Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Brian Ahern]

good advice. The strontium ferrite BILLET is a Perovskite. They are known to 
support shallow potential wells.



From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 2:53 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

>From what is described in the response to the application of an intense high 
>voltage electrostatic field observed by experimenters, the bullet seems to be 
>more responsive to demagnetization when a weak magnetic field is applied to 
>it. The electrostatic field exposure might affect the nanostructure of the 
>magnetic domain boundaries and/or the nanoparticles that comprise the 
>composition of the magnet material.

The experimenter describes behavior of the bubble that forms at the center of 
the bullet moves around like a liquid when an external magnetic field is 
applied to that region of the bullet. This liquid like behavior only occurs 
after the application of the electrostatic field and is a pertinent feature 
thereafter.

Place some magnetic plastic on your active bullet to visualize the behavior of 
its magnetic field at its center. Then expose that area to a weak magnetic 
field from a refrigerator magnet. Do the same test on a unprocessed bullet that 
can be gotten from the marketplace. Check to see if the bubble at the center of 
that unprocessed bullet behaves in the same way...as a liquid.

If the behavior of the magnets are different then a point of comparison is now 
possible. To understand what is going on at the nano level of that bubble needs 
some specialized sensitive magnetic sensor equipment I suspect.

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Brian Ahern 
<ahern_br...@msn.com<mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com>> wrote:

Can anyone describe how this applies to the Manelas billet. It is ferromagnetic 
and highly resistive. Here is what I have learned from my decade accompanying 
Keith Johnson (MIT prof. retired 1997)


1.Magnetism arise from the alignment of spins.


2.The spin is quantized and the electrons are in orbitals that can be predicted.


3.Some ferromagnets have spins that are associated with loose bonding (shallow 
potential wells)


4. Shallow wells enable a relaxation of the Born-Oppenheimer condition 
(Electron motion is independent of ion movement.)


5. Ferromagnetism with shallow potential wells allows for interaction between 
spin alignment and vibrational modes.


6. This condition allows for cooling with the application of pulses to 
interplay with the vibrational modes and spin alignment.



From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com> 
<bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 11:52 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: RE: [Vo]:The Kerr effect




Axil,



Those references are quite instructive.



The idea of power transfer vectors as a coupling mechanism is a new concept for 
me,  I hope that this is being taught in undergraduate physics chemistry and EE 
courses.



The magnetic field and spin energy transfer all closely connected IMHO.   
Engineering coherent systems in the solid state  to allow the coupling to the 
nuclear part of the potential energy  of the system is the crux of achieving 
LENR+.



Bob Cook



From: Axil Axil<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 10:04 AM
To: vortex-l<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect



The following reference actually shows the monopole magnetic field produce by 
the polariton. If you cannot understand that picture, I cannot do more.



The Ni/H reactor produces the same effect using polariton vortexes that form on 
the surface of  nickel micro particles and in clusters of lithium hydride 
nanoparticles. There is also the condensation of these polariton solitons that 
provide super-radiance as another powerful amplification mechanism.



see figure 2 for a picture of the monopole magnetic beam



Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave like magnetic monopoles



http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf



Nanoparticles produce Surface Plasmon Polaritons (SPP) which are the optical 
cavities that produce that magnetic fields that result in meson emission. Sorry 
if the line of connections is long, Here is how nanoparticles produce EMF 
amplification of light.



http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1405/1405.1657.pdf



Plasmonics with a twist: taming optical tornadoes on the nanoscale



Nanoplasmonics provide many types of EMF amplification mechanisms. One of the 
more difficult mechanisms to understand is how a pile of nano and micro 
particles greatly amplify EMF. The reference provided in this post shows how 
the topology in the way particles aggregate explain how EMF is concentrated 
through vortex formation. The reference defines an analogy between a vortex and 
a gear. Like a funnel, a large part

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Axil Axil]

>From what is described in the response to the application of an intense
high voltage electrostatic field observed by experimenters, the bullet
seems to be more responsive to demagnetization when a weak magnetic field
is applied to it. The electrostatic field exposure might affect the
nanostructure of the magnetic domain boundaries and/or the nanoparticles
that comprise the composition of the magnet material.

The experimenter describes behavior of the bubble that forms at the center
of the bullet moves around like a liquid when an external magnetic field is
applied to that region of the bullet. This liquid like behavior only occurs
after the application of the electrostatic field and is a pertinent feature
thereafter.

Place some magnetic plastic on your active bullet to visualize the behavior
of its magnetic field at its center. Then expose that area to a weak
magnetic field from a refrigerator magnet. Do the same test on a
unprocessed bullet that can be gotten from the marketplace. Check to see if
the bubble at the center of that unprocessed bullet behaves in the same
way...as a liquid.

If the behavior of the magnets are different then a point of comparison is
now possible. To understand what is going on at the nano level of that
bubble needs some specialized sensitive magnetic sensor equipment I suspect.

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> wrote:

> Can anyone describe how this applies to the Manelas billet. It is
> ferromagnetic and highly resistive. Here is what I have learned from my
> decade accompanying Keith Johnson (MIT prof. retired 1997)
>
>
> 1.Magnetism arise from the alignment of spins.
>
>
> 2.The spin is quantized and the electrons are in orbitals that can be
> predicted.
>
>
> 3.Some ferromagnets have spins that are associated with loose bonding
> (shallow potential wells)
>
>
> 4. Shallow wells enable a relaxation of the Born-Oppenheimer condition
> (Electron motion is independent of ion movement.)
>
>
> 5. Ferromagnetism with shallow potential wells allows for interaction
> between spin alignment and vibrational modes.
>
>
> 6. This condition allows for cooling with the application of pulses to
> interplay with the vibrational modes and spin alignment.
>
>
> --
> *From:* bobcook39...@hotmail.com <bobcook39...@hotmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, May 5, 2017 11:52 AM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:The Kerr effect
>
>
>
>
> Axil,
>
>
>
> Those references are quite instructive.
>
>
>
> The idea of power transfer vectors as a coupling mechanism is a new
> concept for me,  I hope that this is being taught in undergraduate physics
> chemistry and EE courses.
>
>
>
> The magnetic field and spin energy transfer all closely connected IMHO.
> Engineering coherent systems in the solid state  to allow the coupling to
> the nuclear part of the potential energy  of the system is the crux of
> achieving LENR+.
>
>
>
> Bob Cook
>
>
>
> *From: *Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
> *Sent: *Saturday, April 29, 2017 10:04 AM
> *To: *vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect
>
>
>
> The following reference actually shows the monopole magnetic field produce
> by the polariton. If you cannot understand that picture, I cannot do more.
>
>
>
> The Ni/H reactor produces the same effect using polariton vortexes that
> form on the surface of  nickel micro particles and in clusters of lithium
> hydride nanoparticles. There is also the condensation of these polariton
> solitons that provide super-radiance as another powerful amplification
> mechanism.
>
>
>
> see figure 2 for a picture of the monopole magnetic beam
>
>
>
> Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave like magnetic monopoles
>
>
>
> http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf
>
>
>
> Nanoparticles produce Surface Plasmon Polaritons (SPP) which are the
> optical cavities that produce that magnetic fields that result in meson
> emission. Sorry if the line of connections is long, Here is how
> nanoparticles produce EMF amplification of light.
>
>
>
> http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1405/1405.1657.pdf
>
>
>
> Plasmonics with a twist: taming optical tornadoes on the nanoscale
>
>
>
> Nanoplasmonics provide many types of EMF amplification mechanisms. One of
> the more difficult mechanisms to understand is how a pile of nano and micro
> particles greatly amplify EMF. The reference provided in this post shows
> how the topology in the way particles aggregate explain how EMF is
> concentrated through vortex formation. The reference defines an analogy
> between a vortex and a gea

RE: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Chris Zell]

And somehow, for reasons I cannot find, magnets do not behave as gyroscopes 
even though the fields are caused by spin.

From: Brian Ahern [mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2017 1:44 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect


Can anyone describe how this applies to the Manelas billet. It is ferromagnetic 
and highly resistive. Here is what I have learned from my decade accompanying 
Keith Johnson (MIT prof. retired 1997)



1.Magnetism arise from the alignment of spins.



2.The spin is quantized and the electrons are in orbitals that can be predicted.









.

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Brian Ahern]

Can anyone describe how this applies to the Manelas billet. It is ferromagnetic 
and highly resistive. Here is what I have learned from my decade accompanying 
Keith Johnson (MIT prof. retired 1997)


1.Magnetism arise from the alignment of spins.


2.The spin is quantized and the electrons are in orbitals that can be predicted.


3.Some ferromagnets have spins that are associated with loose bonding (shallow 
potential wells)


4. Shallow wells enable a relaxation of the Born-Oppenheimer condition 
(Electron motion is independent of ion movement.)


5. Ferromagnetism with shallow potential wells allows for interaction between 
spin alignment and vibrational modes.


6. This condition allows for cooling with the application of pulses to 
interplay with the vibrational modes and spin alignment.



From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com <bobcook39...@hotmail.com>
Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 11:52 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:The Kerr effect




Axil,



Those references are quite instructive.



The idea of power transfer vectors as a coupling mechanism is a new concept for 
me,  I hope that this is being taught in undergraduate physics chemistry and EE 
courses.



The magnetic field and spin energy transfer all closely connected IMHO.   
Engineering coherent systems in the solid state  to allow the coupling to the 
nuclear part of the potential energy  of the system is the crux of achieving 
LENR+.



Bob Cook



From: Axil Axil<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 10:04 AM
To: vortex-l<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect



The following reference actually shows the monopole magnetic field produce by 
the polariton. If you cannot understand that picture, I cannot do more.



The Ni/H reactor produces the same effect using polariton vortexes that form on 
the surface of  nickel micro particles and in clusters of lithium hydride 
nanoparticles. There is also the condensation of these polariton solitons that 
provide super-radiance as another powerful amplification mechanism.



see figure 2 for a picture of the monopole magnetic beam



Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave like magnetic monopoles



http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf



Nanoparticles produce Surface Plasmon Polaritons (SPP) which are the optical 
cavities that produce that magnetic fields that result in meson emission. Sorry 
if the line of connections is long, Here is how nanoparticles produce EMF 
amplification of light.



http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1405/1405.1657.pdf



Plasmonics with a twist: taming optical tornadoes on the nanoscale



Nanoplasmonics provide many types of EMF amplification mechanisms. One of the 
more difficult mechanisms to understand is how a pile of nano and micro 
particles greatly amplify EMF. The reference provided in this post shows how 
the topology in the way particles aggregate explain how EMF is concentrated 
through vortex formation. The reference defines an analogy between a vortex and 
a gear. Like a funnel, a large particle gathers the energy from a wave of EMF 
far larger than its diameter, In the case of the Rossi system, this type 
particle is the 5 micron nickel particle.



https://vimeo.com/36691535





This large particle produces a relatively huge vortex. Other particles of 
various sizes accumulate around the nickel particle. Each of these particles 
produce a vortex proportional to the size of the particle. These vortexes fit 
together like gears where the large vortex provides a large amount of power, 
and the other smaller vortexes provide a gear train that speeds up the rotation 
rate of the smaller gears down the train.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkxXheV748U



Finally, the smallest vortexes associated with hydrogen crystals, spin at high 
rates of speed providing large EMF power amplification.

