Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2005, 23:13 +0100 schrieb Hrvoje Niksic:
Hello,
The most requested feature of the last several years finally arrives
-- large file support. With this patch Wget should be able to
download files larger than 2GB on systems that support them.
dont know if its still
Noèl Köthe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2005, 23:13 +0100 schrieb Hrvoje Niksic:
The most requested feature of the last several years finally arrives
-- large file support. With this patch Wget should be able to
download files larger than 2GB on systems that support
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Maciej W. Rozycki
Huh? It's you who should actually charge them for doing bug
discovery for them.
Yeah. Only please understand - I'm not a C programmer. I'm not an expert in
Microsoft interaction (the fewer the better). I just
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Herold Heiko wrote:
Huh? It's you who should actually charge them for doing bug
discovery for them.
Yeah. Only please understand - I'm not a C programmer. I'm not an expert in
Microsoft interaction (the fewer the better). I just have (legal!) access to
a Visual
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
In other words, large files now work on Windows? I must admit, that
was almost too easy. :-)
Don't open the champagne bottle just yet :)
Now could someone try this with Borland and/or Watcom and MingW? I'm
pretty sure I broke them in some places, but it's near impossible to
Gisle Vanem [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
In other words, large files now work on Windows? I must admit, that
was almost too easy. :-)
Don't open the champagne bottle just yet :)
Too late, the bottle is already empty. :-)
Now could someone try this with Borland and/or
Gisle Vanem [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another option was to simply set the (system) errno after the Winsock
operations, and have our own strerror that recognizes them. (That
assumes that Winsock errno values don't conflict with the system ones,
which I believe is the case.)
That assumption
From: Hrvoje Niksic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 10:50 PM
To: Maciej W. Rozycki
Cc: Herold Heiko; wget@sunsite.dk
Subject: Re: Large file support
Maciej W. Rozycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Doesn't GCC work for this target?
It does, in the form
Herold Heiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Said that, in retr.c simplifying the int rdsize line did not solve, but I
tried the following, we have:
#ifndef MIN
# define MIN(i, j) ((i) = (j) ? (i) : (j))
#endif
int rdsize = exact ? MIN (toread - sum_read, dlbufsize) : dlbufsize;
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Herold Heiko wrote:
Doesn't GCC work for this target?
It does, in the form of Cygwin and MingW. But Heiko was using MS
VC before, and we have catered to broken compilers before, so it
doesn't hurt to try.
Also, Cygwin requires a large installed environment. It
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Maciej W. Rozycki
Well, instead of scratching the head, how about filing a bug
report?
Ha :), would be nice.
I suppose that would mean calling PSS, which (if things didn't change) means
an immediate billing on your credit card
From: Hrvoje Niksic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 1:29 PM
The whole point of #ifndef MIN ... #endif is to *use* the
compiler-provided MIN where available.
Dealing with a compiler crash is tricky, as it seems that every change
has a potential of causing it to
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Herold Heiko wrote:
Well, instead of scratching the head, how about filing a bug
report?
Ha :), would be nice.
I suppose that would mean calling PSS, which (if things didn't change) means
an immediate billing on your credit card (to be refunded later if there
Herold Heiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does solve, in fact I found some MS articles suggesting the same thing.
Attached patch does work around the problem by disabling optimization
selectively..
I was able to retrieve a 2.5GB file with ftp.
In other words, large files now work on Windows? I
Sorry, replied to wget-patches instead of redirecting it.
I tried a test compile just now, with Visual C++ 6 I get different errors:
string_t.[ch] - iswblank doesn't seem to be available, however there is a
int isspace( int c );
int iswspace( wint_t c );
Routine Required Header Compatibility
Herold Heiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I tried a test compile just now, with Visual C++ 6 I get different
errors:
Thanks for checking it.
string_t.[ch] - iswblank doesn't seem to be available,
For now, just remove string_t from the Makefile. It's not used
anywhere yet.
Also, the large
From: Hrvoje Niksic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 1:50 PM
Thanks for checking it.
Don't thank me, I'd like to do more but I have no time available :(
http.c(503) : warning C4090: 'function' : different 'const'
qualifiers
[...]
