Re: [Vo]:Bose Einstein Condensate formed at Room Temperature

You know what Axil. The Entropic Gravity theory was one of the few theories that made me step back and made me do a double take and change my view of how gravity works. It's not a coincidence that gravity just doesn't fit into standard model. If gravity is due to entropic forces of an occupied

Re: [Vo]:Bose Einstein Condensate formed at Room Temperature

The standard model is wrong. Gravity fits into a LENR based theory where ALL the forces of nature are Entropic. All the fundamental forces including gravity are not fundamental but instead they all emerge like gravity from entanglement. On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:49 AM, CB Sites

Re: [Vo]:Bose Einstein Condensate formed at Room Temperature

50% chance of emerging entropic branes bringing rain today... On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > The standard model is wrong. Gravity fits into a LENR based theory where > ALL the forces of nature are Entropic. All the fundamental forces > including gravity

Re: [Vo]:Bose Einstein Condensate formed at Room Temperature

Verlinde's new theory of gravity passes first test December 16, 2016 https://phys.org/news/2016-12-verlinde-theory-gravity.html More information: Margot M. Brouwer et al. First test of Verlinde's theory of Emergent Gravity using Weak Gravitational Lensing measurements, Monthly Notices of the

RE: [Vo]:Bose Einstein Condensate formed at Room Temperature

Harry- You noted the following: Monday, June 5, 2017 6:23 PM— “However, as I recall there is a story floating around that a certain batch of Pd from the supplier seemed to work best. If that is true then the energy storage might have happened prior to the experiment when the Pd was processed

Re: [Vo]:The process by which the proton decays in LENR

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep16184 *Topological, non-topological and instanton droplets driven by spin-transfer torque in materials with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya Interaction* This article explains how a unbalanced magnetic field can produce an

Re: [Vo]:Bose Einstein Condensate formed at Room Temperature

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 12 Jun 2017 01:25:05 -0400: Hi, My point was that if particles could pass through one another like superposing waves do, then the particles of your head should be able to pass through the particles in the wall without resistance. You stated that particles

Re: [Vo]:Bose Einstein Condensate formed at Room Temperature

Explaining complex ideas in a simple way takes real talent in writing and requires lots of practice. Thanks for the opportunity to benefit from that practice. On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 3:59 PM, wrote: > In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 12 Jun 2017 15:52:08 -0400: > Hi,

Re: [Vo]:Bose Einstein Condensate formed at Room Temperature

Two particles do not pass through each other, they become identical and their wave functions combine in constructive interference. The process is as follows: Two different particles come to share all charctoristics, These two particles become on superparticle. Over time, this superparticle

Re: [Vo]:Bose Einstein Condensate formed at Room Temperature

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 12 Jun 2017 15:52:08 -0400: Hi, This explanation makes a lot more sense than what you originally said. [snip] >Two particles do not pass through each other, they become identical and >their wave functions combine in constructive interference. > >The

Re: [Vo]: Type A palladium from JM... was Bose Einstein Condensate

In response to: > "However, as I recall there is a story floating around that a certain batch of Pd from the supplier seemed to work best. If that is true then the energy storage might have happened prior to the experiment when the Pd was processed by the supplier.” This subject comes up

Re: [Vo]: Type A palladium from JM... was Bose Einstein Condensate

Thanks for bringing this up. I think it is important. Table 10 from Miles is the most dramatic proof that so-called Type A Pd is particularly effective. It is easier to see this in my version (which has a link to the original), p. 6: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJlessonsfro.pdf Jones

Re: [Vo]: Type A palladium from JM... was Bose Einstein Condensate

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 12 Jun 2017 13:21:41 -0700: Hi, [snip] >It should be noted that several researchers are convinced that the >silver addition is also a reactant in some undefined nuclear way. Both >palladium, silver and nickel are catalysts for the Mills version of

Re: [Vo]: Type A palladium from JM... was Bose Einstein Condensate

I wanted to toss a couple of thoughts in on BEC's in solid state. If you have never read Scott and Talbot Chubb's papers, I highly recommend them. Also Y.E. Kim's BEC theory works fits in all of this. They are all in Jed's library. Y.E. Kim has a great body of work on BEC formations in solids,

Re: [Vo]: Type A palladium from JM... was Bose Einstein Condensate

From: Jones Beene Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:21 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]: Type A palladium from JM... was Bose Einstein Condensate In response to: > "However, as I recall there is a story floating around that a