The take away is that a large spread of particles sizes produced within an 
aggregation of particles generates the most powerful EMF amplification effects. 
This fact explaines why the “secret sauce” effect provides such a large EMF 
power amplification result. These alkali metal hydrides supply the 
intermediatly sized gears that allows the large nickel gears to transfer their 
vast store of energy with little loss to the smallest hydrogen based gears down 
a smoothly running vortex power transmission chain.

I venture to say that there is randomness associated with this particle 
aggregation process that enables a sort of  natural selection where the most  
effective dust pile configurations provide the most EMF amplification. When 
there are an abundance of particles, the chances are good that some of these 
piles will be LENR capable. That is to say, when there are a large number of 
particles, the chances are good that some of their aggregates will produce EMF 
amplication great enough to catalyze nuclear effects.



There is also a certain l

RE: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[bobcook39...@hotmail.com]

Axil,

Those references are quite instructive.

The idea of power transfer vectors as a coupling mechanism is a new concept for 
me,  I hope that this is being taught in undergraduate physics chemistry and EE 
courses.

The magnetic field and spin energy transfer all closely connected IMHO.   
Engineering coherent systems in the solid state  to allow the coupling to the 
nuclear part of the potential energy  of the system is the crux of achieving 
LENR+.

Bob Cook

From: Axil Axil<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 10:04 AM
To: vortex-l<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

The following reference actually shows the monopole magnetic field produce by 
the polariton. If you cannot understand that picture, I cannot do more.

The Ni/H reactor produces the same effect using polariton vortexes that form on 
the surface of  nickel micro particles and in clusters of lithium hydride 
nanoparticles. There is also the condensation of these polariton solitons that 
provide super-radiance as another powerful amplification mechanism.

see figure 2 for a picture of the monopole magnetic beam

Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave like magnetic monopoles

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf

Nanoparticles produce Surface Plasmon Polaritons (SPP) which are the optical 
cavities that produce that magnetic fields that result in meson emission. Sorry 
if the line of connections is long, Here is how nanoparticles produce EMF 
amplification of light.

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1405/1405.1657.pdf

Plasmonics with a twist: taming optical tornadoes on the nanoscale

Nanoplasmonics provide many types of EMF amplification mechanisms. One of the 
more difficult mechanisms to understand is how a pile of nano and micro 
particles greatly amplify EMF. The reference provided in this post shows how 
the topology in the way particles aggregate explain how EMF is concentrated 
through vortex formation. The reference defines an analogy between a vortex and 
a gear. Like a funnel, a large particle gathers the energy from a wave of EMF 
far larger than its diameter, In the case of the Rossi system, this type 
particle is the 5 micron nickel particle.

https://vimeo.com/36691535


This large particle produces a relatively huge vortex. Other particles of 
various sizes accumulate around the nickel particle. Each of these particles 
produce a vortex proportional to the size of the particle. These vortexes fit 
together like gears where the large vortex provides a large amount of power, 
and the other smaller vortexes provide a gear train that speeds up the rotation 
rate of the smaller gears down the train.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkxXheV748U

Finally, the smallest vortexes associated with hydrogen crystals, spin at high 
rates of speed providing large EMF power amplification.
The take away is that a large spread of particles sizes produced within an 
aggregation of particles generates the most powerful EMF amplification effects. 
This fact explaines why the “secret sauce” effect provides such a large EMF 
power amplification result. These alkali metal hydrides supply the 
intermediatly sized gears that allows the large nickel gears to transfer their 
vast store of energy with little loss to the smallest hydrogen based gears down 
a smoothly running vortex power transmission chain.
I venture to say that there is randomness associated with this particle 
aggregation process that enables a sort of  natural selection where the most  
effective dust pile configurations provide the most EMF amplification. When 
there are an abundance of particles, the chances are good that some of these 
piles will be LENR capable. That is to say, when there are a large number of 
particles, the chances are good that some of their aggregates will produce EMF 
amplication great enough to catalyze nuclear effects.

There is also a certain lifetime associated with particle formation. Particle 
piles are constantly falling apart. These particle aggregates must be 
constantly rebuilt to maintain a sustained reaction rate.

The SunCell is an example of dusty plasma based LENR where silver vapor 
condenses into nanoparticles that produce the LERN reaction.

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Axil Axil]

The following reference actually shows the monopole magnetic field produce
by the polariton. If you cannot understand that picture, I cannot do more.

The Ni/H reactor produces the same effect using polariton vortexes that
form on the surface of  nickel micro particles and in clusters of lithium
hydride nanoparticles. There is also the condensation of these polariton
solitons that provide super-radiance as another powerful amplification
mechanism.

see figure 2 for a picture of the monopole magnetic beam

Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave like magnetic monopoles

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf


On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
wrote:

> Axil Axil,
>
> Saying that a plasmon is a quasi particle of plasma oscillation is no more
> helpful than saying a phonon is a quantization of mechanical vibration.
> As an engineer one cares more about the properties than the detailed
> explanation but as a scientist I need something more solid about .how it
> works than the above.  It seems to me that iti is basically just math with
> a name given to something that is not really understood.  Maybe that is
> just my ignorance.
>
> Likewise, in the first paper you linked, I have no idea if the field shown
> around a nano particle subjected to a laser pulse is real or has been
> measured or is a mathematical speculation.  Let alone why or how that field
> is formed.   I have no idea how one could look at what is happening inside
> a volume that is below the diffraction limit.
>
> So, if the papers you link are correct I can understand that your theory
> makes sense, but I would like to see more experimental proof of the
> fundamentals before accepting it.
>
> Thanks for your replies and the links.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Fri, Apr 28, 2017 10:11 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect
>
> Nanoparticles produce Surface Plasmon Polaritons (SPP) which are the
> optical cavities that produce that magnetic fields that result in meson
> emission. Sorry if the line of connections is long, Here is how
> nanoparticles produce EMF amplification of light.
>
> http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1405/1405.1657.pdf
>
> Plasmonics with a twist: taming optical tornadoes on the nanoscale
>
> Nanoplasmonics provide many types of EMF amplification mechanisms. One of
> the more difficult mechanisms to understand is how a pile of nano and micro
> particles greatly amplify EMF. The reference provided in this post shows
> how the topology in the way particles aggregate explain how EMF is
> concentrated through vortex formation. The reference defines an analogy
> between a vortex and a gear. Like a funnel, a large particle gathers the
> energy from a wave of EMF far larger than its diameter, In the case of the
> Rossi system, this type particle is the 5 micron nickel particle.
>
> https://vimeo.com/36691535
>
>
> This large particle produces a relatively huge vortex. Other particles of
> various sizes accumulate around the nickel particle. Each of these
> particles produce a vortex proportional to the size of the particle. These
> vortexes fit together like gears where the large vortex provides a large
> amount of power, and the other smaller vortexes provide a gear train that
> speeds up the rotation rate of the smaller gears down the train.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkxXheV748U
>
> Finally, the smallest vortexes associated with hydrogen crystals, spin at
> high rates of speed providing large EMF power amplification.
> The take away is that a large spread of particles sizes produced within an
> aggregation of particles generates the most powerful EMF amplification
> effects. This fact explaines why the “secret sauce” effect provides such a
> large EMF power amplification result. These alkali metal hydrides supply
> the intermediatly sized gears that allows the large nickel gears to
> transfer their vast store of energy with little loss to the smallest
> hydrogen based gears down a smoothly running vortex power transmission
> chain.
> I venture to say that there is randomness associated with this particle
> aggregation process that enables a sort of  natural selection where the
> most  effective dust pile configurations provide the most EMF
> amplification. When there are an abundance of particles, the chances are
> good that some of these piles will be LENR capable. That is to say, when
> there are a large number of particles, the chances are good that some of
> their aggregates will produce EMF amplication great enough to catalyze
> nuclear effects.
>
> There is also a certain lifetime associated with particle 

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Brian Ahern]

Probably more than 500 times at over 100 facilities. It is easy to do.


From: Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 1:52 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

a stream of helium atoms will emit neutrons when pulses are applied.
Has this actually been confirmed?


-Original Message-
From: Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Fri, Apr 28, 2017 12:18 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

There is a large class of physicists working with chirped laser in the 
femto-second time frame. The pulses go through a NONLINEAR diffraction grating 
and the E-fields superimpose.
For example; a stream of helium atoms will emit neutrons when pulses are 
applied.



From: Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>>
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 12:11 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:l...@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

Brian Ahern,
The significance of your comment is not clear to me.  I thought you disagreed 
with Axil's theory, but this sounds like you now agree.



-Original Message-
From: Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com<mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com>>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:l...@eskimo.com>>
Sent: Fri, Apr 28, 2017 10:15 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

Chirped laser pulses provide sufficient electric and magnetic fields that 
easily cause fission fusion and all decay products known. Holmlid uses laser 
pulses.



From: Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>>
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 9:26 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:l...@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

Axil Axil,

Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields is too dense for me by an order of 
magnitude.  I subscribe to the theory that if one truly understands the 
situation they can explain it in relatively simple terms.

So what would you propose as a demonstration of LENR with a parameter that 
could be altered to prove your theory?





-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:l...@eskimo.com>>
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 7:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

IMHO, Holmlid's recent experiments using  a fast high electric field to induce 
meson production has proved the theory.

This result shows that the SPP requires an electrostatic field stimulus to 
produce the super strong magnetism necessary to activate nucleon decay.

Also, the use of anisotropic magnets (SmCo5) to induce LENR shows that 
magnetism disrupts the gluon condensate inside the proton and neutron.

Even through there is a difference between a monopole fundamental particle, a 
synthetic monopole quasiparticle like the SPP, and an anisotropic magnetic 
field formatted by a pertinent  magnet to support  monopole flux lines, the 
magnetic field produces the same effect.

The SmCo5 magnet produces a magnetic field that is anisotropic field (almost a 
monopole formated magnetic field).

This SmCo5 type magnetic supports monopole flux lines of force.

That is why the SmCo5 magnet can produce a LENR reaction.

To refresh your memory, see

http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg108069.html

The details of what a strong monopole magnetic field does to the insides of the 
proton and neutron is yet to be determined.

