Here's the link to look at:
http://www.x7m.us/_clients/sheavens/development/accommodations/standard_gallery.htm
What's happening is that I'm getting unexpected text decoration throughout
the page (and, of course the entire site) in FF and Netscape. Case in point on
this page is the "Home,
I will be out of the office starting 04/06/2005 and will not return until
04/11/2005.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list
G'day
What I don't understand is, why are just a few of the links showing up
underlined within the UL? If I've screwed up my targeting (or whatever
I've done) shouldn't all links with in a UL pickup my error?
Visited links???
#navBar ul li a:link {
text-decoration: none;
color: Black;
}
I can't remember for sure, but I think font embedding is an IE only
thing...
IMHO it's for the best anyway coz I'd hate to try and read a page of
content written in some crazy Matrix font or similar!
Regards,
Miles.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Hi
Does anybody know how to sumbit the inner form, if you have a form
within a form on the same page and you only want to submit the inner
one..how do you do this?
Any ideas
Charla Nicol
Web Developer
**
The discussion list for
Hi Charla
AFAIK you are not permitted to nest forms.
Regards
Scott Swabey
General Manager
Lafinboy Productions
:: website design :: website development :: graphic design
e [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t +61 (0)415 193 126
w www.lafinboy.com
-Original
I always thought a form was not able to be placed in a form. Can you
explain what you're attempting to do? Are you sure you're not just
wanting to have two submit buttons within the one form?
Charla wrote:
Hi
Does anybody know how to sumbit the inner form, if you have a form
within a form on
We just 'soft launched' a new website, http://www.wirelessforum.org.nz,
so that we can gather a final set of feedback and changes for a Monday
meeting to see the project finished next week.
The entire site is XHTML 1.1, CSS2, WCAG-AAA compliant, and makes good
use of semantic markup, e.g. no
On 4/7/05 12:53 AM Sigurd Magnusson [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this
out:
We just 'soft launched' a new website, http://www.wirelessforum.org.nz,
so that we can gather a final set of feedback and changes for a Monday
meeting to see the project finished next week.
The entire site is XHTML 1.1,
On 4/7/05 12:53 AM Sigurd Magnusson [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this
out:
We just 'soft launched' a new website, http://www.wirelessforum.org.nz,
so that we can gather a final set of feedback and changes for a Monday
meeting to see the project finished next week.
One other thing is that I'd put
This site looks awesome...jus noticed dnt kno if you have but on the
home page in FF mozilla.. in the "coming up" boxes the text doe not
fix...the date in particular
Rick Faaberg wrote:
On 4/7/05 12:53 AM "Sigurd Magnusson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this
out:
We just 'soft
Charla, Rick, Cheers for the nice feedback ;)
Yeah what you mention with the dates overlapping the border was what I
perhaps ambigiously descriped in my email as:
"NB: The two lines of *homepage
event titles* currently don't fit,
but we're going to get some new taller backgroung images here
Rick Faaberg wrote:
On 4/7/05 12:53 AM Sigurd Magnusson [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent
this out:
We just 'soft launched' a new website,
http://www.wirelessforum.org.nz, so that we can gather a final set
of feedback and changes for a Monday meeting to see the project
finished next week.
The entire site is
http://www.themaninblue.com/experiment/InForm/fieldset.htm : would you
say that there is no way to style a legend so that it is not ON the
border of the fieldset?
I've just made a hack for IE:
fieldset {background: red; position: relative;}
legend {position: absolute; top: -0.6em; left: 0;}
Phil Baines
would you say
that there is no way to style a legend so that it is not ON
the border of
the fieldset? It looks like The Man in Blue used a H3. There
must be a way
of styling Legends like this.
Legends are the most fickle form elements to style consistently
across browsers.
Oops--something I forgot to ask, is what does this website look like on
a mobile device that supports HTML? I browsed around it with an Ericsson
P900 and it was quite acceptable (for a similar effect, use FireFox with
images and styles disabled and about 300px window width).
However, I am not
Hi,
I am struggling to get to grips with designing with web standards and
one of the problems I am having is with reading style sheets.
Having sorted out the html code to make it more readable and modifiable
it seems that we have shifted the mess to style sheets. Many of the
sheets I look at
I think it's a very intresting question! :) We always talk about clear
coding in xhtml, but which is the best way to write a css?
I think this could be a starting point discussion.
I normally write my css to follow the structure of the xhtml:
/* Main layout*/
...
...
/* Nav */
...
...
/* Sub nav */
...
...
/* Content */
...
...
/* Side Content */
...
...
/* Footer */
...
...
I also tend to split my css in different files.
structure.css - keep all structure css
And what about the properties order? Generally I use to do something like this:
a {
font:1em sans-serif; color:#333; font-weight:bold;
text-decoration:none;
margin:1em; padding:0.5em;
background:#ddd; border-bottom:1px solid #ccc;
}
First I set the font and text properties, than the
C Slack
Having sorted out the html code to make it more readable and
modifiable
it seems that we have shifted the mess to style sheets. Many of the
sheets I look at are long, comment-less and very difficult to
understand.
