My *FINAL* version is up at http://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_v310.php
Main changes :
I added an abstract
I moved the conclusion near the end of the document
I added a plethora of Sherlock Holmes quotes.
I'm going to generate (semi-automatically, I hope) a reference PDF
printable
You spelled Krivit wrong. As Krivet.
One more revision after all!
- Jed
At 02:36 PM 4/1/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
You spelled Krivit wrong. As Krivet.
One more revision after all!
Fixed. I looked at his paper and corrected KrivetS to Krivet. I
think it's a fact of proof-reading that if you correct an error then
the probabilty of missing an error within one
At 02:36 PM 4/1/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
One more revision after all!
V 3.11 http://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_v311.php
Printable HTML (just with form-feeds) :
http://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_v311.php?print
PDF for reference (with footer, page numbers etc) :
Nearly done ...
http://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_v309.php?todo=1
Apart from final clean-up, I'm wondering whether to present the results
in summary form :
Thinks: For each fake material I present five
different experiments --- I could make a summary table ordered by
experiment and then
Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
I'm looking for a quote I read *YEARS* ago ... with respect to what you have
to do to get PF Cold fusion to work
Something like 5 essential steps, where the debunkers skipped one or more
of them
I do not understand this comment. No one knows what steps
At 04:44 AM 3/24/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Alan J Fletcher
a...@well.com wrote:
I'm looking for a quote I read *YEARS* ago ... with respect to what
you have to do to get PF Cold fusion to work
Something like 5 essential steps, where the debunkers skipped one or
more of them
I do not
that looks familiar.
But remember correlation does not mean causation.
Now I wonder if you can find my poster presentation for the same meeting : )
concerning gas loading yielding heat at higher temperatures ..
The review was made at the request of the conference aimed at introducing new
Yet another version : http://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_v307.php
I've expanded the history section, added Jed's hidden tubes to
the Hidden wires and added more disclaimers to the methodology
(ie I that I include impractical solutions).
I MIGHT add to each Fake a comment on its
At 11:38 AM 3/24/2011, Dennis wrote:
that looks familiar.
But remember correlation does not mean causation.
My History section now has:
Cravens And Letts
(The
Enabling Criteria of Electrochemical Heat: Beyond Reasonable Doubt)
performed a statistical anaylysis of 167 papers, and identified 4
Dennis wrote:
I am still no where near Rossi's 10Kw/100g Ni =100W/gm. I am still
lucky to see 0.5 W/g on a good day.
Okay, so can you try 200 g to get ~100 W? Or would that much material be
too expensive? Would it not fit into your cell?
I think it would be valuable to demonstrate a 100
In reply to Dennis's message of Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:38:31 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
much of anything. I am still no where near Rossi's 10Kw/100g Ni =100W/gm.
I am still
lucky to see 0.5 W/g on a good day.
Oh I wish I know what Rossi's secret additive is.
Dennis C
...My guess would be
Regards,
In reply to Dennis's message of Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:38:31 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
I am still no where near Rossi's 10Kw/100g Ni =100W/gm. I am still
lucky to see 0.5 W/g on a good day.
Oh I wish I know what Rossi's secret additive is.
I would give NaOH a shot. ;)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
Thanks, Cousin for mentioning my opinion.
A large reaction is good:
a) because it is a promise of technological usefulness,
b) it helps you to NOT waste creativity on sophisticated measurement-as
calorimetry, saves you from metrologomania.
I don't understand the problem of signal/noise in this
http://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_v306.php
At 06:10 PM 3/22/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Typo in report:
higher inout power
Probably should be: higher input power
Is that still there? .. I fixed it a few versions ago, and
can't find it in my current version.
In the report you wrote:
Since
Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
higher inout power
Probably should be: higher input power
Is that still there? ..
It's fixed.
burned, there would be copious, fatally asphyxiating fumes --- though in
the January experiment they could theoretically have been piped out of the
I'm looking for a quote I read *YEARS* ago ... with respect to what
you have to do to get PF Cold fusion to work
Something like 5 essential steps, where the debunkers skipped one or
more of them
Krivits
http://www.newenergytimes.com/v2/library/2005/2005KrivitS-HowCanItBeReal-Paper.pdf
At 12:31 PM 3/18/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
I've almost finished the main
versionhttp://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_v305.php
Todo :
-- Implement expressions for the remaining mechanisms (eg Heat storage).
-- Research the Energy Density for Boron/Steam (probably the highest density)
Typo in report:
higher inout power
Probably should be: higher input power
In the report you wrote:
Since then, Rossi has PAID the University of Bologna E500,000 to
investigate and develop the eCat device . . .
I believe that's E1,000,000.
Some or all of the original 'independent
19 matches
Mail list logo
