RM showed a COP of 3 using bomb calorimetry. This was before he discovered how to activate self sustaining plasma.
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> wrote: > A. ..". there is good evidence that the SunCell produces a large > amount of excess heat..." > > > Amazingly, even RM offers no data or measurements on this issue. He could > show water flow calorimetry to an accuracy of 50% within two days of set up > and calibration. I would offer to pay for it and conduct it for him. > > Alas, there is no calorimetry offered to the suggestible investors. > > The mantra for Mills, Rossi and Godes is: No data = no failure = > ambiguity coupled with enticing potential profits = large investments > while showing nothing. > > If they conducted tests and failed the investment stream would cease. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> > *Sent:* Sunday, March 26, 2017 11:23 AM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be lumped together? > > Eric, > I don't feel expert enough to pass judgement. I think that is the point. > Physicists more expert than me can't make up their minds whether Mills is a > genius or delusional. That he can come up with values for particles that > are more accurate than from QM and that his program can show the position > nuclei and electrons for complicated molecules (proven) suggests to me that > it is premature to be so dogmatic that he is wrong. Likewise there is good > evidence that the SunCell produces a large amount of excess heat, though > one might quibble about the actual value. > > AA > > On 3/25/2017 5:52 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 4:49 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> > wrote: > > To me it looks like the hand waving is largely from the skeptics. I have >> yet to see a specific item that is wrong in Mills theories highlighted by >> them. >> > > Did you take a look at the link I sent? Can you help us to make sense of > those equations? What would be ideal would be an explicit derivation of > the electron-neutron mass ratio, which is purportedly based on those > equations. If you can do this, it would be a very helpful thing. My > strong hunch: it is not possible, because the Mills neutron-electron mass > ratio is ad hoc and was not derived from them. But your knowledge here can > help to dispel this impression. > > Eric > > > >
