On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Thanks, I never would have caught those myself. Do you have
suggestions for Autoconf 2.5x features Wget could put to good use?
Not ATM, although I might dig my mail archive for past discussions.
Anyway I think it might be worthwhile to scan the whole
Maciej W. Rozycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I couldn't send the patches earlier, sorry. Besides what you have
already done, I have the following bits within my changes.
Thanks, I never would have caught those myself. Do you have
suggestions for Autoconf 2.5x features Wget could put to good
Hrvoje Niksic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maciej W. Rozycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
If you have patches for Wget's configure.in to work with Autoconf
2.5x, I'll gladly accept those, too.
Please note that the changes to support lone autoconf 2.5x
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
I now did some of the changes myself, at least the obvious ones -- see
the attached patch in case I missed something. The current
configure.in would probably work with both 2.13 and 2.5x, but that's
not a long-term requirement. The next step is to
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
If you have patches for Wget's configure.in to work with Autoconf
2.5x, I'll gladly accept those, too.
Please note that the changes to support lone autoconf 2.5x are minimal
and almost exclusively m4 quotation corrections. I think I sent a patch
Maciej W. Rozycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
If you have patches for Wget's configure.in to work with Autoconf
2.5x, I'll gladly accept those, too.
Please note that the changes to support lone autoconf 2.5x are minimal
and almost exclusively m4
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Georg Bauhaus) writes:
Hrvoje Niksic, Tue, 02 Sep 2003 15:58:02 +0200:
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. Care to elaborate on why you introduced automake in wget?
it makes the sources __MUCH__ easier to
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I almost can't believe this is serious -- ansi2knr and the PARAMS
macro are concession enough to pre-ANSI compilers; I wouldn't want to
encumber the program with the KR-style function definitions too.
i
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
what about the patch for src/url.c?
It looks fine, but I'm not sure I understand why it's necessary to
install full IP address understanding at the URL parsing level.
please, take a look at RFC 2732. it is just 6 pages long and it is
an IETF
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Outside Unix this is needlessly complex and completely unnecessary,
not to mention that it doesn't work outside a shell requirement.
Wget tries to help by allowing you to completely avoid Autoconf and
simply provide your own Makefile and config.h.
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Outside Unix this is needlessly complex and completely unnecessary,
not to mention that it doesn't work outside a shell requirement.
Wget tries to help by allowing you to completely avoid Autoconf and
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can you show me an example of a URL that failed to parse?
the problem was not with false negatives, but with false positives
instead. URLs like:
http://[2001.23]/
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Mauro Tortonesi wrote:
i hope that you will like the new autoconf-2.5x/automake-1.6-ed package. i
also hope that the wget maintainer will consider accepting this patch.
1. There is no current wget maintainer. Your CVS tree has a good chance
of becoming the official one
Mailing List
Subject: autoconf 2.5x and automake support for wget 1.9 beta
hi to everybody,
i have just imported into the deepspace6.net CVS repository a
modified version of wget 1.9 beta:
http://cvs.deepspace6.net/view/wget/
i have fixed a bug in the parsing of urls
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Herold Heiko wrote:
Did you know wget is currently in lack of a maintainer ?
the GNU website says (http://www.gnu.org/help/help.html):
We are looking for new maintainers for these GNU packages (contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED] if
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Mauro Tortonesi wrote:
i hope that you will like the new autoconf-2.5x/automake-1.6-ed package. i
also hope that the wget maintainer will consider accepting this patch.
1. There is no current wget maintainer. Your CVS tree has
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Herold Heiko wrote:
Did you know wget is currently in lack of a maintainer ?
the GNU website says (http://www.gnu.org/help/help.html):
We are looking for new maintainers for these GNU packages (contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED] if you'd like to volunteer):
* GNU dumb
*
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Mauro Tortonesi wrote:
2. Care to elaborate on why you introduced automake in wget?
it makes the sources __MUCH__ easier to maintain, believe me. you only need
6 months (i am __definitely__ not joking here) to understand how the
automake/autoconf/libtool/gettext stuff
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Mauro Tortonesi wrote:
in fact, if you take a look at the Makefile.in's generated by automake in my
package you'll see that they aren't much different from the original
Makefile.in's contained in wget-1.9beta, so why bother
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. Care to elaborate on why you introduced automake in wget?
it makes the sources __MUCH__ easier to maintain, believe me.
How so? It adds the complexity to the build process, and it makes a
crucial
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it makes the sources __MUCH__ easier to maintain, believe me.
How so? It adds the complexity to the build process, and it makes a
crucial build component (Makefiles) almost impossible to understand,
debug, and modify.
that's a point i didn't take
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I almost can't believe this is serious -- ansi2knr and the PARAMS
macro are concession enough to pre-ANSI compilers; I wouldn't want to
encumber the program with the KR-style function definitions too.
i agree that supporting KR compilers is a good
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Georg Bauhaus) writes:
Hrvoje Niksic, Tue, 02 Sep 2003 15:58:02 +0200:
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. Care to elaborate on why you introduced automake in wget?
it makes the sources __MUCH__ easier to maintain, believe me.
How so? It adds the
hi to everybody,
i have just imported into the deepspace6.net CVS repository a
modified version of wget 1.9 beta:
http://cvs.deepspace6.net/view/wget/
i have fixed a bug in the parsing of urls with embedded ipv6 addresses
(the previous check was not exaustive, the new code is taken
24 matches
Mail list logo
