On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Tom Morris t...@tommorris.org wrote:
As an admin who closes a fair few AfDs, and as a human being who isn't a big
fan of loudmouthed ideological posturing, I have to say that I rather like
such topic areas.
Well, there is currently an AfD in progress that
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Tom Morris t...@tommorris.org wrote:
As an admin who closes a fair few AfDs, and as a human being who isn't
a big fan of loudmouthed ideological posturing, I have to say that I
rather like such topic areas.
Well, there is currently an AfD in progress that
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
Goes too far. A Procrustean Bed.
Really?
What about this proposal?
In light of such examples, I think it’s high time to start a
discussion on whether to amend Wikipedia’s BLP policy as follows:
*WP
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012, Carcharoth wrote:
*WP contributors will not start biographies on lesser-known living
people without their permission. The project is full of three-sentence
stubs on people of minor notability, more often than not started by
contributors eager to increase their number of
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net
wrote:
Goes too far. A Procrustean Bed.
Really?
What about this proposal?
In light of such examples, I think its high time to start a
discussion on whether to amend Wikipedias BLP policy as follows:
*WP
2012/3/22 Alan Liefting alieft...@ihug.co.nz:
Does anyone agree with me that the inclusionists are more numerous than the
deletionists around the deletion discussions?
If you tell us how you counted, we can try to agree or to disagree.
It's pointless to talk about subjective feelings.
--
Amir
maybe it is because the deletionists delete the messages before they send
them
mike
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Alan Liefting alieft...@ihug.co.nz wrote:
Does anyone agree with me that the inclusionists are more numerous than
the deletionists around the deletion discussions?
A
Inclusionism and deletionism are a spectrum not a binary choice, wherever
you are on that spectrum there will be editors who are more deletionist or
more inclusionist than yourself. The closer you are to one end of the
spectrum the more likely it is that you will think that the other end of
the
On 23/03/2012 8:20 a.m., Amir E. Aharoni wrote:
2012/3/22 Alan Lieftingalieft...@ihug.co.nz:
Does anyone agree with me that the inclusionists are more numerous than the
deletionists around the deletion discussions?
If you tell us how you counted, we can try to agree or to disagree.
It's
Does anyone agree with me that the inclusionists are more numerous than
the deletionists around the deletion discussions?
A
Sure, there can only be one Crinch.
Fred
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this
There is a good body research around who participates in deletion discussions
(particularlyin the English Wikipedia). These studies mostly looked at the
breakdown by tenure [1] or diversity of participants in AfD discussions or the
effects of the size of a discussion on its outcome [2]) In [3]
On Thursday, 22 March 2012 at 19:34, WereSpielChequers wrote:
Inclusionism and deletionism are a spectrum not a binary choice, wherever
you are on that spectrum there will be editors who are more deletionist or
more inclusionist than yourself. The closer you are to one end of the
spectrum
12 matches
Mail list logo
