http://physik.uni-graz.at/~dk-user/talks/Chernodub_25112013.pdf
search for slides starting at
The Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME)
An electric super current is induced in the quarks because the direction of
their momentums are changed by the magnetic field line.
In the slide titled: The CME in
More:
It looks like the magnetic field drives the quark in the same direction as
its spin. This makes sense because two magnets will attract or repel each
other along a line axial to the magnet pair.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
I did not think quarks were meant to exist in such separation?
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
More:
It looks like the magnetic field drives the quark in the same direction as
its spin. This makes sense because two magnets will attract or repel each
Quark separation causes a quark plasma. When two heavy ions of lead atoms
collide in a ion collision, a quark plasma is produced. If the collision is
off center, a strong magnetic field is generated from the vortex motion
induced in the quark plasma.
The results of these kinds of collisions are
In simple terms, I now understand how a magnetic field can produce
subatomic particles out of the vacuum.
When virtual particles are produced by uncertainty from the vacuum, they
are created in a particle and antiparticle set to conserve vacuum energy.
The Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME) changes
. With
quarks coming loose and superconductivity who know what reactions may be
taking place in Rossi Ni lattice.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 12:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:They're finally catching up!
More:
It looks like
With quarks coming loose and superconductivity who know what reactions may
be taking place in Rossi Ni lattice.
One reason why LENR is go confusing is the vast number of nuclear reactions
that can occur when the strong force that holds matter together is
disrupted.
There is also a vast number
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:They're finally catching up!
With quarks coming loose and superconductivity who know what reactions may
be taking place in Rossi Ni lattice.
One reason why LENR is go confusing is the vast number of nuclear reactions
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Hotson’s essays move around. Most of my old links are dead.
I have combined all three of Hotson's papers into a single .pdf file.
The link provided here is for list members' use only:
Mark, I totally agree and believe the virtual particles winking into and out of
existence are the constituents of this river flowing 90 degrees to our physical
dimensions between the future and the past. While the water molecules of a
physical river persist in our physical dimension this flow
francis.x.roa...@lmco.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, Apr 25, 2014 8:44 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]:They're finally catching up!
Mark, I totally agree and believe the virtual particles winking into and out of
existence are the constituents of this river flowing 90 degrees to our physical
Thanks Terry--
I could not find any.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 5:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:They're finally catching up!
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote
catching up!
Thanks Terry--
I could not find any.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 5:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:They're finally catching up!
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
, 2014 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:They're finally catching up!
This is an interesting paper. It is good reading for those of us that
wonder if current theory is flawed.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
I wonder what school Hotson was at when they silenced him?
You my ask him if he is still around:
Don Hotson P. O. Box 789 Green Mountain Falls, CO 80819
donhot...@yahoo.com
I know he suffered a bout of bad health a
have escaped detection for so
long.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, Apr 25, 2014 12:02 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:They're finally catching up!
Dave, Mark and Jones--
Hotson's reason for leaving physics
is not predicted
by any theory TMK.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: David Roberson
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:They're finally catching up!
Bob,
I was surprised to read that the angular energy was many times the mass
http://hector.elte.hu/budapest14/slides/endrodi_0203_0204.pdf
Search on the following to get to the referenced slide:
*Chiral magnetic effect*
A magnetic field will align the spins of the quarks that comprise a
subatomic particle along the magnetic field line and this will cause
Thanks for that, Terry. I wasn't previously aware of this and it looks
interesting.
Cheers,
Andy.
On 25/04/14 13:20, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Hotson’s essays move around. Most of my old links are dead.
I have combined all
To identify the slide, The slide has this verbiage as follows:
• local CP-violation through domains with *Q*top 6= 0 ?
• detect them through magnetic field *B *[Kharzeev et al. ’08]
1. quarks interact with *B*: spins aligned
2. quarks interact with topology: chiralities (helicities) “aligned”
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Andy Findlay andy_find...@orange.net wrote:
Thanks for that, Terry. I wasn't previously aware of this and it looks
interesting.
You might enjoy this review of Hotson's papers:
http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue86/hotson.html
as the magnetic field is relaxed. But why are
the charges not mixed to begin with and maintain an homogeneous mix even
though spin alignment has occurred?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:They're finally
Mark,
This is essentially why Don Hotson calls the Dirac “sea” the “BEC” instead of
the epo field these days.
… as in the “original BEC” which is of course a dense superfluid…
From: MarkI-Zeropoint
Some of the ol' time Vorts will remember how I've been ranting for years on how
Jones--
What's an epo field? The same as the Dirac sea? What do the letter stand for?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 4:05 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:They're finally catching up!
Mark
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Jones--
What's an epo field? The same as the Dirac sea? What do the letter stand
for?
http://archive.today/SGMFP
Hotson’s essays move around. Most of my old links are dead.
Here is one site (which misspelled his name)
http://issuu.com/scottjenson/docs/d._l._hoston_-_dirac_s_equation_and/1
From: Bob Cook
What's an epo field? The same as the Dirac sea? What do the letter stand for?
26 matches
Mail list logo