So that I don't fall into the same trap, can anyone recommend
Jacobus wrote:
I also tend to split my css in different files.
structure.css - keep all structure css
Text.css - all text related formatting
Small.css - used in style switcher to set text to small
Medium.css - used in style switcher to set text to medium
Large.css - used in style switcher to set
Hi!
Am Mittwoch, 6. April 2005 um 16:31:09 haben Sie geschrieben:
to I will wish to use external fonts (noncommon to pcs, obtained through
to server by the pagina Web) for my designs with css, somebody knows like
to doing it?
If you just need it for headings or smaller paragraphs, this may be a
Thanks Patrick and others.
For the record I think that the Malarkey URL you refer to is:
http://www.stuffandnonsense.co.uk/archives/stylesheet_ordering.html
It has given me lots of things to think about.
Regards,
Charlie
Patrick Lauke wrote:
C Slack
Having sorted out the html code to make
Hi!
I always do the same: I group styles of the same nature, beggining by
redefining default values where it is needed, and then by page structure, main
blocks, navigation, forms, etc. And I always keep the same sequency for each
definition (first positionning, dimensions,
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:33:58 +0100, C Slack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I group and sort properties in rule like this:
selector {
positioning; floats;
width; height;
margin; padding;
border;
color; background;
text-; font-;
}
For programming languages I prefer Allman style of
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:44:52 +0100, Piero Fissore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
#menu {
width: [$menuwidth-$menupadding-2*5px];
padding: $menupadding;
border: 5px solid red;
}
Mmm, cool! But does it really help you?
During development - a lot.
I usually put menu after content in document - this
This is a very interesting topic. As someone who has to write CSS for others
(both colleagues in the development team and others who know very little
about CSS), I have started to adopt a pseudo-object-oriented approach to
writing stylesheets.
First, I split the pages I have to code into smaller,
http://www.mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2004/08/sifr
or http://alistapart.com/articles/dynatext/
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Hi Charlie,
I know what you mean, I did many redesign stuff and find out that I wasn't
able to understand my own css file (that was awful).
You can see a sample at http://www.echo3d.com/css/screen.css
It looks complex but if you pay attention, you'll see that everything is
in order.
Here is some
Hi!
I split the rules into different files:
general.css
layout.css
elements.css
In these files I try to use container centric selectors. That
means: if the XHTML is structured like this:
div id=container1
div id=container2
div id=container3
p/p
/div
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:22:04 +0200, Martin Heiden wrote:
I split the rules into different files:
general.css
layout.css
elements.css
Are you seeing much overhead in load time?
I've put off doing the same for that reason.
Lea
--
Lea de Groot
Elysian Systems -
Boy, do I feel like an idiot. Thanks Bert for being my seeing-eye dog.
Cole
- Original Message -
From: Bert Doorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Unexpected underlines and div wierdness in FF and NS
G'day
Hmm interesting.
There is no right or wrong way to do these as far as I'm aware.
I use one definition per line, in a standard order (ish), all in short form.
I find it easier to scan down the page for class or id, then across for the
property and value.
Currently I'm thinking of separating
Lea,
Am Donnerstag, 7. April 2005 um 15:01:34 haben Sie geschrieben:
LdG On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:22:04 +0200, Martin Heiden wrote:
I split the rules into different files:
general.css
layout.css
elements.css
LdG Are you seeing much overhead in load time?
LdG I've put off doing the
Yes you're right, it it just because I'm always changing my declarations so
I let them on the long formulation :)
I know that soon I'll have to simplified these declarations.
Hugues
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kornel Lesinski
Sent:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:41:55 -0500, Hugues Brunelle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes you're right, it it just because I'm always changing my declarations
so
I let them on the long formulation :)
I know that soon I'll have to simplified these declarations.
Hugues
[...]
border-top-width: 0px;
To add to readability of your css you should also consider the layout
of the individual css rules as well as their
organisation/categorisation.
Using typical whitespacing that applies to most coding standards you
can come up with the usual layout:
.className {
property: propertyValue;
Just your introduction of the site overwhelmed me :)
Good job, most of the things were already said, however there is one
thing I really dislike - the compression of the header. You should
divide the parts, and combine JPG and GIF/PNG while using them for
suitable parts of it...
--
Jan Brasna
It's unstyled and without pictures on Nokia 6230; if it is intention,
then it's great (this phone screws the page a lot if it comes to
applying CSS) so the site is really usable on it.
Also nice in Mobile Opera on Siemens SX1.
