...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 10:31 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:A bombshell of a different type?
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 2:08 PM, mix...@bigpond.commailto:mix...@bigpond.com
wrote:
Something else I just thought of:
17O+6Li = 16O + 7Li + 3.107 MeV
I would
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 2:08 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Something else I just thought of:
17O+6Li = 16O + 7Li + 3.107 MeV
I would not be surprised if there were other stripping reactions occurring
if Ni(7Li,6Ni)Ni was happening. As a side note, with the introduction of a
gas phase
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 5 Jan 2015 22:07:23 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
In the nuclear industry, there is a reactor type called the pebble bed
reactor. That reactor uses a uranium and plutonium nuclear fuel enclosed in
a graphite and Silicon carbide coating called TRISO fuel.
http://luratia.com/graphene/graphene-is-impermeable
graphene is impermeable
Graphene is the most impermeable material Earth scientists have yet
discovered. It’s so impermeable the smallest element hydrogen can’t pass
through.
Real-life applications:
Graphene-lined hydrogen fuel tanks.
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 5 Jan 2015 23:37:08 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
The last MFMP test showed that stainless steal leaked hydrogen badly at
high temperatures.
Actually that wouldn't surprise me. Iron like Pt, Pd, Ti, and Ni, will absorb
some H. A process which I imagine would go faster
What if a coat of graphite was applied to the outside of the HotCat as a
hydrogen barrier during its fabrication and then a final thin veneer coat
of alumina cement completes the fabrication by covering the graphite and
forming the heat radiating fin structure.
The hydrogen could permeate
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Fri, 2 Jan 2015 23:36:57 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Have I missed something important?
Eric
Something else I just thought of:
17O+6Li = 16O + 7Li + 3.107 MeV
This reaction would provide a path for Li7 to be regenerated from O17 in the
Al2O3.
The same mechanism
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 5 Jan 2015 17:58:58 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Providing that a graphite coat would actually perform this function, it could be
a good idea.
What if a coat of graphite was applied to the outside of the HotCat as a
hydrogen barrier during its fabrication and then a
05, 2015 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A bombshell of a different type?
What if a coat of graphite was applied to the outside of the HotCat as a
hydrogen barrier during its fabrication and then a final thin veneer coat of
alumina cement completes the fabrication by covering the graphite
: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 7:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A bombshell of a different type?
In the nuclear industry, there is a reactor type called the pebble bed
reactor. That reactor uses a uranium and plutonium nuclear fuel enclosed in a
graphite and Silicon
.
In summary, your TRISO LENR reactor would not compete with Rossi's drug
store variety IMO.
Bob
- Original Message -
*From:* Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Monday, January 05, 2015 7:07 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:A bombshell of a different type
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:08 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
I just heard Sunday that one of the first Thermo nuclear devices
exploded in the Pacific yielded 15 Megatons of TNT vs the predicted 5 Mega
tons. This estimate or prediction was off by a factor of 3.
Teller-Ulam.
In the nuclear industry, there is a reactor type called the pebble bed
reactor. That reactor uses a uranium and plutonium nuclear fuel enclosed in
a graphite and Silicon carbide coating called TRISO fuel.
I don't think that the 2mg are a problem , that is more the number of
grains analysed.
it is like poling. the size of the sample have to be bigger if there is
tiny minorities. few samples are ok to measure the majority.
the problem like on polling is more about bias on the sampling, like taking
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:21 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 8 Oct 2014 09:22:13 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Li7 + Ni58 = Ni59 + Li6 + 1.75 MeV
Li7 + Ni59 = Ni60 + Li6 + 4.14 MeV
Li7 + Ni60 = Ni61 + Li6 + 0.57 MeV
Li7 + Ni61 = Ni62 + Li6 + 3.34 MeV
Li7 + Ni62
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:21 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Li7 + Ni58 = Ni59 + Li6 + 1.75 MeV
Li7 + Ni59 = Ni60 + Li6 + 4.14 MeV
Li7 + Ni60 = Ni61 + Li6 + 0.57 MeV
Li7 + Ni61 = Ni62 + Li6 + 3.34 MeV
Li7 + Ni62 = Ni63 + Li6 - 0.41 MeV (Endothermic!)
This series stops at Ni62, hence all
The isotopic shift observed is only a side effect of the real reaction that
are taking place. From others LENR experiments one can suspect that
hydrogen is the fuel and that Ni is just modified by whatever is in its
vicinity.
Do you remember all the internet ink was used to debate the copper ash
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you remember all the internet ink was used to debate the copper ash in
the nickel powder; now all that is for naught.
Yes, and thankfully so. Ni(p,ɣ)Cu can go away and die a peaceful death.