I am trying to understand this: See

http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0906083/pdf/25.pdf
Lattice QCD in strong magnetic 
flelds<http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0906083/pdf/25.pdf>
www.slac.stanford.edu<http://www.slac.stanford.edu>
Lattice QCD in strong magnetic flelds P.V.Buividovichab, M.N.Chernodubcdb x, 
E.V.Luschevskayab, M.I.Polikarpovb a JIPNR \Sosny", National Academy of 
Science, Krasin ...




Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields



On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Adrian Ashfield 
<a.ashfi...@verizon.net<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
AXil Axil,

As usual you have come up with a very imaginative theory that sounds just as 
likely or unlikely as myriads of others.
My question is how can it be proved or falsified?



-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>>
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 4:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

LENR in a nutshell

LENR is an optical based process where light is trapped in a waveform called a 
soliton. Think of this structure as Nano sized ball lightning. This ball of 
light can form in many ways: inside ultra-dense hydrogen, on the surface of 
rough metal surfaces, inside cracks in metal, on nanoparticles and 
microparticles, between nanoparticles, and in dusty plasm

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Adrian Ashfield]

Axil Axil,

Saying that a plasmon is a quasi particle of plasma oscillation is no more 
helpful than saying a phonon is a quantization of mechanical vibration.
As an engineer one cares more about the properties than the detailed 
explanation but as a scientist I need something more solid about .how it works 
than the above.  It seems to me that iti is basically just math with a name 
given to something that is not really understood.  Maybe that is just my 
ignorance.

Likewise, in the first paper you linked, I have no idea if the field shown 
around a nano particle subjected to a laser pulse is real or has been measured 
or is a mathematical speculation.  Let alone why or how that field is formed.   
I have no idea how one could look at what is happening inside a volume that is 
below the diffraction limit.

So, if the papers you link are correct I can understand that your theory makes 
sense, but I would like to see more experimental proof of the fundamentals 
before accepting it.

Thanks for your replies and the links. 

 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Fri, Apr 28, 2017 10:11 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect



Nanoparticles produce Surface Plasmon Polaritons (SPP) which are the optical 
cavities that produce that magnetic fields that result in meson emission. Sorry 
if the line of connections is long, Here is how nanoparticles produce EMF 
amplification of light.



http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1405/1405.1657.pdf


Plasmonics with a twist: taming optical tornadoes on the nanoscale


Nanoplasmonics provide many types of EMF amplification mechanisms. One of the 
more difficult mechanisms to understand is how a pile of nano and micro 
particles greatly amplify EMF. The reference provided in this post shows how 
the topology in the way particles aggregate explain how EMF is concentrated 
through vortex formation. The reference defines an analogy between a vortex and 
a gear. Like a funnel, a large particle gathers the energy from a wave of EMF 
far larger than its diameter, In the case of the Rossi system, this type 
particle is the 5 micron nickel particle. 


https://vimeo.com/36691535





This large particle produces a relatively huge vortex. Other particles of 
various sizes accumulate around the nickel particle. Each of these particles 
produce a vortex proportional to the size of the particle. These vortexes fit 
together like gears where the large vortex provides a large amount of power, 
and the other smaller vortexes provide a gear train that speeds up the rotation 
rate of the smaller gears down the train. 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkxXheV748U


Finally, the smallest vortexes associated with hydrogen crystals, spin at high 
rates of speed providing large EMF power amplification. 

The take away is that a large spread of particles sizes produced within an 
aggregation of particles generates the most powerful EMF amplification effects. 
This fact explaines why the “secret sauce” effect provides such a large EMF 
power amplification result. These alkali metal hydrides supply the 
intermediatly sized gears that allows the large nickel gears to transfer their 
vast store of energy with little loss to the smallest hydrogen based gears down 
a smoothly running vortex power transmission chain. 

I venture to say that there is randomness associated with this particle 
aggregation process that enables a sort of  natural selection where the most  
effective dust pile configurations provide the most EMF amplification. When 
there are an abundance of particles, the chances are good that some of these 
piles will be LENR capable. That is to say, when there are a large number of 
particles, the chances are good that some of their aggregates will produce EMF 
amplication great enough to catalyze nuclear effects.


There is also a certain lifetime associated with particle formation. Particle 
piles are constantly falling apart. These particle aggregates must be 
constantly rebuilt to maintain a sustained reaction rate.



The SunCell is an example of dusty plasma based LENR where silver vapor 
condenses into nanoparticles that produce the LERN reaction.





On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:

Axil Axil,
Thanks for the interesting paper.  While it seems clear that small particles 
are formed in the vicinity of the gold nano particles, the mechanism does not 
appear to be understood.  If they are neutrons, as the authors think, why do 
you think they originate from the H rather than from the thorium salt in 
solution?

 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>

Sent: Fri, Apr 28, 2017 2:47 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect



An experiment based on this one t

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Axil Axil]

Nanoparticles produce Surface Plasmon Polaritons (SPP) which are the
optical cavities that produce that magnetic fields that result in meson
emission. Sorry if the line of connections is long, Here is how
nanoparticles produce EMF amplification of light.

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1405/1405.1657.pdf

Plasmonics with a twist: taming optical tornadoes on the nanoscale

Nanoplasmonics provide many types of EMF amplification mechanisms. One of
the more difficult mechanisms to understand is how a pile of nano and micro
particles greatly amplify EMF. The reference provided in this post shows
how the topology in the way particles aggregate explain how EMF is
concentrated through vortex formation. The reference defines an analogy
between a vortex and a gear. Like a funnel, a large particle gathers the
energy from a wave of EMF far larger than its diameter, In the case of the
Rossi system, this type particle is the 5 micron nickel particle.

https://vimeo.com/36691535


This large particle produces a relatively huge vortex. Other particles of
various sizes accumulate around the nickel particle. Each of these
particles produce a vortex proportional to the size of the particle. These
vortexes fit together like gears where the large vortex provides a large
amount of power, and the other smaller vortexes provide a gear train that
speeds up the rotation rate of the smaller gears down the train.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkxXheV748U

Finally, the smallest vortexes associated with hydrogen crystals, spin at
high rates of speed providing large EMF power amplification.
The take away is that a large spread of particles sizes produced within an
aggregation of particles generates the most powerful EMF amplification
effects. This fact explaines why the “secret sauce” effect provides such a
large EMF power amplification result. These alkali metal hydrides supply
the intermediatly sized gears that allows the large nickel gears to
transfer their vast store of energy with little loss to the smallest
hydrogen based gears down a smoothly running vortex power transmission
chain.
I venture to say that there is randomness associated with this particle
aggregation process that enables a sort of  natural selection where the
most  effective dust pile configurations provide the most EMF
amplification. When there are an abundance of particles, the chances are
good that some of these piles will be LENR capable. That is to say, when
there are a large number of particles, the chances are good that some of
their aggregates will produce EMF amplication great enough to catalyze
nuclear effects.

There is also a certain lifetime associated with particle formation.
Particle piles are constantly falling apart. These particle aggregates must
be constantly rebuilt to maintain a sustained reaction rate.

The SunCell is an example of dusty plasma based LENR where silver vapor
condenses into nanoparticles that produce the LERN reaction.


On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
wrote:

> Axil Axil,
> Thanks for the interesting paper.  While it seems clear that small
> particles are formed in the vicinity of the gold nano particles, the
> mechanism does not appear to be understood.  If they are neutrons, as the
> authors think, why do you think they originate from the H rather than from
> the thorium salt in solution?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Fri, Apr 28, 2017 2:47 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect
>
> An experiment based on this one that has been already performed as
> follows:
>
> Initiation of nuclear reactions under laser irradiation of Au
> nanoparticles in
> the presence of Thorium aqua-ions
> A.V. Simakin and G.A. Shafeev
>
> https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0906/0906.4268.pdf
>
> "The resulting average size of Au NPs as determined by Transmission
> Electron Microscopy lies between 10 and 20 nm."
>
> The addition is to configure this experiment with two double concentric
> glass chambers with pure water and gold nanoparticles in the inner chamber
> and one with a thorium salt in solution in water filling the outer chamber
> but without any nanoparticles inside of it.
>
> First test the two concentric chambers without nanoparticles added to the
> inner chamber. Expect to see no transmutation in either the inner or the
> outer chamber.
>
> Next test the two concentric chambers with nanoparticles added to the
> inner chamber. Expect to see transmutation  results involving thorium in
> the outer chamber as was seen in the referenced experiment done by A.V.
> Simakin and G.A. Shafeev.
>
> This will show that interaction between light and nanoparticles produce
> the LENR reaction and that the reaction is carried out at a distance by
> subatom

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Adrian Ashfield]

Axil Axil,
Thanks for the interesting paper.  While it seems clear that small particles 
are formed in the vicinity of the gold nano particles, the mechanism does not 
appear to be understood.  If they are neutrons, as the authors think, why do 
you think they originate from the H rather than from the thorium salt in 
solution?

 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Fri, Apr 28, 2017 2:47 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect



An experiment based on this one that has been already performed as follows:



Initiation of nuclear reactions under laser irradiation of Au nanoparticles in
the presence of Thorium aqua-ions
A.V. Simakin and G.A. Shafeev


https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0906/0906.4268.pdf


"The resulting average size of Au NPs as determined by Transmission Electron 
Microscopy lies between 10 and 20 nm."


The addition is to configure this experiment with two double concentric glass 
chambers with pure water and gold nanoparticles in the inner chamber and one 
with a thorium salt in solution in water filling the outer chamber but without 
any nanoparticles inside of it.


First test the two concentric chambers without nanoparticles added to the inner 
chamber. Expect to see no transmutation in either the inner or the outer 
chamber.


Next test the two concentric chambers with nanoparticles added to the inner 
chamber. Expect to see transmutation  results involving thorium in the outer 
chamber as was seen in the referenced experiment done by A.V. Simakin and G.A. 
Shafeev.


This will show that interaction between light and nanoparticles produce the 
LENR reaction and that the reaction is carried out at a distance by subatomic 
particles that can penetrate a glass wall.


Variations on the wall material: aluminum, iron, stainless steel, lead etc can 
be carried out if the laser beam enters the inner chamber from an open top of 
the inner chamber.


Next, a high voltage spark discharge can replace the laser light that is fired 
just above the top of the water level on the inner chamber. As a probe of the 
LENR reaction, expect to see transmutation results involving thorium in the 
outer chamber.










On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:

Axil Axil,

Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields is too dense for me by an order of 
magnitude.  I subscribe to the theory that if one truly understands the 
situation they can explain it in relatively simple terms.

So what would you propose as a demonstration of LENR with a parameter that 
could be altered to prove your theory?



 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>

Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 7:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect



IMHO, Holmlid's recent experiments using  a fast high electric field to induce 
meson production has proved the theory.


