Re: [Vo]:flying cars on the horizon

Dave, I too would love to have one but I,d hate to think of my neighbors in one! Ron On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:33:34 -0400, David Roberson wrote: > I would love to have a flying car, especially when within the DC area. My > major concern is that we have far too many lawyers

Re: [Vo]:flying cars on the horizon

I would love to have a flying car, especially when within the DC area. My major concern is that we have far too many lawyers ready to sue any new technology offering. Don't you think that some form of immunity to unreasonable lawsuits might be required for any small to mid sized companies

Re: [Vo]:Cap Warp - McCandlish

John, I honestly do not understand how an electrical charge is associated with gravity, but apparently some have observed a link. The fact that gravitational forces are so weak with respect to electromagnetic forces tend to suggest that a very tiny coupling between the two would be all that is

Re: [Vo]:Why Scientists Must Share Their Failures

My power supply blew up shortly afterwards and although I have bought some new ones (they are only a few pounds) I have not set it up again as it has been rather overtaken by events Nigel On 24/04/2017 02:17, Eric Walker wrote: On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Nigel Dyer

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

I have been a dedicated foe of the Rossi Planet since February 2009. I interacted with his cohorts in New Hampshire. Even they had no idea what he was doing, because the first 11 'independent tests \' all broke down and were indeterminate. Eight years later nothing has changed. He has duped a

Re: [Vo]:Cap Warp - McCandlish

Dave, it's not that there is a link between electrostatics and gravity, so much as there is a link between the medium underlying both. Well over 20 years ago now, I got a good grounding (as an autodidact) in physics. Then a bit over 20 years ago, I came across fringe science claims, I was

[Vo]:I would rather have a lilium than a flying car

https://lilium.com/

Re: [Vo]:flying cars on the horizon

For sure it will require some good regulations that would, but won't. be better made by engineers. Imagine your typical Philly car driver in the air! The other problem is noise. AA -Original Message- From: David Roberson To: vortex-l

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

One consideration that I feel is important to understand is what PT symmetry violation means with respect to CP symmetry violation. We understand that we can produce PT symmetry breaking using optical mechanisms but can PT symmetry violation somehow generate CP violation which is required to

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

Once again the master has prevailed. You are basing assumptions on tales from the "Book of Rossi" ! It is insulting to give any credence to the impresario. From: Axil Axil Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2017 9:47 PM To: vortex-l Subject: [Vo]:The

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

Brian Ahern, The proof that Rossi's E-cats don't work is less than that they do. It serves no useful purpose to continually repeat your insults with no actual content. I wonder what you will say if Rossi comes up with a decent demo this Summer. -Original Message- From: Axil Axil

[Vo]:what I think about opposition to LENR causes and effects

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-24-2017-lenr-what-i-think-about.html Please read my blog associate Georgina's posting too! thanks! peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

[Vo]:flying cars on the horizon

It seems that a flying car is getting close to being commercial. Companies trying to make one include:. Terrafugia Kitty Hawk Airbus Group Moller International Xplorair PAL-V Joby Aviation EHang Volocopter Uber Haynes Aero Samson Motorworks AeroMobil Parajet Lilium Inherently inefficient , I