2014-03-08 0:39 GMT+02:00 George Herbert george.herb...@gmail.com:
This is not disrespecting development, which is extremely important by any
measure. But we're running a top-10 worldwide website, a key worldwide
information resource for humanity as a whole. We cannot cripple
development to
Le 07/03/2014 19:25, Asaf Bartov a écrit :
btw, are these new improved tools documented anywhere?
http://kiwix.org/wiki/Development does not seem to point in the right
direction.
The usage is pretty straightforward (for IT people) and IMO everything
necessary is explained in the READMEs:
*
On 08/03/14 09:15, Niklas Laxström wrote:
2014-03-08 0:39 GMT+02:00 George Herbert george.herb...@gmail.com:
This is not disrespecting development, which is extremely important by any
measure. But we're running a top-10 worldwide website, a key worldwide
information resource for humanity as a
- Original Message -
From: Emmanuel Engelhart kel...@kiwix.org
PS: We really want to make a post @blog.wikimedia.org (so in English).
If someone is volunteer to write this, I would really appreciate his
help.
If you write such a blog post in what English you have handy, I'd be happy
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes! This is a _good_ thing. Developers should feel responsible for what
they build. It's shouldn't be operation's job to make sure the site is
stable for code changes. Things should go more in this direction, in fact.
If you
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badger
On Mar 8, 2014, at 1:38 PM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes! This is a _good_ thing. Developers should feel responsible for what
they build. It's shouldn't
On 8 mrt. 2014, at 21:48, Russell Nelson russnel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Derk-Jan Hartman
d.j.hartman+wmf...@gmail.com wrote:
This is thinking way too simple. Would it be nice to be able to do this ?
Sure, but we already have dynamic maps. WikiMiniAtlas, the
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes! This is a _good_ thing. Developers should feel responsible for what
they build. It's shouldn't be operation's job to make sure the site is
stable
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes! This is a _good_ thing. Developers should feel responsible for what
they
On 03/08/2014 02:10 PM, Isarra Yos zhoris...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/03/14 09:15, Niklas Laxström wrote:
Please do not forget the contributors who want to improve MediaWiki
for their own needs. We also have to balance how much we inconvenience
them to meet the requirements of WMF. In my opinion,
On 03/08/2014 04:38 PM, Tyler Romeo wrote:
Tell me something, what about the developers of MariaDB? Should they be
responsible for WMF's stability? If they accidentally release a buggy
version, are they expected to revert it within hours so that the WMF
operations team can redeploy?
I'm going
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Marc A. Pelletier m...@uberbox.org wrote:
The answer is: no, obviously not. And for that reason the MariaDB
developers are not allowed to simply push their latest code on our
infrastructure with a simple +2 to code review.
Yes, and my point is that MediaWiki
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Marc A. Pelletier m...@uberbox.org
wrote:
The answer is: no, obviously not. And for that reason the MariaDB
developers are not allowed to simply push their latest code on our
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote:
Wikimedia uses deployment branches. Just because someone +2/merges into
master doesn't mean it immediately shows up on Wikimedia servers. It needs
to go into a deployment branch, then it needs to get deployed by a person.
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote:
Wikimedia uses deployment branches. Just because someone +2/merges into
master doesn't mean it immediately shows up on Wikimedia servers. It
needs
to
New rule: calling badger is synonymous with asking for the moderation bit
for yourself.
-Chad
On Mar 8, 2014 1:42 PM, Brandon Harris bhar...@wikimedia.org wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badger
On Mar 8, 2014, at 1:38 PM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:27 AM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.comwrote:
When Commons gets the Wikidata treatment, almost everything that has to do
with meta data will gain wikidata statements on the Wikidata item that
reflects a media file (sound photo movie no matter). When items
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote:
The jenkins report says it passed tests, hence why it was deployed. If
there's other tests that aren't reporting to gerrit or if there's a test
that needs to be added, maybe that's a post-mortem action to track?
Yep. Hence
Chad wrote:
On Mar 8, 2014 1:42 PM, Brandon Harris bhar...@wikimedia.org wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badger
New rule: calling badger is synonymous with asking for the moderation bit
for yourself.
Fine, but first we have to ban the people who top-post and don't trim
unnecessary parts of
Hoi,
Your assumption is that the metadata from Wikidata will be essentially the
same. It is not.
Because the metadata will be essentially different, I ask for attention. At
this moment in time all the metadata is essentially English. This will be
no longer the case with Wikidata. The data that is
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 9:34 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Chad wrote:
On Mar 8, 2014 1:42 PM, Brandon Harris bhar...@wikimedia.org wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badger
New rule: calling badger is synonymous with asking for the moderation bit
for yourself.
Fine, but
On Mar 9, 2014 1:35 AM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
Your assumption is that the metadata from Wikidata will be essentially the
same. It is not.
Because the metadata will be essentially different, I ask for attention.
At
this moment in time all the metadata is
22 matches
Mail list logo