This result shows that the SPP requires an electrostatic field stimulus to 
produce the super strong magnetism necessary to activate nucleon decay.



Also, the use of anisotropic magnets (SmCo5) to induce LENR shows that 
magnetism disrupts the gluon condensate inside the proton and neutron.


Even through there is a difference between a monopole fundamental particle, a 
synthetic monopole quasiparticle like the SPP, and an anisotropic magnetic 
field formatted by a pertinent  magnet to support  monopole flux lines, the 
magnetic field produces the same effect.


The SmCo5 magnet produces a magnetic field that is anisotropic field (almost a 
monopole formated magnetic field).


This SmCo5 type magnetic supports monopole flux lines of force.



That is why the SmCo5 magnet can produce a LENR reaction. 


To refresh your memory, see


http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg108069.html


The details of what a strong monopole magnetic field does to the insides of the 
proton and neutron is yet to be determined.


I am trying to understand this: See


http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0906083/pdf/25.pdf




Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields







On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:

AXil Axil,

As usual you have come up with a very imaginative theory that sounds just as 
likely or unlikely as myriads of others.
My question is how can it be proved or falsified?

 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 4:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect




LENR in a nutshell

LENR is an optical based process where light is trapped in a waveform called a 
soliton. Think of this structure as Nano sized ball lightning. This ball of 
light can form in many ways: inside ultra-dense hydrogen, on the surface of 
rough metal surfaces, inside cracks in metal, on nanoparticles and 
microparticles, between nanoparticles, and in

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Axil Axil]

An experiment based on this one that has been already performed as follows:

Initiation of nuclear reactions under laser irradiation of Au nanoparticles
in
the presence of Thorium aqua-ions
A.V. Simakin and G.A. Shafeev

https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0906/0906.4268.pdf

"The resulting average size of Au NPs as determined by Transmission
Electron Microscopy lies between 10 and 20 nm."

The addition is to configure this experiment with two double concentric
glass chambers with pure water and gold nanoparticles in the inner chamber
and one with a thorium salt in solution in water filling the outer chamber
but without any nanoparticles inside of it.

First test the two concentric chambers without nanoparticles added to the
inner chamber. Expect to see no transmutation in either the inner or the
outer chamber.

Next test the two concentric chambers with nanoparticles added to the inner
chamber. Expect to see transmutation  results involving thorium in the
outer chamber as was seen in the referenced experiment done by A.V. Simakin
and G.A. Shafeev.

This will show that interaction between light and nanoparticles produce the
LENR reaction and that the reaction is carried out at a distance by
subatomic particles that can penetrate a glass wall.

Variations on the wall material: aluminum, iron, stainless steel, lead etc
can be carried out if the laser beam enters the inner chamber from an open
top of the inner chamber.

Next, a high voltage spark discharge can replace the laser light that is
fired just above the top of the water level on the inner chamber. As a
probe of the LENR reaction, expect to see transmutation results involving
thorium in the outer chamber.





On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
wrote:

> Axil Axil,
>
> Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields is too dense for me by an order of
> magnitude.  I subscribe to the theory that if one truly understands the
> situation they can explain it in relatively simple terms.
>
> So what would you propose as a demonstration of LENR with a parameter that
> could be altered to prove your theory?
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 7:29 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect
>
> IMHO, Holmlid's recent experiments using  a fast high electric field to
> induce meson production has proved the theory.
>
> This result shows that the SPP requires an electrostatic field stimulus to
> produce the super strong magnetism necessary to activate nucleon decay.
>
> Also, the use of anisotropic magnets (SmCo5) to induce LENR shows that
> magnetism disrupts the gluon condensate inside the proton and neutron.
>
> Even through there is a difference between a monopole fundamental
> particle, a synthetic monopole quasiparticle like the SPP, and an
> anisotropic magnetic field formatted by a pertinent  magnet to support
>  monopole flux lines, the magnetic field produces the same effect.
>
> The SmCo5 magnet produces a magnetic field that is anisotropic field
> (almost a monopole formated magnetic field).
>
> This SmCo5 type magnetic supports monopole flux lines of force.
>
> That is why the SmCo5 magnet can produce a LENR reaction.
>
> To refresh your memory, see
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg108069.html
>
> The details of what a strong monopole magnetic field does to the insides
> of the proton and neutron is yet to be determined.
>
> I am trying to understand this: See
>
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0906083/pdf/25.pdf
>
> Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
> wrote:
>
> AXil Axil,
>
> As usual you have come up with a very imaginative theory that sounds just
> as likely or unlikely as myriads of others.
> My question is how can it be proved or falsified?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 4:29 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect
>
> LENR in a nutshell
>
> LENR is an optical based process where light is trapped in a waveform
> called a soliton. Think of this structure as Nano sized ball lightning.
> This ball of light can form in many ways: inside ultra-dense hydrogen, on
> the surface of rough metal surfaces, inside cracks in metal, on
> nanoparticles and microparticles, between nanoparticles, and in dusty
> plasma. But critically, this soliton is not active until it is triggered
> through the electrostatic effects of a stimulating emission.
>
> When this soliton first form, light rotates around inside the soliton and
> supp

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Adrian Ashfield]

a stream of helium atoms will emit neutrons when pulses are applied.

 Has this actually been confirmed?
 

 

-Original Message-
From: Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Fri, Apr 28, 2017 12:18 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect



There is a large class of physicists working with chirped laser in the 
femto-second time frame. The pulses go through a NONLINEAR diffraction grating 
and the E-fields superimpose.
For example; a stream of helium atoms will emit neutrons when pulses are 
applied.



From: Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 12:11 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect
 

Brian Ahern,
The significance of your comment is not clear to me.  I thought you disagreed 
with Axil's theory, but this sounds like you now agree.







-Original Message-
From: Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Fri, Apr 28, 2017 10:15 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect



Chirped laser pulses provide sufficient electric and magnetic fields that 
easily cause fission fusion and all decay products known. Holmlid uses laser 
pulses.



From: Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 9:26 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect
 

Axil Axil,

Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields is too dense for me by an order of 
magnitude.  I subscribe to the theory that if one truly understands the 
situation they can explain it in relatively simple terms.

So what would you propose as a demonstration of LENR with a parameter that 
could be altered to prove your theory?









-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 7:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect



IMHO, Holmlid's recent experiments using  a fast high electric field to induce 
meson production has proved the theory.


This result shows that the SPP requires an electrostatic field stimulus to 
produce the super strong magnetism necessary to activate nucleon decay.



Also, the use of anisotropic magnets (SmCo5) to induce LENR shows that 
magnetism disrupts the gluon condensate inside the proton and neutron.


Even through there is a difference between a monopole fundamental particle, a 
synthetic monopole quasiparticle like the SPP, and an anisotropic magnetic 
field formatted by a pertinent  magnet to support  monopole flux lines, the 
magnetic field produces the same effect.


The SmCo5 magnet produces a magnetic field that is anisotropic field (almost a 
monopole formated magnetic field).


This SmCo5 type magnetic supports monopole flux lines of force.



That is why the SmCo5 magnet can produce a LENR reaction. 


To refresh your memory, see


http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg108069.html


The details of what a strong monopole magnetic field does to the insides of the 
proton and neutron is yet to be determined.


I am trying to understand this: See


http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0906083/pdf/25.pdf




Lattice QCD in strong magnetic flelds
www.slac.stanford.edu
Lattice QCD in strong magnetic flelds P.V.Buividovichab, M.N.Chernodubcdb x, 
E.V.Luschevskayab, M.I.Polikarpovb a JIPNR \Sosny", National Academy of 
Science, Krasin ...








Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields







On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Adrian Ashfield<a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:

AXil Axil,

As usual you have come up with a very imaginative theory that sounds just as 
likely or unlikely as myriads of others.
My question is how can it be proved or falsified?







-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 4:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect




LENR in a nutshell

LENR is an optical based process where light is trapped in a waveform called a 
soliton. Think of this structure as Nano sized ball lightning. This ball of 
light can form in many ways: inside ultra-dense hydrogen, on the surface of 
rough metal surfaces, inside cracks in metal, on nanoparticles and 
microparticles, between nanoparticles, and in dusty plasma. But critically, 
this soliton is not active until it is triggered through the electrostatic 
effects of a stimulating emission. 

When this soliton first form, light rotates around inside the soliton and 
supports two degenerate propagating-wave modes: clockwise (CW) and 
counterclockwise (CCW) waves, manifesting the symmetry of this system. This 
counter rotation of the light negates any organization of the spin of the light 
from generating any meaningful magnetic effect. 

But when the symmetry of this counter rotating light is broken by this 
electrostatic stimulant, like a magnet all spin of the light ceases to 
interfere with each other and a newly organized super intense magnetic beam 
projects ou

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Brian Ahern]

There is a large class of physicists working with chirped laser in the 
femto-second time frame. The pulses go through a NONLINEAR diffraction grating 
and the E-fields superimpose.

For example; a stream of helium atoms will emit neutrons when pulses are 
applied.



From: Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 12:11 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

Brian Ahern,
The significance of your comment is not clear to me.  I thought you disagreed 
with Axil's theory, but this sounds like you now agree.



-Original Message-
From: Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Fri, Apr 28, 2017 10:15 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

Chirped laser pulses provide sufficient electric and magnetic fields that 
easily cause fission fusion and all decay products known. Holmlid uses laser 
pulses.



From: Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>>
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 9:26 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:l...@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

Axil Axil,

Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields is too dense for me by an order of 
magnitude.  I subscribe to the theory that if one truly understands the 
situation they can explain it in relatively simple terms.

So what would you propose as a demonstration of LENR with a parameter that 
could be altered to prove your theory?





-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:l...@eskimo.com>>
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 7:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

IMHO, Holmlid's recent experiments using  a fast high electric field to induce 
meson production has proved the theory.

This result shows that the SPP requires an electrostatic field stimulus to 
produce the super strong magnetism necessary to activate nucleon decay.

Also, the use of anisotropic magnets (SmCo5) to induce LENR shows that 
magnetism disrupts the gluon condensate inside the proton and neutron.

Even through there is a difference between a monopole fundamental particle, a 
synthetic monopole quasiparticle like the SPP, and an anisotropic magnetic 
field formatted by a pertinent  magnet to support  monopole flux lines, the 
magnetic field produces the same effect.

The SmCo5 magnet produces a magnetic field that is anisotropic field (almost a 
monopole formated magnetic field).

This SmCo5 type magnetic supports monopole flux lines of force.

That is why the SmCo5 magnet can produce a LENR reaction.

To refresh your memory, see

http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg108069.html

The details of what a strong monopole magnetic field does to the insides of the 
proton and neutron is yet to be determined.