I don't quite understand
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Generating Code...
retr.c(261) : fatal error C1001: INTERNAL COMPILER ERROR
(compiler file 'E:\8966\vc98\p2\src\P2\main.c', line 494)
Please choose the Technical Support command on the Visual C++
Help menu, or open the
Herold Heiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http.c(503) : warning C4090: 'function' : different 'const'
qualifiers
[...]
I don't quite understand these warnings. Did they occur before?
Definitively, I trie with a rev from March 2004, same warnings.
Then we can ignore them for now.
I
Maciej W. Rozycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Doesn't GCC work for this target?
It does, in the form of Cygwin and MingW. But Heiko was using MS
VC before, and we have catered to broken compilers before, so it
doesn't hurt to try.
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
1. I'd say that code like if ( sizeof(number) == 8 ) should have
been a compile-time #ifdef rather than a run-time decision.
Where do you see such code? grep 'if.*sizeof' *.c doesn't seem to
show such examples.
As I recall, it was in
Maciej W. Rozycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually if (sizeof(number) == 8) is much more readable than any
preprocessor clutter and yields exactly the same.
Agreed, in some cases. In others it yields to pretty annoying
compiler warnings.
From: Hrvoje Niksic
[...] It is no small task to study Info-ZIP's source
code. I did plan to look at it later, but at the time it was quicker
to just ask.
It's fairly easy to SEARCH [...]*.c, *.h LARGE_FILE_SUPPORT (or
your local find/grep equivalent). Locating zip_fzofft would also be
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Actually if (sizeof(number) == 8) is much more readable than any
preprocessor clutter and yields exactly the same.
Agreed, in some cases. In others it yields to pretty annoying
compiler warnings.
What kind of warnings? It's valid C.
Maciej
Maciej W. Rozycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Actually if (sizeof(number) == 8) is much more readable than any
preprocessor clutter and yields exactly the same.
Agreed, in some cases. In others it yields to pretty annoying
compiler warnings.
Maciej W. Rozycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Besides, despite sizeof(foo) being a constant, you can't move a
comparison against it to cpp.
You can, Autoconf allows you to check for size of foo, which gives
you a SIZEOF_FOO preprocessor constant. Then you can write things
like:
#if SIZEOF_FOO
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Besides, despite sizeof(foo) being a constant, you can't move a
comparison against it to cpp.
You can, Autoconf allows you to check for size of foo, which gives
you a SIZEOF_FOO preprocessor constant. Then you can write things
like:
#if
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steven M. Schweda) writes:
1. I'd say that code like if ( sizeof(number) == 8 ) should have
been a compile-time #ifdef rather than a run-time decision.
Where do you see such code? grep 'if.*sizeof' *.c doesn't seem to
show such examples.
As I recall, it was in
Dave Yeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ps anyone getting a bunch of what look like viruses on the
wget-patches list?
I just noticed them on gmane. I've now asked the SunSITE.dk staff to
deploy the kind of virus/spam protection currently used by this list
(confirmation required for non-subscribers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steven M. Schweda) writes:
1. I'd say that code like if ( sizeof(number) == 8 ) should have
been a compile-time #ifdef rather than a run-time decision.
Where do you see such code? grep 'if.*sizeof' *.c doesn't seem to
show such examples.
2. Multiple functions like
Roman Bednarek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Info-ZIP code uses one function with a ring of string buffers to
ease the load on the programmer.
That makes sense. I assume the print function also receives an
integer argument specifying the ring position?
The function can have a circular
Is the source for Zip 3.0/UnZip 6.0 publicaly available?
I believe that some relatively recent beta code (Zip 3.0d, UnZip
6.0b) is available under:
ftp://ftp.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/OLD/beta/
and probably various mirrors around the world. You might wish to start
at
Alle 16:28, lunedì 10 gennaio 2005, hai scritto:
El 10/01/2005, a las 5:07, Mark Wiebe escribió:
This occurred after many hours of downloading. At 2GB, the bytes
downloaded started reporting negative numbers, but it still appeared
to be working.
This is the third post to this list in
33 matches
Mail list logo