More info on topic:
HTMLDog | HTML and CSS for Mobiles:
But if Tee were using an ideographic writing system for one or more of
Chinese sites or any other targeted use of his access keys, then he's
not working with the limits of 26 alphabetic characters, nor the sum
total
of punction and other signs, nor both of these with the decimal numerics
0-9. He
I'm just curious if any popular browser would display this page properly
http://www.tarunz.org/~vassilii/html-is-an-sgml-dtd.html
I though Moz would, but it disapointed me.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Hi,
From what I can tell, there's no reall way embed fonts, apart from
image or flash replacement. All we have is the Microsoft propriety-ware
and something that was released by Bitstream but abandoned because
Bitstream would not open-source it. Too bad.
Alan Trick
tomcask o_o wrote:
I will
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 17:26:50 +0100, Kornel Lesinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:55:52 +0100, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
border: 0; border-bottom: 0.1em dotted #781B11;
Property redefined.
That's correct.
The shorthand property border already defines
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 15:06:32 -0400, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Granted. Is there any browser software will not render the shortest
declaration? http://www.dlaakso.com/border.html
Best,
David
Both look the same-Opera 7.54u2 Mac...
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
Tom Livingston wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:41:16 -0400, Alan Trick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just curious if any popular browser would display this page properly
http://www.tarunz.org/~vassilii/html-is-an-sgml-dtd.html
I though Moz would, but it disapointed me.
you should not see: |But; your; fine; browser; does; n0t; care;|
or the |]| at the top
Opera 7.54u2 screenie attached...
oh well...
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
mlinc.com
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
Picture 1.pdf
Description:
Neerav wrote:
Looks nice, wish I could afford it :-)
The only 2 small problems I see are caused by the standard text size
being too small, so I choose medium size text (in Firefox 1.0 Win
2000 1024x768) and:
1. Making your African Dreams a Reality! is overlapped by Lodges
Hotels
2. Terms
On Apr 7, 2005 8:41 PM, Alan Trick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just curious if any popular browser would display this page properly
http://www.tarunz.org/~vassilii/html-is-an-sgml-dtd.html
I though Moz would, but it disapointed me.
I thought it was common knowledge that no browser in common
Phil Baines wrote:
http://www.themaninblue.com/experiment/InForm/fieldset.htm : would you say
that there is no way to style a legend so that it is not ON the border of
the fieldset? It looks like The Man in Blue used a H3. There must be a way
of styling Legends like this.
G'day Phil,
if you read
It's fascinating to see so many CSS styling standards. What makes perfect
sense to one person can be nonsensical to the next. Clearly what makes
styling work for any author is consistency and thoughtful logic -- even if
that logic is idiosyncratic.
Here's what I do:
Any given page can have
Im also interested in this As I'm a programmer I had started laying out my
css like code, so that id have:
#nav{}
#nav p{}
#nav ul{}
#nav ul li{}
Which to me made sense and was nice and clear. But the problem was that things
are not related 1 to 1... the #nav ul li{} may
Zudora.com today launched an IT job search engine http://www.zudora.com that
combines over 20,000 new IT jobs daily from a wide range of employment web
sites across the USA. The new search engine provides users with an ability
to search for IT related jobs within specific States.
--
Cheers and
Hi, Have a page that seems to be lining up fine everywhere I am
checking ( Opera, Firefox, IE ), validates fine but is a little off
on a MAC
I'm going to do this every time someone posts a generalised on a
Mac question...
***Please tell us which browser you're referring to.***
It just doesn't
Another thing to consider is whether other people have to read your CSS.
If working in groups (or still learning) its best to minimise redundancy.
see http://www.mezzoblue.com/archives/2005/01/20/redundancy_v/
cheers,
Grant
Having sorted out the html code to make it more readable and
I'm also from a programming background. Lately I've been working to try
to take advantage of the inheritance in CSS. So, I start with a base.css
(or global.css) and as the CSS grows, I break out portions specific to a
portion of the interface out into seperate files.
For instance, start with
Sigurd Magnusson wrote:
We just 'soft launched' a new website, http://www.wirelessforum.org.nz,
snip
so if anyone can point out things in our markup or CSS to make it even
more bullet proof, or find any holes, that would be fantastic snip
Siggy,
Try increasing the text sizein FF one size
I was recently talking to someone who'd validated their CSS and got
an error for display:inline-block.
He was using the W3 validator, and it was telling him it was invalid,
and it is of course, for CSS 1 and 2. If you used the advanced
options and validated against the CSS 3 standard, it was
That is a good point, there should be a DOCTYPE identifier for CSS, that
would make it a lot easier to validate and everything.
--
Ryan
On 4/7/05 8:08 PM, John Horner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was recently talking to someone who'd validated their CSS and got
an error for
Sigurd Magnusson wrote:
We just 'soft launched' a new website, http://www.wirelessforum.org.nz,
so that we can gather a final set of feedback and changes for a Monday
meeting to see the project finished next week.
By the time I zoom the news items big enough to see in Firefox, half the
page
60 matches
Mail list logo