I am trying to understand this: See

http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0906083/pdf/25.pdf
Lattice QCD in strong magnetic 
flelds<http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0906083/pdf/25.pdf>
www.slac.stanford.edu<http://www.slac.stanford.edu>
Lattice QCD in strong magnetic flelds P.V.Buividovichab, M.N.Chernodubcdb x, 
E.V.Luschevskayab, M.I.Polikarpovb a JIPNR \Sosny", National Academy of 
Science, Krasin ...




Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields



On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Adrian Ashfield 
<a.ashfi...@verizon.net<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
AXil Axil,

As usual you have come up with a very imaginative theory that sounds just as 
likely or unlikely as myriads of others.
My question is how can it be proved or falsified?



-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>>
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 4:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

LENR in a nutshell

LENR is an optical based process where light is trapped in a waveform called a 
soliton. Think of this structure as Nano sized ball lightning. This ball of 
light can form in many ways: inside ultra-dense hydrogen, on the surface of 
rough metal surfaces, inside cracks in metal, on nanoparticles and 
microparticles, between nanoparticles, and in dusty plasma. But critically, 
this soliton is not active until it is triggered through the electrostatic 
effects of a stimulating emission.

When this soliton first form, light rotates around inside the soliton and 
supports two degenerate propagating-wave modes: clockwise (CW) and 
counterclockwise (CCW) waves, manifesting the symmetry of this system. This 
counter rotation of the light negates any organization of the spin of the light 
from generating any meaningful magnetic effect.

But when the symmetry of this counter rotating light is broken by this 
electrostatic stimulant, like a magnet all spin of the light ceases to 
interfere with each other and a newly organize

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Adrian Ashfield]

Brian Ahern,
The significance of your comment is not clear to me.  I thought you disagreed 
with Axil's theory, but this sounds like you now agree.

 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Fri, Apr 28, 2017 10:15 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect



Chirped laser pulses provide sufficient electric and magnetic fields that 
easily cause fission fusion and all decay products known. Holmlid uses laser 
pulses.



From: Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 9:26 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect
 

Axil Axil,

Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields is too dense for me by an order of 
magnitude.  I subscribe to the theory that if one truly understands the 
situation they can explain it in relatively simple terms.

So what would you propose as a demonstration of LENR with a parameter that 
could be altered to prove your theory?









-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 7:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect



IMHO, Holmlid's recent experiments using  a fast high electric field to induce 
meson production has proved the theory.


This result shows that the SPP requires an electrostatic field stimulus to 
produce the super strong magnetism necessary to activate nucleon decay.



Also, the use of anisotropic magnets (SmCo5) to induce LENR shows that 
magnetism disrupts the gluon condensate inside the proton and neutron.


Even through there is a difference between a monopole fundamental particle, a 
synthetic monopole quasiparticle like the SPP, and an anisotropic magnetic 
field formatted by a pertinent  magnet to support  monopole flux lines, the 
magnetic field produces the same effect.


The SmCo5 magnet produces a magnetic field that is anisotropic field (almost a 
monopole formated magnetic field).


This SmCo5 type magnetic supports monopole flux lines of force.



That is why the SmCo5 magnet can produce a LENR reaction. 


To refresh your memory, see


http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg108069.html


The details of what a strong monopole magnetic field does to the insides of the 
proton and neutron is yet to be determined.


I am trying to understand this: See


http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0906083/pdf/25.pdf




Lattice QCD in strong magnetic flelds
www.slac.stanford.edu
Lattice QCD in strong magnetic flelds P.V.Buividovichab, M.N.Chernodubcdb x, 
E.V.Luschevskayab, M.I.Polikarpovb a JIPNR \Sosny", National Academy of 
Science, Krasin ...








Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields







On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Adrian Ashfield<a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:

AXil Axil,

As usual you have come up with a very imaginative theory that sounds just as 
likely or unlikely as myriads of others.
My question is how can it be proved or falsified?







-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 4:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect




LENR in a nutshell

LENR is an optical based process where light is trapped in a waveform called a 
soliton. Think of this structure as Nano sized ball lightning. This ball of 
light can form in many ways: inside ultra-dense hydrogen, on the surface of 
rough metal surfaces, inside cracks in metal, on nanoparticles and 
microparticles, between nanoparticles, and in dusty plasma. But critically, 
this soliton is not active until it is triggered through the electrostatic 
effects of a stimulating emission. 

When this soliton first form, light rotates around inside the soliton and 
supports two degenerate propagating-wave modes: clockwise (CW) and 
counterclockwise (CCW) waves, manifesting the symmetry of this system. This 
counter rotation of the light negates any organization of the spin of the light 
from generating any meaningful magnetic effect. 

But when the symmetry of this counter rotating light is broken by this 
electrostatic stimulant, like a magnet all spin of the light ceases to 
interfere with each other and a newly organized super intense magnetic beam 
projects out of the soliton in an highly organized mode. The soliton then 
becomes a synthetic analog monopole quasiparticle. 

When this beam of magnetism enters inside protons and neutrons that move into 
its path, the quarks that make up these protons and neutrons change their 
type(color) and the protons and neutrons transform into exotic mesons made up 
of strange and beauty quark types. Energy is also produced in these subatomic 
particle decays and is feed back into the solitons of light thereby increasing 
their intensity. In this way, this infusion of incoming subatomic energy allows 
the soliton to survive for an extended period in a self-sustaining mode while 
the electrostatic stimulant continues to maintain the o

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Brian Ahern]

Chirped laser pulses provide sufficient electric and magnetic fields that 
easily cause fission fusion and all decay products known. Holmlid uses laser 
pulses.



From: Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 9:26 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

Axil Axil,

Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields is too dense for me by an order of 
magnitude.  I subscribe to the theory that if one truly understands the 
situation they can explain it in relatively simple terms.

So what would you propose as a demonstration of LENR with a parameter that 
could be altered to prove your theory?





-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 7:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

IMHO, Holmlid's recent experiments using  a fast high electric field to induce 
meson production has proved the theory.

This result shows that the SPP requires an electrostatic field stimulus to 
produce the super strong magnetism necessary to activate nucleon decay.

Also, the use of anisotropic magnets (SmCo5) to induce LENR shows that 
magnetism disrupts the gluon condensate inside the proton and neutron.

Even through there is a difference between a monopole fundamental particle, a 
synthetic monopole quasiparticle like the SPP, and an anisotropic magnetic 
field formatted by a pertinent  magnet to support  monopole flux lines, the 
magnetic field produces the same effect.

The SmCo5 magnet produces a magnetic field that is anisotropic field (almost a 
monopole formated magnetic field).

This SmCo5 type magnetic supports monopole flux lines of force.

That is why the SmCo5 magnet can produce a LENR reaction.

To refresh your memory, see

http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg108069.html

The details of what a strong monopole magnetic field does to the insides of the 
proton and neutron is yet to be determined.

I am trying to understand this: See

http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0906083/pdf/25.pdf
Lattice QCD in strong magnetic 
flelds<http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0906083/pdf/25.pdf>
www.slac.stanford.edu
Lattice QCD in strong magnetic flelds P.V.Buividovichab, M.N.Chernodubcdb x, 
E.V.Luschevskayab, M.I.Polikarpovb a JIPNR \Sosny", National Academy of 
Science, Krasin ...




Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields



On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Adrian Ashfield 
<a.ashfi...@verizon.net<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
AXil Axil,

As usual you have come up with a very imaginative theory that sounds just as 
likely or unlikely as myriads of others.
My question is how can it be proved or falsified?



-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>>
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 4:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

LENR in a nutshell

LENR is an optical based process where light is trapped in a waveform called a 
soliton. Think of this structure as Nano sized ball lightning. This ball of 
light can form in many ways: inside ultra-dense hydrogen, on the surface of 
rough metal surfaces, inside cracks in metal, on nanoparticles and 
microparticles, between nanoparticles, and in dusty plasma. But critically, 
this soliton is not active until it is triggered through the electrostatic 
effects of a stimulating emission.

When this soliton first form, light rotates around inside the soliton and 
supports two degenerate propagating-wave modes: clockwise (CW) and 
counterclockwise (CCW) waves, manifesting the symmetry of this system. This 
counter rotation of the light negates any organization of the spin of the light 
from generating any meaningful magnetic effect.

But when the symmetry of this counter rotating light is broken by this 
electrostatic stimulant, like a magnet all spin of the light ceases to 
interfere with each other and a newly organized super intense magnetic beam 
projects out of the soliton in an highly organized mode. The soliton then 
becomes a synthetic analog monopole quasiparticle.

When this beam of magnetism enters inside protons and neutrons that move into 
its path, the quarks that make up these protons and neutrons change their 
type(color) and the protons and neutrons transform into exotic mesons made up 
of strange and beauty quark types. Energy is also produced in these subatomic 
particle decays and is feed back into the solitons of light thereby increasing 
their intensity. In this way, this infusion of incoming subatomic energy allows 
the soliton to survive for an extended period in a self-sustaining mode while 
the electrostatic stimulant continues to maintain the organization of the 
photonic spin.

Leif Holmlid has been using a laser pulse as the stimulator but yesterday 
Sveinn Olafsson just told me this: “Leif has applied fast high electric fie

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Adrian Ashfield]

Axil Axil,

Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields is too dense for me by an order of 
magnitude.  I subscribe to the theory that if one truly understands the 
situation they can explain it in relatively simple terms.

So what would you propose as a demonstration of LENR with a parameter that 
could be altered to prove your theory?



 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 7:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect



IMHO, Holmlid's recent experiments using  a fast high electric field to induce 
meson production has proved the theory.


This result shows that the SPP requires an electrostatic field stimulus to 
produce the super strong magnetism necessary to activate nucleon decay.



Also, the use of anisotropic magnets (SmCo5) to induce LENR shows that 
magnetism disrupts the gluon condensate inside the proton and neutron.


Even through there is a difference between a monopole fundamental particle, a 
synthetic monopole quasiparticle like the SPP, and an anisotropic magnetic 
field formatted by a pertinent  magnet to support  monopole flux lines, the 
magnetic field produces the same effect.


The SmCo5 magnet produces a magnetic field that is anisotropic field (almost a 
monopole formated magnetic field).


This SmCo5 type magnetic supports monopole flux lines of force.



That is why the SmCo5 magnet can produce a LENR reaction. 


To refresh your memory, see


http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg108069.html


The details of what a strong monopole magnetic field does to the insides of the 
proton and neutron is yet to be determined.


I am trying to understand this: See


http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0906083/pdf/25.pdf




Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields







On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:

AXil Axil,

As usual you have come up with a very imaginative theory that sounds just as 
likely or unlikely as myriads of others.
My question is how can it be proved or falsified?

