self perpetuating plasma would produce some heat? Several (hired) independent investigators also back Mill's claims, or do you think they are all lying? AA On 3/26/2017 12:00 PM, Brian Ahern wrote:

Re: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be lumped together?

Eric, I don't feel expert enough to pass judgement. I think that is the point. Physicists more expert than me can't make up their minds whether Mills is a genius or delusional. That he can come up with values for particles that are more accurate than from QM and that his program can show