Re: [Vo]:Brillouin Energy press release

2017-01-07 Thread David Roberson
accounting of the supply input power contribution. I hope that this report holds up under careful skeptical analysis. Dave -Original Message- From: Jack Cole <jcol...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sat, Jan 7, 2017 8:22 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Brillouin

RE: [Vo]:Brillouin Energy press release

2017-01-07 Thread Russ George
To: Vortex Subject: Re: [Vo]:Brillouin Energy press release Jack Cole <jcol...@gmail.com <mailto:jcol...@gmail.com> > wrote: The input power being mis-measured is one possibility that has not been discussed in sufficient detail to know if they have ruled this out. This is no

Re: [Vo]:Brillouin Energy press release

2017-01-07 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jack Cole wrote: > The input power being mis-measured is one possibility that has not been > discussed in sufficient detail to know if they have ruled this out. > This is not a detailed report. I expect they have ruled it out, by methods not described here. > Since

Re: [Vo]:Brillouin Energy press release

2017-01-07 Thread Jack Cole
Yes, they would be wise to assume the results are false, and make every effort to disprove the results. Start with the thought process of, "Assuming this is an artifact, what can explain it?" The input power being mis-measured is one possibility that has not been discussed in sufficient detail

Re: [Vo]:Brillouin Energy press release

2017-01-06 Thread Jones Beene
Jed Rothwell wrote: I think Brian wants them to measure power going into the power supplies. That sounds like a good idea to me. Probably a lot is lost between the power supply input and the reactor core, but you could still compare a null run to an excess heat run. You could confirm that

Re: [Vo]:Brillouin Energy press release

2017-01-06 Thread Jed Rothwell
Okay, I have read this SRI report a few times. I have a good impression. I need to think about it more, but so far, so good. People at lenr-forum complained there is not much about errors or the margin of error. That's true, but there is some discussion. They say the errors are less than 5%. That

RE: [Vo]:Brillouin Energy press release

2017-01-05 Thread bobcook39923
I wonder if Ni Nano particles are involved? Is there a patent in the USA for the IPB HHT? Bob Cook Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Jed Rothwell Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 1:29 PM To: Vortex Subject: [Vo]:Brillouin Energy press release See:

Re: [Vo]:Brillouin Energy press release

2015-11-18 Thread Axil Axil
It is alway wise to tell the truth. On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > November 18, 2015 > > CONGRESS VIEWS BRILLOUIN ENERGY’S LENR WET™ AND HHT™ BOILER REACTOR > SYSTEMS FOR GENERATING THERMAL ENERGY > > >

Re: [Vo]:Brillouin Energy press release

2015-11-18 Thread Esa J. Ruoho
Axil, is there some context to this rather short sentence in light of that Brillouin press-release? Sent from some iDevice. Written by Esa. > On 18 Nov 2015, at 23:59, Axil Axil wrote: > > It is alway wise to tell the truth. > > >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Jed