 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 4:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect




LENR in a nutshell

LENR is an optical based process where light is trapped in a waveform called a 
soliton. Think of this structure as Nano sized ball lightning. This ball of 
light can form in many ways: inside ultra-dense hydrogen, on the surface of 
rough metal surfaces, inside cracks in metal, on nanoparticles and 
microparticles, between nanoparticles, and in dusty plasma. But critically, 
this soliton is not active until it is triggered through the electrostatic 
effects of a stimulating emission. 

When this soliton first form, light rotates around inside the soliton and 
supports two degenerate propagating-wave modes: clockwise (CW) and 
counterclockwise (CCW) waves, manifesting the symmetry of this system. This 
counter rotation of the light negates any organization of the spin of the light 
from generating any meaningful magnetic effect. 

But when the symmetry of this counter rotating light is broken by this 
electrostatic stimulant, like a magnet all spin of the light ceases to 
interfere with each other and a newly organized super intense magnetic beam 
projects out of the soliton in an highly organized mode. The soliton then 
becomes a synthetic analog monopole quasiparticle. 

When this beam of magnetism enters inside protons and neutrons that move into 
its path, the quarks that make up these protons and neutrons change their 
type(color) and the protons and neutrons transform into exotic mesons made up 
of strange and beauty quark types. Energy is also produced in these subatomic 
particle decays and is feed back into the solitons of light thereby increasing 
their intensity. In this way, this infusion of incoming subatomic energy allows 
the soliton to survive for an extended period in a self-sustaining mode while 
the electrostatic stimulant continues to maintain the organization of the 
photonic spin. 

Leif Holmlid has been using a laser pulse as the stimulator but yesterday 
Sveinn Olafsson just told me this: “Leif has applied fast high electric field 
and sees meson signal”



On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:


A post that might hold some insights as follows:



Giuseppe April 23, 2017 at 3:37 PM
Dear Andrea,

seems that to activate the E-Cat you need heat, does the QuarkX need heat to be 
activated?

Best regards, Giuseppe

Andrea Rossi April 23, 2017 at 3:48 PM
Giuseppe:

Not exactly. The mechanism is much more complex and is based on electromagnetic 
fields.

Warm Regards,

A.R.


The nature of the LENR reaction has evolved when the gas envelope is in the 
plasma state to depend solely on optical mechanisms. An EMF trigger is the 
factor can gets the LENR reaction going. not 

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Axil Axil]

IMHO, Holmlid's recent experiments using  a fast high electric field to
induce meson production has proved the theory.

This result shows that the SPP requires an electrostatic field stimulus to
produce the super strong magnetism necessary to activate nucleon decay.

Also, the use of anisotropic magnets (SmCo5) to induce LENR shows that
magnetism disrupts the gluon condensate inside the proton and neutron.

Even through there is a difference between a monopole fundamental particle,
a synthetic monopole quasiparticle like the SPP, and an anisotropic
magnetic field formatted by a pertinent  magnet to support  monopole flux
lines, the magnetic field produces the same effect.

The SmCo5 magnet produces a magnetic field that is anisotropic field
(almost a monopole formated magnetic field).

This SmCo5 type magnetic supports monopole flux lines of force.

That is why the SmCo5 magnet can produce a LENR reaction.

To refresh your memory, see

http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg108069.html

The details of what a strong monopole magnetic field does to the insides of
the proton and neutron is yet to be determined.

I am trying to understand this: See

http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0906083/pdf/25.pdf

Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields



On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
wrote:

> AXil Axil,
>
> As usual you have come up with a very imaginative theory that sounds just
> as likely or unlikely as myriads of others.
> My question is how can it be proved or falsified?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 4:29 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect
>
> LENR in a nutshell
>
> LENR is an optical based process where light is trapped in a waveform
> called a soliton. Think of this structure as Nano sized ball lightning.
> This ball of light can form in many ways: inside ultra-dense hydrogen, on
> the surface of rough metal surfaces, inside cracks in metal, on
> nanoparticles and microparticles, between nanoparticles, and in dusty
> plasma. But critically, this soliton is not active until it is triggered
> through the electrostatic effects of a stimulating emission.
>
> When this soliton first form, light rotates around inside the soliton and
> supports two degenerate propagating-wave modes: clockwise (CW) and
> counterclockwise (CCW) waves, manifesting the symmetry of this system. This
> counter rotation of the light negates any organization of the spin of the
> light from generating any meaningful magnetic effect.
>
> But when the symmetry of this counter rotating light is broken by this
> electrostatic stimulant, like a magnet all spin of the light ceases to
> interfere with each other and a newly organized super intense magnetic beam
> projects out of the soliton in an highly organized mode. The soliton then
> becomes a synthetic analog monopole quasiparticle.
>
> When this beam of magnetism enters inside protons and neutrons that move
> into its path, the quarks that make up these protons and neutrons change
> their type(color) and the protons and neutrons transform into exotic mesons
> made up of strange and beauty quark types. Energy is also produced in these
> subatomic particle decays and is feed back into the solitons of light
> thereby increasing their intensity. In this way, this infusion of incoming
> subatomic energy allows the soliton to survive for an extended period in a
> self-sustaining mode while the electrostatic stimulant continues to
> maintain the organization of the photonic spin.
>
> Leif Holmlid has been using a laser pulse as the stimulator but yesterday
> Sveinn Olafsson just told me this: “Leif has applied fast high electric
> field and sees meson signal”
>
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> A post that might hold some insights as follows:
>
>
>1. Giuseppe April 23, 2017 at 3:37 PM
>
> <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892=230#comment-1276782>
>Dear Andrea,
>
>seems that to activate the E-Cat you need heat, does the QuarkX need
>heat to be activated?
>
>Best regards, Giuseppe
>2. Andrea Rossi April 23, 2017 at 3:48 PM
>
> <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892=230#comment-1276783>
>Giuseppe:
>
>Not exactly. The mechanism is much more complex and is based on
>electromagnetic fields.
>
>Warm Regards,
>
>A.R.
>
> 
> The nature of the LENR reaction has evolved when the gas envelope is in
> the plasma state to depend solely on optical mechanisms. An EMF trigger is
> the factor can gets the LENR reaction going. not heat. As stated in 

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Adrian Ashfield]

AXil Axil,

As usual you have come up with a very imaginative theory that sounds just as 
likely or unlikely as myriads of others.
My question is how can it be proved or falsified?

 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 4:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect



LENR in a nutshell

LENR is an optical based process where light is trapped in a waveform called a 
soliton. Think of this structure as Nano sized ball lightning. This ball of 
light can form in many ways: inside ultra-dense hydrogen, on the surface of 
rough metal surfaces, inside cracks in metal, on nanoparticles and 
microparticles, between nanoparticles, and in dusty plasma. But critically, 
this soliton is not active until it is triggered through the electrostatic 
effects of a stimulating emission. 

When this soliton first form, light rotates around inside the soliton and 
supports two degenerate propagating-wave modes: clockwise (CW) and 
counterclockwise (CCW) waves, manifesting the symmetry of this system. This 
counter rotation of the light negates any organization of the spin of the light 
from generating any meaningful magnetic effect. 

But when the symmetry of this counter rotating light is broken by this 
electrostatic stimulant, like a magnet all spin of the light ceases to 
interfere with each other and a newly organized super intense magnetic beam 
projects out of the soliton in an highly organized mode. The soliton then 
becomes a synthetic analog monopole quasiparticle. 

When this beam of magnetism enters inside protons and neutrons that move into 
its path, the quarks that make up these protons and neutrons change their 
type(color) and the protons and neutrons transform into exotic mesons made up 
of strange and beauty quark types. Energy is also produced in these subatomic 
particle decays and is feed back into the solitons of light thereby increasing 
their intensity. In this way, this infusion of incoming subatomic energy allows 
the soliton to survive for an extended period in a self-sustaining mode while 
the electrostatic stimulant continues to maintain the organization of the 
photonic spin. 

Leif Holmlid has been using a laser pulse as the stimulator but yesterday 
Sveinn Olafsson just told me this: “Leif has applied fast high electric field 
and sees meson signal”



On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:


A post that might hold some insights as follows:



Giuseppe April 23, 2017 at 3:37 PM
Dear Andrea,

seems that to activate the E-Cat you need heat, does the QuarkX need heat to be 
activated?

Best regards, Giuseppe

Andrea Rossi April 23, 2017 at 3:48 PM
Giuseppe:

Not exactly. The mechanism is much more complex and is based on electromagnetic 
fields.

Warm Regards,

A.R.


The nature of the LENR reaction has evolved when the gas envelope is in the 
plasma state to depend solely on optical mechanisms. An EMF trigger is the 
factor can gets the LENR reaction going. not heat. As stated in the Rossi 
patent, very high voltage electrostatic potential is that trigger. The name of 
the triggering effect is "kerr effect". The minimum voltage at which the kerr 
effect is triggered is 30,000 volts.


This trigger applies to both Rossi's low temperature reactions and his plasma 
based reactions.


Kerr electro-optic effect

The Kerr electro-optic effect, or DC Kerr effect, is the special case in which 
a slowly varying external electric field is applied by, for instance, a voltage 
on electrodes across the sample material. Under this influence, the sample 
becomes birefringent, with different indices of refraction for light polarized 
parallel to or perpendicular to the applied field. The difference in index of 
refraction is controlled by the strength of the applied electric field.





Birefringence modifies how light behaves inside a whispering gallery wave.



Birefringence is the optical property of a material having a refractive index 
that depends on the polarization and propagation direction of light. These 
optically anisotropic materials are said to be birefringent (or birefractive). 
The birefringence is often quantified as the maximum difference between 
refractive indices exhibited by the material. Crystals with non-cubic crystal 
structures are often birefringent, as are plastics under mechanical stress.



The kerr effect produces a change in stated of the optical properties that 
underpin the LENR reaction. Research should be directed at finding where that 
change of state sets in.


As in Holmlid's experiments, a laser can produce the kerr effect


Optical Kerr effect

The optical Kerr effect, or AC Kerr effect is the case in which the electric 
field is due to the light itself. This causes a variation in index of 
refraction which is proportional to the local irradiance of the light. This 
refractive index variation is responsib

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Axil Axil]

LENR in a nutshell

LENR is an optical based process where light is trapped in a waveform
called a soliton. Think of this structure as Nano sized ball lightning.
This ball of light can form in many ways: inside ultra-dense hydrogen, on
the surface of rough metal surfaces, inside cracks in metal, on
nanoparticles and microparticles, between nanoparticles, and in dusty
plasma. But critically, this soliton is not active until it is triggered
through the electrostatic effects of a stimulating emission.

When this soliton first form, light rotates around inside the soliton and
supports two degenerate propagating-wave modes: clockwise (CW) and
counterclockwise (CCW) waves, manifesting the symmetry of this system. This
counter rotation of the light negates any organization of the spin of the
light from generating any meaningful magnetic effect.