(Not to say that it doesn't
Sample 2 was the fuel used to charge the E-Cat. It’s in the form of a
very fine powder. Besides the analyzed elements it has been found that the
fuel also contains rather high concentrations of C, Ca, Cl, Fe, Mg, Mn and
these are not found in the ash.
This indicates that also virgin powder was
Eric--
It may not be so high in the local mag. field if the Li7 is lined up properly
with the Ni nucleus.
The question remains, what is the mechanism that transfers mass energy to
thermal energy at Mev levels without gammas?
The paper on neutron hopping that Jones identified may help answer
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:58 AM, frobertcook frobertc...@hotmail.com
wrote:
The question remains, what is the mechanism that transfers mass energy to
thermal energy at Mev levels without gammas?
As you allude, gammas were not seen in this test run. That leads me to
adopt Robin's hypothesis,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:58 AM, frobertcook frobertc...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Eric--
The question remains, what is the mechanism that transfers mass energy to
thermal energy at Mev levels without gammas?
Superabsorbsion of a polariton (SPP) boson condensate. SPP last about 50
picoseconds,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
At 1400C all atoms are either ionized or in dipole vibrations. There is an
electron plasma formed from which polaritons are then formed from electron
shielded infrared photons,
Sometimes I wonder whether there's a
I for one consider a hot Li6 is inconsistent with no radiation.
The enerrgy release must be by a different mechanism.
Bob Cook
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE SmartphoneAxil Axil janap...@gmail.com
wrote:
I agree, you really can tell where that Li6 came from.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at
On 10/08/2014 12:22 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
You have to wonder - given the tiny amount of hydrogen at the start, and the
isotopic analysis at the end, if hydrogen was necessary for this reaction.
This looks like a lithium burner.
Captain, we're going to need more dilithium crystals!
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Craig Haynie
You have to wonder - given the tiny amount of hydrogen at the start, and the
isotopic analysis at the end, if hydrogen was necessary for this reaction.
This looks like a lithium burner.
Captain, we're going to need more dilithium crystals!
I have postulated for years that a alkali metal would be the secret sauce
based on the operating temperature of the reactor.
When the operating temperature is about 1200C, this makes lithium the best
fit to vaporize at about 1330C and at lower temperatures condense into
nano-particles in areas of
One more interesting thing about this report. If lithium is the active fuel,
and not hydrogen, which seems to be the case, then the ash which is lithium-6
is as valuable for batteries as is the natural metal. Maybe more valuable.
Thus the fuel is essentially free, since the ash can be sold for
What is missing from LENR theory is how any nuclear radiation types are
not detected in the Rossi reaction. I have put forward the Super-absorber
theory made possible by boson condensation. The testing and analysis group
are afraid to put their names onto a nuclear reaction mechanism that is
I also see that the tubules on the a fraction of the micro-particles are
melted by the high heat. This leads be to the conclusion that reaction is
also being carried by lithium based nano-particles produced by plasma
condensation. The testers are only looking at the nickel particles for
isotope
On the subject of energy balance and radiation
Mass of Ni58 =57.935 mass of Ni62 =61.928 difference 3.993 amu
Mass of neutron 1.0087 x 4 = 4.035
Mass of Li7=7.016 Mass of Li6= 6.015 difference 1.001 x 4= 4.004
The problem is that on paper - lithium cannot give up a neutron easily as there
It may have been noted that lithium has a heat of vaporization of about 140
kJ/mol and that the boiling point is close to the operating temp of this
reactor on the inside 1350C.
This seems to work out to a whopping 20 MJ/kg which is high (did I get that
wrong?) Consequently a lot thermal
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 8 Oct 2014 09:22:13 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Li7 + Ni58 = Ni59 + Li6 + 1.75 MeV
Li7 + Ni59 = Ni60 + Li6 + 4.14 MeV
Li7 + Ni60 = Ni61 + Li6 + 0.57 MeV
Li7 + Ni61 = Ni62 + Li6 + 3.34 MeV
Li7 + Ni62 = Ni63 + Li6 - 0.41 MeV (Endothermic!)
This series stops at
I agree, you really can tell where that Li6 came from.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:21 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 8 Oct 2014 09:22:13 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Li7 + Ni58 = Ni59 + Li6 + 1.75 MeV
Li7 + Ni59 = Ni60 + Li6 + 4.14 MeV
Li7 + Ni60 = Ni61 + Li6
I agree, you really can tell where that Li6 came from
should read
I agree, you really can not tell where that Li6 came from
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree, you really can tell where that Li6 came from.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:21 PM,
35 matches
Mail list logo