But when the symmetry of this counter rotating light is broken by this
electrostatic stimulant, like a magnet all spin of the light ceases to
interfere with each other and a newly organized super intense magnetic beam
projects out of the soliton in an highly organized mode. The soliton then
becomes a synthetic analog monopole quasiparticle.

When this beam of magnetism enters inside protons and neutrons that move
into its path, the quarks that make up these protons and neutrons change
their type(color) and the protons and neutrons transform into exotic mesons
made up of strange and beauty quark types. Energy is also produced in these
subatomic particle decays and is feed back into the solitons of light
thereby increasing their intensity. In this way, this infusion of incoming
subatomic energy allows the soliton to survive for an extended period in a
self-sustaining mode while the electrostatic stimulant continues to
maintain the organization of the photonic spin.

Leif Holmlid has been using a laser pulse as the stimulator but yesterday
Sveinn Olafsson just told me this: “Leif has applied fast high electric
field and sees meson signal”

On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:

> A post that might hold some insights as follows:
>
>
>
>1. Giuseppe April 23, 2017 at 3:37 PM
>
> 
>
>Dear Andrea,
>
>
>seems that to activate the E-Cat you need heat, does the QuarkX need
>heat to be activated?
>
>
>Best regards, Giuseppe
>2. Andrea Rossi April 23, 2017 at 3:48 PM
>
> 
>
>Giuseppe:
>
>
>Not exactly. The mechanism is much more complex and is based on
>electromagnetic fields.
>
>
>Warm Regards,
>
>
>A.R.
>
> 
>
> The nature of the LENR reaction has evolved when the gas envelope is in
> the plasma state to depend solely on optical mechanisms. An EMF trigger is
> the factor can gets the LENR reaction going. not heat. As stated in the
> Rossi patent, very high voltage electrostatic potential is that trigger.
> The name of the triggering effect is "kerr effect". The minimum voltage at
> which the kerr effect is triggered is 30,000 volts.
>
>
> This trigger applies to both Rossi's low temperature reactions and his
> plasma based reactions.
>
>
> Kerr electro-optic effect
>
> The Kerr electro-optic effect, or DC Kerr effect, is the special case in
> which a slowly varying external electric field is applied by, for instance,
> a voltage  on electrodes across
> the sample material. Under this influence, the sample becomes birefringent
> , with different indices of
> refraction for light polarized
>  parallel to or
> perpendicular to the applied field. The difference in index of refraction
> is controlled by the strength of the applied electric field.
>
>
>
> [image: 1-physicistsob.jpg]
>
> Birefringence modifies how light behaves inside a whispering gallery wave.
>
>
> Birefringence is the optical  property
> of a material having a refractive index
>  that depends on the
> polarization  and
> propagation direction of light .
> These optically anisotropic  
> materials
> are said to be birefringent (or birefractive). The birefringence is often
> quantified as the maximum difference between refractive indices exhibited
> by the material. Crystals  with
> non-cubic crystal structures
>  are often birefringent,
> as are plastics  under mechanical
> stress .
>
>
> The kerr effect produces a change in stated of the optical properties that
> 

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Adrian Ashfield]

 


He has duped a cadre of gullable and hopeful folks from the LENR community.



 So Sergio Focardi ,  Guiseppe Levi, Sven Kullander, Hanno Essen, Roland 
Pettersson
Alexander Parkhomov, Fulvio Fabiani, all of whom claim to have witnessed the 
E-Cat working, are gullible idiots but you know better?
 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Mon, Apr 24, 2017 8:08 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect





I have been a dedicated foe of the Rossi Planet since February 2009. I 
interacted with his cohorts in New Hampshire. Even they had no idea what he was 
doing, because the first 11 'independent tests
\' all broke down and were indeterminate.


Eight years later nothing has changed. He has duped a cadre of gullable and 
hopeful folks from the LENR community. With any luck he will be incarcerated 
for fraud and tax evasion. 


From: Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 4:52 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect
 

Brian Ahern,
The proof that Rossi's E-cats don't work is less than that they do.
It serves no useful purpose to continually repeat your insults with no actual 
content.
I wonder what you will say if Rossi comes up with a decent demo this Summer.







-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Mon, Apr 24, 2017 3:01 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect



One consideration that I feel is important to understand is what PT symmetry 
violation means with respect to CP symmetry violation. We understand that we 
can produce PT symmetry breaking using optical mechanisms but can PT symmetry 
violation somehow generate CP violation which is required to produce the decay 
of the nucleon (protons and neutrons)?  



>From the various descriptions of symmetry in this article:
https://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/02/epn2016472p17.pdf



Space time (PT) Symmetry is only valid in an open system where energy and/or 
matter can be gained or lost. In a closed system, PT symmetry does not exist 
since a closed system can neither gain nor lose energy and/or matter. Because 
LENR requires CP symmetry breaking and CP symmetry breaking requires PT 
symmetry breaking, LENR can only occur in an open system.



Open vs. Closed Systems



Systems can be either open or closed. A closed system is one where a quantity 
or series of quantities cannot enter or leave the system. For example, a system 
might be closed to energy, meaning energy might not be able to enter or leave 
the system. A vacuum thermos flask does a really good job of stopping energy 
from leaving the system to keep your drink warm. So it might make sense to 
treat it as a closed system - but no system in the real world is ever perfectly 
closed, so it will only be an approximation.



The opposite of a closed system is an open system. An open system is one where 
a quantity or series of quantities can enter or leave the system to a 
significant degree. If you pour your hot drink into a mug instead of a vacuum 
thermos flask, the heat will escape relatively quickly into its surroundings. 
So a mug is most certainly an open system! Open systems are a lot more 
complicated to understand than closed systems, and so scientists prefer to work 
with closed systems when possible. Science usually stays away from open systems 
because closed systems makes things much simpler to explain and can be a good 
starting point before trying to explain open systems, too. Quantum mechanics 
only deals with closed systems.



Traveling backward in time.


If you make a movie of yourself throwing a ball, and thread the film backwards, 
it'll look the same as you catching a ball. So if you want to think of the 
falling object as being the same as the rising one going backwards in time, the 
physics will support that statement, but it doesn't sound all that cool.  It 
is, however, the same thing as antimatter being viewed as going backwards in 
time.



At the most basic level, the laws of physics are symmetrical: reverse time and 
they will follow the same route in reverse.  Reverse the charge, and things 
will be attracted where they would have repulsed, and vice versa.  Flip them 
both, and you've flipped it twice, so it's just like you started.  



Since a positron is exactly like an electron, only with the opposite charge, 
then if you (a) replace an electron with a positron, and (b) reverse time, it 
behaves exactly like an electron.  The physicists call this Charge/Parity (CP) 
symmetry, where "parity" is actually more like looking at things in a mirror 
rather than flipping time, but it's the same idea.



Flipping time is another way of looking at flipping left and right: a 
left-moving object going forwards in time is just like a right-moving object 
moving backwards.
  
An electron like a ball sitting in the same

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Brian Ahern]

I have been a dedicated foe of the Rossi Planet since February 2009. I 
interacted with his cohorts in New Hampshire. Even they had no idea what he was 
doing, because the first 11 'independent tests
\' all broke down and were indeterminate.

Eight years later nothing has changed. He has duped a cadre of gullable and 
hopeful folks from the LENR community. With any luck he will be incarcerated 
for fraud and tax evasion.


From: Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 4:52 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

Brian Ahern,
The proof that Rossi's E-cats don't work is less than that they do.
It serves no useful purpose to continually repeat your insults with no actual 
content.
I wonder what you will say if Rossi comes up with a decent demo this Summer.



-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Mon, Apr 24, 2017 3:01 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

One consideration that I feel is important to understand is what PT symmetry 
violation means with respect to CP symmetry violation. We understand that we 
can produce PT symmetry breaking using optical mechanisms but can PT symmetry 
violation somehow generate CP violation which is required to produce the decay 
of the nucleon (protons and neutrons)?

>From the various descriptions of symmetry in this article:
https://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/02/epn2016472p17.pdf

Space time (PT) Symmetry is only valid in an open system where energy and/or 
matter can be gained or lost. In a closed system, PT symmetry does not exist 
since a closed system can neither gain nor lose energy and/or matter. Because 
LENR requires CP symmetry breaking and CP symmetry breaking requires PT 
symmetry breaking, LENR can only occur in an open system.

Open vs. Closed Systems

Systems can be either open or closed. A closed system is one where a quantity 
or series of quantities cannot enter or leave the system. For example, a system 
might be closed to energy, meaning energy might not be able to enter or leave 
the system. A vacuum thermos flask does a really good job of stopping energy 
from leaving the system to keep your drink warm. So it might make sense to 
treat it as a closed system - but no system in the real world is ever perfectly 
closed, so it will only be an approximation.

The opposite of a closed system is an open system. An open system is one where 
a quantity or series of quantities can enter or leave the system to a 
significant degree. If you pour your hot drink into a mug instead of a vacuum 
thermos flask, the heat will escape relatively quickly into its surroundings. 
So a mug is most certainly an open system! Open systems are a lot more 
complicated to understand than closed systems, and so scientists prefer to work 
with closed systems when possible. Science usually stays away from open systems 
because closed systems makes things much simpler to explain and can be a good 
starting point before trying to explain open systems, too. Quantum mechanics 
only deals with closed systems.

Traveling backward in time.

If you make a movie of yourself throwing a ball, and thread the film backwards, 
it'll look the same as you catching a ball. So if you want to think of the 
falling object as being the same as the rising one going backwards in time, the 
physics will support that statement, but it doesn't sound all that cool.  It 
is, however, the same thing as antimatter being viewed as going backwards in 
time.

At the most basic level, the laws of physics are symmetrical: reverse time and 
they will follow the same route in reverse.  Reverse the charge, and things 
will be attracted where they would have repulsed, and vice versa.  Flip them 
both, and you've flipped it twice, so it's just like you started.

Since a positron is exactly like an electron, only with the opposite charge, 
then if you (a) replace an electron with a positron, and (b) reverse time, it 
behaves exactly like an electron.  The physicists call this Charge/Parity (CP) 
symmetry, where "parity" is actually more like looking at things in a mirror 
rather than flipping time, but it's the same idea.

Flipping time is another way of looking at flipping left and right: a 
left-moving object going forwards in time is just like a right-moving object 
moving backwards.

An electron like a ball sitting in the same spot is a closed system. It cannot 
change into a positron because it is not moving. The motionless ball is a 
closed system which cannot experience CP symmetry breaking. A moving ball is an 
open system where its motion can be deemed to have CP symmetry.

So in an open system that has experienced PT symmetry breaking, LENR occurs 
because the nucleon undergoes CP symmetry breaking since in this case PT = CP.

In optics, there are special conditions involving optical cavities that can 

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Adrian Ashfield]

Brian Ahern,
The proof that Rossi's E-cats don't work is less than that they do.
It serves no useful purpose to continually repeat your insults with no actual 
content.
I wonder what you will say if Rossi comes up with a decent demo this Summer.

 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Mon, Apr 24, 2017 3:01 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect



One consideration that I feel is important to understand is what PT symmetry 
violation means with respect to CP symmetry violation. We understand that we 
can produce PT symmetry breaking using optical mechanisms but can PT symmetry 
violation somehow generate CP violation which is required to produce the decay 
of the nucleon (protons and neutrons)?  



>From the various descriptions of symmetry in this article:
https://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/02/epn2016472p17.pdf



Space time (PT) Symmetry is only valid in an open system where energy and/or 
matter can be gained or lost. In a closed system, PT symmetry does not exist 
since a closed system can neither gain nor lose energy and/or matter. Because 
LENR requires CP symmetry breaking and CP symmetry breaking requires PT 
symmetry breaking, LENR can only occur in an open system.



Open vs. Closed Systems



Systems can be either open or closed. A closed system is one where a quantity 
or series of quantities cannot enter or leave the system. For example, a system 
might be closed to energy, meaning energy might not be able to enter or leave 
the system. A vacuum thermos flask does a really good job of stopping energy 
from leaving the system to keep your drink warm. So it might make sense to 
treat it as a closed system - but no system in the real world is ever perfectly 
closed, so it will only be an approximation.



The opposite of a closed system is an open system. An open system is one where 
a quantity or series of quantities can enter or leave the system to a 
significant degree. If you pour your hot drink into a mug instead of a vacuum 
thermos flask, the heat will escape relatively quickly into its surroundings. 
So a mug is most certainly an open system! Open systems are a lot more 
complicated to understand than closed systems, and so scientists prefer to work 
with closed systems when possible. Science usually stays away from open systems 
because closed systems makes things much simpler to explain and can be a good 
starting point before trying to explain open systems, too. Quantum mechanics 
only deals with closed systems.



Traveling backward in time.


If you make a movie of yourself throwing a ball, and thread the film backwards, 
it'll look the same as you catching a ball. So if you want to think of the 
falling object as being the same as the rising one going backwards in time, the 
physics will support that statement, but it doesn't sound all that cool.  It 
is, however, the same thing as antimatter being viewed as going backwards in 
time.



At the most basic level, the laws of physics are symmetrical: reverse time and 
they will follow the same route in reverse.  Reverse the charge, and things 
will be attracted where they would have repulsed, and vice versa.  Flip them 
both, and you've flipped it twice, so it's just like you started.  



Since a positron is exactly like an electron, only with the opposite charge, 
then if you (a) replace an electron with a positron, and (b) reverse time, it 
behaves exactly like an electron.  The physicists call this Charge/Parity (CP) 
symmetry, where "parity" is actually more like looking at things in a mirror 
rather than flipping time, but it's the same idea.



Flipping time is another way of looking at flipping left and right: a 
left-moving object going forwards in time is just like a right-moving object 
moving backwards.
  
An electron like a ball sitting in the same spot is a closed system. It cannot 
change into a positron because it is not moving. The motionless ball is a 
closed system which cannot experience CP symmetry breaking. A moving ball is an 
open system where its motion can be deemed to have CP symmetry.



So in an open system that has experienced PT symmetry breaking, LENR occurs 
because the nucleon undergoes CP symmetry breaking since in this case PT = CP. 


In optics, there are special conditions involving optical cavities that can 
experience PT summitry breaking. These cavities can reach out magnetically and 
become entangled with nucleons via their magnetic projections. This phenomenon 
is known as the chiral magnetic effect(1) — “chiral” means “distinguishing left 
from right, When PT symmetry is broken in these entangled open systems of 
optical cavities and nucleons decay via CP symmetry breaking. The energy of the 
nucleon decay flows one way into the optical cavity.  


It seems to me that it is central to the understanding of LENR to appreciate 
the mechanisms of symmetry breaking with re

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Axil Axil]

One consideration that I feel is important to understand is what PT
symmetry violation means with respect to CP symmetry violation. We
understand that we can produce PT symmetry breaking using optical
mechanisms but can PT symmetry violation somehow generate CP violation
which is required to produce the decay of the nucleon (protons and
neutrons)?


>From the various descriptions of symmetry in this article:

https://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/02/epn2016472p17.pdf


Space time (PT) Symmetry is only valid in an open system where energy
and/or matter can be gained or lost. In a closed system, PT symmetry does
not exist since a closed system can neither gain nor lose energy and/or
matter. Because LENR requires CP symmetry breaking and CP symmetry breaking
requires PT symmetry breaking, LENR can only occur in an open system.


Open vs. Closed Systems


Systems can be either open or closed. A closed system is one where a
quantity or series of quantities cannot enter or leave the system. For
example, a system might be closed to energy, meaning energy might not be
able to enter or leave the system. A vacuum thermos flask does a really
good job of stopping energy from leaving the system to keep your drink
warm. So it might make sense to treat it as a closed system - but no system
in the real world is ever perfectly closed, so it will only be an
approximation.


The opposite of a closed system is an open system. An open system is one
where a quantity or series of quantities can enter or leave the system to a
significant degree. If you pour your hot drink into a mug instead of a
vacuum thermos flask, the heat will escape relatively quickly into its
surroundings. So a mug is most certainly an open system! Open systems are a
lot more complicated to understand than closed systems, and so scientists
prefer to work with closed systems when possible. Science usually stays
away from open systems because closed systems makes things much simpler to
explain and can be a good starting point before trying to explain open
systems, too. Quantum mechanics only deals with closed systems.


Traveling backward in time.


If you make a movie of yourself throwing a ball, and thread the film
backwards, it'll look the same as you catching a ball. So if you want to
think of the falling object as being the same as the rising one going
backwards in time, the physics will support that statement, but it doesn't
sound all that cool.  It is, however, the same thing as antimatter being
viewed as going backwards in time.


At the most basic level, the laws of physics are symmetrical: reverse time
and they will follow the same route in reverse.  Reverse the charge, and
things will be attracted where they would have repulsed, and vice versa.
Flip them both, and you've flipped it twice, so it's just like you started.



Since a positron is exactly like an electron, only with the opposite
charge, then if you (a) replace an electron with a positron, and (b)
reverse time, it behaves exactly like an electron.  The physicists call
this Charge/Parity (CP) symmetry, where "parity" is actually more like
looking at things in a mirror rather than flipping time, but it's the same
idea.


Flipping time is another way of looking at flipping left and right: a
left-moving object going forwards in time is just like a right-moving
object moving backwards.



An electron like a ball sitting in the same spot is a closed system. It
cannot change into a positron because it is not moving. The motionless ball
is a closed system which cannot experience CP symmetry breaking. A moving
ball is an open system where its motion can be deemed to have CP symmetry.


So in an open system that has experienced PT symmetry breaking, LENR occurs
because the nucleon undergoes CP symmetry breaking since in this case PT =
CP.


In optics, there are special conditions involving optical cavities that can
experience PT summitry breaking. These cavities can reach out magnetically
and become entangled with nucleons via their magnetic projections. This
phenomenon is known as the chiral magnetic effect(1) — “chiral” means
“distinguishing left from right, When PT symmetry is broken in these
entangled open systems of optical cavities and nucleons decay via CP
symmetry breaking. The energy of the nucleon decay flows one way into the
optical cavity.


It seems to me that it is central to the understanding of LENR to
appreciate the mechanisms of symmetry breaking with regards to nucleons.


1 -
http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2010/02/16/violating-parity-with-quarks-and-gluons/#comments

On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:

> A post that might hold some insights as follows:
>
>
>
>1. Giuseppe April 23, 2017 at 3:37 PM
>
> 
>
>Dear Andrea,
>
>
>seems that to activate the E-Cat you need heat, does the QuarkX need
>heat to be activated?
>
>
>Best 

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Brian Ahern]

Once again the master has prevailed.

You are basing assumptions on tales from the "Book of Rossi" !

It is insulting to give any credence to the impresario.


From: Axil Axil 
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2017 9:47 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:The Kerr effect


A post that might hold some insights as follows:


  1.  Giuseppe April 23, 2017 at 3:37 
PM

Dear Andrea,

seems that to activate the E-Cat you need heat, does the QuarkX need heat to be 
activated?

Best regards, Giuseppe

  2.  Andrea Rossi April 23, 2017 at 3:48 
PM

Giuseppe:

Not exactly. The mechanism is much more complex and is based on electromagnetic 
fields.

Warm Regards,

A.R.



The nature of the LENR reaction has evolved when the gas envelope is in the 
plasma state to depend solely on optical mechanisms. An EMF trigger is the 
factor can gets the LENR reaction going. not heat. As stated in the Rossi 
patent, very high voltage electrostatic potential is that trigger. The name of 
the triggering effect is "kerr effect". The minimum voltage at which the kerr 
effect is triggered is 30,000 volts.


This trigger applies to both Rossi's low temperature reactions and his plasma 
based reactions.


Kerr electro-optic effect

The Kerr electro-optic effect, or DC Kerr effect, is the special case in which 
a slowly varying external electric field is applied by, for instance, a 
voltage on electrodes across the sample 
material. Under this influence, the sample becomes 
birefringent, with different 
indices of refraction for light 
polarized parallel to or 
perpendicular to the applied field. The difference in index of refraction is 
controlled by the strength of the applied electric field.


[1-physicistsob.jpg]

Birefringence modifies how light behaves inside a whispering gallery wave.


Birefringence is the optical property of 
a material having a refractive 
index that depends on the 
polarization and 
propagation direction of light. These 
optically anisotropic materials are 
said to be birefringent (or birefractive). The birefringence is often 
quantified as the maximum difference between refractive indices exhibited by 
the material. Crystals with non-cubic 
crystal structures are often 
birefringent, as are plastics under 
mechanical stress.


The kerr effect produces a change in stated of the optical properties that 
underpin the LENR reaction. Research should be directed at finding where that 
change of state sets in.


As in Holmlid's experiments, a laser can produce the kerr effect


Optical Kerr effect

The optical Kerr effect, or AC Kerr effect is the case in which the electric 
field is due to the light itself. This causes a variation in index of 
refraction which is proportional to the local 
irradiance of the light. This 
refractive index variation is responsible for the nonlinear 
optical effects of 
self-focusing, self-phase 
modulation and 
modulational 
instability, and is the 
basis for Kerr-lens 
modelocking. This effect 
only becomes significant with very intense beams such as those from 
lasers. The optical Kerr effect has also 
been observed to dynamically alter the mode-coupling properties in multimode 
fibre, a technique that has potential applications for all-optical switching 
mechanisms.